Can we trust Legendary member chmod755 ?

[Veleor]

<...> You have been looking to something to point me for days, even mentioned me in the plagiarism section and deleted when you see you were wrong, like a spoiled child and after losings arguments jut using the "power" you have.

Certain posts of yours look like they were taken from Portuguese resources and then converted into English texts with Google Translate Tool.

Perhaps someone from Portuguese section can verify this info?



Copy:

Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly created bitcoins to cover their costs. Almost everyone knows that after the halving, not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are supplied to the market daily. This change is believed to have a positive effect on the price of bitcoin. If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block is rewarded by half, the miners revenue calculated in $ will decrease. This means that they will have trouble covering their costs, and that will cause miners with the highest electricity costs to leave the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will decrease. Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% of attacks. What do you think?

(Archive)

Original:

Os mineradores usam toneladas de eletricidade para processar transações, e a suposição geral é que os mineradores vendem diretamente seus bitcoins recém-criados para cobrir seus custos. Isso significa que, depois da metade, não 1800 bitcoins, mas apenas 900 bitcoins são fornecidos ao mercado diariamente. Acredita-se que essa escassez tenha um efeito positivo no preço do bitcoin. Se o preço do bitcoin não aumentar após a recompensa do bloco pela metade, a receita dos mineradores calculada em $ USD diminuirá. Isso significa que eles terão problemas para cobrir seus custos, e isso fará com que os mineradores com os mais altos custos de eletricidade saiam do mercado primeiro. A redução no consumo de eletricidade para manter a rede significa que a dificuldade de processar um bloco de transações diminuirá. Teoricamente, isso significa que seria mais fácil atacar a rede blockchain e criar 51% de ataques. O que você acha?

Copy:

I expect a little retraction after the halving, which would cause the value to drop to around 7K-8K. Do not go with the momentum of the market because that is what the big players want. It is a deregulated market and many people operate with inside information, but I think that bitcoin should end the year valued at around 15k with a massive appreciation occurring from September when the price should stabilize.

(Archive)

Original:

“Eu espero uma retração de 30%, o que faria com que o valor caísse para cerca de 7.000 dólares”, diz o empresário. “Não vá pelo ímpeto do mercado porque é isso que os grandes players querem. É um mercado desregulamentado e que muitas pessoas atuam com informações privilegiadas”, diz. Nas previsões de Lopes, o bitcoin deve encerrar o ano avaliado por volta de 15.000 dólares por unidade com uma valorização massiva ocorrendo a partir de setembro, quando o preço deverá se estabilizar.

Copy:

The ETH 2.0 project is another factor that can make the price spike. The project that will be launched this year will have an impressive impact on the price, as the team seeks to transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, also, block validators are expected to bet 32 ETH in an attempt to bet on the network, instead of maintaining mining platforms. The price will increase more and more with all this hype.

(Archive)

Original:

Além disso, o projeto ETH 2.0 é outro fator que pode fazer mágica. O projeto que será lançado este ano terá um impacto impressionante no preço, pois a equipe procura fazer a transição de proof-of-work para proof-of-stake. Além disso, os validadores de bloco deverão apostar 32 ETH em uma tentativa de apostar na rede, em vez de manter plataformas de mineração. Isso provavelmente causará um aumento na demanda e, eventualmente, aumentará o preço.

[1714060786]

1714060786

[1714060786]

1714060786

[1714060786]

1714060786

[1714060786]

1714060786

[1714060786]

1714060786

[FatFork]

<...> You have been looking to something to point me for days, even mentioned me in the plagiarism section and deleted when you see you were wrong, like a spoiled child and after losings arguments jut using the "power" you have.

Certain posts of yours look like they were taken from Portuguese resources and then converted into English texts with Google Translate Tool.

Perhaps someone from Portuguese section can verify this info?
<cut>

Judging by the sentence structure this is pure plagiarism as far as I can see. And you claim to have 'earned' that legendary status account? Really @chmod755?!

[mindrust]

Judging by the sentence structure this is pure plagiarism as far as I can see. And you claim to have 'earned' that legendary status account? Really @chmod755?!

You can earn it by paying for it too. That doesn't mean people will trust you for that though. Plagiarism however... is a nice way to quickly lose what you earned (no matter how you accomplished it).

You He should have started your journey  with a newbie acc like everybody else. It is free ffs.

edit: Addressing chmod obviously.

[FatFork]

Hey @mindrust! Your reply obviously applies to chmod755 but you quoted my post. Maybe you should refer to the user you are addressing, so that there is no confusion.

Resolved. Thanks @mindrust

[dkbit98]

@Veleor
Interesting discovery, and that can for sure ruin all the fun, music and party in this topic 
I have many more interesting things to show here in due time...

