Gambling License

[Chikito]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation.

Regarding the pool on the front page, not all members/majority choose that suggestion. I see 21 voters only (13 voters choose another option). If so when I check thread statistic had about 133 users posted, this means 99 users didn't have a choice. Regarding this, I don't think the reputable majority of member choose that option.

[Yogee]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation.

Regarding the pool on the front page, not all members/majority choose that suggestion. I see 21 voters only (13 voters choose another option). If so when I check thread statistic had about 133 users posted, this means 99 users didn't have a choice. Regarding this, I don't think the reputable majority of member choose that option.

It was my mistake to add the poll after three pages of replies and I'm not sure if those who posted earlier came back and cast their votes. Here's the time and date it was added https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5279285.msg55317302#msg55317302

If we read back at the comments, it is noticeable that most of them answered reputable over licensed casinos so the poll is just a formality.

[Japinat]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation.

Regarding the pool on the front page, not all members/majority choose that suggestion. I see 21 voters only (13 voters choose another option). If so when I check thread statistic had about 133 users posted, this means 99 users didn't have a choice. Regarding this, I don't think the reputable majority of member choose that option.

It was my mistake to add the poll after three pages of replies and I'm not sure if those who posted earlier came back and cast their votes. Here's the time and date it was added https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5279285.msg55317302#msg55317302

If we read back at the comments, it is noticeable that most of them answered reputable over licensed casinos so the poll is just a formality.

It doesn't matter if the poll was created after this thread was already active, that's the vote of the people, and I don't think they will lie. With the poll result, I'm quite convince that some people aren't really reading the TOS, hence they care about the license.

[Yogee]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation.

Regarding the pool on the front page, not all members/majority choose that suggestion. I see 21 voters only (13 voters choose another option). If so when I check thread statistic had about 133 users posted, this means 99 users didn't have a choice. Regarding this, I don't think the reputable majority of member choose that option.

It was my mistake to add the poll after three pages of replies and I'm not sure if those who posted earlier came back and cast their votes. Here's the time and date it was added https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5279285.msg55317302#msg55317302

If we read back at the comments, it is noticeable that most of them answered reputable over licensed casinos so the poll is just a formality.

It doesn't matter if the poll was created after this thread was already active, that's the vote of the people, and I don't think they will lie. With the poll result, I'm quite convince that some people aren't really reading the TOS, hence they care about the license.

It does matter if we're going to consider the fact that there were more or less 20 people who were not able to vote but, like I said, majority of the early comments say they prefer reputation so they would have probably chosen that option and further widen the gap.

[michellee]

If you found the gambling platform because of their review or ratings, I don't think that the gambling site will recommend playing gambling. If it's related to the crypto world, it is better to find the recommended gambling site from here because you will get so many trustable and recommended gambling sites that you can use to gamble.

Would have been much better if you'd have given him the suggestion to also clearly read the rules and especially, the ToS of a specific gambling website they want to gamble at because this can turn bad for them if their country is listed in that website's restricted countries list and then they still gamble there but are stopped from withdrawing anything (some sites even do it like this because it's gambler's fault in the end that they didn't check the terms before registering). Nowadays, even the best and reputed gambling websites are turning grey when it comes to withdrawals.

Oh yeah, reading the TOS will be recommended to know more about the rules, so he will not have a problem. If his reason for playing gambling is to search for fun, I think he will not try to win the game, but he will be a bonus for him if he can win.

Most gamblers will not check the TOS because they want to test the site, and if they feel comfortable playing gambling at that site, they will try to deposit some money. But then, if they win, they are forced to read the TOS to find out about the withdrawal section.

If they can not withdraw the money because of prohibiting from the country list, that will be their mistake. Maybe the solution is after they check the site by playing some games, they need to read the TOS so that they will know the pros and cons. If the gambling site has a prohibited country, he will not play gambling at that site, but he can move to another gambling site.

[CODE200]

If you found the gambling platform because of their review or ratings, I don't think that the gambling site will recommend playing gambling. If it's related to the crypto world, it is better to find the recommended gambling site from here because you will get so many trustable and recommended gambling sites that you can use to gamble.

Would have been much better if you'd have given him the suggestion to also clearly read the rules and especially, the ToS of a specific gambling website they want to gamble at because this can turn bad for them if their country is listed in that website's restricted countries list and then they still gamble there but are stopped from withdrawing anything (some sites even do it like this because it's gambler's fault in the end that they didn't check the terms before registering). Nowadays, even the best and reputed gambling websites are turning grey when it comes to withdrawals.

Oh yeah, reading the TOS will be recommended to know more about the rules, so he will not have a problem. If his reason for playing gambling is to search for fun, I think he will not try to win the game, but he will be a bonus for him if he can win.

