Solution to too many promoters

[mu_enrico]

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Honestly, they don't care about quality in the first place, what they want is SPAM. The more SPAM, more links, more fake followers, etc.
Legit campaigns are very costly, so this is what they can do with their small budget.

What you can do is not participate if you feel your rewards are not acceptable, and the invisible hand will work to regulate these things.

[freedomgo]

A campaign is looking for volume of promoters, so sometimes the quality of the bounty was already sacrifice because the bounty managers are not limiting the participants, and you are right, the more participants who will join, the more the reward will drop, and this is not applicable now since usually the price will just dump after it sells in the exchange, so bounty hunters will not be getting a good or reasonable reward.

[qigong13]

I think there are many bounties already foresaw this problem and introduce the 'stake'. A fixed amount set for bounty and more bounty hunter meaning lower reward per stake. Of course, in the end, this solving nothing as more peoples = more stakes and lower reward per stake as well. The bounty manager doesn't care since more people participate in their project would be more reaches for them. It's up to each bounty hunter to see if the reward worth and balancing out to keep the stake profitable for everyone.

[Towerbreeze]

There are bounty managers that use fixed stakes and limited participants, it depends on the allocation of a bounty campaign but not all bounty managers sees this as something unfair to Bounty Hunters, the choice is left for hunters to choose wisely, if you think a particular bounty campaign has too low bounty reward then find another

[Towerbreeze]

You can also talk to the bounty manager, I heard few ones like listening to bounty hunters opinion, but for many, rules are just rules, honestly speaking it will be a good thing entirely for all bounty hunters if bounties have limited participants more than unlimited

[takana212]

there are also some bounty managers who make regulations to limit bounty signature participants in a project because of the small allocation of funds for bounty hunters, if all prize managers limit participants from joining a project, participants who are late will be very disappointed if the project is very good.

[ScamViruS]

Every project wants to get more promotion for less money. And now the Bounty Hunters are helping them fulfill this purpose. If the manager makes a fixed participant then it will be good for Bounty Hunters. By doing so, they will be rewarded for their work. But the real issue here is whether the project team will agree or not. Since they are getting huge number of participants with less money then why would they set the limit? I think managers should make fixed rewards and fixed participants in the bounty. As a result, Bounty Hunters will receive a good amount for their work.

[judeafante]

That's a good idea but if the project is good many bounty hunters will request to join the bounty campaign even if they are limiting it, and besides, it's advantageous for the campaign that many bounty hunters joined their campaign it's just mean they are a good project, and the campaign will reach many investors.

[OrangeII]

I strongly agree to limit the participants who join the bounty. besides preventing mass sales, it could have prevented dumps. however, some projects are sometimes only concerned with their achievements so there is no limit to that.
besides, if the participant is indeed unlimited, it would be best to use a coin payment weekly. it's better than using a stake.

[adzino]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Isn't it the bounty hunters own fault? Why would someone want to join a bounty program where they take hundreds of participants and pay really less? If you guys stop joining and promoting them, they will eventually start increasing the rewards.
Though, I don't think its still worth joining a bounty program. The amount of scam project is too high. You will be just wasting your time.

[drumamat]

A campaign is looking for volume of promoters, so sometimes the quality of the bounty was already sacrifice because the bounty managers are not limiting the participants, and you are right, the more participants who will join, the more the reward will drop, and this is not applicable now since usually the price will just dump after it sells in the exchange, so bounty hunters will not be getting a good or reasonable reward.

If you look at it from the company's point of view, the more participants there are, the better it is for them.The thing is, I don't join the bounty if there are a lot of participants. It is not difficult to check the spreadsheet before joining the bounty.

[Avirunes]

[..]
The thing is, I don't join the bounty if there are a lot of participants. It is not difficult to check the spreadsheet before joining the bounty.

Well its not same for everyone. It might be easy for the ones who apply in the middle of the campaign like you but someone who had applied right in the beginning wouldn't know the participants will go beyond some "XX" no.s by the end and will reduce his share of reward significantly.

Fixed bounty reward should be good, rest they can put limit in no. of participants depending upon the part they are willing to allocate towards bounty.

[bluebit25]

A campaign is looking for volume of promoters, so sometimes the quality of the bounty was already sacrifice because the bounty managers are not limiting the participants, and you are right, the more participants who will join, the more the reward will drop, and this is not applicable now since usually the price will just dump after it sells in the exchange, so bounty hunters will not be getting a good or reasonable reward.

But projects will never want to limit their participation, they want as many participants as possible to promote their projects, making their projects reach more people in this market. Very rarely can we see bounty campaigns restricting participants

[HunterUnchained]

I still think the best bounties are those with fixed tokens to stakes. That is 1 stake equal 1 token or 100 tokens as the case may be. Stakes to token basis where there is no fixed amount means once participants get crowded on a particular bounty, it becomes fruitless and non attractive. Many participants will always mean lesser tokens to be shared and that isn't always a good thing. Unfortunately, we have more bounties like this these days..

[Balili]

It does not look good to get low reward after bounty promotions but due to many participants involved, it always plays out like that. It would be nice to limit participants but the developers needs more people to advertise them. I feel the most important aspect of Bounty rewards is the worth of the token received, there's no point of bagging millions of shit tokens in reward

[Henrobakkara]

I agree with you if the bounty manager must place restrictions on participants who join in order to get results that are commensurate with their work for months. but sometimes the bounty manager doesn't have the right to do that if the project team wants a lot of promotion

[cabron]

Bounty hunters had learn things. Today you don't see bounty hunters that joins a project that seem scam. They already begin to investigate right after posting in the bounty section.

I agree with you if the bounty manager must place restrictions on participants who join in order to get results that are commensurate with their work for months. but sometimes the bounty manager doesn't have the right to do that if the project team wants a lot of promotion

That is also what is really happening. Bounty managers just doesn't have the control of what the team wants. The bounty manager just count the tweets and posts of their participants and give how many stakes they could receive and the more participants I guess the team will be more happy that users fill the forum with their ads.

[ene1980]

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

If you are running a project and you are planning to collect money to make it successful, do you think you will limit the amount of people willing to market the project, the project team would reveal the budget they have on advertising the project and if it is a limited budget then the users participating should be responsible for the selection rather than complaining about it. The fact is the users who join these bounty programs does not even read what they are doing and spend time to read about the project, once that blind promotion is limited then it would be great for everyone.

[Kiefner]

I also think that there should be a bounty with a fixed number of participants. The work of the bounty hunters depreciated and some measures needed to be taken. But in fact, project developers do not care about that. The main thing for them is to have as much information as possible about their project and they don’t think that the bounty hunters need good money.

[AmoreJaz]

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

If you are running a project and you are planning to collect money to make it successful, do you think you will limit the amount of people willing to market the project, the project team would reveal the budget they have on advertising the project and if it is a limited budget then the users participating should be responsible for the selection rather than complaining about it. The fact is the users who join these bounty programs does not even read what they are doing and spend time to read about the project, once that blind promotion is limited then it would be great for everyone.

yes, that is the project's prerogative. if they want more participants, they have the privilege to do so. so it is up to the bounty hunter if he will take it or leave it. It is the preference of the participant if he decides to join, given fixed allotment for all those increasing number of participants. very few projects have the initiative to limit their participants because on their end, the more bounty hunters they have, the better as it will give more exposure to their project. so a bounty hunter has the privilege also to accept what is laid on the table or just walk away...