FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076
keybase.io/fallingknife/
|
 |
May 09, 2015, 06:24:38 PM
Last edit: May 09, 2015, 10:02:19 PM by FallingKnife |
|
Thanks, ipominer. I agree with your comment and will act on that when we're through this. I added your pool, https://www.ipominer.com/, to the OP. The following orgs have been contacted so far. Please reach out to your favorite pool or service that I can not reached yet. I am not done: Goldmin.es - left IRC message coinmine.pl - sent form message uno.port-x.de - no known way to contact, but no miners here. securepayment.cc - tauris, already responsed on bct. mineoncloud.com - dead pool uno.united-miners.com - closed their uno pool. Sent a message anyway. miningpools.tk, emailed support @ raq2.com http://www.xpool.ca/ notified via cryptocointalk Tompool.org -- posted message on chat... unable to post to msg board. genesis-mining.com, opened ticket rav3n's pool - pm via bct ispace.co.uk, emailed pools[at]ispace.co.uk p2pool.org, emailed multipool.us, emailed cryptsy - email, has already responded bittrex - email cryptopia - ticket comkort - ticket coinse - ticket shapeshift.io - opened ticket coinpayments.net - ticket Cryptap.us, already responded in bct Please keep Windows wallets offline for the time being. Chainz is now reporting that 0.10.0 has the majority of the network. They may not be seeing all of the 0.9.5 nodes, but we can use this as a benchmark for now.
 |
Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
richiela
|
|
May 09, 2015, 09:38:04 PM |
|
I don't think this should be isolated to miners. I believe all transactions on v0.9.5 after block 600k will be questionable at best, on a forked chain at worst. I would advise saving your wallet.dat and waiting for a v0.10 binary to become available.
I agree. Its a good time to step back. Exchanges have been notified. I reached out to known pools in the OP; I'm sure I missed some, so please help with this by contacting your favorite pool and asking them to update to 0.1.0. ipoMiner has updated to v0.1.0 now. Some form of proactive notice for pools and exchanges would have been nice... There's definitely a fork that has happened at or around block 600k. Forked happened at 600147 ... are all the block explorers correct at this time? thanks, richie@bittrex |
|
|
|
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076
keybase.io/fallingknife/
|
|
May 09, 2015, 09:41:05 PM |
|
Thanks everyone for the great community response -- closing 0.9.5 wallets and temporarily reducing network hash as pools check to ensure they are on 0.1.0.
BW & I appreciate it. Lets sustain this response through the weekend. We just need a little time. It's all going to be fine, because we all care about Uno, and when something breaks we respond and fix it. When this is done, we'll look back and learn, and figure out how we can do this better.
|
Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
|
|
|
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076
keybase.io/fallingknife/
|
|
May 09, 2015, 09:45:24 PM
Last edit: May 09, 2015, 10:01:53 PM by FallingKnife |
|
I don't think this should be isolated to miners. I believe all transactions on v0.9.5 after block 600k will be questionable at best, on a forked chain at worst. I would advise saving your wallet.dat and waiting for a v0.10 binary to become available.
I agree. Its a good time to step back. Exchanges have been notified. I reached out to known pools in the OP; I'm sure I missed some, so please help with this by contacting your favorite pool and asking them to update to 0.10.0. ipoMiner has updated to v0.10.0 now. Some form of proactive notice for pools and exchanges would have been nice... There's definitely a fork that has happened at or around block 600k. Forked happened at 600147 ... are all the block explorers correct at this time? thanks, richie@bittrex Hi Richie, These explorers are correct. I checked them all moments ago, and they concur: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/unohttp://insight-uno.cryptap.us/http://blocktree.io/e/UNOhttp://explorer.coinpayments.net/index.php?chain=19 https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/BlockExplorer |
Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
|
|
|
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076
keybase.io/fallingknife/
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:10:37 PM
Last edit: May 09, 2015, 10:27:55 PM by FallingKnife |
|
The following pools confirm they are on 0.10: http://crypticzero.com/uno/http://un.ispace.co.uk/Multipool.us ipominer.com Cryptopia.co.nz pool is displaying the correct block in their explorer, so probably fine. It would be ok to begin mining the above pools. I'll mention more as I receive confirmation. Others: Genesis-mining has responded and is investigating Coinpayments.net is investigating; their explorer is correct, so they are probably ok. Bittrex is investigating Cryptsy is investigating |
Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
|
|
|
|
|
Destined
Member
Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:34:13 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blakesss
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:43:53 PM |
|
I don't want to screw up my old wallet by updating. I'm just going to take these steps... My plan is to wait for a new Windows wallet to be compiled, copy my existing wallet.dat file, install the new wallet, paste old wallet into new unobtanium wallet file. Are those the steps to get into the .0.1.0 fork?
