Wright's Ph.D. flying the coop? Shouldn't have put his eggs in one basket!

[gmaxwell]

This post might ruffle feathers but no sense incubating a lark. I'm just going to wing it.

After years of Wright puffin up his accomplishments some hawk-eyed observer spotted that most of them were parroted! He probably thought leaving twitter was da skies enough to avoid being caged for his ill eagle activities but he should have spent more time defending his nest and stayed out of Satoshi's territory.

While some might applaud his respect for national tradition, I don't think that this albatross is anything to emu-late. His raven about Bitcoin's Turing completeness generated much mocking but those it flew over were left thinking of him as Coq-of-the-walk. *Now* even his flock will know that he's a turkey. Who did he think was that gull-ible?

Even CSU has to find this too hard to swallow. Degree printer may go Brrrrrr but Brrrr-d is a cardinal sin! Letting it stand would cheepen their reputation.

Wright's migration to the UK has no doubt made handling the ensuing flap pretty cuckoo. Although I'm sure he'll keep preening, I bet he privately r-egrets hatching this plan.

I fully expect he'll be dis-quail-ified. Once he re-terns his ducktorate will he get a booby prize or will he be left brooding over a goose egg?  Either way I don't think it will be long before his fowl play goes entirely tits up and we hear the swan song of a caw-nvicted jail bird and, at last, the end of his robin.

Coming next: A shocking revelation that Wright's "first draft" of of the "Bitcoin Whitepaper" was also plagiarized!

[1714801167]

1714801167

[1714801167]

1714801167

[1714801167]

1714801167

[1714801167]

1714801167

[Mbitr]

Lol - best post I’ve read in a long time .
PLEASE CLICK ON ALL OF OPs LINKS


He’s definitely cooked his goose!

[SatsLife]

This is certainly not surprising. Going to enter a short on BSV. brb

[eaLiTy]

I fully expect he'll be dis-quail-ified. Once he re-terns his ducktorate will he get a booby prize or will he be left brooding over a goose egg?  Either way I don't think it will be long before his fowl play goes entirely tits up and we hear the swan song of a caw-nvicted jail bird and, at last, the end of his robin.

Coming next: A shocking revelation that Wright's "first draft" of of the "Bitcoin Whitepaper" was also plagiarized!

After reviewing he will loose his duck-torate and he can come up with chicken theory 

[DeathAngel]

The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.

[SpanishSoldier]

While we're discussing the validity of his PHD, he has appeared with a new story line...

[MicroGuy]

The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.

Ummm. BSV is the #4 cryptocurrency in the world today and gaining.

I don't think the CTO of Blockstream would be spending his time on this subject if he wasn't a grave concern.

[pixie85]

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pahological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

The Chicken thesis was the best.
He knew this was coming years before
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/the-game-of-chicken-e8a26b39e49e

[MicroGuy]

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pathological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

The same could be said of Tesla, Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg, and a host of others.

[pixie85]

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pathological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

The same could be said of Tesla, Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg, and a host of others.

Those guys at least invented something or were part of a team that did which we cannot say about Craig.

You probably believe that he's Satoshi, but for the other 99% of the community he's just a liar and an usurper who wants to take credit for someone else's work.

[SpanishSoldier]

I don't think the CTO of Blockstream would be spending his time on this subject if he wasn't a grave concern.

Wake up! Gmaxwell left Blockstream in January 2018.

https://twitter.com/Blockstream/status/954244689095417856

https://blockstream.com/2018/01/19/en-blockstream-bids-farewell-to-gregory-maxwell/

But he was around 50% of the original Bitcoin team.

Where is the signed message from address of genesis block, that he showed from Gavin to BBC in private?

[gmaxwell]

Gmaxwell left Blockstream in January 2018.

I left there in December 2017 and haven't had any relationship with the company since then, in fact.  They just dragged their feet in announcing it.

Microguy has got to up his scamming game, because he's not fooling anyone here.

Ummm. BSV in the #4 cryptocurrency in the world today and gaining.

Hardly, it's a worthless zombie coin, that is listed at few exchanges (and hardly any reputable ones) and has a massive market cap boost from the large number of immobile abandoned coins.

If you're so confident in it's value, how much would you charge for 10 year BSV puts with a strike at $100?   At a price consistent with your statements I'd probably be interested in buying as many as you could reliably collateralize (e.g. with a lien on real property).  [Spoiler: like other paid scammer-shills, MicroGuy won't enter into an agreement that will bankrupt him when it turns out that the things he said were absolutely sure of don't come true.]

[Welsh]

The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.

