Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[b1boy]

I think for me the answer i would be going for is No because signature is just Part of Bounty and the main point to bring awareness to the project and most people click on people’s signature to check out the project and its up to you to make your research before knowing if the project is worth investing in or not

[1713285206]

1713285206

[1713285206]

1713285206

[1713285206]

1713285206

[smyslov]

I've been reading some comments her and all who posted agreed that signature campaign has nothing to do with credibility but it will only contribute traffic and awareness, when it comes to credibility, it lies on the team and not on promotion, when I was active in bounty campaign out of 9 of ten I've participated are scams and that's a fact.

[Vishnu.Reang]

It's just to make the project go round publicly, it's not a guarantee for credibility of success. You still have to do your own due diligence on any project you come across either on Bitcointalk or anywhere else.

Obviously the main purpose is to get some exposure and advertisement for the project. Making the project a success doesn't have much to do with the signature campaigns. Signature campaigns run during the ICO phase. Whether a project becomes succesful or not is decided after the next 1-2 years. During this period, there will be no bounty campaigns and the exchange rate of the token and other parameters will be decided by the merit of the project.

[BAGOBO]

This is like making Viral, you know in this forum there are so many members. The members here are not only Bounty Hunters but also investors who are looking for projects here for investment.

Automatically will attract their interest if many people talk about it.

not only Signature but Social media campaigns are also very influential to increase and make it easier to find Google.

[matchi2011]

It's just to make the project go round publicly, it's not a guarantee for credibility of success. You still have to do your own due diligence on any project you come across either on Bitcointalk or anywhere else.

Obviously the main purpose is to get some exposure and advertisement for the project. Making the project a success doesn't have much to do with the signature campaigns. Signature campaigns run during the ICO phase. Whether a project becomes successful or not is decided after the next 1-2 years. During this period, there will be no bounty campaigns and the exchange rate of the token and other parameters will be decided by the merit of the project.

Aside from good advertisement to attract the investors there's none that signature campaign can help the project, it's all decided with how the team works and how they will continue to developed.

Everything under any crypto coins relied with the team and the community support it takes time to say if the project did success or it will turned into nothing and die eventually.

[ampu]

I have noticed that Bitcointalk has fewer users as it becomes more difficult to rank the account and duplicate topics. People are turning to Cryptotalk, Altscoinstalk, Bitcoingarden ...
So a signature campaign will attract less attention in the community as the number of users decreases.
The signature campaign only reflects the total amount of money that is worthwhile and attracts many participants. In 2017, there were various signature schemes from bounty campaigns, and by far those projects have largely died out.

[BITCOIN4X]

Signature campaigns are often used to promote an ICO / IEO project to increase investor confidence,

No, I don't think a signature campaign can increase investor confidence in a project under development. The purpose of the signature campaign is to disseminate information about the project in all part of the forum (there may be limitation depending on the manager) and that will increase public awareness of the project. All investor will not be easy to believe until they have done an in-depth project analysis. If they believe in the potential that exists, then they will invest there and if not then they will ignore it.

A signature campaign can still be used as an attempt to increase the confidence of investors and trader if the project has previously been successful with an ICO or fundraising. To increase product attractiveness, promotion must be carried out by offering the features and advantages of each.

[ilovealtcoins]

I am a regular participant in signature programs and I find that they do not help projects. The signature program is inferior to Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Youtube Video ... because it only affects the Bitcointalk forum. Other social networks have more users and certainly bring more advertising value.
I consider the signature program of interest to encourage everyone to participate in discussions on this forum.

[scolary23]

I am a regular participant in signature programs and I find that they do not help projects. The signature program is inferior to Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Youtube Video ... because it only affects the Bitcointalk forum. Other social networks have more users and certainly bring more advertising value.

In what you wrote, there is a place to be, but partially. The bitcoin talk forum effectively promotes projects through signatures. First of all, this is due to the profile and narrow focus of the forum. It discusses the basics, development and promotion of projects by people who have knowledge since the inception of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Therefore, social networks are thieves in importance.

[sangjoewara]

I think for me the answer i would be going for is No because signature is just Part of Bounty and the main point to bring awareness to the project and most people click on people’s signature to check out the project and its up to you to make your research before knowing if the project is worth investing in or not

Yes, obviously there won't be much impact on the project in terms of signatures, because it is only part of the campaign that is opened to members who are in the forum with a certain rank, so the effect won't be much, even though sometimes there are people. which takes more references than the signature campaign, and for the subject of seeing about the project I think each project clearly has a website and a whitepaper that describes the complete project.

