Non successful projects find it hard to pay

[Banulit]

It is really hard for the non successful to raised their bounty rewards for the reason that they are avoiding possible dump of the bounty hunter which are more likely to happen due to there are plenty of hunters that once they receive their reward they will immediately sell off their token that make the project become unsuccessful.

[1713492983]

1713492983

[kenelmark]

yes you are right, in reality failed projects will not pay bounty hunters.  successful sales projects that pay bounty hunters, so if you enter a bounty that doesn't sell well, don't expect to be paid.  don't complain because it's our risk  being a bounty hunter must have more patience

True, there are no words to complain when the project is not maximally successful, but I have also found successful projects but bounty hunters are also not paid, even when complained they were even removed from their telegram group.

[Natalim]

yes you are right, in reality failed projects will not pay bounty hunters.  successful sales projects that pay bounty hunters, so if you enter a bounty that doesn't sell well, don't expect to be paid.  don't complain because it's our risk  being a bounty hunter must have more patience

It's a very simple, bounty hunters reward are coming from the amount the project is generated through crowd sale.

So this will happen, if the project will not sell enough, they will fail, if they fail they will not pursue the project, hence the coin or token has no value, and bounty hunters and other kind of jobs promoting the project will not get paid, and you are right, we should not complain for not understanding how bounty hunting works.

Bounty hunters even should be thankful they don't loss a dime unlike investors.

[Kelvinid]

It was not surprising and that is usually the ending story of scams or fake projects. Their devs are not seeing what could be the worse result in the crypto community as they only wanting to fool people and make money from their promotion (it was free of cost).

It sometimes happens that even we receive our rewards but somehow it can't be traded as well. It doesn't make sense than having these shitcoins without a chance to trade it since it wasn't listed to any exchangers.

Really disappointing, and it a little bit worried that this might be a reason that many people will no longer take the risk in crypto particularly in new projects. Coz even now, I felt it and have to see that most of them never succeed.

[max6575]

as developers manage of work following customs with personal strategy, there might be different on choice as option with part of tasks on marketing and distribution of product and service for public audience, that more or less developer might requires of supports with fair limit of resource to complete tasks on request with the project management.

[kak uli]

Are new projects supposed to be well successful today to pay bounty hunters their promised payment? If they raise huge amount of money paying bounty hunters won't be a big problem, am I right ?

many new projects could not afford bounty hunters once they had completed all the sales. those who do not pay bounty hunters are not only failed projects but there are also projects that are very successful but still do not want to pay bounty hunters for various reasons. and conditions like these have been experienced by bounty hunters. so experienced bounty hunters will seek and follow bounty projects with the best bounty managers.

[Ceyflix-Rez]

Non successful projects will definitely find it hard to pay and thats not their fault, not raising enough money to develop a project means game over, if you promote a project and it failed to achieve softcap it's better to forget such project cos everything will come to an halt, even if you get paid the tokens or coins will be worthless

[Retainly_Collie]

People are less stressed when the campaigns they participate in are paid for, but not every project is like that which is what always happens in this space. But I have a completely different opinion from many people here, instead of blaming the project you blame yourself for the meaningless work and hope it will bring you laughter.

[Arkann]

Project developers need to be more attentive and productive so that their project develops and the coins have sufficient value so that users do not worry about the commission spent. In most cases, today the cost of the commission can be much higher than the cost of a certain amount of cryptocurrency on the Ethereum network.

[AmoreJaz]

It never going to be easy for a project that's not successful to pay promoters, if they raise very low amount of money for development they can decide not to pay a dime, it's never their fault, as a reasonable bounty hunter if a project you promote failed to raise money for development do not bother to expect anything from such project, it's not easy to look away but it's part of the risks that bounty hunters must take

There are certain minimums that are negotiated in advance, the minimum capitalization of funds that the project needs to collect for the initial implementation, this is called a soft cap.
Upon reaching the soft cap, the project must fulfill its promises to investors and bounty hunters, otherwise it should be considered a scam and be devoid of trust.
Too many projects forget about this, allowing themselves to be deceived in order not to pay people for their work.

sadly, most projects disappear once they collected money from these naive buyers. how many projects have you seen here that actually develop into something useful for the community. there are so many of them, and yet, you can only see few to successfully hit their goals.
so it is understandable that most will not pay their bounty hunters because they have no intentions to begin with. if these projects can't get their hunters, i guess they will stop doing this kind of scheme and return to be btc-paying campaign.