Nah, from a spotlight point of view he does everything right. His fuck ups are quite entertaining to supporters of Bitcoin, and his bullshit is quite entertaining to those that support whatever trash hes promoting. I don't think he's a psychopath like pointed out above, but what I do believe he is someone that hates to not be in the spotlight, and him trying to "hide" his plagiarized content has shown a different side to him. When has he ever wanted to not be in the spotlight? When he's been caught doing something which could strip him of his previous "achievements".

Unfortunately, for the others which have grown tired of the man, I think he'll still be around in a year or two, and probably wouldn't have learned from his mistakes, and likely keep on making the same ones as evidenced by the recent news. 

[AmoreJaz]

The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.

Nah, from a spotlight point of view he does everything right. His fuck ups are quite entertaining to supporters of Bitcoin, and his bullshit is quite entertaining to those that support whatever trash hes promoting. I don't think he's a psychopath like pointed out above, but what I do believe he is someone that hates to not be in the spotlight, and him trying to "hide" his plagiarized content has shown a different side to him. When has he ever wanted to not be in the spotlight? When he's been caught doing something which could strip him of his previous "achievements".

Unfortunately, for the others which have grown tired of the man, I think he'll still be around in a year or two, and probably wouldn't have learned from his mistakes, and likely keep on making the same ones as evidenced by the recent news. 

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

[franky1]

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pathological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

The same could be said of Tesla, Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg, and a host of others.

Those guys at least invented something or were part of a team that did which we cannot say about Craig.

You probably believe funded to say that he's Satoshi, but fot the other 99% of the community he's just a liar and an usurper who wants to take credit for someone else's work.

FTFY
though i have seen a few idiots n this forum. im swaying in more of the direction that with all the public evidence against CSW. which i doubt even microguy can plead ignorance too.. the only other option would be that there is a financial benefit to him kissing CSW ass

im guessing soon enough microguy will be paid to do interviews to explain his thoughts. and year a few btc an hour doing tours

[MicroGuy]

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

There is an organized concerted effort to discredit Wright because of the severe threat that BSV presents to the Bitcoin establishment.

That's the short version.

im guessing soon enough microguy will be paid to do interviews to explain his thoughts. and year a few btc an hour doing tours

I'll try to keep my speaking fees down to a reasonable minimum. Working on a new book, "My Romp in the Hay with Satoshi".

[franky1]

There is an organized concerted effort to discredit Wright because of the severe threat that BSV presents to the Bitcoin establishment.

BSV is just another altcoin that was forked off not even 2 years ago...
i know your looking to make money out of your kiss ass methods. but further down the road. it wont pay out for you
calvin has been waiting years and has still not broken even for his kiss ass partnership with CSW. and you will be last on the pile of kiss-asses to get anything from him..

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

..
by the way. i do like how you did separate the established bitcoin and BSV.
yep. you foolishly debunked yourself there by saying BSV is not the established bitcoin. but a separate thing..
oopsie

[MicroGuy]

by the way. i do like how you did separte the established bitcoin and BSV. yep. you foolishly debunked yourself there by saying BSV is not the established bitcoin. but a separate thing..
oopsie

Until BSV reaches or exceeds BTC market capitalization, Bitcoin I suppose is BTC.

(Something I did by the way tell Satoshi and he blocked me on Twitter.)

[franky1]

by the way. i do like how you did separte the established bitcoin and BSV. yep. you foolishly debunked yourself there by saying BSV is not the established bitcoin. but a separate thing..
oopsie

Until BSV reaches or exceeds BTC market capitalization, Bitcoin I suppose is BTC.

BSV will not exceed BTC
but another tip for you.
when CSW pleads guilty to the satoshi scam and fesses up that he isnt satoshi
he wil double scam BSV users by saying 'its not craig wright version is it' and say he has proved he is not satoshi so BSV has nothing to do with him.

leaving you fools stuck empty handed and trying to cause more drama to prove CSW was connected to BSV
its what scammers do.

like i said just cut your losses earlier and dont be a kiss ass
spend your time playing poker instead

[MicroGuy]

by the way. i do like how you did separte the established bitcoin and BSV. yep. you foolishly debunked yourself there by saying BSV is not the established bitcoin. but a separate thing..
oopsie

Until BSV reaches or exceeds BTC market capitalization, Bitcoin I suppose is BTC.

BSV will not exceed BTC
but another tip for you.
when CSW pleads guilty to the satoshi scam and fesses up that he isnt satoshi
he wil double scam BSV users by saying 'its not craig wright version is it' and say he has proved he is not satoshi so BSV has nothing to do with him.

leaving you fools stuck empty handed and trying to cause more drama to prove CSW was connected to BSV
its what scammers do.

like i said just cut your losses earlier and dont be a kiss ass
spend your time playing poker instead

BSV is much more than a single individual. The code is really the only thing to fear.

