If truely betking partner with bistler then their are set to reform they business and have a great relaunch if their follows bistler footsteps and system. Thanks to the thread starter for giving out this warning.
Your post is incoherent and contradictory, maybe you can try again so others can understand.
Why would Bitsler invole and participate in such practices? I don't think Bitsler has a bad name at all.
Collaborating with Betking/Dean Nolan would only damage your image.
You are right Bitsler does not have a bad name at all but they probably calculated their image would not be hit bad because they showed themselves to be helping give payments to betking victims by giving the funds to the betking serial scammer and entrusting him to hand over the funds to the victims he created. Strange why they would do that
I think that was from before I read a thread here about their partnership with Dean Nolan but I think that was from before and Bitsler now is doing good and now they have a sports betting on their website.
Bitlser have always been doing well but I thinl they fell in to the trap laid out by serial scammer Dean Nolan because he obviously oversold the information an story to Bitsler and they accepted it thinking they could spend $200 for each victim that betking has and that those victims would end up spending more than the $200 and they would make new customers BUT it is clear Bitsler made a mistake. Their overwhelming error was to believe everything serial scammer Dean Nolan said without even making an audit or checking for evidence.
You may be right, but the problem with this kind of thing remains that for the general public the name will always stick to their website.
They may not have been able to do anything about that at the time, but users and customers are very critical, and if they are suspicious they will not create an account.
betking.io will always be remembered a scam website that could have conquered most other casinos but the greed and timing of returning the bankroll and having the ICO in 2017 in order for serial cammer DEan Nolan to get rich by pocketing the cash will be remembered as the betking scam.
Why would Bitsler invole and participate in such practices? I don't think Bitsler has a bad name at all.
Collaborating with Betking/Dean Nolan would only damage your image.
Basing up on their confirmation post.This isnt really a partnership but rather a show of appreciation of Baryom to Betking owner Dean.
In the same spirit, we prefer to invest in promotions for our players and for the amazing community that always supported us instead of big communication campaigns. Even though online cryptocurrency casinos are all competitors by default, we always try to respect them as long as they respect their users and are fair. We never really knew what happened when Betking was closed except that many players were not able to get their balances back. However, we still try to be aware of what's happening in this community and we noticed after a long time that Dean is still here trying to payback players and investors of his site. For me, it's at the very least a sign of goodwill from him, so when we found an opportunity to help out the players still waiting to receive their balances as well as promoting Bitsler, we thought that it could be a good opportunity for everybody to benefit from.Getting it at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1268718.msg54234856#msg54234856You would eventually able to understand that this isnt totally talking about tie-ups but rather seeing this as some sort of appreciation of Bitsler to Betking and a part of promotion on to the site itself..
They wont really be messing out their reputation just because of this action but you would really be having that kind of question in mind.
Before the deal was announced but after it was agreed with a cooling off period, Bitsler should have announced they were about to go ahead with this deal and then would have seen the public outrage towards it. In the end nobody knows how many of $200 in Bitcoin were ever released to real victims of betking and how many were released to fake accounts set up by serial scammer Dean Nolan to pocket the cash for himself.
This deal was not about Bitsler helping victims of the betking scam because Bitsler could have done it in other ways. The explanation given by Bitsler where they justified their deal with betking was nothing more than a PR disaster. Who actually believes the line "
we noticed after a long time that Dean is still here trying to payback players and investors of his site. For me, it's at the very least a sign of goodwill from him, so when we found an opportunity to help out the players still waiting to receive their balances as well as promoting Bitsler, we thought that it could be a good opportunity for everybody to benefit from." ?
Bitsler effectively handed control of $200 x 250 players to serial scammer Dean Nolan. Bitsler have no evidence that any of the $50,000 would have gone to the victims.
How many of you out there would give donations in the hand of a burglar that broke in to the homes and stole belongings from innocent victms? Would you not prefer to donate directly to the victims? If the burglar was really reformed surely he would have no objections to giving the email addresses and tx ids to prove they were really his victims so the donors could help them directly.
Bitsler made a huge PR blunder with this so-called deal.
