I've never understood this bizarre fixation some people have in tying together the actions of totally unrelated strangers residing within a set of arbitrary lines on the map and treating them as a single entity with shared goals and ambitions. Large number of miners being located in China was largely circumstance. When you talk about "
Chinese dominance", you make it sound as though people in China are somehow acting in unison with the aim of being in a leading position. And people often come away with that exact misconception. They then formulate opinions based on their own personal biases about whether it's "
good" or "bad" that the most mining activity happens to take place in certain geographical boundaries, as if it somehow matters.
If the goal of the blog is to say "
these are some interesting stats", then fine, but as soon as you start pretending you can somehow know the social/political/economic motivations of every single individual within that location and start making judgements based on that fallacy, people start jumping at shadows.