[dkbit98]

You have been looking to something to point me for days, even mentioned me in the plagiarism section and deleted when you see you were wrong, like a spoiled child and after losings arguments jut using the "power" you have.

Who was wrong?
Here it is again SAME POST i reported:

Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly created bitcoins to cover their costs. Almost everyone knows that after the halving, not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are supplied to the market daily.
This change is believed to have a positive effect on the price of bitcoin.
If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block is rewarded by half, the miners revenue calculated in $ will decrease. This means that they will have trouble covering their costs, and that will cause miners with the highest electricity costs to leave the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will decrease.
Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% of attacks.

What do you think?

archive: http://archive.vn/otE2M

''Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly minted bitcoins in order to cover their costs. This would mean that after the halving not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are freshly supplied to the market every day. This scarcity is believed to have a positive effect on the bitcoin price.

If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block reward halving, the revenue of miners calculated in $USD will decrease. This means that they will have problems covering their cost, and this will drive miners with the highest electricity costs out of the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will drop. Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% attacks.

What do you think?''

Original source: https://blockchair.com/tools/halving-countdown
archive: http://archive.vn/BLiAx


How about just STOP buying and creating new accounts and just accept the fact that you are banned from this forum multiple times?

[chmod755]

Similar not equal, the is a few different words in all sentences if you guys do translation but looks like didn't posted here, of course its possible to find similar content through the internet this does not mean that is copied.

[dkbit98]

Similar not equal, the is a few different words in all sentences if you guys do translation but looks like didn't posted here, of course its possible to find similar content through the internet this does not mean that is copied.

You LIAR.
What I posted is 100% PLAGIARISM
And you have been again accused not just in bitcointalk forum, but in other platforms also!!

SHAME ON YOU THIEF !!!

Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly created bitcoins to cover their costs. Almost everyone knows that after the halving, not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are supplied to the market daily.
This change is believed to have a positive effect on the price of bitcoin.
If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block is rewarded by half, the miners revenue calculated in $ will decrease. This means that they will have trouble covering their costs, and that will cause miners with the highest electricity costs to leave the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will decrease.
Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% of attacks.

What do you think?

archive: http://archive.vn/otE2M

''Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly minted bitcoins in order to cover their costs. This would mean that after the halving not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are freshly supplied to the market every day. This scarcity is believed to have a positive effect on the bitcoin price.

If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block reward halving, the revenue of miners calculated in $USD will decrease. This means that they will have problems covering their cost, and this will drive miners with the highest electricity costs out of the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will drop. Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% attacks.

What do you think?''

Original source: https://blockchair.com/tools/halving-countdown
archive: http://archive.vn/BLiAx

[FatFork]

Similar not equal, the is a few different words in all sentences if you guys do translation but looks like didn't posted here, of course its possible to find similar content through the internet this does not mean that is copied.

You are so very wrong!

• Plagiarism: If you copy some text from somewhere, then you should have a good reason for it, and you must link to the source. Doing otherwise is plagiarism. Changing a few words around doesn't matter. If we find that you plagiarized, then you absolutely will be permanently banned, even if we find it years after you did it.

All of the following are considered plagiarism:

-turning in someone else's work as your own
-copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
-failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
-giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
-changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
-copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether ---you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)
Source: https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism

[bonesjonesreturns]

I would trust him more than this member

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20


Do you trust him?

What about laudas deliberate grafting in copy and paste into his own paragraphs

Are you trusting them?

No more double standards punishment

Apply the same standards to your friends as everyone else.

A lot of members are just Hippocrates that see only what they want to see and create what they want to see, they keep control and their high stats, not everyone, but there is a lot of people like this here.

The op loves my poetry, so another one for him:

Welcome to the free world Where nothing's as it seems to Tell me, can you find a cure When you can't see, and you can't feel the disease Can you seek a higher truth When you're living on your knees
Where freedom grows from blood-soaked soil In the lands of hypocrisy

- Crushed, Parkway Drive

The problem is money for most of them or popularity. Or fear of busting the most dangerous scammers. Weakness or just evil who can say. This one I have not taken note of yet.

They want to make a name for themselves " busting the untrustworthy or high financial risk members"
Or so they say

But they dont give one shit about the forum.

They never dare hold DT to their same standards? Why?

Because they want to keep spamming their sigs or remain popular

Pushing double standards is just like scamming ...you are lying in effect.

When he holds nutildah and lauda to his spoken standards then we can consider his points as being genuine.

I see all of this " scammer" hunting bullshit they do as destroying their financial competition or anyone that points out their free speech crushing double standards

Dont beg forgiveness nor seek to join with them. Crush them all and their sponsors unless they will work transparent rules that ensures every member is treated equally. No more scammers punishing whistleblowers here.