I think it's a great experiment to see if Satoshi's Vision was the correct one. Classic battle between big blockers and small blockers.

If LN manages to get off the ground soon, BTC might have a chance.

[gmaxwell]

There is an organized concerted effort to discredit Wright because

You know what the ultimate organizing force is? The goddamn truth. It permeates the universe and allow parties that have never even communicated to magically "conspire" on the same facts.

Wright's victims and sponsors have poured tens of millions promoting this scam ... hundreds of millions if you believe their own claims (you probably shouldn't).

Unfunded participants from the general public speaking up and supporting the truth and opposing lies and scammers like you that transmit them is not an organized and concerted effort by comparison but it's what we have.

If there was a concerned effort wright would be locked in a cage, and maybe you would be too.  Keep it up and perhaps that's where it will end up.

[franky1]

I think it's a great experiment to see if Satoshi's Vision was the correct one. Classic battle between big blockers and small blockers.

If LN manages to get off the ground soon, BTC might have a chance.

while you play drama games about alt networks..
ill continue to buy food and pay bills with ONCHAIN BTC..

oh wait. i see BSV cant do that
there are hundreds of altcoins that play on the 'big block. small block' debate. and dozens that play on the LN alt network. BSV is nothing special

but i cant buy food using them alt currencies/pegged millisat tokens. so they are useless
i like my gold/i like my onchain BTC.
altcoins and pegged tokens are for kids and scammer to play with

[DooMAD]

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

It's a natural consequence of a consensus mechanism.  New ideas can quickly become divisive.  If someone wants to implement features that are fundamentally incompatible with the current network rules, the only way to implement that feature at protocol level is to propose a fork and see who goes along with it.  Alternatively you can sometimes build a new layer on top of the base protocol, but that's not always a viable option for some ideas.  Gavin and Mike made their clients and tried to implement their ideas via hardfork (rightly or wrongly, however people choose to perceive it), but were unsuccessful.

You probably believe that he's Satoshi, but fot the other 99% of the community he's just a liar and an usurper who wants to take credit for someone else's work.

No. But he was around 50% of the original Bitcoin team.

There is insufficient evidence for this assertion.  You are once again attempting to portray your theory that Kleiman and Wright are satoshi as though it were some sort of fact.  It is nowhere close to being a fact.  Please recall the difference between education and indoctrination.  You're putting your credibility on the line again.

[kryptqnick]

This discussion moved in a different direction, but going back to the op I'm wondering whether there will be consequences. Plagiarism is a strict violation of academic integrity, and even though in my country it's, unfortunately, widely tolerated, even here we have talks about implementing procedures of stripping people off their titles which were earned by defending theses that are now known to contain plagiarism. That university is very low in QS university rankings, just like the previous one where he allegedly plagiarized another degree work, so does it mean Craig will get away with this? An article on Cointelegraph claims that the university has launched an investigation already. Do you think we'll see him losing the title?

[hv_]

The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.

Ummm. BSV is the #4 cryptocurrency in the world today and gaining.

I don't think the CTO of Blockstream would be spending his time on this subject if he wasn't a grave concern.

Why not? Trolling still too cheap.

Metanet gonna fix it.

Wait - that s biggest concern?

[gmaxwell]

That university is very low in QS university rankings, just like the previous one where he allegedly plagiarized another degree work, so does it mean Craig will get away with this? An article on Cointelegraph claims that the university has launched an investigation already. Do you think we'll see him losing the title?

I think it's entirely a question of it becoming a scandal for the university.  If it does, they'll drop him like a hot potato-- surely at this point their rules would permit it. If it doesn't, they'll sweep it under the rug-- such is the norm for institutions.

[Iamtutut]

Calvin should put a stand up comedy show, he's so good at it: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1259108213548613633

He doesn't realize how hilarious he can be.

[hv_]

Calvin should put a stand up comedy show, he's so good at it: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1259108213548613633

He doesn't realize how hilarious he can be.

How can some little ano point on a public successful man and doesn't seem hilarious himself?

At least this funny 'public' bloke tries it and hopes to find some little peas between the 16000 - funny, but off the road


https://mobile.twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1259255430859104260

 

It's just totally funny, that all of u try to derail from the tech and legal  issues of btc with hunting ppl and name calling

Satoshi, was wrong
White Paper- don't care
First code, didn't understand
First code maintainer - send to hell
2x contract- broken

Now Segwit solves it all .... still believe that crap?

[Haunebu]

Craig Wright and John McAfee are two of the biggest scamming entertainers in the crypto world these days. I wasn't surprised at all to hear about his PhD issues which was highlighted by another poster recently.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5246331.msg54374889#msg54374889

He won't stop here people no matter what the university decides to do about it. He is basically trying his best to outwit McAfee as the biggest loser in the crypto community and he probably will never give up his scamming ways.

