removed

[The Cryptovator]

First of all the feedback isn't showing by default. Then it too older and wondering why OP created this thread too late. Wapinter should use the reference link on such as feedback. Not doing bounty tasks properly and asking for a stake isn't sufficient to leave negative feedback without evidence (if not cheating). Although his feedback isn't worthy of the default trust network, it shouldn't use this way. No matter OP is a spammer, this subject should handle by forum moderators.

Since no one can remove this feedback except Wapinter, so you have to communicate with him or he should reply on this thread if he notices. Otherwise, you may take rest since that feedback wouldn't harm you.

[Steamtyme]

Tagging a participant not doing sufficient work is wrong in the first place in my opinion. We both will agree that the feedback culture we have in here (red tag for scammer) and feedback culture in a freelancing website or ebay kind of platform are not the same. Not making sufficient work can not be considered as scamming. So, I would say leaving a neg to OP from Wapinter is not justified in the first place.

Agreed. It falls well below my standards for feedback. A neutral comment on their work quality would have made sense. That's what I base my opinions on regarding actions OP could reasonably take. With what is presented I see the managers actions worse than OP's.

Problem is though OP, went all flammy and ranty as well, I linked it. Not that that deserves red trust but could show why communication broke down. Who knows.

Probably won't come back to comment anymore, this is just starting to turn into another feedback circlejerk discussion, up until OP or Wapinter do something one way or another.

[malikg18]

I am looking way to get rid of but did not get any method .I send pm to the relevant but did not reply yet. I think there should be speedy method to resolve these type of Problems.

[YOSHIE]

I am looking way to get rid of but did not get any method .I send pm to the relevant but did not reply yet. I think there should be speedy method to resolve these type of Problems.

Your story is different from @tumis, there is no tolerance and rebuttal for you, you really deserve it.

And you have indeed violated the rules that have been implemented by the Bounty manager.

ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260771.0

• Using multi-accounts, cheating and spamming are not allowed. It will result getting all of your accounts permanently banned from the campaign. For any type of negative trust you can be banned as well.

While @tumis the red trust given by: @Wapinter, is different.
@tumis claims the token was not given by the campaign manager, namely: @Wapinter, while @Wapinter said @tumis did not complete KYC properly, but on the other hand @tumis used harsh words to @Wapinter, that if verified from the trust given by @Wapinter.
In fact, this case has been a long time ago, now the problem has risen again, so as it is now happening, that's my understanding.

So in conclusion: the @Wapinter case with @tumis is a pure misunderstanding between Kyc and the emotional manager and participants, you are a cheating case, another problem.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I am looking way to get rid of but did not get any method .I send pm to the relevant but did not reply yet. I think there should be speedy method to resolve these type of Problems.

The first and foremost way to get rid of such problems is to respect the community and accept its rules. The second way should be considered getting rid of your own greed. What can you call someone who has multiple accounts in their arsenal? And they were created only for cheating bounty. You can think of thousands of excuses for the fact that bounty hunters do not get anything in bounty companies or, in extreme cases, they will earn a penny. But, after all, no one forces them to participate there. Therefore, you have to pay for your mistakes. Or to respect the created rules and in this case, no one will give you red trust.