[Boxing]: Kell Brook vs Terence Crawford November 14

[wheelz1200]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

[Kemarit]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

LOL, at least we have someone here who understand how boxing is. Maybe people are just hyping it for Brook but the sportbookies are telling us otherwise. 

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

Record is as good on paper, but come fight night, records doesn't matter as there are just two combatants in the ring, puncher each other until someone gets knockout.

[wheelz1200]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

LOL, at least we have someone here who understand how boxing is. Maybe people are just hyping it for Brook but the sportbookies are telling us otherwise.  

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

Record is as good on paper, but come fight night, records doesn't matter as there are just two combatants in the ring, puncher each other until someone gets knockout.

People tend to use stats and standings as a way to analyze a fight which is rediculous.  And I've seen over and over on this forum people knock Mayweater as not a "true warrior".  These are the same people that know zero about boxing.  Ali perfected the rope a dope, where he just tired out his opponent and then when they threw themselves out of energy would go to town on them.  Floyd could never even get barely touch.  Love him or hate him as a person its undeniable he is one of the greatest ever to put on gloves.

Can't wait to watch Crawford go to work he is one of my favorite fighters right now.  He is one of the best in game fighters to be able to switch up fighting styles and adjust to put himself in position to win the fight.

[freedomgo]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

LOL, at least we have someone here who understand how boxing is. Maybe people are just hyping it for Brook but the sportbookies are telling us otherwise. 

The guy is not a hype, maybe as a gambler or a fan, we have different views on this fight and we can't just say that everyone should love Terrence Crawford as he is the better fighter, you know, upset is possible in boxing.

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

Record is as good on paper, but come fight night, records doesn't matter as there are just two combatants in the ring, puncher each other until someone gets knockout.

Honestly, I do believe that Crawford will win this fight but I'm hoping for an upset, can't resist the odds of Brook.

[rodskee]

This is going to be a good fight, Kell Brook of England vs Terence Crawford set on November 14

Brook beat Porter six years ago (Porter as still green), but it was his mistakes to face GGG in 2016, and it was a devastating lost for Brook as it was really a mismatch as Kell's eye socket open broken. And then he fight Spence Jr. which he also lost, he was really doing good early on, but we all know how Spence is, he will break you down and that's what happen.

No odds in sports bookies, but I'm sure Crawford will be the favourite. I'm seeing Crawford by TKO/KO in the later rounds. But it will be good early as Brook is known to start strong but faded in championships round.



https://www.boxingscene.com/crawford-brook-nsac-approves-request-stage-fight-las-vegas--152296
https://www.essentiallysports.com/boxing-news-terence-crawford-vs-kell-brook-early-analysis-and-prediction/



https://www.bestodds.ai/odds/sport-boxing/matchups/terence-crawford-vs-kell-brook

looks like crawford will get this one as though Brook is also strong starter,But asking for stamina it is  crawford's ability so in the End the later will win the fight.

Im already anticipating that one thats why im with Brook on this one. 

With that high odds it's hard to resist even though Crawford here is the champion and undefeated.

Other boxing threads have voting poll, I think @Baofeng it's nice if you'll also add a poll here.

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

[Natalim]

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

Yeah of course, odds are just a probability of this fight, if Crawford wins and you put your bet on him, you'll win but 5% of your bet, not much enticing with small bet, try to bet on the handicap, it's more exciting and more worth of your bet, if Crawford is still Crawford, he should KO his opponent and that I think gives good odds.

[Twinkledoe]

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

Yeah of course, odds are just a probability of this fight, if Crawford wins and you put your bet on him, you'll win but 5% of your bet, not much enticing with small bet, try to bet on the handicap, it's more exciting and more worth of your bet, if Crawford is still Crawford, he should KO his opponent and that I think gives good odds.

Really interesting if in case Brook will win this fight by any chance. This year may be the year of underdogs after all. Will Crawford really live up to the expectations of his fans? 2 more weeks to go...

[Natalim]

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

Yeah of course, odds are just a probability of this fight, if Crawford wins and you put your bet on him, you'll win but 5% of your bet, not much enticing with small bet, try to bet on the handicap, it's more exciting and more worth of your bet, if Crawford is still Crawford, he should KO his opponent and that I think gives good odds.

I'd rather choose those who have higher odds, this usually I choose to put my bets, and that seems an effective strategy for me. Well, I can't say that all of them did work and able to win but because we still have 50/50 chances to win in gambling. However, it is many times that it works for me. May we consider their performance and carrier record but that isn't an absolute measurement as well, no, it is a big difference when they got into the ring.

