Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 04:03:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 232 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 289 blocks solved!  (Read 92171 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (20 posts by 4+ users deleted.)
100knot2dae
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 29


View Profile
March 25, 2021, 08:07:44 PM
Last edit: March 25, 2021, 09:07:37 PM by 100knot2dae
 #1021

I had the same/similar thoughts on this topic recently and came to a concept that works for me (props to -ck for "the rock with the toothpick" image)

Think of solo mining as drilling holes into a huge rock from either side, desperately searching for a single fragment of gold inside. The one who finds it first, may keep it.

The drill is your miner instance. The more hash power you have, the bigger and faster rotating is the drill. There are MANY MANY drills, that are drilling this poor rock all at the same time. Smiley

Now you can drill holes sequentially with a bigger drill (by combining your hashing power into a single miner instance). Or have multiple holes drilled in different locations on the rock at the same time, but with a smaller drill (by splitting the hash rate on seperate miner instances).

Each mining instance gets the location info on where to drill with the nonce and extranonce1 value from the solo pool (or bitcoind) and drills there for gold until the self-generated (and continuously incremented) extranonce2 value is exhausted. Which then means, your miner did not find the gold in this location. Then the miner requests a new location and starts drilling there again. The number of locations is near to infinite, so a chance of a collision is near to none. Exactly this drilling job is repeated all over again and again until the gold is found by someone.

The most tricky (and hardest to understand) aspect here is that, while the very same location might be your drill's sweet spot, other drills cannot find anything there. So reusing the same location is not a bad thing in general. (This is due to the fact that each miner creates a different unique input for the hashing.)

A bigger and faster drill will increase your chance to find the gold earlier since you can drill many more holes than others in the same time, but even the small drill next to yours may be the lucky one instead. It's all pure luck in the end, with a known probability though, which may lead to you finding the block in the next instance or never.

All the experts out there, please correct me if I am wrong ofc  Grin

mikeywith
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 6424


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
March 25, 2021, 10:23:10 PM
 #1022

Apologies, quick question and excuse my ignorance. I am looking into solo mining so I was wondering if you what you've suggested is also good for solo mining in order to avoid duplicated nonce guesses?

Why do you even worry about the nonce thing altogether? each mining instance will get a different template from the pool, and then the miner itself will adjust the extranonce2 as it pleases, and then you have the timestamp which adds up to the making of the Merkel root which creates a whole new world of possibilities, it's good that you want to learn about these things just for the sake of knowledge, but these "problems" are from the past and they have been solved for good, just pick the pool you like and mine on.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
chillfactr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 637
Merit: 131


View Profile
March 26, 2021, 05:23:48 AM
 #1023

Apologies, quick question and excuse my ignorance. I am looking into solo mining so I was wondering if you what you've suggested is also good for solo mining in order to avoid duplicated nonce guesses?
Mining on this pool IS solo mining (KanoPool has that as well as an option). Solo mining just means that you all get all of the rewards and Tx fees minus 2% (-ck's fee) or minus 0.9% (Kano's fee) IF you find a block.

If you mean solo mining to your own personal node - thass another story. AFAIK the more recent versions of Bitcoin Core (the node software) no longer supports that so the pool operators do some addition coding for it to work.

who asked about caino pool? not like it matters with two miners but is it really necessary?  knowing the history?
theres plenty of topic if one wanted to mine that way  Undecided
o_solo_miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2470
Merit: 1478


-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-


View Profile
March 27, 2021, 09:22:54 AM
 #1024

If you mean solo mining to your own personal node - thass another story.
AFAIK the more recent versions of Bitcoin Core (the node software) no longer supports that so the pool operators do some addition coding for it to work.

