Solution to too many promoters

[cassavachips]

This is like the old platform that is bountyhive which now seems like they no longer operate as bounty managers through their platform, before stopping they also impose restrictions on participants for bounty campaigns and that's good but the problem is the project is not good.
I agree with the participant restrictions, that would be good for bounty hunter income.

[Gibreil]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

It is good in part of bounty hunters but it may be a disadvantage in bounty campaigns since they have a limited promoters. If they will increase the number of promoters, then they will also increase the total allocation of their tokens. Aside from that, late comers will have no opportunity at all specially if the first 300 participants cheat the bounty by enrolling their alts.

Though it is good, there are also weakness and it should be studied so far.

[masulum]

I think @masulum has adopted this great method, I believe that if every bounty manager does the same then there can be profit in Bounties, but I do not think it will ever happen.
ShengWorld| by masulum

Thank you,

Just want to share the reason why i do that,
1. From my experience have small rewards because of stake system with unlimited participants
2. Limit participants to prevent spamming in this forum
3. To safe project from too many distributed token from bounty
4. To help participants get good rewards if the project success and the rewards have a value.
5. Win-win solution for member, project and bounty manager.

But every BM has own style, and as you say maybe it hard to do same think because of the goal is very differences. Once again, thank you for your support. I wish all of project i handle before have a value so you can get real money from tokens you get.

[Gayong88]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

It seems better that the amount of allocation is not proportional to the participants who followed it. You're right it's good the project team can start limiting the bounty hunters at least the prize is still fair enough to be distributed according to the planned schedule.

[MinhThanh88]

This contradicts the goals of most projects, which want minimal costs but can still be promoted as much as possible. So Few Projects limit the number of hunters taking out the bonus.

[havoc928]

There are two solutions to this type of problem that I know of, the first is

1. Fixed allocation

Every bounty hunters who joined the bounty will get a fixed token per their rank on this forum

2. Limited participants

The bounty campaign will only allow a certain number of bounty hunters so they can get reasonable tokens

I totally agree with the idea of limiting participants. However, it's too hard to give out a fixed allocation rate for bounty hunters. There are too many problems with that. When you reward by the fixed amount, it creates unfairness and reduces the motivation for those who want to dedicate their work. Because they know whether they work hard or not, they still receive the same reward as others. Furthermore, paying based on ranking also inaccurate!

[New_order]

New projects will also need max participants, this is their aims, the higher the participants the better for the new project, I think limiting bounty participants will oy make sense if the project is already trading on exchanges, for new projects it's bad

[Leah38]

Good day. Bounty rewards before is good but lately bounty hunters get low rewards which is unfair. It is due to many bounty participants and some because of the low result of the token sale. Still its up to the bounty hunters if they are willing to join the campaign or not. Projects don't force us to join. There are also campaigns that has limits on participants.

[ATSgrowth]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Why would do they? They rather have 5000 participants than 500 participants because 5000 participants do more work than 500 participants . So if they attract 5000 participants for same money, why would they limit the number of participants? Do you see the absurdity? 

[Looper_U]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

If bounty hunters raise the point bounty manager conducting the project Campaign can consider closing the form to avoid over crowded participants, a good manager must satisfy his fellow bounty hunters

[jcpone]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Sometimes there are Bounty Manager's obviously making a fool of some bounty hunters. Like they attract the hunters in millions or billions
of token to help them to promote the project but when you calculate the price of each token there are some the budget allocation was only 1 ETH, 1000$, 100$ and more, this type of deceiving the hunters for me are the one who is a real scammer, Just a thought.

[cabron]

The teams are always going to make their projects popular by getting more participants as much as possible. Unless they ware building a community and are not doing IEO or ICO at all, they can just limit the number of participants into a hundred to 200.

This will still not satisfy bounty hunters though especially when the tokens are distributed and they found out someone had dumped the tokens before them.
Some bounty hunters result in threatening the team by posting a scam accusation.

[Metall303]

Yes, exactly we need to find a solution to it because as per the OP suggestion we can clearly see the difference and we have been suffering from it for a very long time. That's why there should have to make some changes regarding bounty campaign's participation. I think there should be limited seats for the bounty campaign which can help the participant to receive a greater reward. Fewer participants mean greater rewards and that sounds good. So this might be good solution for quality reward distribution.

anyway, I did not see good companies where the number of participants was limited. no one made good money thanks to the limits. I have no examples. Such companies can only be signatures with payment in bitcoins, but for 3 years I have never been so fast to register in such campaigns

[The cure]

I think it's impossible to happen that bounty campaign will limit their participants because it is more in favor of them that there are many participants so that more people can promote their project.

[robelneo]

We have many greedy developers, bounty managers like those rules because they will be managing a small number of participants and they can easily distribute, but knowing developers of the project, they want as many promoters in a minimum cost and so, they always have the last say on the how the project will run, they want a full advantage of the campaign.

[Python Master]

It's very good solution for bounty hunters. However project owner will never do this because as more bounty hunters join the campaign, the campaign will be more effective. That's what they want, more bounty hunters, more people will know about the project, more potential buyers. So they will not limit bounty hunters

[WalkerIVIV]

I think it's impossible to happen that bounty campaign will limit their participants because it is more in favor of them that there are many participants so that more people can promote their project.

nah that's what im thinking about. the dev and manager need to get massive advertisement to make a lot of investors will know about the project and it needs a lot of participants to make it happen.
In fact so many managers were not putting limitation.

[Ryushin]

Limited participants is the best solution, we are in pandemic period now and many people have joined this forum meaning that we will have many bounty hunters joining Campaigns and rewards will be too low

[Ryushin]

It's also very hard to see new project team paying good amount of money to bounty hunters, nowadays almost all bounty allocations are between 20k to 50k worth of token, bubbalex and bounty detective are the two BMs that listens when bounty hunters request for limiting bounty participants

[someone703]

Currently there are too many bounty hunters but there are too few bounty running, in addition they also have very low budgets. I participated in a few campaigns for 8 weeks and received only $ 20 from it, the best way is to restrict participants. It will help the project avoid spam accounts and bounty hunters will also receive a better reward