[franky1]

Calvin should put a stand up comedy show, he's so good at it: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1259108213548613633

and there we have it.
craig wants the case dropped because he knows the whole him and dave partnership had nothing to do with bitcoin. and was a ‘an elaborate fiction.’

we knew this years ago that craig and dave never had a hoard of coins.

but yea the comedy moment is that calvin thinks this then is then the pivot point that allows craig to start patent trolling everyone
(so that calvin can get return on investment)
i pitty calvin. such an idiot. such a mindless fool and such a kiss ass.
and when he doesnt get money from his 'scammer lover' partnership he will then try riding the book tour train. trying to sell his boring story of how he fell victim to the scams for so long

[irukandji]

Where is the signed message from address of genesis block, that he showed from Gavin to BBC in private?

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

[irukandji]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

[Iamtutut]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

[24Kt]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

Question here is - how many people still believe on CW? Because if you ask how many are not believers, it will comprise more than 95% of crypto population. So better ask, is or are there still individual/s that have high regards on CW? Who are still loyal followers of this guy?

[gmaxwell]

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

Gavin stonewalled technical experts like myself that inquired about it after answering only a couple questions, so we can only figure out so much.

I think at the end of the day we should simply consider Gavin complicit in Wright's fraud. From that perspective there really isn't much to explain.  Sure, he was probably tricked at the time, but in the time since he's failed to withdraw his claims beyond saying that maybe he was tricked and it shouldn't matter.  His endorsement continues to be cited as a central factor in other people's belief.

I say 'probably tricked at the time'; because in spite of my low opinion of Gavin's character and capability I still have a hard time believing that he'd knowingly go along with such a transparent scam-- it just had too low a chance of achieving anything.  Wright apparently tried his con on other people unsuccessfully before Gavin.

Zectro posted a set of instructions for how to perform a fake signing that would have worked given what we (little) know about the irresponsible process Gavin used: https://twitter.com/Zectro1/status/1192576225413222405

[Vlad2Vlad]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

Question here is - how many people still believe on CW? Because if you ask how many are not believers, it will comprise more than 95% of crypto population. So better ask, is or are there still individual/s that have high regards on CW? Who are still loyal followers of this guy?

I never liked following the herd.  BTC gonna get rekt this year so you better dump on the next big run this summer.  CSW will turn up on top so maybe take off the haters glasses and look at his factual work.

[Kakmakr]

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

History lesson: https://medium.com/block-chain/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830

Now they're using smear tactics against Wright (big blocker) in a desperate attempt to keep their 1MB narrative alive.

They did not push out Gavin, he left on his own. Mike Hearn rage quit and also left when he saw that he could not take control of the real Bitcoin (BTC) ... they then partnered to try to hard fork a competitive Alt coin and then they failed.    (Underestimating the support that they had in the community)  

CW is simply a Snake oil salesman and you have to be blind not to see it. It has nothing to do with his big blocker position, but rather the combined total of the lies that has been exposed over time.

The 1MB narrative is working like a charm and it is supported by the majority.  

[Wind_FURY]

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pathological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

The same could be said of Tesla, Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg, and a host of others.

HAHAHA! Did you just suggest that Craig Wright could be like those people who actually brought/did/built something "insanely great" in this world?

Craig Wright is a Borat-like-character, a troll.

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

Gavin stonewalled technical experts like myself that inquired about it after answering only a couple questions, so we can only figure out so much.

I think at the end of the day we should simply consider Gavin complicit in Wright's fraud. From that perspective there really isn't much to explain.  Sure, he was probably tricked at the time, but in the time since he's failed to withdraw his claims beyond saying that maybe he was tricked and it shouldn't matter.  His endorsement continues to be cited as a central factor in other people's belief.

I say 'probably tricked at the time'; because in spite of my low opinion of Gavin's character and capability I still have a hard time believing that he'd knowingly go along with such a transparent scam-- it just had too low a chance of achieving anything.  Wright apparently tried his con on other people unsuccessfully before Gavin.

Zectro posted a set of instructions for how to perform a fake signing that would have worked given what we (little) know about the irresponsible process Gavin used: https://twitter.com/Zectro1/status/1192576225413222405

Too take things deeper, WHY? Was he deliberately destroying his own reputation? Was there "something" going on with him after he went to Langley?

[Iamtutut]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

Question here is - how many people still believe on CW? Because if you ask how many are not believers, it will comprise more than 95% of crypto population. So better ask, is or are there still individual/s that have high regards on CW? Who are still loyal followers of this guy?

