[SCAM] Sportsbet.io seized my profits

[saturent]

"Perfect" sportsbook would be non custodial. Where the book never has possession of your funds.

Check Degens.com as it uses smart contracts that are audited. It's 100% KYC free. So there is no 'multi account' issues. And nobody at Degens can touch your money.

Centralized sportsbooks won't exist for long IMO. Non custodial, decentralized books fixes all the dozens of problems cited about sportbet etc.

spamming since earlier, probably a scammer.

[1714801902]

1714801902

[1714801902]

1714801902

[Use Your Brain]

spamming since earlier, probably a scammer.

pot calling the kettle black

Maybe I will not recover my funds, but Karma will pay back, eventually. 

[saturent]

spamming since earlier, probably a scammer.

pot calling the kettle black

Maybe I will not recover my funds, but Karma will pay back, eventually.  

Lol get out of my thread.

Who the hell are you?

Looks like you intentionally created this Use Your Brain account (and other accounts) to post a thread, discredit and attack the several complaints made against Sportsbet.io.

Are you getting paid by Sportsbet.io to do all this bs? Little man, you are disgusting.

or are there an awful lot of Russian gamblers getting "scammed" by sportsbet so recent .
so many popping up all of a sudden really makes me wonder

I am not even Russian.

Why put so much font weight into certain words and phrases? Did Rigor1899, neymarjr12 and saturent took the same English class or that's just a Russian thing?

neymarjr12 deposits 0.5 btc and immeadiately makes 30+ bets within 4 hours with high stakes up to 80mbtc
saturent deposits 0.5 btc and immeadiately generates high volume of bets in a short period of time with stakes up to 53mbtc


Why hurry to make so many bets?

Saying that "we rushed to do many bets in a short time frame",.. have you ever bet on live events? You sound ridiculous and your accusations are just pathetic.

Insulting our English as well.. At least I can communicate very well while knowing and speaking more than 1 language. I am pretty sure you are limited to only English, you ignorant.

Use your brain and get out of here.

[Use Your Brain]

Maybe I will not recover my funds, but Karma will pay back, eventually.  

keep smileing 

[saturent]

Maybe I will not recover my funds, but Karma will pay back, eventually.  

keep smileing  

Yeah, there are more and more players having issues with them, so eventually they will have to face it and its going to be negative for them (KARMA).

Go lick their ass, whoever you are you just show how pathetic Sportsbet.io can be as to make low lives like you attack whoever has a complaint against them.

Will just ignore you, you arent worth my time.

Keep "smile-ing" and get lost

[hacker1001101001]

In your scenario, you're describing a sportsbook that I simply wouldn't play at, but I don't think Sportsbet sees their decisions as "arbitrary." You see them as arbitrary.

I'm describing Sportsbet.io.

Check the Terms and Conditions.

I don't see the word "arbitrary" there.

They doesn't have to include it as there ToS is already very self defensive and trappy to anyone with geniune winnings on the site. It is selective scamming in a way and does not secure users interest if clear reasons are not shown to the customer or player after accusing them of something as empty as multiple accounting.

And, if seen overall even if any casino or sportsbook manages to accuse 5 out of 100 customer's for voliting multi accounting rule they are in all increasing there house edge in an indirect way.

"Perfect" sportsbook would be non custodial. Where the book never has possession of your funds.

Check Degens.com as it uses smart contracts that are audited. It's 100% KYC free. So there is no 'multi account' issues. And nobody at Degens can touch your money.

Centralized sportsbooks won't exist for long IMO. Non custodial, decentralized books fixes all the dozens of problems cited about sportbet etc.

Solid promotion !

[cabirr]

Are we surprised? No! Because Sportbet.io is really very scam project.

[JollyGood]

Here we go again with another newbie who seems to know everything about everything... 

Are we surprised? No! Because Sportbet.io is really very scam project.

[cabirr]

Here we go again with another newbie who seems to know everything about everything... 

Are we surprised? No! Because Sportbet.io is really very scam project.

You are right that I am a beginner. but I never claimed that I knew everything.

[saturent]

Dirty, cheating Russian’s. I am not surprised, it’s always somebody else’s fault isn’t it. Bow down to Putin infidels.

Another intentionally created account to go after complaints against Sportsbet.io.

Get your facts together you ignorant.

Another Russki scammer haha. These guys are as subtle as a brick through a window.

All betting on table tennis? Skam is obvious is skam, how much are you guys paying the bent player(s)

Hmmmmm

You are a disgrace, pathetic clown.

