[Suggestion] Corruption in Judicial (DT)

[Tony Chopper]

Reading in this forum is a forgotten art. It doesn't matter who wrote the thought. It is important who determines the judiciary. If the thought disturbs you, you attack the one who says it. People talk about it in many places. Everyone reacts, except the gang. Do it if you can make a real survey.

Corruption in Judicial (DT). Dozens of DT1 members can trust a proven fraud like Lauda (And many people like him). A deep gang of altaccounts, friends and merit sources. They take their power from secrecy. A solution should be found. If there is a judiciary, there should be no doubt about it.

[Lauda]

Reading in this forum is a forgotten art. It doesn't matter who wrote the thought. It is important who determines the judiciary. If the thought disturbs you, you attack the one who says it. People talk about it in many places. Everyone reacts, except the gang. Do it if you can make a real survey.

Corruption in Judicial (DT). Dozens of DT1 members can trust a proven fraud like Lauda (And many people like him). A deep gang of altaccounts, friends and merit sources. They take their power from secrecy. A solution should be found. If there is a judiciary, there should be no doubt about it.

You also seem to have forgotten how to read. Here let me make it a bit bigger for you.

Is this because nobody wants to hire the Turkish monkeys into campaigns?

[Tony Chopper]

No Lauda. Because you can easily abuse trust system. A force you use against other members. You do it to make more money on your own accounts. My request for a solution is not for you. You are a real toxic to forum. This topic is much bigger than you. A topic related to the future of the forum.

Is it possible to abuse the system in this way? Yes, definitely. So Corruption in Judicial (DT)

(In Satoshi time, there was no such thing as DT.)

[Csmiami]

--A solution should be found--

What about....

[Tony Chopper]

When something serious is spoken make fun, humiliate him and destroy him. Typical. This is what you are always do.

@Theymos's reading will suffice.