Tell the op to consider your actions in the full context of nutildah and lauda
Then we will see who we can trust more.

People need to unite against DT double standards scammer supporters... I dont know if the op wants to deliberately push double standards but we will find out when we see if he is willing to appraise your trustworthiness in the context of others he does trust.

Does he want the entire truth or just some partitioned truth that rings false when reviewing all of his actions.

I cant say who to trust but I can see double standards and I can see proven scammers. 

[chmod755]

Hello, I am the original owner / registrant.

This account was hacked

[suchmoon]

An online friend borrowed this account so he could get a few $ more in signature campaigns.

We've heard that excuse before. Even if this is true, it makes you untrustworthy just the same so you didn't need to bother with PGP.

[chmod755]

That's not a problem, I am not doing business here.

[suchmoon]

That's not a problem, I am not doing business here and I don't care if I am considered "untrustworthy" in this shithole full of scams (bitcointalk wasn't like that when I started...  )

Well, giving your account to an "online friend" to make money sounds like business and you cared enough to come up with that excuse. That's a pretty solid contribution to making it a shithole.

[dkbit98]

That's not a problem, I am not doing business here and I don't care if I am considered "untrustworthy" in this shithole full of scams (bitcointalk wasn't like that when I started...  )

When exactly did you started and what are all your other previously used bitcointalk accounts?
Changing avatar and location in your profile will not help you very much.
Most shit in this forum is from people like you.

Hello, I am the original owner / registrant (PGP signed with my key from Bitcoin OTC)

I am not doing business here. An online friend borrowed this account so he could get a few $ more in signature campaigns.

Bollocks!
Story changed again  

[dkbit98]

Update and more information about this guy ref link spamming activity is posted in SpamBusters topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.msg54849411#msg54849411

[dkbit98]

I noticed member chmod755 woke up again and he is spamming like crazy, usually he is posting copy-paste articles every few minutes.
He is mostly posting worthless news articles and he started doing that since last year November when he woke up, maybe account changed hands yet again.

One example of his posting habits:


https://ninjastic.space/search?author=chmod755

[yahoo62278]

I noticed member chmod755 woke up again and he is spamming like crazy, usually he is posting copy-paste articles every few minutes.
He is mostly posting worthless news articles and he started doing that since last year November when he woke up, maybe account changed hands yet again.

One example of his posting habits:


https://ninjastic.space/search?author=chmod755

Account sales were pretty common back then, especially since most lenders accepted accounts as collateral. I wouldn't be surprised if the account has been sold multiple times since 2010.

This account looks to already be tagged and flagged from the last change of ownership, so I doubt anyone would do any sort of business with them. If they did, hopefully they use an escrow at least. The account is worthless as is regardless as well.

[SmartGold01]

Account sales were pretty common back then, especially since most lenders accepted accounts as collateral. I wouldn't be surprised if the account has been sold multiple times since 2010.

This account looks to already be tagged and flagged from the last change of ownership, so I doubt anyone would do any sort of business with them. If they did, hopefully they use an escrow at least. The account is worthless as is regardless as well.

Well I still can't believed someone will go buy an account that is not originally created by them, how and why would they involved themselves with such deals knowing too well the implication involved buying account that is already been used by another user.
Who knows if the original own has used the account to scam someone and decided to sell it away to some random users? Maybe the lazy person who goes buying might feels so happy for having a Legendary account without knowing the account has been soiled by the first owner.

My suggestion> Why not theymos implement a new law that any account found (suspected and proven) changed of hand should be locked otherwise, if they are the real owner they should come with evidence maybe with the first bitcoin address or with the first mail associated with account with this, the forum will total discourage and eliminate account selling since they now knows the implication involved. With this forum may limit people falling victim of scam or dealing with untrusted users.

[logfiles]

Well I still can't believed someone will go buy an account that is not originally created by them, how and why would they involved themselves with such deals knowing too well the implication involved buying account that is already been used by another user.

Perhaps they think that they will never be caught.

My suggestion> Why not theymos implement a new law that any account found (suspected and proven) changed of hand should be locked otherwise, if they are the real owner they should come with evidence maybe with the first bitcoin address or with the first mail associated with account with this, the forum will total discourage and eliminate account selling since they now knows the implication involved. With this forum may limit people falling victim of scam or dealing with untrusted users.

It's already in place. Once the account's email is changed, the old email address will get a notification containing a link to lock the account if clicked on. Once the account is locked. It can only be recovered by writing to the cryptios team.

Admins and mods don't want to involve themselves in community disputes, which could involved hunting for accounts that just changed hands since the forum still Okays having multiple accounts.