We paid tons of money to fix table tennis matches to just getting a profit of 0.021btc, thats what you mean, right? Lol how stupid..

Surely hidding behind this account as you dont have the balls to use your main one because you know how ridiculous and stupid you would look.

[asche]

Of course I disagree with the word "scam" here because that implies a net monetary loss, which didn't happen no matter how you frame it.

You are very wrong on that nutildah.

The player takes a risk in placing the bet. From the moment the bet is won the money is his. So if he gets anything less returned than his deposits + his winnings it is indeed a loss.

It's like if you go to work for 10 days and then you don't get paid, because fuck you. Would you also say that's not a scam because technically you just worked and didn't lose any money? Your reasoning makes exactly 0 sense.

[adam0991]

Can sportsbet.io just hurry up and resolve this?

[saturent]

The player takes a risk in placing the bet. From the moment the bet is won the money is his. So if he gets anything less returned than his deposits + his winnings it is indeed a loss.

It's like if you go to work for 10 days and then you don't get paid, because fuck you. Would you also say that's not a scam because technically you just worked and didn't lose any money? Your reasoning makes exactly 0 sense.

Exactly, when the bet is made an agreement is closed btw the booker and the player, which implies that if the bet is lost, the booker takes the money, but if it isnt, the player recovers the money he previously put on risk + profits.

[saturent]

Can sportsbet.io just hurry up and resolve this?

I am expecting to hearing from them during the weekend.

[nutildah]

Of course I disagree with the word "scam" here because that implies a net monetary loss, which didn't happen no matter how you frame it.

You are very wrong on that nutildah.

The player takes a risk in placing the bet. From the moment the bet is won the money is his. So if he gets anything less returned than his deposits + his winnings it is indeed a loss.

Not if he was never eligible to receive it in the first place. In that case the net winnings are zero. I already said it would be more ideal if the system flushed out multi-accounters before they placed their bets, but nobody does that.

It's like if you go to work for 10 days and then you don't get paid, because fuck you. Would you also say that's not a scam because technically you just worked and didn't lose any money? Your reasoning makes exactly 0 sense.

This is an overly-simplified analogy that leaves out relevant details of both real and hypothetical situations.

We're just beating a dead horse here. There's nothing more to be said. What it comes down to is either taking the side of Sportsbet or the side of OP in choosing who you want to believe. Maybe Sportsbet will provide more input into the matter but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Until then I'm going to excuse myself from this conversation because its now quite boring but feel free to continue on if you must.

[saturent]

Not if he was never eligible to receive it in the first place. In that case the net winnings are zero. I already said it would be more ideal if the system flushed out multi-accounters before they placed their bets, but nobody does that.

In short, you are elegible to deposit and lose, then no matter if ToS are being violated, however, once it is time to withdraw, alarms ring and everything is checked to the smallest detail.

Really reasonable.

[asche]

Of course I disagree with the word "scam" here because that implies a net monetary loss, which didn't happen no matter how you frame it.

You are very wrong on that nutildah.

The player takes a risk in placing the bet. From the moment the bet is won the money is his. So if he gets anything less returned than his deposits + his winnings it is indeed a loss.

Not if he was never eligible to receive it in the first place. In that case the net winnings are zero. I already said it would be more ideal if the system flushed out multi-accounters before they placed their bets, but nobody does that.

Yeah but that's the issue. Because the implied contract starts when the player places the bet. Basically the casino has until the start of the game the bet is placed on to null the bet. After that it's set in stone.

Your point is relevant, but it's exactly what is wrong. Casinos decide wether the bet is ok or not based on the outcome of the bet. The input is already flawed.

I stand by my point.

[saturent]

Upon registration, it should be clearly stated that if any wrongdoing is suspected, it wont be mentioned until the player tries to withdraw.

Otherwise, the whole thing becomes decepive.

[mindrust]

Let everything aside, would you play in a casino if you knew your winnings could be confiscated for whatever bullshit reason? I wouldn't.

Don't give me that it is written in their ToS. Nobody reads it. They should, but they don't. Accept this reality first. You don't read it neither.

According to my logic, no ToS should be above common sense. THAT shit makes no sense. None. Zip.

I never heard of a casino returning the initial deposits of a losing player btw. Never.

[saturent]

I agree.

Sadly, they only use to respond when those cases are exposed publicly.

Anyway, Im still waiting for new updates.