I never liked following the herd.  BTC gonna get rekt this year so you better dump on the next big run this summer.  CSW will turn up on top so maybe take off the haters glasses and look at his factual work.

*playing violin*

Just like the fatal SegWit flaw he was supposed to show ?

Just like he'll 51% HR attack Bitcoin ?

Just like he'll cramble the mem pool ?

-> LMAO.

[Vlad2Vlad]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

Question here is - how many people still believe on CW? Because if you ask how many are not believers, it will comprise more than 95% of crypto population. So better ask, is or are there still individual/s that have high regards on CW? Who are still loyal followers of this guy?

I never liked following the herd.  BTC gonna get rekt this year so you better dump on the next big run this summer.  CSW will turn up on top so maybe take off the haters glasses and look at his factual work.

*playing violin*

Just like the fatal SegWit flaw he was supposed to show ?

Just like he'll 51% HR attack Bitcoin ?

Just like he'll cramble the mem pool ?

-> LMAO.

Laugh it up, but soon you’ll cry and wonder why you didn’t heed the obvious advice. 

How strong is your marriage?  Haha

[Iamtutut]

so cut your loses early, or you will be hurting more later

I don't know what to think about Craig Wright. It looks like he has lied a lot.
BSV though has been the best performing crypto over the last year, so you could have losses but more likely gains.

Not even remotely closed to.

Read from these accounts on twitter, you'll have a better idea of the huge amount of lies from Wrights:
https://twitter.com/MartinSewell
https://twitter.com/xtraelv
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit
https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure

You can ad "zectro" and "painted frog"

Question here is - how many people still believe on CW? Because if you ask how many are not believers, it will comprise more than 95% of crypto population. So better ask, is or are there still individual/s that have high regards on CW? Who are still loyal followers of this guy?

I never liked following the herd.  BTC gonna get rekt this year so you better dump on the next big run this summer.  CSW will turn up on top so maybe take off the haters glasses and look at his factual work.

*playing violin*

Just like the fatal SegWit flaw he was supposed to show ?

Just like he'll 51% HR attack Bitcoin ?

Just like he'll cramble the mem pool ?

-> LMAO.

Laugh it up, but soon you’ll cry and wonder why you didn’t heed the obvious advice. 

How strong is your marriage?  Haha

Much stronger than your shitcoin.

[hv_]

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

History lesson: https://medium.com/block-chain/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830

Now they're using smear tactics against Wright (big blocker) in a desperate attempt to keep their 1MB narrative alive.

They did not push out Gavin, he left on his own. Mike Hearn rage quit and also left when he saw that he could not take control of the real Bitcoin (BTC) ... they then partnered to try to hard fork a competitive Alt coin and then they failed.    (Underestimating the support that they had in the community)  

CW is simply a Snake oil salesman and you have to be blind not to see it. It has nothing to do with his big blocker position, but rather the combined total of the lies that has been exposed over time.

The 1MB narrative is working like a charm and it is supported by the majority.  

aaand the majority just uses fiat - not crypto, but tries to go rather closed blockchains / R3 (by Mike Hearn)  / IBM - cause of the evil governance issues with 'decentralized' open ones (bcore, buterin, sun ,...)  - what is now fixed by just having only the Satoshi White Paper in governance (supported  by CSW) and patent protected against IBM / R3 / other central governed crap ( by CSW)

so what exactly are you discussing for / against ?

[Wind_FURY]

Why do giga-meg-BSV supporters believe that "BSV will top Bitcoin"? From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin will win the war of attrition vs. Bitcoin Cash, and its alt-altcoin fork Bitcoin Cash SV. Remember, BSV block rewards were halved too, and will also continue to be halved every four years. How can a low-fee network that has less transaction volume than Dogecoin compete against the king, Bitcoin?

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

History lesson: https://medium.com/block-chain/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830

Now they're using smear tactics against Wright (big blocker) in a desperate attempt to keep their 1MB narrative alive.

They did not push out Gavin, he left on his own. Mike Hearn rage quit and also left when he saw that he could not take control of the real Bitcoin (BTC) ... they then partnered to try to hard fork a competitive Alt coin and then they failed.    (Underestimating the support that they had in the community)  

CW is simply a Snake oil salesman and you have to be blind not to see it. It has nothing to do with his big blocker position, but rather the combined total of the lies that has been exposed over time.

The 1MB narrative is working like a charm and it is supported by the majority.  

aaand the majority just uses fiat - not crypto, but tries to go rather closed blockchains / R3 (by Mike Hearn)  / IBM - cause of the evil governance issues with 'decentralized' open ones (bcore, buterin, sun ,...)  - what is now fixed by just having only the Satoshi White Paper in governance (supported  by CSW) and patent protected against IBM / R3 / other central governed crap ( by CSW)

so what exactly are you discussing for / against ?

