Suggestions for changes to the rules for bounty companies ' placements

[Shef198911]

Hello everyone, many people may have noticed that recently quite a lot of bounty and airdrop companies of a dubious nature have been placed, if during the ICO companies adhered to the rules of having a whitepaper team descriptions, then in the defi era many simply ignore these rules, thereby exposing investors to the risk of losing funds, as the company's analysis becomes harder!

I offer to tighten the rules, and if the team, or bounty Manager, will spread projects on which there are no such things as a whitepaper and a team, then such companies are immediately marked in the trust as negative, and the opening of the flag is considered.

I think it will be a little safer for investors, and bounty hunters, investors will save their money, and hunters time !


As for the airdrop itself, it would be good to create a separate branch such as the bounty, and I would also like to prohibit users with the status of "novice" to create topics in the branches "bounty" and "airdrop" as scammers spam the branch creating new users

[1715244428]

1715244428

[1715244428]

1715244428

[1715244428]

1715244428

[thetimetravelerz]

I agree with your idea and further there should be a provision of having an escrow and option to get paid in btc eth and stable coin as part of the payment so only serious projects and dubious one can be distinguished easily

[Shef198911]

I agree with your idea and further there should be a provision of having an escrow and option to get paid in btc eth and stable coin as part of the payment so only serious projects and dubious one can be distinguished easily

On account of the escrow funds then I difficult situation, very few people will agree, many companies are just starting development, and they have only their own tokens which they produce, and only them can pay, and these proposals think podtolknut of the company and managers, to take or not to release the bounty if there are no criteria, maybe even as an option to those engaged particular person to whom you are sending for consideration whether there is a whitepaper and team or not, and then goes to the forum

[Bitum]

There are already some threads on the forum where all scams projects are listed, for example here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274460.0
I can't find any further links now, there are several threads maybe someone can help me

[AhmadM]

I offer to tighten the rules, and if the team, or bounty Manager, will spread projects on which there are no such things as a whitepaper and a team, then such companies are immediately marked in the trust as negative, and the opening of the flag is considered.

I'm not really sure who's the main purpose of this suggestion for, whether is it for the forum or the community itself (BM and hunters) but somehow I disagree with giving negative trust when they decide to not reveal the whole teams behind the project meanwhile there is some of group keep develop the project seriously while they are staying in anonymously. Well, I'm not against that most anonymous projects are suspicious enough since there are more chances of it being an exit scam, that's why you need to always keep an eye on such kind of project when you invest in it.

[Shef198911]

I offer to tighten the rules, and if the team, or bounty Manager, will spread projects on which there are no such things as a whitepaper and a team, then such companies are immediately marked in the trust as negative, and the opening of the flag is considered.

I not really sure who's the main purpose of this suggestion for, whether is it for the forum or the community itself (BM and hunters) but somehow I disagree with giving negative trust when they decide to not reveal the whole teams behind the project meanwhile there is some of group keep develop the project seriously while they are staying in anonymously. Well, I'm not against that most anonymous projects are suspicious enough since there are more chances of it being an exit scam, that's why you need to always keep an eye on such kind of project when you invest in it.

About the team Yes, there were some companies that did not want to disclose their identities and showed good results, but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible

[AhmadM]

~snip~ but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible

Yeah that's right, they are taking advantage of defi hype moment and hope there are some victims (FOMOed people) fall into their trap. If you look at the project's site deeper you will find that most of the contents of the site are just copied from various sources, there's no valuable pieces of information inside, and giving suggestions to them just waste your time. It's better to stay away and giving awareness to people around you about such kind of project.

[Shef198911]

~snip~ but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible

Yeah that's right, they are taking advantage of defi hype moment and hope there are some victims (FOMOed people) fall into their trap. If you look at the project's site deeper you will find that most of the contents of the site are just copied from various sources, there's no valuable pieces of information inside, and giving suggestions to them just waste your time. It's better to stay away and giving awareness to people around you about such kind of project.

Just among all these scammers, it became even harder to determine the real companies, the requirements for the availability of sufficient information on the site, would simplify the task, here's the thing, on the forum it so happened that many people absolutely do not care what this project is, they are ready for 5 bucks to even promote them, without thinking that they will not even be able to withdraw them, since the price of the Commission will be 3 times more expensive, but they still advertise them, even a potonuial Scam, they will publish slag, because they will have to make more effort than just copying someone's site

[makishart]

~snip~ but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible

Yeah that's right, they are taking advantage of defi hype moment and hope there are some victims (FOMOed people) fall into their trap. If you look at the project's site deeper you will find that most of the contents of the site are just copied from various sources, there's no valuable pieces of information inside, and giving suggestions to them just waste your time. It's better to stay away and giving awareness to people around you about such kind of project.

Just among all these scammers, it became even harder to determine the real companies, the requirements for the availability of sufficient information on the site, would simplify the task, here's the thing, on the forum it so happened that many people absolutely do not care what this project is, they are ready for 5 bucks to even promote them, without thinking that they will not even be able to withdraw them, since the price of the Commission will be 3 times more expensive, but they still advertise them, even a potonuial Scam, they will publish slag, because they will have to make more effort than just copying someone's site

It caused by they were similar like bots. They didn't even use their eyes and blindly participate in the potential scam campaign. I have seen that before so many newbies were doing this It caused by they were similar like bots. They didn't even use their eyes and blindly participate in the potential scam campaign. I have seen that before so many newbies were doing this very bad behaviour.
The problem is we didn't have strong point to determine whether it's a real team or no who has been running the project.
If we are taking WP as an indicator and how reliable is it?
So many PAID service to create WP. It's a difficult thing to determine whether's a legit or scam project. Various analyzation must be done. 

[Shef198911]

~snip~ but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible

Yeah that's right, they are taking advantage of defi hype moment and hope there are some victims (FOMOed people) fall into their trap. If you look at the project's site deeper you will find that most of the contents of the site are just copied from various sources, there's no valuable pieces of information inside, and giving suggestions to them just waste your time. It's better to stay away and giving awareness to people around you about such kind of project.

Just among all these scammers, it became even harder to determine the real companies, the requirements for the availability of sufficient information on the site, would simplify the task, here's the thing, on the forum it so happened that many people absolutely do not care what this project is, they are ready for 5 bucks to even promote them, without thinking that they will not even be able to withdraw them, since the price of the Commission will be 3 times more expensive, but they still advertise them, even a potonuial Scam, they will publish slag, because they will have to make more effort than just copying someone's site

It caused by they were similar like bots. They didn't even use their eyes and blindly participate in the potential scam campaign. I have seen that before so many newbies were doing this It caused by they were similar like bots. They didn't even use their eyes and blindly participate in the potential scam campaign. I have seen that before so many newbies were doing this very bad behaviour.
The problem is we didn't have strong point to determine whether it's a real team or no who has been running the project.
If we are taking WP as an indicator and how reliable is it?
So many PAID service to create WP. It's a difficult thing to determine whether's a legit or scam project. Various analyzation must be done. 

not many think to use paid services for writing WP and just make a rip-off, so this is also a good step to the definition, all would be well indeed to make a Deposit of funds one of the requirements to issue a bounty on the forum to add that the tokens were already issued, and the percentage immediately provide to the Manager that the distribution has already said it, Yes I agree that the company and it can cascamite, but will also be a small indicator of the seriousness of the company