Good luck with that, but bear in mind that betting on high odds will result to losing most of the time and that is normal. What you should do is just don't bet blindly, do an analysis also before putting your bet, who knows this would be another upset by the underdog and that will destroy the clean record of Crawford.

[Viscore]

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

Yeah of course, odds are just a probability of this fight, if Crawford wins and you put your bet on him, you'll win but 5% of your bet, not much enticing with small bet, try to bet on the handicap, it's more exciting and more worth of your bet, if Crawford is still Crawford, he should KO his opponent and that I think gives good odds.

I'd rather choose those who have higher odds, this usually I choose to put my bets, and that seems an effective strategy for me. Well, I can't say that all of them did work and able to win but because we still have 50/50 chances to win in gambling. However, it is many times that it works for me. May we consider their performance and carrier record but that isn't an absolute measurement as well, no, it is a big difference when they got into the ring.

Good luck with that, but bear in mind that betting on high odds will result to losing most of the time and that is normal. What you should do is just don't bet blindly, do an analysis also before putting your bet, who knows this would be another upset by the underdog and that will destroy the clean record of Crawford.

That is the best thing to do. Looking into their previous fights, carrier record, that will help to make a good analysis, not just relying into odds because can't be just a sort of manipulation. Crawford make this right decision as well, now he needsto prove that he is better to him otherwise, the underdog will ruin his record. But then, I'm still putting my bet to Crawford, not exactly I like him but because he have that guts to win this fight.

[TravelMug]

Odds don't dictate who will win so lets see what will happen in the end,and still i'm with crawford.

At least there's a prize for the winners if there is a Poll for a single match ..

Yeah of course, odds are just a probability of this fight, if Crawford wins and you put your bet on him, you'll win but 5% of your bet, not much enticing with small bet, try to bet on the handicap, it's more exciting and more worth of your bet, if Crawford is still Crawford, he should KO his opponent and that I think gives good odds.

I'd rather choose those who have higher odds, this usually I choose to put my bets, and that seems an effective strategy for me. Well, I can't say that all of them did work and able to win but because we still have 50/50 chances to win in gambling. However, it is many times that it works for me. May we consider their performance and carrier record but that isn't an absolute measurement as well, no, it is a big difference when they got into the ring.

Good luck with that, but bear in mind that betting on high odds will result to losing most of the time and that is normal. What you should do is just don't bet blindly, do an analysis also before putting your bet, who knows this would be another upset by the underdog and that will destroy the clean record of Crawford.

That is the best thing to do. Looking into their previous fights, carrier record, that will help to make a good analysis, not just relying into odds because can't be just a sort of manipulation. Crawford make this right decision as well, now he needsto prove that he is better to him otherwise, the underdog will ruin his record. But then, I'm still putting my bet to Crawford, not exactly I like him but because he have that guts to win this fight.

Yes, if you look at the records, Crawford resume's really stand out and I would say that he has a tougher opponents, specially once he become a champion he faces different kind of fighters but the end result is the same. He either knock them out or win via technical knock out.

Again, Brook is good but he is way past his prime, but good fight for him, he still got the chance to face the best in the division and then have a good paycheck. But as far as winning, he has a slim chance against Crawford, it's just a matter of which round will Crawford will win, by KO/TKO.

[Kemarit]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

LOL, at least we have someone here who understand how boxing is. Maybe people are just hyping it for Brook but the sportbookies are telling us otherwise.  

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

Record is as good on paper, but come fight night, records doesn't matter as there are just two combatants in the ring, puncher each other until someone gets knockout.

People tend to use stats and standings as a way to analyze a fight which is rediculous.  And I've seen over and over on this forum people knock Mayweater as not a "true warrior".  These are the same people that know zero about boxing.  Ali perfected the rope a dope, where he just tired out his opponent and then when they threw themselves out of energy would go to town on them.  Floyd could never even get barely touch.  Love him or hate him as a person its undeniable he is one of the greatest ever to put on gloves.

Maybe they don't really appreciate the sweet science of boxing? LOL, there are casual fans here and then we have average knowledge and I would say some who really follow the sports many years ago and really betting on the fight.

Can't wait to watch Crawford go to work he is one of my favorite fighters right now.  He is one of the best in game fighters to be able to switch up fighting styles and adjust to put himself in position to win the fight.

