Checking bitcoin transfer with only amount

[hhjerv]

Hello, I would like to know if I can check BTC transfer or find it if I know only transfer amount (0.100697) ?
Transfer has been made within last 2h.

[1715221647]

1715221647

[1715221647]

1715221647

[1715221647]

1715221647

[1715221647]

1715221647

[1715221647]

1715221647

[1715221647]

1715221647

[TryNinja]

Take a look at the Blockchair explorer. They let you filter transactions by input/output value, fee, size, weight, block, etc...

Transactions with a 0.100697 BTC input: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transactions?s=time(desc),output_total(desc)&q=input_total(10069700)#f=hash,block_id,input_count,output_count,time,output_total,output_total_usd,fee_usd,input_total

[hhjerv]

Thank you for your reply, but I could not find any transaction.

[TryNinja]

Thank you for your reply, but I could not find any transaction.

That doesn't seem right. I just tried myself before posting the link.



Here are some examples:

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/3db4a2873b3ed750ccf2e8da8fd88b2b0af0f23f0f76e4dedb9307db98b801bd
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/fd48ede205c59570e0d20083c881b6afe0fc417ca77937e9c9cb2cc74ff4d50a

edit: add the filter yourself, it's not working through the link for some reason.

[hhjerv]

I found transfers now, again thank you for your help, but I am still confused.

These transfers seems to be with amount + fee = 0.100697

But I have received email from coinbase "You just received 0.100697 BTC (€3,812.66 EUR) from an external Bitcoin account. It may take up to 3 network confirmations before your Bitcoin is available to trade."

I am not able to log in to coinbase to check this transfer, I am working on it.
I was just thinking maybe there is a way to check/find this transfer sooner.

[nc50lc]

But I have received email from coinbase "You just received 0.100697 BTC (€3,812.66 EUR) from an external Bitcoin account. It may take up to 3 network confirmations before your Bitcoin is available to trade."

You should be looking for "outputs" (Recipients) instead of "inputs" (Senders).
Using TryNinja's link, here's an edited filtered results: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transactions?s=output_total(desc)&q=output_total(10069700)
However, Blockchair's output filter can only filter all of the transaction's total output(s) amount and not the individual outputs, so, if your deposit has a change, it won't be included in the result.

If you want to get the actual transaction, you can paste your Coinbase deposit address to a blockexplorer and check the latest transaction's outputs (that address) for matching amount.

[hhjerv]

Thank you both for your replies. I understand now all situation better.

[Charles-Tim]

If you want to get the actual transaction, you can paste your Coinbase deposit address to a blockexplorer and check the latest transaction's outputs (that address) for matching amount.

This will be a very simple to understand way to track a transaction on blockchain using blockchain explorer like blockchair.com. If he is good with Electrum, he can also just import the address on Electrum which will be a watch-only wallet and not be able to spend from it but will be able to check the address transactions in history.

[o_e_l_e_o]

However, Blockchair's output filter can only filter all of the transaction's total output(s) amount and not the individual outputs, so, if your deposit has a change, it won't be included in the result.

The way around this is to search for individual outputs rather than filter a transaction search by the output value. This link shows every output which has ever existed with a value of 0.100697 BTC: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/outputs?q=value(10069700)

Using that link, we can see this transaction made just a couple of hours before OP's post: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/a156376aad72490a9f95a390068c641779bc571510ea1ec828cb29df315919a6. If we follow it on, we can then see it has been swept in a transaction with 600 inputs and 1 output, so it is almost certain this is OP's Coinbase deposit transaction he was looking for. Obviously it is long confirmed by now, but handy to know for future reference.