Thats wrong, bitcoincore does support solo mining.
After the changes in the gbt protocol, cgminer and ckpool could not decode the gbt right, because of the changes made in bitcoincore.
Using bitcoincore 0.18.1 does still work with the last version of cgminer for solo mining. So until no greater change in bitcoincore is made,
you are fine using that for solo mining.
The changes are documented in bitcoincore and could be implemented into cgminer or ckpool for beeing up to date.



from the creator of CGMiner http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers
paused: passthrough for solo.ckpool.org => stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334
OlgaMachslochov
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 3


View Profile
April 02, 2021, 11:17:26 AM
 #1025

I just noticed that there are slight deviations (about half a minute) from the timestamps my cgminer reports from the ones on Blockchain Explorers like "BTC.com".
My time settings should be fine, just counterchecked them with "time.is" and the difference is just a few milliseconds.
Anything I have to worry about? Just wanted to make sure everything runs fine. Would be sad if a found Block is rejected by the network because of a bad time stamp  Embarrassed
100knot2dae
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 29


View Profile
April 03, 2021, 10:22:29 AM
 #1026

I just noticed that there are slight deviations (about half a minute) from the timestamps my cgminer reports from the ones on Blockchain Explorers like "BTC.com".
My time settings should be fine, just counterchecked them with "time.is" and the difference is just a few milliseconds.
Anything I have to worry about? Just wanted to make sure everything runs fine. Would be sad if a found Block is rejected by the network because of a bad time stamp  Embarrassed


That's true. On the other hand, the timestamps correlate with the data from https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/
I cannot tell which source is more to be trusted to be accurate.

In regards to the deviating timestamps I think there would only be an issue if these were the consequence of the propagation of new blocks to/from the network being too slow, potentially giving another found block precedence.

The timestamp that is used for the mining process is anyway provided by the client and added to the mined block header. If I understood the stratum protocol spec correctly, any timestamp within about a minute is considered valid from the Bitcoin network's perspective.
mikeywith
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 6424


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
April 04, 2021, 03:18:37 AM
Merited by Gws24 (1)
 #1027



I quoted you both because you two have the same concern, don't worry about the timestamp at all, NO, you won't lose a block because your clock is half a minute late/early, you can even mine blocks with a timestamp in that past.

If block 100 is mined at 2:00 AM and you manage to solve block 101 with a timestamp of 1:50 AM, it will still be accepted, there are basically two rules for the timestamp of a block, it can't be more than 2 hours into the future based on your node network adjusted time, and it can't be lower than the median time of the last 11 blocks.

As for the online explorers, some might be showing the timestamp on which they received the block based on their own clock, some will show the timestamp that is in the block itself, clocks are never 100% synced so all this variation is completely normal.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Grodis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 05, 2021, 06:53:21 PM
 #1028

Why is there no Germany: mine to de.ckpool.org:3333 on this new page?
And i did a ping test to both germany and us pool and both gives me 108 ms, is that good?
mikeywith
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 6424


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
April 06, 2021, 05:34:03 AM
Merited by o_solo_miner (1)
 #1029

Why is there no Germany: mine to de.ckpool.org:3333 on this new page?
And i did a ping test to both germany and us pool and both gives me 108 ms, is that good?

The pool no longer has a server in Germany, only one in the U.S, however, o_solo_miner has a passthrough located in Germany

Code:
stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334

108ms is more than good, there is nothing to worry about.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Grodis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2021, 04:52:06 PM
 #1030

Why is there no Germany: mine to de.ckpool.org:3333 on this new page?
And i did a ping test to both germany and us pool and both gives me 108 ms, is that good?

The pool no longer has a server in Germany, only one in the U.S, however, o_solo_miner has a passthrough located in Germany

Code:
stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334

108ms is more than good, there is nothing to worry about.
Thanx dude!
evade_57
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 12, 2021, 03:41:34 PM
 #1031

In the news today
https://www.hackster.io/news/you-can-now-mine-bitcoin-using-your-vintage-commodore-64-49057d732c47
I know a pool I can test this out on (not ck's)
 Lips sealed
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3668
Merit: 2604


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
April 12, 2021, 05:29:02 PM
 #1032