[ilovealtcoins]

In what you wrote, there is a place to be, but partially. The bitcoin talk forum effectively promotes projects through signatures. First of all, this is due to the profile and narrow focus of the forum. It discusses the basics, development and promotion of projects by people who have knowledge since the inception of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Therefore, social networks are thieves in importance.

The more signatures discussed will be displayed, which also means that people will see more signatures. People who skim through the project will decide whether or not to invest in it.
Isn't the purpose of the signature program to sell a lot of tokens and attract the community? So if it's a bad project, who will buy it? The most important issue is whether the project itself is good enough or not.

[bobyhodob]

I am a regular participant in signature programs and I find that they do not help projects. The signature program is inferior to Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Youtube Video ... because it only affects the Bitcointalk forum. Other social networks have more users and certainly bring more advertising value.

In what you wrote, there is a place to be, but partially. The bitcoin talk forum effectively promotes projects through signatures. First of all, this is due to the profile and narrow focus of the forum. It discusses the basics, development and promotion of projects by people who have knowledge since the inception of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Therefore, social networks are thieves in importance.

well, unfortunately only people who understand cryptocurrency will understand bitcointalk, while ordinary people who have no experience do not know bitcointalk, for information dissemination, social media and media blogs or youtube campaigns can be the right choice because they can attract investors.

[mirakal]

I am a regular participant in signature programs and I find that they do not help projects. The signature program is inferior to Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Youtube Video ... because it only affects the Bitcointalk forum. Other social networks have more users and certainly bring more advertising value.

In what you wrote, there is a place to be, but partially. The bitcoin talk forum effectively promotes projects through signatures. First of all, this is due to the profile and narrow focus of the forum. It discusses the basics, development and promotion of projects by people who have knowledge since the inception of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Therefore, social networks are thieves in importance.

well, unfortunately only people who understand cryptocurrency will understand bitcointalk, while ordinary people who have no experience do not know bitcointalk, for information dissemination, social media and media blogs or youtube campaigns can be the right choice because they can attract investors.

That's what bounty is all about, they don't only focus in one platform because not everyone stay in one platform.
Best thing about our forum is that it will display right away if people will look for bitcoin forum as it's the most popular in the crypto space.

I've been in the forum for 5 years already, I am not only earning money from bounty and from different promotions but I learn a lot as well and that I can use when choosing the right investment in the market.

[olabiyijummy02]

Trust in some ICO, even without arriving at the mark, can be defended by the standard of cautious investigation of the task. This ought to be the standard. If all else fails, leave the ICO for later or mark it as undesirable. What's more, the signature and wearing it is a publicizing move to pull in expected financial specialists, just as to draw in new members to advance the task

[Kang TB]

I believe it can, if the ICO manager is one of the high trusted members in bitcointalk it can add some credits to ICO because he/she would get negative trust if the ICO turns out scam or doesn't pay, but it is not true for newbies as bounty managers.

the OP ask about signature campaign my friend, not about the campaign manager
and in my opinion signature campaign is just a way to promote a new crypto project but in the right forum, because i believe all people in this forum is believe in cryptocurrency

check this words again

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

[Btra]

No campaign will increase the credibility whether it be the signature or any social media campaign as far as the project itself will not be challenging behind any ICO. So, always read the whitepaper of any ICO coming thoroughly before ICO investment.

[TIDOVEE]

Signature campaign is designed to majorly promotes projects as a publicity media, signature campaign most time get higher token at distribution because you can only carry a signature at a time while on twitter, facebook...you can promote many projects at a time.the credibility of ico is more in the function of the team and managers. Signature campaign does not increase ico credibility.

[Tigerheart3026]

For me, yes. By investing in signature campaign, the Project team for me is quite serious with their project. It shows how they want to have a crowd for their ICO and probably succeed their project.

signature campaign able to big promotion in the forum community. its way of advertisement process. running a campaign doesn't mean it's increase credibility. scam projects runs signature campaign too, that it’s not a guaranteed to succeed ico.

[pixie85]

It does increase visibility. The name and logo becomes more recognizable and you're increasing traffic on the project's site, getting more people to join telegram, getting more people to download wallets and click referral links.

It does not increase credibility. If you want credibility you need to have a known dev team or pay someone to promote you. John McAfee used to sell his own name to add credibility to projects, but this made him lose his own credibility

[kidbounty]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

credibility has nothing to do with the signature campaign. Signature is only part of promotion, to assess the credibility of a project you can see it from the experience of members of the development team or from their goals and readiness to launch the project. for the first stage you can judge from their whitepaper, roadmap, website. a credible project must have prepared it very carefully.