He said CSW is a snake oil salesman, and that everything you posted never refuted anything.

[hv_]

Why do giga-meg-BSV supporters believe that "BSV will top Bitcoin"? From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin will win the war of attrition vs. Bitcoin Cash, and its alt-altcoin fork Bitcoin Cash SV. Remember, BSV block rewards were halved too, and will also continue to be halved every four years. How can a low-fee network that has less transaction volume than Dogecoin compete against the king, Bitcoin?

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

History lesson: https://medium.com/block-chain/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830

Now they're using smear tactics against Wright (big blocker) in a desperate attempt to keep their 1MB narrative alive.

They did not push out Gavin, he left on his own. Mike Hearn rage quit and also left when he saw that he could not take control of the real Bitcoin (BTC) ... they then partnered to try to hard fork a competitive Alt coin and then they failed.    (Underestimating the support that they had in the community)  

CW is simply a Snake oil salesman and you have to be blind not to see it. It has nothing to do with his big blocker position, but rather the combined total of the lies that has been exposed over time.

The 1MB narrative is working like a charm and it is supported by the majority.  

aaand the majority just uses fiat - not crypto, but tries to go rather closed blockchains / R3 (by Mike Hearn)  / IBM - cause of the evil governance issues with 'decentralized' open ones (bcore, buterin, sun ,...)  - what is now fixed by just having only the Satoshi White Paper in governance (supported  by CSW) and patent protected against IBM / R3 / other central governed crap ( by CSW)

so what exactly are you discussing for / against ?

He said CSW is a snake oil salesman, and that everything you posted never refuted anything.

.. or s getting deleted.  Anyway - keep building on what you think is best BitCoin solution for the globe.

[buwaytress]

Oooh, how did I miss this gem of a post. Pretty proud of myself for having stayed out of the CW loop for so long but nice to see the 'f-owl' play summed up nicely in one place with all the interesting 'tits' and bobs. It must be so hard for him to 'swallow' all this, and one would think he would have known better than to 'crane' his neck into hallowed grounds. Could not have had a 'swift'-er demise, but something tells me we'll get a few more 'larks' from CW yet.

[RawDog]

Haha - found this on twitter.  Too true Craigie Boy.  20 years for you.

https://gofile.io/d/W7X4Vb

[Vlad2Vlad]

Haha - found this on twitter.  Too true Craigie Boy.  20 years for you.

https://gofile.io/d/W7X4Vb

Meh.  Ain’t gonna happen. 

[Wind_FURY]

Why do giga-meg-BSV supporters believe that "BSV will top Bitcoin"? From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin will win the war of attrition vs. Bitcoin Cash, and its alt-altcoin fork Bitcoin Cash SV. Remember, BSV block rewards were halved too, and will also continue to be halved every four years. How can a low-fee network that has less transaction volume than Dogecoin compete against the king, Bitcoin?

First they (banker-backed Blockstream) pushed out Gavin (big blocker) then ran off Mike Hearn (big blocker).

History lesson: https://medium.com/block-chain/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830

Now they're using smear tactics against Wright (big blocker) in a desperate attempt to keep their 1MB narrative alive.

They did not push out Gavin, he left on his own. Mike Hearn rage quit and also left when he saw that he could not take control of the real Bitcoin (BTC) ... they then partnered to try to hard fork a competitive Alt coin and then they failed.    (Underestimating the support that they had in the community)  

CW is simply a Snake oil salesman and you have to be blind not to see it. It has nothing to do with his big blocker position, but rather the combined total of the lies that has been exposed over time.

The 1MB narrative is working like a charm and it is supported by the majority.  

aaand the majority just uses fiat - not crypto, but tries to go rather closed blockchains / R3 (by Mike Hearn)  / IBM - cause of the evil governance issues with 'decentralized' open ones (bcore, buterin, sun ,...)  - what is now fixed by just having only the Satoshi White Paper in governance (supported  by CSW) and patent protected against IBM / R3 / other central governed crap ( by CSW)

so what exactly are you discussing for / against ?

He said CSW is a snake oil salesman, and that everything you posted never refuted anything.

.. or s getting deleted.  Anyway - keep building on what you think is best BitCoin solution for the globe.

Deleted? No, I never saw one, or ANY, of your posts that undisputedly refuted the fact the Craig Wright is a Borat-like character-troll made to spread the Word of the Flat Earth version of Bitcoin.

[hilariousetc]

You could have just called him a cock. Or a cowardly chicken talking a whole load of chiff-chaff.