In the news today
https://www.hackster.io/news/you-can-now-mine-bitcoin-using-your-vintage-commodore-64-49057d732c47
I know a pool I can test this out on (not ck's)
 Lips sealed
Sigh....
Please ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2415854.msg24714338#msg24714338
Quote
TL/DR Summary:
 - You CANNOT meaningfully mine bitcoin with your PC or laptop no matter how powerful it is.
- You CANNOT meaningfully mine bitcoin with your tablet or phone no matter how powerful it is.
 - Mining apps for your phone or tablet that claim to mine bitcoin are almost certainly scams.
 - You CANNOT find software here to mine bitcoin with your PC by itself.
 - You MIGHT be able to do one of the above with altcoins, but such discussion goes into the altcoin mining section.
 - You CANNOT find or post software here to mine on other peoples' PC without their permission.
It would be a very very pointless enterprise.... Your share rate would be so incredibly low most pools would treat it as a dropped or offline connection  Roll Eyes

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome!  3NtFuzyWREGoDHWeMczeJzxFZpiLAFJXYr
 -Sole remaining active Primary developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
machac10
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2021, 05:34:59 AM
 #1033

Hi Everybody, I'm a newbie, I found a couple of asic usb block erupter that I purchase in 2014, and just to see if they still work, I put them to mine in solo.ckpool.org with cgminer 4.10.0 which is the only one  software I found that works in Windows 10 and this old usb, I know if pointless because they don't have enought hash power, but for my surprise, in some point start to found something that I never saw in the past,  I saw some Accepted in the text screen, it was doing this for a couple of hours giving several Acepted, also take some pictures with my phone, until the cgminer stop to run, I am to figure what happend but I really don't understand what the stats means, if somebody can help me please.

Thanks in Advance

{
 "hashrate1m": "0",
 "hashrate5m": "0",
 "hashrate1hr": "654M",
 "hashrate1d": "756M",
 "hashrate7d": "353M",
 "lastshare": 1618539680,
 "workers": 2,
 "shares": 78075,
 "bestshare": 478709.6423020818,
 "bestever": 478709,
 "worker": [
  {
   "workername": "36zuYSiD44yKZEwDbPeMHcEXMuC9yaCQ69.0",
   "hashrate1m": "0",
   "hashrate5m": "0",
   "hashrate1hr": "654M",
   "hashrate1d": "711M",
   "hashrate7d": "219M",
   "lastshare": 1618539680,
   "shares": 46590,
   "bestshare": 16264.64072211665,
   "bestever": 16264
  },
  {
   "workername": "36zuYSiD44yKZEwDbPeMHcEXMuC9yaCQ69.1",
   "hashrate1m": "0",
   "hashrate5m": "0",
   "hashrate1hr": "0",
   "hashrate1d": "33.2M",
   "hashrate7d": "92.8M",
   "lastshare": 1618275277,
   "shares": 31485,
   "bestshare": 478709.6423020818,
   "bestever": 478709
  }
 ]
}

Regards
mikeywith
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 6424


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
April 16, 2021, 07:15:26 AM
 #1034

I am to figure what happend but I really don't understand what the stats means, if somebody can help me please.

Thanks in Advance

Code:
{

 "workers": 2,
 "shares": 78075,
}

Your miners submitted 78075 shares with hashes below the pool's difficulty and they were accepted as valid shares by the pool, but they were not good enough to hit a block, the only thing to take out from the status is that your miners did connect and are doing "okay". until and unless they hit a block, the number of shares accepted means exactly nothing.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
machac10
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2021, 12:31:38 PM
 #1035

I am to figure what happend but I really don't understand what the stats means, if somebody can help me please.

Thanks in Advance

Code:
{

 "workers": 2,
 "shares": 78075,
}

Your miners submitted 78075 shares with hashes below the pool's difficulty and they were accepted as valid shares by the pool, but they were not good enough to hit a block, the only thing to take out from the status is that your miners did connect and are doing "okay". until and unless they hit a block, the number of shares accepted means exactly nothing.

Thank you very much
Grodis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 19, 2021, 02:39:42 PM
 #1036

Guys! What is the best and most correct way to ping a stratum on osx?
AzagraMac
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 2


View Profile
April 26, 2021, 06:05:41 PM
Last edit: April 26, 2021, 06:32:17 PM by AzagraMac
 #1037

Hi, I've been using a couple of RedFury and an Antminer U3 for a few days now, using bfgminer v5.5.0-28.

