Beirut just got nuked it's on the news

[TECSHARE]

Yeah the newest reports seem to indicate a stored chemical explosion. That seems to be consistent with the blast. There was an initial blast wave followed by the explosive material reaching critical 02 mix, and it all ignites at once creating a massive shock wave. That said, there is no way to know for sure if it was accidental or intentional. Often that is the point.

Or if it was both; some group or even an individual was looking to do damage in one spot and there were some chemicals that were supposed to be stored safely over there, but some dock worker put them over here instead. Your minor insurance fire or sabotage or a bit of terrorism to stop things in a port for a few days just bombed a city. Remember most things you don't have to attribute to malice, it's usually incompetence.

-Dave

You act as if we are living in a totally normal time where exceptional things don't happen every day. I don't remember drawing any conclusions, I did however offer some of the more likely explanations. Plausible deniability is most certainly a viable military strategy. No reptilians need be involved.

[1714670787]

1714670787

[1714670787]

1714670787

[tvbcof]

It was a pretty big explosion which caused a lot of damage and a lot of death.  Seems that the worldwide consensus is that this is not cool even if Lebanese have darker skin than Ashkenazim Khazars who, according to their own lore, God gave the land to.

I've heard that Israel is going to play it as 'yes, we did some minor bombing, as we do practically every day, but we didn't know that the Lebanese unwisely choose to pack 2000 tons of explosives into the building next door.  So, Lebanese at fault, and the Zionists are, as usual, completely blameless.  Because holocaust.'

Sadly the lie will probably work as well as it always has, especially in the 'Western Hemisphere' (where the various Espstein-type operations have re-structured the government, media, and society.)

[Salauddin1994]

Economically devastated Lebanon is struggling to cope with the old sectarian conflict and the new coronavirus crisis. The country is also in a precarious position due to Israel's recent confrontation with the Iranian-backed armed group Hezbollah. In Beirut, the news just stopped. The quake was also felt in the island of Cyprus, 240 kilometres away, where residents thought it was an earthquake. The blast started on Tuesday at an explosives depot in the port. After the explosion, a cloud of smoke spread over an area of ​​several kilometres. Many people were injured and killed.

[iRaMMuS34]

Definitely not nukes, and these horrific accidents happen all over the world from time to time (2015 blast in China comes to mind first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv5g2MhPT5I ) . Not the best time for panic.

[pakhitheboss]

Another country destroyed because of corrupt politicians. After this horrific incident in Lebanon, it was found out that those chemicals were lying in the docks from 2013. The government is to be blamed as they never responded to the letters send by the dock authorities in regards to shifting those chemicals to a secure location.

This is the second country in the middle east which is got destroyed because of Saudia and Iran's proxy war.

[tvbcof]

I've been having an unusually difficult time finding out information on this event.  The 'narrative' here is as jelously controlled as in anything I've seen recently.  Even 5G!

My hypothesis:  There was something of a diversionary bombing.  The site underwent DEW treatment for some time until it got good and hot.  Then some substance was delivered which created a thermobaric detonation.  The odd colored 'smoke' was quite telling.  The principle of thermite is rather easy to grasp, but aluminum and iron are not the only two elements which can exchange oxygen in a rapid exothermic reaction.  An element of my hypothesis is that there is another set of chemicals used in more advanced and possibly more efficient/energetic reaction.  Due to the crater I would suspect a bunker-buster of some sort was also delivered.

The 'Lebanese officials' going along with the '2000 tons of fertilizer' charade is no surprise.  One of the goal is to get a war going which is exactly what the Zionists want.  It would be a great excuse to completely ethnically cleans the whole country with modern weapons and thus avoid the humiliation that Israel suffered at the hands of Hezbollah when they tried to do it the old fashioned way in the last conventional attack during Olmert's tenure.  Anveryone, including Hezbollah, have every reason to shut things up for now so as not to give Israel exactly what it wants.

I have seen no compelling evidence for nuclear effects, and I don't believe that it is necessary to explain the magnitude of energy delivery for this particular event.  Most likely it is a demonstration to anyone who dares to challenge Israel (and their minions and lackies such as the U.S..)  KJV in Revelations somewhere:

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

Believing the mainstream media bullshit about almost anything is very aptly described by the term 'worshipping' as I see it (which is from a secular point of view.)

[Barnabe]

It is just more probable that the Lebanese authorities suck and they forgot about this storage and its potential dangers. There is no need to go for a very complicated justification when negligence is so obvious.

[tvbcof]

It is just more probable that the Lebanese authorities suck and they forgot about this storage and its potential dangers. There is no need to go for a very complicated justification when negligence is so obvious.