Coming next: A shocking revelation that Wright's "first draft" of of the "Bitcoin Whitepaper" was also plagiarized!

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

There is an organized concerted effort to discredit Wright because of the severe threat that BSV presents to the Bitcoin establishment.

That's the short version.

The short version is that most people can see he's a blatant fraud trying to hijack bitcoin for his own reasons.

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

Why do people normally claim to have achieved something they haven't? Fame, respect, money. In Craig's case it's clear he's trying to hijack bitcoin for his own financial gain, but I'm sure he wants the kudos as well. Craig Wright was a nobody before he muscled his way into the bitcoin, now he's trying to be a somebody and probably cash in on that along the way too. I mean, I bet he doesn't do all these talks for free.

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pahological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

He's

Calvin should put a stand up comedy show, he's so good at it: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1259108213548613633

He doesn't realize how hilarious he can be.

Where is the signed message from address of genesis block, that he showed from Gavin to BBC in private?

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

https://seebitcoin.com/2016/05/heres-how-craig-wright-probably-tricked-gavin-andresen/

We can only speculate as nobody can be sure, but if he can't show everybody else how he did it we can only assume he somehow conned or faked it to Gavin.

HAHAHA! Did you just suggest that Craig Wright could be like those people who actually brought/did/built something "insanely great" in this world?

Craig Wright is a Borat-like-character, a troll.

He's not a troll. He's a fraudster. Trolls do things for entertainment and to get a rise out of people. CW does things for his own gains.

[wozzek23]

This is very funny. So he copied every of these and reworded them thinking that he wouldn't be caught, and finally, here we are. This dude is really jerk, seriously, I'm really pissed with him. People like him are very wicked. He's a thief and a scammer who is trying to steal from people by pretending to be who and what he's not. The main Satoshi Nakamoto kept silent and didn't bother about showing himself, then these thieves are thinking that they can do whatever they please to do without being caught. That's not going to work out for them, they will all keep on failing with their plans.

[Vlad2Vlad]

This is very funny. So he copied every of these and reworded them thinking that he wouldn't be caught, and finally, here we are. This dude is really jerk, seriously, I'm really pissed with him. People like him are very wicked. He's a thief and a scammer who is trying to steal from people by pretending to be who and what he's not. The main Satoshi Nakamoto kept silent and didn't bother about showing himself, then these thieves are thinking that they can do whatever they please to do without being caught. That's not going to work out for them, they will all keep on failing with their plans.

Ever cross your tiny mind that Satoshi was a team?   

[Vlad2Vlad]

You could have just called him a cock. Or a cowardly chicken talking a whole load of chiff-chaff.

Coming next: A shocking revelation that Wright's "first draft" of of the "Bitcoin Whitepaper" was also plagiarized!

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

There is an organized concerted effort to discredit Wright because of the severe threat that BSV presents to the Bitcoin establishment.

That's the short version.

The short version is that most people can see he's a blatant fraud trying to hijack bitcoin for his own reasons.

so what do you think is his ulterior motive why he's doing this? fame/money? since his reputation has long been ruined, no credibility whatsoever.

Why do people normally claim to have achieved something they haven't? Fame, respect, money. In Craig's case it's clear he's trying to hijack bitcoin for his own financial gain, but I'm sure he wants the kudos as well. Craig Wright was a nobody before he muscled his way into the bitcoin, now he's trying to be a somebody and probably cash in on that along the way too. I mean, I bet he doesn't do all these talks for free.

I'm pretty sure CSW is not right in the head. He can be a pahological liar with delusions of grandeur. Definitely a case for a psychiatrist.

He's

Calvin should put a stand up comedy show, he's so good at it: https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1259108213548613633

He doesn't realize how hilarious he can be.

Where is the signed message from address of genesis block, that he showed from Gavin to BBC in private?

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

https://seebitcoin.com/2016/05/heres-how-craig-wright-probably-tricked-gavin-andresen/

We can only speculate as nobody can be sure, but if he can't show everybody else how he did it we can only assume he somehow conned or faked it to Gavin.

HAHAHA! Did you just suggest that Craig Wright could be like those people who actually brought/did/built something "insanely great" in this world?

Craig Wright is a Borat-like-character, a troll.

He's not a troll. He's a fraudster. Trolls do things for entertainment and to get a rise out of people. CW does things for his own gains.

You know less than jack, and man, jack doesn’t know jack. 

[DooMAD]

This is very funny. So he copied every of these and reworded them thinking that he wouldn't be caught, and finally, here we are. This dude is really jerk, seriously, I'm really pissed with him. People like him are very wicked. He's a thief and a scammer who is trying to steal from people by pretending to be who and what he's not. The main Satoshi Nakamoto kept silent and didn't bother about showing himself, then these thieves are thinking that they can do whatever they please to do without being caught. That's not going to work out for them, they will all keep on failing with their plans.