Most gamblers will not check the TOS because they want to test the site, and if they feel comfortable playing gambling at that site, they will try to deposit some money. But then, if they win, they are forced to read the TOS to find out about the withdrawal section.

If they can not withdraw the money because of prohibiting from the country list, that will be their mistake. Maybe the solution is after they check the site by playing some games, they need to read the TOS so that they will know the pros and cons. If the gambling site has a prohibited country, he will not play gambling at that site, but he can move to another gambling site.

This one shows the reality of what is happening most of the time. I am even guilty because when I started playing online, I did not mind TOS at first because I though it is the same with other apps. I was not aware of the limitations regarding countries when it comes to withdrawals until my friend told me so. But so far I did not encounter gambling sites which causes problem in my country. But still, I made it a habit to read whenever I encounter new gambling sites. Reading will often save us from mistakes.

[michellee]

This one shows the reality of what is happening most of the time. I am even guilty because when I started playing online, I did not mind TOS at first because I though it is the same with other apps. I was not aware of the limitations regarding countries when it comes to withdrawals until my friend told me so. But so far I did not encounter gambling sites which causes problem in my country. But still, I made it a habit to read whenever I encounter new gambling sites. Reading will often save us from mistakes.

That is good for you. You can at least try to familiarize yourself first before you go deep into that site and know about their rule. But mostly, people don't read the TOS on their first visit, and they will try to read the TOS if they think that they need an answer to their question before they contact the support system. I am also trying to read the TOS after I feel comfortable staying at the site to know the site's situations. Besides that, I don't get a bad experience until now, even if I don't read the TOS because I don't use too big money to gamble, and if I win, I don't withdraw all of the money instead withdraw for small money or withdraw my initial money.

[aioc]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation.

Regarding the pool on the front page, not all members/majority choose that suggestion. I see 21 voters only (13 voters choose another option). If so when I check thread statistic had about 133 users posted, this means 99 users didn't have a choice. Regarding this, I don't think the reputable majority of member choose that option.

I don't see the number representing the majority of the members here, there are members who opted not to vote but participated on the discussion and there are players who are not active in the gambling discussion, but if going to vote the vote could be that on the lowest generate vote I don't see more than 30 members representing the majority of the gambling community.

[XZERO1]

I don't understand, why the majority of our community members here choose gambling sites that no license as long as there is a reputation. I guess reputation has been started with a licensed gambling casino.

If you were going to ask me, I will prefer to choose both characteristics that should gambling online casinos have. The license and reputation will be the right choice. You can also choose a gambling site that already ran a business within 5 months to 1 year. If they don't have critical complaints, I guess they are good to go.

Obviously it would be ideal to use a gambling website with a license and good amount of reputation at the same time, but this poll is more about which one would you choose if you had to choose between reputation and gambling license, since many of the good gambling website with great reputation do not have gambling license and also many licensed gambling websites don't have enough reputation to give the user some sense of trust you have to choose one of them as your priority, and that doesn't surprise me at all that most people chose reputation over gambling license because it's way harder for a casino website to gain a decent amount of reputation while it's rather easy to get a gambling license from some country with questionable law system.

[tyz]

Preferring a casino with a license only makes sense if you are investing your own taxed money. But most of the gamblers use Bitcoin that they got from somewhere (e.g. airdops, crypto trading etc) and didn't pay tax for it. Therefore, the license for such gamblers is completely irrelevant, only the reputation and seriousness of the casino should be considered.

[FontSeli]

Preferring a casino with a license only makes sense if you are investing your own taxed money. But most of the gamblers use Bitcoin that they got from somewhere (e.g. airdops, crypto trading etc) and didn't pay tax for it. Therefore, the license for such gamblers is completely irrelevant, only the reputation and seriousness of the casino should be considered.

Different people get their coins in different ways. For example, I bought my first coins with money received from other taxable activities. I think that a lot of people in the crypto market bought their cryptocurrencies with money from their official income.
In addition, if you Deposit money on a gambling site to scammers, you will be equally sorry to lose both dirty money and clean money.

[pankowri]

To prove the company's legitimacy, a license is a standard form to show the customers for being trusted easily. In the case of Casino, people need to know the company details where it is being registered because Casino is the most popular and people are nowadays using it with huge money. So for their safety, a license can get them relief for not to be worried. It increases the level of trust.

[Yogee]

Preferring a casino with a license only makes sense if you are investing your own taxed money. But most of the gamblers use Bitcoin that they got from somewhere (e.g. airdops, crypto trading etc) and didn't pay tax for it. Therefore, the license for such gamblers is completely irrelevant, only the reputation and seriousness of the casino should be considered.

Fair enough. I haven't even considered that as a factor when choosing between licensed and reputable casinos.

Do you think someone who bought $100 [or less] worth of BTC for gambling purposes using his own taxed money would care about a casino's license? I've stated in the past that most gamblers wouldn't mind if they're betting with small capital.