Since Israel is constantly invading Lebanon's airspace and regularly bombing Lebanon itself, and since the very building which used to sit where the crater is was identified specifically as a potential target by the IDF, the 'simple explanation' is that it was blown up by the Israelis.  But that doesn't make it the factually correct explanation of course, and even if it is basically correct there are still a lot of unanswered questions.

The idea that enough explosives to blow up half the capital were stockpiled at the port of the war-torn city for 6 years and the Lebanese were to stupid to figure out the danger is actually a more complex explanation and it strains credulity.  Very few thinking people who are familiar with the situation in that area are giving the theory (either the 'fireworks' variant or the 'fertilizer' variant) much thought.  As usual these days, the mainstream media, a few flesh-n-blood propagandists, and a ton of bots are giving the negligent accident story what legs it has.

---

Edit:  I retract the statement about the specific building being identified as a target.  That may be inaccurate and it was more or less a conclusion I jumped to without proper geo analysis.

[Barnabe]

It is just more probable that the Lebanese authorities suck and they forgot about this storage and its potential dangers. There is no need to go for a very complicated justification when negligence is so obvious.

Since Israel is constantly invading Lebanon's airspace and regularly bombing Lebanon itself, and since the very building which used to sit where the crater is was identified specifically as a potential target by the IDF, the 'simple explanation' is that it was blown up by the Israelis.  But that doesn't make it the factually correct explanation of course, and even if it is basically correct there are still a lot of unanswered questions.

The idea that enough explosives to blow up half the capital were stockpiled at the port of the war-torn city for 6 years and the Lebanese were to stupid to figure out the danger is actually a more complex explanation and it strains credulity.  Very few thinking people who are familiar with the situation in that area are giving the theory (either the 'fireworks' variant or the 'fertilizer' variant) much thought.  As usual these days, the mainstream media, a few flesh-n-blood propagandists, and a ton of bots are giving the negligent accident story what legs it has.

---

Edit:  I retract the statement about the specific building being identified as a target.  That may be inaccurate and it was more or less a conclusion I jumped to without proper geo analysis.

The lebanese government admitted it was negligence right ? So there is no need for further theories, as far as Lebanon is concerned, the only thing we can do now is focus on the protests happening right now.

[tvbcof]

...

The lebanese government admitted it was negligence right ? So there is no need for further theories, as far as Lebanon is concerned, the only thing we can do now is focus on the protests happening right now.

Like I said, Israel wishes to get a full-on war going so they can decimate the population of Lebanon.  As far as I can see, the 'official government' of Lebanon is some gaggle of lackeys of the West.  IIRC, the last 'president of Lebanon' had his office (and his ass) in Saudi Arabia much of the time.  It's a Juan Guido type situation.  Even so, they probably don't want to see 80% of the population ethnically cleansed to make way for the Greater Israel project so they'll do anything to avoid going to war.  Most certainly including lying about an Israeli attack using novel weapons of mass destruction.

Hezbollah seems like the real government of Lebanon and who the people trust.  With good reason.  They more than the puppet government wish not to see their people final solution-ed and have stayed relatively mum about things as best I can tell.  Nasrullah, however, has said that 'he knows more about what is where at the port of Haifa than at the port of Beirut.'  And he has a reputation for making good on his promises.  We'll see what happens next.  I would expect fireworks in Jerusalem as trade for the Beirut flash-bang.  Seems more of a fair trade.

[squatz1]

It is just more probable that the Lebanese authorities suck and they forgot about this storage and its potential dangers. There is no need to go for a very complicated justification when negligence is so obvious.

Since Israel is constantly invading Lebanon's airspace and regularly bombing Lebanon itself, and since the very building which used to sit where the crater is was identified specifically as a potential target by the IDF, the 'simple explanation' is that it was blown up by the Israelis.  But that doesn't make it the factually correct explanation of course, and even if it is basically correct there are still a lot of unanswered questions.

The idea that enough explosives to blow up half the capital were stockpiled at the port of the war-torn city for 6 years and the Lebanese were to stupid to figure out the danger is actually a more complex explanation and it strains credulity.  Very few thinking people who are familiar with the situation in that area are giving the theory (either the 'fireworks' variant or the 'fertilizer' variant) much thought.  As usual these days, the mainstream media, a few flesh-n-blood propagandists, and a ton of bots are giving the negligent accident story what legs it has.

---

Edit:  I retract the statement about the specific building being identified as a target.  That may be inaccurate and it was more or less a conclusion I jumped to without proper geo analysis.

The lebanese government admitted it was negligence right ? So there is no need for further theories, as far as Lebanon is concerned, the only thing we can do now is focus on the protests happening right now.