|
|
|
|
|
|
learminer
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:49:08 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
Yeah we discussed many ideas, the decision was made to go with the traditional route, same/similar to what namecoin and others are doing. |
|
|
|
|
learminer
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:59:35 PM |
|
I don't want to screw up my old wallet by updating. I'm just going to take these steps... My plan is to wait for a new Windows wallet to be compiled, copy my existing wallet.dat file, install the new wallet, paste old wallet into new unobtanium wallet file. Are those the steps to get into the .0.1.0 fork?
Sounds reasonably similar to what I intend to do once we have a windows binary. |
|
|
|
|
sa_ddam213
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:01:14 PM |
|
Just double checked. All Cryptopia wallets are on the correct version.
Exchange, Explorer and Pool good to go
|
Fuck I hate this site
|
|
|
Destined
Member
Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:04:33 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
Yeah we discussed many ideas, the decision was made to go with the traditional route, same/similar to what namecoin and others are doing. Just with bitcoin or with all sha-256 coins? |
|
|
|
|
|
learminer
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:21:19 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
Yeah we discussed many ideas, the decision was made to go with the traditional route, same/similar to what namecoin and others are doing. Just with bitcoin or with all sha-256 coins? I *think* just Bitcoin - at least that's what was decided. Wether the implementation is really Bitcoin specific, or would also allow other sha-256 coins I do not know. You could try tweeting @BryceWeiner about it if you're curious. |
|
|
|
TogoMan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:23:05 PM |
|
Big mistake by devs. UNO price is crashing down @ cryptsy. UNO the next shitcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
balu2
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:25:17 PM |
|
Big mistake by devs. UNO price is crashing down @ cryptsy. UNO the next shitcoin?
I'm betting Mr. "Brand new" is buying  |
|
|
|
|
|
electricretard
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:26:40 PM |
|
Can you add a download link for the new wallet (win) for the slow children like me who don't know how to build one
|
|
|
|
|
Destined
Member
Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:27:37 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
Yeah we discussed many ideas, the decision was made to go with the traditional route, same/similar to what namecoin and others are doing. Just with bitcoin or with all sha-256 coins? I *think* just Bitcoin - at least that's what was decided. Wether the implementation is really Bitcoin specific, or would also allow other sha-256 coins I do not know. You could try tweeting @BryceWeiner about it if you're curious. Thanks for taking the time to answer.  |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptapus
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:42:58 PM |
|
I don't want to screw up my old wallet by updating. I'm just going to take these steps... My plan is to wait for a new Windows wallet to be compiled, copy my existing wallet.dat file, install the new wallet, paste old wallet into new unobtanium wallet file. Are those the steps to get into the .0.1.0 fork?
That should work. Do yourself a favor and make a backup of everything before you overwrite, especially wallet.dat. As long as you don't have any transactions after block 600k you should be fine. |
website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
|
|
|
|
cryptapus
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:45:48 PM |
|
Which way was the decision for auxpow decided? As I was reading thru the thread about it, but I don't really have time to read thru countless pages past the 10 I already read thru about it that contained many different ideas for how auxpow should be implemented. I just need to know which way the auxpow setup is currently functioning so I can make use of it with all the stuff I am currently working like mad to configure/build.
Yeah we discussed many ideas, the decision was made to go with the traditional route, same/similar to what namecoin and others are doing. Just with bitcoin or with all sha-256 coins? I *think* just Bitcoin - at least that's what was decided. Wether the implementation is really Bitcoin specific, or would also allow other sha-256 coins I do not know. You could try tweeting @BryceWeiner about it if you're curious. My understanding is that you should be able to merge mine UNO with any coin that uses SHA256 as POW. But pools running BTC will probably dominate the difficulty. |
website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
|
|
|
EBK1000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
|
|
May 09, 2015, 11:59:06 PM |
|
Can someone please help with this problem. I sent 24.9752133 UNO from Cryptsy to my UNO wallet (v0.9.5.9-thermoremnant) address: ufx5KUWgy7AR5kpjeJJRPuQFX8QJ9PfFuE This transaction is showing in the block chain in block #600475 ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/block.dws?600475.htm) This transaction is not showing up in my wallet which is currently showing in sync up to block #600731 Can someone please explain what may have happened and why this transaction appears lost?   |
Soooooooon...............
|
|
|
|