[owengtam09]

The truth is, when I am playing online on gambling sites, I don't check if the site is registered or something or have a License. As long as I know that a gambling site is trusted then I will not be afraid of putting my BTC on that gambling site, but for those who have online gambling site then I think it's a must.

[MWesterweele]

To prove the company's legitimacy, a license is a standard form to show the customers for being trusted easily. In the case of Casino, people need to know the company details where it is being registered because Casino is the most popular and people are nowadays using it with huge money. So for their safety, a license can get them relief for not to be worried. It increases the level of trust.

As what i have know a prestigious gambling for sure was legally operated and has a licensed. Of course the licensed itself of a gambling business will attract gamblers. Aside from the fact that licensed make the gambling site worked freely but with some restrictions of a government, this would be also their assets to attract players, an edge to other gambling site that weren't licensed yet. Example of a gambling site that have a licensed were casino.

[molsewid]

The truth is, when I am playing online on gambling sites, I don't check if the site is registered or something or have a License. As long as I know that a gambling site is trusted then I will not be afraid of putting my BTC on that gambling site, but for those who have online gambling site then I think it's a must.

Then how can you know a gambling website is trusted if you didn't check if they are registered or have a license? By just the reputation or the feedback in their thread, right? When I'm playing too, I didn't care about gambling online if registered or have a license. I'm just reading some feedback or post about the gambling website to know if this website is safe for gambling.

[FontSeli]

Preferring a casino with a license only makes sense if you are investing your own taxed money. But most of the gamblers use Bitcoin that they got from somewhere (e.g. airdops, crypto trading etc) and didn't pay tax for it. Therefore, the license for such gamblers is completely irrelevant, only the reputation and seriousness of the casino should be considered.

Fair enough. I haven't even considered that as a factor when choosing between licensed and reputable casinos.

Do you think someone who bought $100 [or less] worth of BTC for gambling purposes using his own taxed money would care about a casino's license? I've stated in the past that most gamblers wouldn't mind if they're betting with small capital.

Do you think that people with little money will not regret their loss? This is because you have more money. However, do not forget that there are people for whom $ 100 is a large amount.
Even I would be sorry to lose $ 100 as a result of scam. I don't pay attention to online casino licenses, but I always pay attention to reputation. Perhaps because of this, I haven't lost anything yet.

[Becky666]

The truth is, when I am playing online on gambling sites, I don't check if the site is registered or something or have a License. As long as I know that a gambling site is trusted then I will not be afraid of putting my BTC on that gambling site, but for those who have online gambling site then I think it's a must.

That's exactly what I have registered here before now because, anyone in the gambling industry can get license within a short Period of time and still engage in scam, so, i don't quite border around platforms licensed. But what I anxiously believed and always craved to check before gambling in any platform is it reputation. Those gambling platforms I have used before now are with good reputation and I enjoyed their usage.

[Oilacris]

Preferring a casino with a license only makes sense if you are investing your own taxed money. But most of the gamblers use Bitcoin that they got from somewhere (e.g. airdops, crypto trading etc) and didn't pay tax for it. Therefore, the license for such gamblers is completely irrelevant, only the reputation and seriousness of the casino should be considered.

Fair enough. I haven't even considered that as a factor when choosing between licensed and reputable casinos.

Do you think someone who bought $100 [or less] worth of BTC for gambling purposes using his own taxed money would care about a casino's license? I've stated in the past that most gamblers wouldn't mind if they're betting with small capital.

Do you think that people with little money will not regret their loss? This is because you have more money. However, do not forget that there are people for whom $ 100 is a large amount.
Even I would be sorry to lose $ 100 as a result of scam. I don't pay attention to online casino licenses, but I always pay attention to reputation. Perhaps because of this, I haven't lost anything yet.

Didnt lose something in the sense that you havent put out any money into those casinos that arent really that trusted.We can have our own research and does have our own free
will to recognize on what casinos are really that capable on doing on giving some legit service to gamblers.

I agree that not all people do see that 100 bucks would be small yet lots would really be giving out importance on such amount yet this cant be earn too easily.
Gambling it will or making out deposit into a site will surely give out some hesitance.

[FontSeli]

Didnt lose something in the sense that you havent put out any money into those casinos that arent really that trusted.We can have our own research and does have our own free
will to recognize on what casinos are really that capable on doing on giving some legit service to gamblers.

I agree that not all people do see that 100 bucks would be small yet lots would really be giving out importance on such amount yet this cant be earn too easily.
Gambling it will or making out deposit into a site will surely give out some hesitance.

Sometimes the first glance at a gambling site makes you want to go to Google and search for the reputation of this casino. At the same time, some gambling and betting sites are so popular that I have heard about them far beyond the bitcoin forum. When I chose a site for the game, I didn't even look at whether it has any license)