I don't understand very well the data, this morning the whole bfgminer console was showing many messages "Accepted XXXXXXXXX BPM X Diff x/x" and now it only shows "Network difficulty changed to 23.6T (168.8E)" and many "Stratum from pool 0 detected new block".

If you look at the statistics, now it shows 0 in hashrate1m and hashrate5m, I tried to reboot and nothing.  Huh

Thanks.

Code:
{
 "hashrate1m": "0",
 "hashrate5m": "0",
 "hashrate1hr": "41.2M",
 "hashrate1d": "3.24G",
 "hashrate7d": "1.15G",
 "lastshare": 1619442446,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 204544,
 "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
 "bestever": 601946,
 "worker": [
  {
   "workername": "1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc.0",
   "hashrate1m": "0",
   "hashrate5m": "0",
   "hashrate1hr": "41.2M",
   "hashrate1d": "3.24G",
   "hashrate7d": "1.15G",
   "lastshare": 1619442446,
   "shares": 204544,
   "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
   "bestever": 601946
  }
 ]
}

Do you see it viable to leave this equipment playing the lottery... or is it completely useless?
It gives me peaks of 68Gh/s and troughs of 65Gh/s.

Rebooted and relaunched...
Code:
[2021-04-26 20:25:47] Started bfgminer 5.5.0-28-g8e0278ad
[2021-04-26 20:25:48] Probing for an alive pool
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Message from pool 0: Authorised, welcome to solo 1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc!
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 alive
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Network difficulty changed to 23.6T (168.8E)
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:26:03] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:26:11] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:31:46] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

BTC 1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc
chillfactr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 637
Merit: 131


View Profile
April 27, 2021, 05:52:56 AM
 #1038

Hi, I've been using a couple of RedFury and an Antminer U3 for a few days now, using bfgminer v5.5.0-28.

I don't understand very well the data, this morning the whole bfgminer console was showing many messages "Accepted XXXXXXXXX BPM X Diff x/x" and now it only shows "Network difficulty changed to 23.6T (168.8E)" and many "Stratum from pool 0 detected new block".

If you look at the statistics, now it shows 0 in hashrate1m and hashrate5m, I tried to reboot and nothing.  Huh

Thanks.

Code:
{
 "hashrate1m": "0",
 "hashrate5m": "0",
 "hashrate1hr": "41.2M",
 "hashrate1d": "3.24G",
 "hashrate7d": "1.15G",
 "lastshare": 1619442446,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 204544,
 "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
 "bestever": 601946,
 "worker": [
  {
   "workername": "1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc.0",
   "hashrate1m": "0",
   "hashrate5m": "0",
   "hashrate1hr": "41.2M",
   "hashrate1d": "3.24G",
   "hashrate7d": "1.15G",
   "lastshare": 1619442446,
   "shares": 204544,
   "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
   "bestever": 601946
  }
 ]
}

Do you see it viable to leave this equipment playing the lottery... or is it completely useless?
It gives me peaks of 68Gh/s and troughs of 65Gh/s.

Rebooted and relaunched...
Code:
[2021-04-26 20:25:47] Started bfgminer 5.5.0-28-g8e0278ad
[2021-04-26 20:25:48] Probing for an alive pool
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Message from pool 0: Authorised, welcome to solo 1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc!
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 alive
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Network difficulty changed to 23.6T (168.8E)
[2021-04-26 20:25:49] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:26:03] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:26:11] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-26 20:31:46] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

BTC 1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc


Well these are your stats as of right now,  so its all up to you if you want to leave them solo, lottery or not

{
 "hashrate1m": "5.42G",
 "hashrate5m": "4.86G",
 "hashrate1hr": "5.17G",
 "hashrate1d": "4.03G",
 "hashrate7d": "1.41G",
 "lastshare": 1619502667,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 254478,
 "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
 "bestever": 601946,
 "worker": [
  {
   "workername": "1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc.azagramac",
   "hashrate1m": "5.42G",
   "hashrate5m": "4.86G",
   "hashrate1hr": "5.17G",
   "hashrate1d": "4.03G",
   "hashrate7d": "1.41G",
   "lastshare": 1619502667,
   "shares": 254478,
   "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
   "bestever": 601946
  }
 ]
}
AzagraMac
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 2


View Profile
April 27, 2021, 06:23:34 AM
Last edit: April 27, 2021, 05:33:21 PM by AzagraMac
 #1039

Left him all night... I have seen from the log, that he started to accept at 3 am, Spanish time.

