“People with billions of dollars don’t want to invest in crypto networks that support anarchists,” Saylor explained.
I asked Saylor if this was a marketing problem.
"It’s a matter of emphasis. The industry would benefit if we didn’t call Bitcoin a cryptocurrency, but a crypto asset."
1.99% of the people,who own cryptocurrencies aren't anarchists.His point isn't valid.
2.It doesn't matter how we call Bitcoin.BTC is both a cryptocurrency and a crypto asset,so the way we call it doesn't change the nature of Bitcoin in any way.I don't give a damn about the opinions of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve.
I don't like the views of this guy about crypto.As if he is trying to say "Look,I'm OK with pumping the Bitcoin price,but let's not make the big boys angry." By the "big boys" I mean the Federal Reserve,the government and the big payment gateway companies.
This is what we see in the market, no matter what bad words they throw on bitcoin, the price won't even budge no matter how famous they are in terms of wealth. The only opinions that matter are those of the world leaders and still the only opinions that will make a big change in the market will be good opinions just like what happened when the Chinese President said good things about BTC last year.
