Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API

[PrimeNumber7]

TryNinja could theoretically add every thread to his watchlist and monitor for the thread's location being changed, although this is probably less feasible than the above.

The Watchlist gets slower when there are more topics to watch, and I've seen theymos recommend to clean it up. So I doubt this will work with 5 million topics.

Okay, fair enough. Although my suggestion that the sub a thread is located in when scraping new posts could easily be implemented.

[1714054468]

1714054468

[1714054468]

1714054468

[1714054468]

1714054468

[1714054468]

1714054468

[1714054468]

1714054468

[TryNinja]

@TryNinja if you can make modifications to the results, it would be a good idea to remove the sensitive data from those couple of posts.

Anyone can DM me which posts they think should be censored for privacy/security reasons. I have received a few requests in the past.

Thanks for updating website with cool new features that can improve search function a lot, but I have some questions.
Is there a way I could unignore specific topic that I ignored before with click on the button?

I added a small list with the ignored threads (so you can view which ones and even undo it) below the search params card.

I tried doing that in the first place before asking my question in forum, and even after refreshing page I was not getting the same results like before.
Even clicking on F5 didn't fix this so maybe all history with cookies need to be deleted in some cases.
I would like to hear what TryNinja has to say about this.

The ignored list isn't stored, so this shouldn't be the case. As soon as you refresh the page, it should be cleared.

The only thing that is stored anywhere is the color scheme you're using (light or dark) on your browser's localStorage.

Okay, fair enough. Although my suggestion that the sub a thread is located in when scraping new posts could easily be implemented.

I think this is doable, so I'll add it to my TODO list. But yeah, it would only detect topics that had recent activity.

[Pmalek]

I tried doing that in the first place before asking my question in forum, and even after refreshing page I was not getting the same results like before.

I assume you didn't try it on Google Chrome or Firefox. Knowing you, you probably avoid Chrome like the plague.
I just tried it again to test the new feature where you can undo the ignored threads and it works and appears just fine both on Firefox and Chrome.

You use an alternative browser, forked off of Firefox right? Did you get it fixed? If not, try it with one of the regular ones if you haven't already.   

[PrimeNumber7]

Okay, fair enough. Although my suggestion that the sub a thread is located in when scraping new posts could easily be implemented.

I think this is doable, so I'll add it to my TODO list. But yeah, it would only detect topics that had recent activity.

I don't think it would be terribly difficult to implement, but it really depends on your current code base.

I am not 100% sure, but I think it is reasonable to believe that most threads that get moved will get moved not long after they are created, which means most threads that get moved will have at least one post made after they are moved. This is probably a good compromise between having a high accuracy rate of the location of a thread and the resources consumed.

[Xal0lex]

For some reason the site has stopped working. Is it just me or is there anyone else who doesn't have it working?

[LoyceV]

For some reason the site has stopped working. Is it just me or is there anyone else who doesn't have it working?

TryNinja announced the downtime.

[TryNinja]

For some reason the site has stopped working. Is it just me or is there anyone else who doesn't have it working?

TryNinja announced the downtime.

Thanks, forgot to post the warning here.

It's already back online.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Thanks, forgot to post the warning here.

It's already back online.

Maybe it's just me, but I am still unable to load the site. The homepage goes blank and then trying to view an archive of a topic, It takes so long while loading then it brings up an error "Something went wrong" afterwards.

Could it be related to the downtime earlier on?

[Xal0lex]

The site loads for me, but, when trying to find the text of the post the site takes a while trying to find something and then a search error appears. I don't know what happened. Maybe while repairing the VPS (as TryNinja reported here) the repairmen damaged something.

[8rch7]

Still not working normal yet until right now and I have try several time and access using VPN keep not working yet, here blank show when opening with https://ninjastic.space/ before back blank white. I hope can back normal as soon possible and try to check several important history

[TryNinja]

My apologies. Some services didn't start correctly after their maintenance ended.

I already sent an angry email telling them to stop doing that or I'll move somewhere else.

[LoyceV]

or I'll move somewhere else.

Contabo's rates are hard to beat, better uptimes can get quite expensive. I'm on the lookout too, my (sponsored) AWS is running out soon.

[dkbit98]

Contabo's rates are hard to beat, better uptimes can get quite expensive. I'm on the lookout too, my (sponsored) AWS is running out soon.

You should check out and follow lowendbox.com website, they have some great hosting and VPS deals, among other things.
I am not sure if they can beat Contabo but hetzner.com should be solid and reliable alternative.

PS
IT looks like forum is still facing some issues on my side.
When I click on the Quote button to reply I am getting big green LOADING bar on the top, and nothing happens until I refresh page and do it again.

[LoyceV]

You should check out and follow lowendbox.com website, they have some great hosting and VPS deals, among other things.

Don't trust all webhosts there, I've been scammed by their "offers". Lowendtalk.com (more or less the same) has good offers too, and I've come to trust some of them (after I got scammed by another one). But I wouldn't expect better uptime than Contabo. High uptime doesn't go well with "low end".

I am not sure if they can beat Contabo but hetzner.com should be solid and reliable alternative.

They don't accept Bitcoin. I don't want to pay by creditcard.

[dkbit98]

Don't trust all webhosts there, I've been scammed by their "offers". Lowendtalk.com (more or less the same) has good offers too, and I've come to trust some of them (after I got scammed by another one). But I wouldn't expect better uptime than Contabo. High uptime doesn't go well with "low end".

Lol
Lowendtalk is official forum of lowendbox website and you can actually see their link posted on top next to their Facebook and Youtube link, and domain owner is the same, so there is really no difference
If I said check that you should check that website it doesn't mean that you should buy the first thing someone posted there.
I think that Hostinger and Namecheap are accepting Bitcoin payments, any maybe few other websites that are less known and less reliable.

[Rikafip]

Hey @TryNinja, I wanted to check the amount of users on some boards years ago and compare it with the current situation but your tool (afaik) counts only up to 10,000 users. Is there some way to increase that cap, or its limited due some technical reason?

[indah rezqi]

Hey @TryNinja, I wanted to check the amount of users on some boards years ago and compare it with the current situation but your tool (afaik) counts only up to 10,000 users. Is there some way to increase that cap, or its limited due some technical reason?

I searched in this thread about whether there was a similar request before. I got the answer that this tool was previously only limited to 2K numbers, but has been upgraded to 10K on august 2021. So I think it's still possible to expect it to be 20K to 50K, but it might just depend on the database. Database overload is a problem to be avoided based his post.

Will we get bigger limit in the future, maybe 5000-10.000?

Hey, 2000 users was just an arbitrary number that I used to avoid overloading the database, but I can try raising the limit to 10k and you'll tell me if that's enough.

edit: done, the maximum is now 10k

[TryNinja]

Is there some way to increase that cap, or its limited due some technical reason?

Like @indah rezqi said above, it's an arbitrary number to keep everything running fine. But since there hasn't been any abuse, I'm uncapping it (at least for now). Let me know if it works.

[skarais]

Like @indah rezqi said above, it's an arbitrary number to keep everything running fine. But since there hasn't been any abuse, I'm uncapping it (at least for now). Let me know if it works.

I started testing it for the first time, now it's over 10K. From these results, there are 10997 users who actively post on bitcoin discussion boards including child boards during 2020. I think the tool is better now, is there still a limit to the number?

[TryNinja]

]I think the tool is better now, is there still a limit to the number?

10.000.000, maybe a bit too much...?

I tried running it for the entire archive (no filters) and I gave up before the query could finish.