For power consumption, the usb miner consumes hardly anything, right now it's at 67Gh/s... we'll see how long it lasts.

I still don't understand the statistics very well....
Thank you very much! Cheesy


## Update, I have made some changes, we will see how it goes....
I am using cgmienr v4.9.2 compiled with redfury and u3 (icarus) support.
Code:
./configure --enable-icarus --enable-bitfury

I have added the --suggested-diff parameter with value 128, and now it runs faster.
Is it advisable to add this parameter?
What I notice, with respect to bfgminer v5.5.0 is that the hashrate is slightly lower, with bfgminer, it was around 68Gh/s, with cgminer it's around 60Gh/s.
Code:
[2021-04-27 11:30:15] Accepted 446b2cb1 Diff 245K/128 BF1 1
[2021-04-27 11:30:22] Accepted 461cbe0b Diff 935/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 11:32:30] Accepted 0149493a Diff 199/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 11:33:10] Accepted 01afa1a9 Diff 152/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 11:35:05] Accepted c80ae918 Diff 328/128 BF1 1
[2021-04-27 11:38:26] Accepted 23bd94b5 Diff 1.83K/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 11:41:15] Accepted bdf37067 Diff 345/128 BF1 1
[2021-04-27 11:44:55] Accepted 0ff6963b Diff 4.11K/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 11:45:07] Accepted 01c06ecb Diff 146/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 11:45:14] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 11:45:30] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 11:45:52] Accepted 1dca7703 Diff 2.2K/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 11:51:02] Accepted 2e71c32d Diff 1.41K/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 11:53:27] Accepted a054a1a8 Diff 409/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 11:53:55] Accepted 981c277e Diff 431/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 11:57:56] Accepted 01bd4e07 Diff 147/128 BF1 1
[2021-04-27 11:59:08] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 12:02:36] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[2021-04-27 12:03:54] Rejected 8ea3086d Diff 459/128 BF1 0  (Stale)
[2021-04-27 12:05:13] Accepted 01476e40 Diff 200/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 12:05:36] Accepted 89036b4a Diff 478/128 BF1 0
[2021-04-27 12:06:13] Accepted 243f0ba7 Diff 1.81K/128 BF1 1

Code:
{
 "hashrate1m": "17.1G",
 "hashrate5m": "9.3G",
 "hashrate1hr": "7.76G",
 "hashrate1d": "3.73G",
 "hashrate7d": "1.43G",
 "lastshare": 1619518228,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 262546,
 "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
 "bestever": 601946,
 "worker": [
  {
   "workername": "1DCRu4pnnwtbUYRy1evVw7TzXGW8XMwMNc.azagramac",
   "hashrate1m": "17.1G",
   "hashrate5m": "9.3G",
   "hashrate1hr": "7.76G",
   "hashrate1d": "3.73G",
   "hashrate7d": "1.43G",
   "lastshare": 1619518228,
   "shares": 262546,
   "bestshare": 601946.0725657769,
   "bestever": 601946
  }
 ]
}


## Update 2, It has happened again... it has been going on for quite a while now.

Code:
[2021-04-27 18:08:37] Accepted 0adc6513 Diff 3.57K/128 AU3 2
[2021-04-27 18:15:00] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 18:17:29] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 18:27:07] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 18:27:40] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 18:40:27] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 19:02:59] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 19:13:30] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2021-04-27 19:20:01] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
kulneet
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2021, 05:16:14 PM
 #1040

I need help understanding what happened on my BFGminer. I'm experimenting with crypto and getting into ETH mining. But I have a usb block erupter i was toying with and trying to see if I can get it to script mine. But I left the bfg miner for ck pool running just for the hell of it and I ended up getting an accepted share which I have no idea what it is. My Efficiency reads at 12.66 and my Accepted share is at 1.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 232 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!