One of the best p4p him and Spence are the best in the welterweight division right now. Love him when he goes unorthodox stance, those counter right and then followed by big left. I would say that he had fights wherein he has lost some rounds because he is reading this opponents, but when he adjusted already, expect him to finished the fight within 10 rounds or less.

[Botnake]

Again, Brook is good but he is way past his prime, but good fight for him, he still got the chance to face the best in the division and then have a good paycheck. But as far as winning, he has a slim chance against Crawford, it's just a matter of which round will Crawford will win, by KO/TKO.

Obviously the winning chance is very low because because everyone is favoring Crawford to win this fight.

However, Brook is not an easy opponent, as per his record, it says he is a dangerous fighter so Crawford can go for KO but he has to be careful and he might make a mistake that could give Brook a chance to knock him out, Brook has a good KO rate, he can do that.

[wheelz1200]

In the words of Iron Mike, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.  Everyone is on here talking about brook taking this one, lol.  Has anyone even watched Crawford fight?  Dude is straight beast in the ring, everyone always downplays saying this might be the one then gets straight annialated.  I see this one maybe going 4 or 5 with either a tko or ko and another win for crawford.

LOL, at least we have someone here who understand how boxing is. Maybe people are just hyping it for Brook but the sportbookies are telling us otherwise.  

I've read through the entire thread and it sounds as though most are just posting nonsense about records lol.  You think the sports books give such big odds to Crawford as a gift???  

Record is as good on paper, but come fight night, records doesn't matter as there are just two combatants in the ring, puncher each other until someone gets knockout.

People tend to use stats and standings as a way to analyze a fight which is rediculous.  And I've seen over and over on this forum people knock Mayweater as not a "true warrior".  These are the same people that know zero about boxing.  Ali perfected the rope a dope, where he just tired out his opponent and then when they threw themselves out of energy would go to town on them.  Floyd could never even get barely touch.  Love him or hate him as a person its undeniable he is one of the greatest ever to put on gloves.

Maybe they don't really appreciate the sweet science of boxing? LOL, there are casual fans here and then we have average knowledge and I would say some who really follow the sports many years ago and really betting on the fight.

Can't wait to watch Crawford go to work he is one of my favorite fighters right now.  He is one of the best in game fighters to be able to switch up fighting styles and adjust to put himself in position to win the fight.

One of the best p4p him and Spence are the best in the welterweight division right now. Love him when he goes unorthodox stance, those counter right and then followed by big left. I would say that he had fights wherein he has lost some rounds because he is reading this opponents, but when he adjusted already, expect him to finished the fight within 10 rounds or less.

Yeah I see that with a lot of the boxing threads here, most are just casual fans.  This fight isn't worth betting on.  Crawfords odds aren't worth laying money on and betting on brook is dead money.  Just enjoy the match for what it is

[Finestream]

Yeah I see that with a lot of the boxing threads here, most are just casual fans.  This fight isn't worth betting on.  Crawfords odds aren't worth laying money on and betting on brook is dead money.  Just enjoy the match for what it is

That's what I would do if I believe Crawford would easily win this fight, but I could also do some experiment laying a little amount for Brook to win, just for the sake of entertainment, who knows, he will hit a lucky punch, anything can happen, like what happen to LOMA, though not a lucky punch.

[btc_angela]

Again, Brook is good but he is way past his prime, but good fight for him, he still got the chance to face the best in the division and then have a good paycheck. But as far as winning, he has a slim chance against Crawford, it's just a matter of which round will Crawford will win, by KO/TKO.

Obviously the winning chance is very low because because everyone is favoring Crawford to win this fight.

However, Brook is not an easy opponent, as per his record, it says he is a dangerous fighter so Crawford can go for KO but he has to be careful and he might make a mistake that could give Brook a chance to knock him out, Brook has a good KO rate, he can do that.

I believed that Kell Brook is dangerous, but in the early rounds. And as the fight gets along, Crawford ring's IQ is very high and he could figure a way to negate Brooks's strength and then go for a KO or TKO in the later rounds. The last time I watch him fight against Khan, he tried to get the feel and distance and then KD Khan in the first round, after that, Crawford put a clinic. Could be the same here, he is known to be a slow starter, but it doesn't mean that he is not reading his opponents early.

