Is BCNext Satoshi? Discuss and analyze their language.

[DubFX]

Ask NSA they can analyse it deeper lol.

[1714669157]

1714669157

[1714669157]

1714669157

[1714669157]

1714669157

[1714669157]

1714669157

[1714669157]

1714669157

[1714669157]

1714669157

[r0ach]

Let's see, Satoshi releases a fair mine coin.  BCNext releases a 100% premine, IPO scam coin.  The similarities are overwhelming !

LOL at "fair mine coin" . I didn't know that having more than 1M BTC for yourself can be described as FAIR  

Well, it's not like he didn't tell people about it.  There was just not much interest in making your computer run 100c for something that has 0 profit.

The same exactly thing happened to BCNext with his initial announcement and IPO for NXT. Few people got interested to pay for something that had 0 value.

Not even close to a valid comparison.  We all know IPO is a scamfest distribution method.  The only valid distribution method is one which doesn't directly enrich the creator, otherwise it's no different from "The Creature from Jekyll Island" system we have now.  Five guys get in a room together, instantly create the currency out of thin air, and become billionaires in under one second.  The idea is ridiculous.

It's in everyone's best interest on the entire planet earth for NXT to die, except the 30 people who own it.

[instacalm]

Not even close to a valid comparison.  We all know IPO is a scamfest distribution method.  The only valid distribution method is one which doesn't directly enrich the creator, otherwise it's no different from "The Creature from Jekyll Island" system we have now.  Five guys get in a room together, instantly create the currency out of thin air, and become billionaires in under one second.  The idea is ridiculous.

It's in everyone's best interest on the entire planet earth for NXT to die, except the 30 people who own it.

Let's see, Satoshi releases a fair mine coin.  BCNext releases a 100% premine, IPO scam coin.  The similarities are overwhelming !

You sure do realise that over 50% of Bitcoin is held by <1000 people [1]. Calling NXT a scam makes as little sense as calling Bitcoin a scam.

Your allegedly high morals are nice to listen to -- but money is and will not be fair. Cryptocurrencies are not fair, Capitalism is not "fair".

Anyhow, this thread is another story which I'm not addressing now.

[r0ach]

You sure do realise that over 50% of Bitcoin is held by <1000 people [1]. Calling NXT a scam makes as little sense as calling Bitcoin a scam.

You're trying to derail the idea that IPOs are scams and replace it with a different argument about distribution, which is also another NXT problem.

[instacalm]

You're trying to derail the idea that IPOs are scams and replace it with a different argument about distribution, which is also another NXT problem.

Nonsense, I was addressing your statement about Bitcoin being a "fair mine coin".

"IPOs" can be honest or dishonest, and the far majority on BCT are indeed the latter. As a matter of fact, in the case of Nxt dishonesty was clearly not the case. Your argument is invalid (no offense!).  [As a side note, Nxt's initial IPO was meant for distribution of the genesis block, not to make big bucks.]

Disliking Proof of Stake distribution is your right, but educate yourself a bit. The world is not black and white.

[r0ach]

You're trying to derail the idea that IPOs are scams and replace it with a different argument about distribution, which is also another NXT problem.

Nonsense, I was addressing your statement about Bitcoin being a "fair mine coin".

"IPOs" can be honest or dishonest, and the far majority on BCT are indeed the latter. As a matter of fact, in the case of Nxt dishonesty was clearly not the case. Your argument is invalid (no offense!).  [As a side note, Nxt's initial IPO was meant for distribution of the genesis block, not to make big bucks.]

Disliking Proof of Stake distribution is your right, but educate yourself a bit. The world is not black and white.

I've already written extensively why IPOs should be banned from the site, and even with massive amounts of NXT shills voting, the vote to ban them won by 1.8% :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=443196.0

[wangdaniel2014]

You have a great imagination.

Anyway, OP starts with the assumption which BCNext may be Satoshi.
While this thread will evovle into the arguement of if the NXT is a scam.

[r0ach]

You have a great imagination.

Anyway, OP starts with the assumption which BCNext may be Satoshi.
While this thread will evovle into the arguement of if the NXT is a scam.

Most posts on this forum revolve around "Is NXT/Quark a scam?"

100% of NXT/Quark holders agree that it's not a scam.

100% of people who don't own NXT/Quark agree it is.

[msin]

You have a great imagination.

Anyway, OP starts with the assumption which BCNext may be Satoshi.
While this thread will evovle into the arguement of if the NXT is a scam.

Most posts on this forum revolve around "Is NXT/Quark a scam?"

100% of NXT/Quark holders agree that it's not a scam.

100% of people who don't own NXT/Quark agree it is.

Seeing how you joined crypto after the Nxt IPO and launch, I can see why you would think its a scam.  I'll break it down for you since you're new here; people who own Nxt, people who don't own Nxt, people who are jealous that they didn't invest during the two month IPO of Nxt.

[doublespend timestamp]

I know the temptation will be to send this to Alt coin section but this deserves a wider audience.


I looked though BCNext's posts and also Satoshi and you can't help but see a strong language correlation between the two.


What I thought would be interesting is to find language similarities and differences. Some are hard to place your finger on and are more about a certain tone or voice but still they can be discussed. I think it has value cause if he/she is the same person then it has ramifications for Bitcoin whether you like them or not.



After a short read though I noticed a few things.

1) Both often start sentences with I.
2) Both use spaces after punctuation.
3 Both have a very educated and well spoken tone.
4) Both want to be anonymous.
5) Both use lists just like this one often.

Its a hunch but I recon they are the same person. I wonder if there is anyone on here with forensic skills as language identifying or have their own opinions on similarities or differences. list them maybe...


Satoshi posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts

BCNext posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152600;sa=showPosts

Yes.  He superceded his own invention in Java.