Duckdice.io feedback removal

[sujonali1819]

Actually, as I think, a signature campaign is not for only removing negative feedback. If so then all the (Red trusted) companies do it. First, do a Scam, then run a signature campaign all problem solved? No, it is not. So You have to prove that you are legit now and all the previous problems were solved. Suppose follow on betnomy .They had some negative feedback from the beginning, Later they do some effort to prove them legit. But they have still 1-2 neg feedback but they earned some positive feedback too. (Maybe yahoo know more than us about betnomy, so better to ask him and start your journey to prove you are legit now)
You can also notice bestchange efforts to remove their negative feedbacks.

My suggestions:

1. Create a thread and ask bitcointalk users to post anything wrong about duckdice. so that you can solve the issues. ( you can also launch a review campaign)
2. Solve all the issues, and refer them (who gave you red trust) to the thread to see recent review about duckdice. Also you can request them to review their feedback. (but don't ask them to give you a positive feedback instead of negative one )
3. Start marketing in bitcointalk with your full power.

I hope in this way you could be helped you to prove you are legit and also Any DT members can counter the previous neg feedbacks If you can prove you legit. Good Luck

[1714807230]

1714807230

[1714807230]

1714807230

[1714807230]

1714807230

[examplens]

If you say, they can run signature and improve his rating, it sounds that through a signature campaign he can buy a positive rating here. I think that's the wrong guideline, I know some services which did not help SC no matter how generous they were.

If that was possible, may be every scam projects would including 1xbet run signature campaign and wash their bad reputations. May be this is the reason why marlboroza had suggested 1xbet to run a signature campaign 

I do not want to bid on who suggested what and with which intention, just saying that high paying signature campaign can't remove negative rating if it's based on a real accusation. I remember p2pb2b exchange which promises his investment in the forum through a signature campaign with the expectation to wash his reputation. in fact, they would run the campaign with money they took from deceived users.

Just saying Duckdice.io or any other neg. rated service can start with improving his rating through correcting mistakes and showing us that they are doing business with good intentions. Say "sorry" or "we removed all Ponzi" is not enough to be trusted.
If we can see there positive move, the rating can be improved even if previous red tags still exist.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Agree with this one, launch signature campaign and managed from reputable CM will gain trust for his casino.

No, that's not the right way. It all looks like an attempt to buy trust using a signature campaign which is something untrustworthy itself on the community's side while also looking like a stupid ransom from duckdice's position (Launch a signature campaign or the feedback won't be removed). The problem here is different members react differently to removing the negative feedback they have already left on a profile.

signature campaigns should never be used as a tool to remove negative trust but rather as a way of marketing and expanding a service's reach to new customers.

You can also notice bestchange efforts to remove their negative feedbacks.

Bestchange were never scammers. Some negative-trust-happy people just rained red tags on them without even thinking twice. I felt bad for them and i believe if it was some other service, they would have given up in the very first week. I don't think they fit as an example here.

[marlboroza]

May be this is the reason why marlboroza had suggested 1xbet to run a signature campaign 

Maybe it was sarcasm.

[OcTradism]

Personally, I don't think it's easy to remove red tags here. Zepher for obvious reasons, but Lutpin and Lauda the question is how willing they are to reconsider the situation and potentially to remove negative feedback.
it can be covered with positive feedbacks, earned or as a counter. So, it is necessary by Duckdice.io to make an effort a get some positive feedback.

I dunno but Lauda had this topic [Cult of Lauda] An historic peace: Rome’s treaty with Carthage and I believe that if Lauda see good things and changes from Duckdice.io, neg feedback can be removed.

The issue is Lauda is less active recent months.