Limited participants is the best option for bounty campaigns this days

[CryptoTech_]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

[memed97]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

Yes, and it is very unusual for the project that you are taking part in, because it only accepts 25 participants for the signature campaign and the percentage for the signature is also very pretty, this is what many bounty participants like in general.

[terizla]

Agree with limited participant, so this is can reduce Bounty Hunters cheating. But this is same nothing if the project fail.

[Pffrt]

With limited participants, the promotion will be limited too while with unlimited participants, the chances of reaching potential investors is high. However, why would anyone join in a bounty which pool is too low? I think small bounty payment pool should be ignored. Campaign manager will most of the time think of getting as much as participants possible.

[minairia3]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Thats the thing about bounty on altcoin. The best actually is to join a signature campaign with limited participants like on service section that pays btc. Very few altcoin nowadays have a good bounty rewards that can make a participants happy. Ive joining countless altcoin campaign before and only few got paid with decent amount. But Im glad that at least even today Im still on bestchange campaign and its one of the best campaign in forum.

Anything that promises on the altcoin section now really not good except those like cartesi, harmony and some potential campaign. I advise newbies to focus on learning and gain some ranking cause in the end youll realize its much worth it.

[meldrio1]

In my opinion well I agree that they should limit the participants so that we satisfied our earnings from it. It's ok to suggest it but it depends to the team or the manager if they really want to limit.

[Davian144]

In my opinion well I agree that they should limit the participants so that we satisfied our earnings from it. It's ok to suggest it but it depends to the team or the manager if they really want to limit.

Yes, all bounty hunters certainly agree that restrictions are made for campaign participants, only that it is only done by the project team or manager who already has good experience in running the project, because a good and well-known project will be easy to succeed despite restrictions on participants in the campaign, because the teams are also confident in the projects they manage, and this will certainly not be done by project teams that still need a lot of introductions and promotions on their projects.

[Asuspawer09]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Im not familiar with how it is done and I'm not a bounty or campaign manager either. When it comes to weekly payments of the signature campaign it is already a thing to have a limited participant since the team needs to send the payment every week it can be easily considered and it is going to be difficult for them if they are going to pay a lot of participants every week.

When it comes to Bounty most of the time there are so many participants involved in promoting could also be the reason why a lot of bounties are becoming a big scam because they could pay all of the participants. When it comes to the payment I'm sure that the manager doesn't decide that the team behind the project will be the one to decide about it what much is the payment etc. Most of the time the bounty manager is just going to send the spreadsheet and the team is going to send it to the escrow now the manager and then the escrow is the one that is going to make the payment/

[serjent05]

Echoing the majority of the sentiment.  Bounty managers should prefer quality over quantity so I also strongly agree on limiting participants in a campaign.  Most of the previous bounty campaign does not care about the influx of participants, all they think that the more the better but the thing is most of these participants create poor quality works.  Aside from that, I think those who create quality jobs are being robbed of a decent reward due to a huge number of participants.

[Desscount]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

the Ludena Bounty program is indeed a little prize, only 24 ETH,
if there is no limit the prize participants will be distributed to the bounty hunter will be a little

[Yamifoud]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

More participants = more promotion,
and could actually attract investors but it also has a disadvantage in regards to the rewards, and of course, it usually ends with a small amount to receive. But anyway, it is the company's decision to limit the numbers of participants for this matter but I don't think if they care about it knowing that most bounties do not have such limitation. Instead, they welcome those who want to participate in the campaign until the last week of their promotion.

[wozzek23]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Limited bounty participants? Are you sure? Then you will be happy with limited contributors for your ICO? I guess this sounds like inappropriate idea to over come the bounty abusers. I believe instead of looking for limiting the participants in bounty campaigns, devs and managers must look for options to disqualify those bounty abusers. More number of bounty participants means high level of promotions for a project. This is what a project must be needing hence limiting the number of participants is not sounding as a good idea in my opinion.

There are a lot of experienced managers are available hence devs must hire only those managers so that they will catch all the bounty cheaters which will be helping rewarding only the real bounty hunters.

[TopTort777]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

the Ludena Bounty program is indeed a little prize, only 24 ETH,
if there is no limit the prize participants will be distributed to the bounty hunter will be a little

I'm 100% sure there will be no limit of participants in this campaign. I've never seen that bounties, that are managed by BountyDetective have any kind of limitation.

I would not recommend participating in this campaign. It runs for 10 weeks, with almost $5000 budget (24 ETH), there are already 100+ participants and in the end it may turn out that bounty hunter will receive nothing. Because of the rule, when in the end of campaign only top25-50 will be rewarded (according to campaign).

[Jating]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

The main reason why they have opened a "bounty campaign" and not a bitcoin paying campaign is that they wanted to get maximum exposure so that most of the project doesn't care how much participants they have. That's why they have this so called allotment for the bounty. It is already taken in consideration prior to launching their project.

So there will be no effects whatsoever between 10 or 100 to them. The intention is to hire many participants that are going to get paid promoting their project in as many threads in this community. So the numbers doesn't matter for them.

[onrise]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

I think in coming time this is going to happen and just like the btc campaign we will have the bounty campaign with the limited number of enrolments and with selected participants. Also they may come up with combine of their coins and with btc as currently mostly they pay with their own coin and does not much value if they do not get list well.

[lumeire]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

I guess most of the projects want as much marketing as possible and this is the reason why they don't apply any upper limit to the number of participants aa the more the number of participants the more exposure they get. Although if a bounty campaign have a low bounty reward then they should apply some restrictions so that every participant will get enough payment for their time invested in the campaign.

[Google+]

I think when the bounty campaign participants are very limited it will have a good influence on the price of the coin when the project is launched because of course the price will not collapse and investors will still remain calm, and with restrictions on bounty campaign participants can be more controlled.

[$crypto$]

Take a look now if there is a bounty campaign there is already a price like the IQ.qash example which is so wide to join while the allocation is very small, of course this cannot be expected to pay very much for the hunter.

That's one perfect example of a bounty campaign that may give small reward to its participants because they have fixed allotment and if it is shared by many participants, one can end up very small amount.
They just kept on accepting participants without a limit. I don't think that is good for all participants.
If you are a bounty hunter, you have to weigh if that is for you even if it is very promising or jut find another one.

At the beginning I also joined IQ.qash bounty on the signature but I thought I should go out and look for another campaign because I saw so many who joined so I thought it would not be big in rewards after the bounty ended, although now there is a second round with 100k allocation is also not guaranteed because of its small allocation.

I am also a hunter but I am considering returning to join the bounty now and on average they are only a small reward that hunters always receive, so now I am more focused on looking for btc weekly paid campaigns.

[fortunecrypto]

I strongly agree with the participant limit system, so that every participant who participates in the bounty will get a prize that is commensurate with his hard work. And I see a number of bounty managers already doing this, for example like the project I'm in now.

Congratulations that should be the way so bounty hunters will have a reason to stay on promoting projects, some projects wants to have as many bounty hunters participating in their bounty because it will work to their advantages, bounty hunters will just be content on the allocated bounty and they will only received a fraction.

[Wayrey2020]

This is just the truth, limited participants for bounty campaigns comes with several beneifts.

1. You get the select the best hunters amongst applicants.
2. You get to reduce spam and spammy contents.

Likewise, a thread to remove task negligers after two weeks too.