Ever cross your tiny mind that Satoshi was a team?   

So a team of plagiarists is somehow better in your opinion?  And what difference does it make anyway?  It looks like you're placing the emphasis in all the wrong places here. 

[Vlad2Vlad]

This is very funny. So he copied every of these and reworded them thinking that he wouldn't be caught, and finally, here we are. This dude is really jerk, seriously, I'm really pissed with him. People like him are very wicked. He's a thief and a scammer who is trying to steal from people by pretending to be who and what he's not. The main Satoshi Nakamoto kept silent and didn't bother about showing himself, then these thieves are thinking that they can do whatever they please to do without being caught. That's not going to work out for them, they will all keep on failing with their plans.

Ever cross your tiny mind that Satoshi was a team?   

So a team of plagiarists is somehow better in your opinion?  And what difference does it make anyway?  It looks like you're placing the emphasis in all the wrong places here. 

Nah, I’m looking past bias and personality types and at the work being done.  Funny thing is, if you remain objective and out in some work you can figure out the best coins for the future without ever reading or writing a single like of code. 

That’s the Wright, erm, right emphasis and perspective, brother.  Mad Max is coming and ya’ll better be ready cause you’ll only have yourselves to blame.   

[Wind_FURY]

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

Gavin stonewalled technical experts like myself that inquired about it after answering only a couple questions, so we can only figure out so much.

I think at the end of the day we should simply consider Gavin complicit in Wright's fraud. From that perspective there really isn't much to explain.  Sure, he was probably tricked at the time, but in the time since he's failed to withdraw his claims beyond saying that maybe he was tricked and it shouldn't matter.  His endorsement continues to be cited as a central factor in other people's belief.

I say 'probably tricked at the time'; because in spite of my low opinion of Gavin's character and capability I still have a hard time believing that he'd knowingly go along with such a transparent scam-- it just had too low a chance of achieving anything.  Wright apparently tried his con on other people unsuccessfully before Gavin.

Zectro posted a set of instructions for how to perform a fake signing that would have worked given what we (little) know about the irresponsible process Gavin used: https://twitter.com/Zectro1/status/1192576225413222405

From the depositions of Craig Wright's case vs. David Kleiman's estate.

I believe that he would have kept some his reputation among some of his peers if he told everyone of his doubts earlier.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.589.3.pdf

[JayJuanGee]

If he fooled Gavin then does anyone know how he did it?

Gavin stonewalled technical experts like myself that inquired about it after answering only a couple questions, so we can only figure out so much.

I think at the end of the day we should simply consider Gavin complicit in Wright's fraud. From that perspective there really isn't much to explain.  Sure, he was probably tricked at the time, but in the time since he's failed to withdraw his claims beyond saying that maybe he was tricked and it shouldn't matter.  His endorsement continues to be cited as a central factor in other people's belief.

I say 'probably tricked at the time'; because in spite of my low opinion of Gavin's character and capability I still have a hard time believing that he'd knowingly go along with such a transparent scam-- it just had too low a chance of achieving anything.  Wright apparently tried his con on other people unsuccessfully before Gavin.

Zectro posted a set of instructions for how to perform a fake signing that would have worked given what we (little) know about the irresponsible process Gavin used: https://twitter.com/Zectro1/status/1192576225413222405

From the depositions of Craig Wright's case vs. David Kleiman's estate.

I believe that he would have kept some his reputation among some of his peers if he told everyone of his doubts earlier.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.589.3.pdf

I am not sure how much that would have helped Gavin.  He is kind of revealing himself as a BIG ASS dweeb with the more passage of time.  I know that he has a tendency to present well, but he continues to make a lot of pretty BIG dumbass statements including both ongoing support for shit projects which may or may not be aimed at undermining bitcoin on a regular basis.

I understand that some people say that perhaps Gavin was good, at one point, but than at some later point he might have been compromised by some three letter agency. So the suggestion that he was always good, but he might be purposefully sabotaging his own reputation because he does not want to have to give damaging information to the three letter agency about bitcoin.

Of course, I will concede that we might not always be able to know for sure the deep down intentions of any individuals, but seems that there is enough information out there to undermine some of these theories that try to give Gavin very much benefit of the doubt, either that 1) he had good intentions all along or that 2) he really is a good guy in spite of what appears to be.  

Just seems to be a whole hell of a lot more straight-forward to appreciate the evidence for what it is, he is a dweeb, instead of trying to twist the evidence into either giving him benefit of the doubt or making him out to be some kind of purportedly good guy... .deep, deep on the inside (whatever the fuck that's worth?).