[motun01]

actually I have seen some good projects that, they neglect to get the objective supports required yet they actually endure and proceed with the project and as of not long ago they can in any case be effective, there are projects that way, so inability to gather reserves is anything but a significant issue since, in such a case that the project is helpful for some individuals, the subsidizes will be not difficult to acquire and investors will see from the case firsthand when the project is good then it is sure that investors will give their cash for the advancement cycle

[Fredomago]

It never going to be easy for a project that's not successful to pay promoters, if they raise very low amount of money for development they can decide not to pay a dime, it's never their fault, as a reasonable bounty hunter if a project you promote failed to raise money for development do not bother to expect anything from such project, it's not easy to look away but it's part of the risks that bounty hunters must take

There are certain minimums that are negotiated in advance, the minimum capitalization of funds that the project needs to collect for the initial implementation, this is called a soft cap.
Upon reaching the soft cap, the project must fulfill its promises to investors and bounty hunters, otherwise it should be considered a scam and be devoid of trust.
Too many projects forget about this, allowing themselves to be deceived in order not to pay people for their work.

Soft cap achievers do have chances to pay the hunters while those who didn't meet this level mostly turned to scam both hunters and investors, some are for real and they are sending back collected fund.

While the most are scammers who really intend to runaway investors fund and ending up hunters as part of scamming activities
since they've participated with team to attract investors.

Very risky activites even you are just trying to get some sort of extra earnings.

[max6575]

as part with consequence that developer works on customs with the development and manufacturing, the ico scheme helps on funding on covering expends to prepare release of product to public audience that different manage on running with strategic might be taken by developer considering distinct of factors and aspects with assumption.

[rozak]

Even if there are new projects that are done, it still depends on how much the company has collected in ico because even if it has been successful and they have collected little money, it is still not enough for them to do the things they want to do. the coins that they will pay to the bounty hunters are useless if the development of their project is not successful so the result will be shitcoin a coin.

at least they must be able to achieve the minimum achievement. and payments to campaign participants must of course be made. but when their sales do not reach the minimum target, the project will be canceled or with the solution of an extension of time to add more sales.
Most developers will say they will seek private investors to raise funds for project development. after that, they will run away.
that kind of thing, obviously won't be of any use even if we get paid.

[conected]

For projects that were not successful, they tended not to pay participants. Even successful projects sometimes don't keep their promises to pay. there is always a reason during distribution.
reduced payments. the reason for the fee. payment becomes delayed for several months. this is a risk for bounty participants because they are faced with not getting their rights if they have

- Even if unsuccessful projects can pay participants, the value of these tokens is zero, without listing and liquidity, we won't have money, successful projects often fall into the same situation, they gain acceptance from an exchange but soon, dumping continuously occurs and that exchange takes them off the exchange. The crypto industry has always had such risks, as a participant in projects we should be ready for those situations in which we fail, expecting a perfect success rate is nonexistent when everything like bounty and airdrop is free, can't ask for more, we can just try luck

[DarkIT]

Some project will not list after the payment to bounty hunters.It should be corrected by the project people. Then the people will not participated in bounty. Then no project will be promoted in bitcointalk. One of the project doing this is JACS team.Jacs team should list their token in the exchange. If they keep delay, it will back fire the project.

[meldrio1]

It depends to the project team if they promised to pay bounty hunters after the bounty or the ICO.. and If they raised a huge amount of money then there is no problem to pay bounty hunters, I don't see any problem here unless they will turn scam and ran with the money.