actmyname reputation thread

[Deena]

Please refrain from tying yourself to theymos and Satoshi, you are just a random dude on the internet with no actual job other than using your position to join signature campaigns and run them as well to earn your living. we just don't know what else you have done in secret, only God knows that and yourself, someday you'll have to answer for all the sins.

  Could some merit source please merit this brilliant post?

[1715078954]

1715078954

[1715078954]

1715078954

[AngelSky]

Hello mate, why you have tagged for the personal fights which I had with lauda. I did not do anything with the forum rules or anything. Then I did not hack this and all. Kindly check and reconsider me from your trust list.

[actmyname]

broke zoomer

[El duderino_]

?? I thought you're an alt of micgoossens...... 

Didn't had many words with you before,am I lucky with that.... I guess I was, but recently we did had some talking and your an total cool dude IMO......

^
It isn't blue, hope that's not a problem ....?

[LoyceV]

I forgot about this thread, but this is the right place to discuss this: you've left several users "empty" negative feedback, which means it doesn't show up as red (but it counts as DT-red):

(there are a few more that I didn't screenshot)

Although creative, I think this is incorrect use of the feedback system.

[actmyname]

I think this is incorrect use of the feedback system.

Ironic how we have no time for fun in these trite times.

Assurance of DT feedback should be verified through the reference rather than the comment. In that sense, the comments are more-or-less irrelevant.

[LoyceV]

Assurance of DT feedback should be verified through the reference rather than the comment. In that sense, the comments are more-or-less irrelevant.

True. But the only way to see if it's positive, neutral or negative is to look at either the HTML source, or by counting the other feedbacks and compare it to the total Trust score.
The problem is the lack of color (not the lack of description), just one word (such as "scammer") could have been enough.

[DireWolfM14]

Assurance of DT feedback should be verified through the reference rather than the comment. In that sense, the comments are more-or-less irrelevant.

I agree with this 98%.  Of the remaining 2%, 1% is because I'm lazy, and agree with LoyceV that one word would suffice.  The other 1% depends on who's leaving the review; if it's someone who's judgement I find to be beyond reproach (a very select few) I might choose to be even more lazy and not bother with the reference link.

[suchmoon]

Ironic how we have no time for fun in these trite times.

Assurance of DT feedback should be verified through the reference rather than the comment. In that sense, the comments are more-or-less irrelevant.

Quit breaking old PHP things and apply for a QA position for the new forum software... that's where your talents are sorely needed.

[actmyname]

Password change for security purposes. Any doubters can request a signed message.

[peloso]

Password change for security purposes. Any doubters can request a signed message.

account seller said ))

[actmyname]

account seller said ))

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Think whatever you like, but usually account trades result in two password changes and an email change since I'm sure the new owner wouldn't want the previous one having access to it. Time will tell. Maybe I'm secretly Lauda after all?!?!

[ChiBitCTy]

account seller said ))

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Think whatever you like, but usually account trades result in two password changes and an email change since I'm sure the new owner wouldn't want the previous one having access to it. Time will tell. Maybe I'm secretly Lauda after all?!?!

Lol if Act was selling their account then why would they even post that info on here drawing attention to it ?
 This dude has the strongest English vocabulary/ technical writing skills I’ve probably ever seen ..the sheer knowledge someone else would be posting less than perfect English drives this hypothesis in to the ground lol.

Side Note: Act is definitely both Tman and Lauda however-this is a fact 

[Timelord2067]

account seller said ))

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Think whatever you like, but usually account trades result in two password changes and an email change since I'm sure the new owner wouldn't want the previous one having access to it. Time will tell. Maybe I'm secretly Lauda after all?!?!

I've lost the bookmark now, but somewhere on this Forum is a thread titled "why yes I have changed my password" - couldn't find it just now and this post jogged my memory about it.

Checking act's BPIP page we have this:



Which tells me s/he has done a routine password change.  Nothing more.


Cross referencing with the DT change log we see:



Again, no radical changes.


Going three-for-three:

This is prior to the password change: http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-30_Sat_12.05h/465017.html Week 72.

as with weeks 73, 74 and now 75.  No changes at all.


There's no activity to suggest actmyname's account has changed hands.

[actmyname]

There's no activity to suggest actmyname's account has changed hands.

Glad to know that if ever my account was compromised, you would be on the case. With eyes like these on the forum, I doubt anyone would even bother trying to switch accounts without some ridiculously convoluted and time-exhaustive method. Even a change of prose will tick off some red flags danger pennants.