Yup. The Lebanese government has come out and said that they were wrong to keep the materials there, and that they should've been more careful about concerns from people regarding it.

One of the ministers in the government has resigned, and a few others have spoken about doing so. I'm pretty sure this would be done to relax the protesting of the people. The people who resign would most likely move back into some sort of cushy government job at some point -- just not now.

https://www.arabnews.com/node/1717036/middle-east

[Barnabe]

...

The lebanese government admitted it was negligence right ? So there is no need for further theories, as far as Lebanon is concerned, the only thing we can do now is focus on the protests happening right now.

Like I said, Israel wishes to get a full-on war going so they can decimate the population of Lebanon.  As far as I can see, the 'official government' of Lebanon is some gaggle of lackeys of the West.  IIRC, the last 'president of Lebanon' had his office (and his ass) in Saudi Arabia much of the time.  It's a Juan Guido type situation.  Even so, they probably don't want to see 80% of the population ethnically cleansed to make way for the Greater Israel project so they'll do anything to avoid going to war.  Most certainly including lying about an Israeli attack using novel weapons of mass destruction.

Hezbollah seems like the real government of Lebanon and who the people trust.  With good reason.  They more than the puppet government wish not to see their people final solution-ed and have stayed relatively mum about things as best I can tell.  Nasrullah, however, has said that 'he knows more about what is where at the port of Haifa than at the port of Beirut.'  And he has a reputation for making good on his promises.  We'll see what happens next.  I would expect fireworks in Jerusalem as trade for the Beirut flash-bang.  Seems more of a fair trade.

The president of Lebanon is christian, so I don't really know what we would do in Saudi Arabia, do you have any source for that ?

[Vod]

Nuke would cause mushroom.

Any large explosion will cause a mushroom. It's the most efficient way to spread out all the energy fast.

Just looking at it I am predicting it was some kind of pressurized fuel or liquid fuel tank which was heated by a fire and over pressured.

Guess we can't call you Analyst Techy.   

20 shipping containers would cause a cascade of 20 separate explosions..

Not really....  depends on the material strength of the containers compared to the heat and expansion.  Yes, you are correct but the cascade would happen almost as fast as the initial explosion. 

[tvbcof]

...

The lebanese government admitted it was negligence right ? So there is no need for further theories, as far as Lebanon is concerned, the only thing we can do now is focus on the protests happening right now.

Like I said, Israel wishes to get a full-on war going so they can decimate the population of Lebanon.  As far as I can see, the 'official government' of Lebanon is some gaggle of lackeys of the West.  IIRC, the last 'president of Lebanon' had his office (and his ass) in Saudi Arabia much of the time.  It's a Juan Guido type situation.  Even so, they probably don't want to see 80% of the population ethnically cleansed to make way for the Greater Israel project so they'll do anything to avoid going to war.  Most certainly including lying about an Israeli attack using novel weapons of mass destruction.

Hezbollah seems like the real government of Lebanon and who the people trust.  With good reason.  They more than the puppet government wish not to see their people final solution-ed and have stayed relatively mum about things as best I can tell.  Nasrullah, however, has said that 'he knows more about what is where at the port of Haifa than at the port of Beirut.'  And he has a reputation for making good on his promises.  We'll see what happens next.  I would expect fireworks in Jerusalem as trade for the Beirut flash-bang.  Seems more of a fair trade.

The president of Lebanon is christian, so I don't really know what we would do in Saudi Arabia, do you have any source for that ?

Pfffft!  Almost all of these 'leaders' are Luciferians (usually by way of crypto-jewery) or under control of said.  Certainly that goes for the 'Young Turks' (Donmeh) in Turkey and 'House of Saud' in the ME in straight-up Kabbalist form.  In the West it's more of the 'under control' form via Epstein-esque operations.

  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-saad-hariri-mohammed-bin-salman-lebanon.html

[elisabetheva]

Another country destroyed because of corrupt politicians. After this horrific incident in Lebanon, it was found out that those chemicals were lying in the docks from 2013. The government is to be blamed as they never responded to the letters send by the dock authorities in regards to shifting those chemicals to a secure location.

This is the second country in the middle east which is got destroyed because of Saudia and Iran's proxy war.

If the incident happened because chemicals were indeed found and there was no serious work from the government to remove it, of course it is regrettable that this could have happened because this was a tragedy that could have been avoided if there was serious attention to something that was dangerous so that it could be moved to the safest place. .

but is that the real news? This is still sounding confusing and there is no certainty that can be justified. I hope that events like this will not happen again just because of neglect. what should be inappropriate and worthy will be a disaster.