[mirakal]

Again, Brook is good but he is way past his prime, but good fight for him, he still got the chance to face the best in the division and then have a good paycheck. But as far as winning, he has a slim chance against Crawford, it's just a matter of which round will Crawford will win, by KO/TKO.

Obviously the winning chance is very low because because everyone is favoring Crawford to win this fight.

However, Brook is not an easy opponent, as per his record, it says he is a dangerous fighter so Crawford can go for KO but he has to be careful and he might make a mistake that could give Brook a chance to knock him out, Brook has a good KO rate, he can do that.

I believed that Kell Brook is dangerous, but in the early rounds. And as the fight gets along, Crawford ring's IQ is very high and he could figure a way to negate Brooks's strength and then go for a KO or TKO in the later rounds. The last time I watch him fight against Khan, he tried to get the feel and distance and then KD Khan in the first round, after that, Crawford put a clinic. Could be the same here, he is known to be a slow starter, but it doesn't mean that he is not reading his opponents early.

I'm sure Kell Brook knows that, he is the older fighter, his chances will reduce if he will take this fight to the later rounds, he should find a way to hurt Crawford in the early rounds and finish him if possible, that's the only way I'm seeing it now, or he could also be finish early if he is not careful but Kell Brook here has to take that risk if he wants to win.

[Twinkledoe]

Again, Brook is good but he is way past his prime, but good fight for him, he still got the chance to face the best in the division and then have a good paycheck. But as far as winning, he has a slim chance against Crawford, it's just a matter of which round will Crawford will win, by KO/TKO.

Obviously the winning chance is very low because because everyone is favoring Crawford to win this fight.

However, Brook is not an easy opponent, as per his record, it says he is a dangerous fighter so Crawford can go for KO but he has to be careful and he might make a mistake that could give Brook a chance to knock him out, Brook has a good KO rate, he can do that.

I believed that Kell Brook is dangerous, but in the early rounds. And as the fight gets along, Crawford ring's IQ is very high and he could figure a way to negate Brooks's strength and then go for a KO or TKO in the later rounds. The last time I watch him fight against Khan, he tried to get the feel and distance and then KD Khan in the first round, after that, Crawford put a clinic. Could be the same here, he is known to be a slow starter, but it doesn't mean that he is not reading his opponents early.

I'm sure Kell Brook knows that, he is the older fighter, his chances will reduce if he will take this fight to the later rounds, he should find a way to hurt Crawford in the early rounds and finish him if possible, that's the only way I'm seeing it now, or he could also be finish early if he is not careful but Kell Brook here has to take that risk if he wants to win.

Maybe the bookies also saw this weakness as the odds of course is favoring Crawford. ANd you will earn small percentage of your bet if you are rooting for Crawford. But if miraculously, Brook will win, those who will bet on him will win the big prize. But unlikely that it will happen.

[plr]

I'm sure Kell Brook knows that, he is the older fighter, his chances will reduce if he will take this fight to the later rounds, he should find a way to hurt Crawford in the early rounds and finish him if possible, that's the only way I'm seeing it now, or he could also be finish early if he is not careful but Kell Brook here has to take that risk if he wants to win.

Old fighters with the exception of Manny Pacquiao should scored points or stop his opponents, because if the fights drag on, old age will catch up with an old fighter, and Crawford is so good at making old fighters really look old, I don't want Manny Pacquiao to fight this guy he is the best welterweight of this era no doubt about it.

[Sanitough]

I'm sure Kell Brook knows that, he is the older fighter, his chances will reduce if he will take this fight to the later rounds, he should find a way to hurt Crawford in the early rounds and finish him if possible, that's the only way I'm seeing it now, or he could also be finish early if he is not careful but Kell Brook here has to take that risk if he wants to win.

Old fighters with the exception of Manny Pacquiao should scored points or stop his opponents, because if the fights drag on, old age will catch up with an old fighter, and Crawford is so good at making old fighters really look old, I don't want Manny Pacquiao to fight this guy he is the best welterweight of this era no doubt about it.

We never know if they will not fight, If Pacquiao beat Thurman who is a younger fighter, a champion and undefeated as well, then it's not possible to beat Crawford though he is the best in his division now. Pacquiao  is just ordinary, he is a living legend, if he agrees with the fight, that means he knows his chance is higher.

[Baofeng]

Here's the face-off:



https://www.boxingscene.com/photos-terence-crawford-kell-brook-face-face-final-presser--153187

For someone who is looking for the underdogs, then former champ Brook is your man here.  , 9-1 odds.