Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports

[MrlostinBTC]

BSGS Dual CPU support? Running 2x intel gold 6148 40 threads each 256gig ram.

At 40 threads I get 15 Exa keys/s

At 80 threads I get 6-12 Exa keys/s

All threads are fully loaded when 80 is requested. Bottle neck somewhere?

I am still fine with 40, but 80 would be nice.

Thank you for all the great work Alberto!

[1714959489]

1714959489

[1714959489]

1714959489

[1714959489]

1714959489

[1714959489]

1714959489

[1714959489]

1714959489

[albert0bsd]

Maybe it is something related to the Operating system thread administration. Can you try some 78 or 79 threads instead?

Maybe the CPU gets heater and it reduce the frequency. Check first running it with less than 80 thread try some 70, 75... Just to discard some cases.

[MrlostinBTC]

Maybe it is something related to the Operating system thread administration. Can you try some 78 or 79 threads instead?

Maybe the CPU gets heater and it reduce the frequency. Check first running it with less than 80 thread try some 70, 75... Just to discard some cases.

Ubuntu 23.04

I have tried 78, 50, 55 all the same results. Anything over 40 decreases the speed by half with twice the threads. Maybe a Kernel issue?

[albert0bsd]

Uhmm, I think that 40 is the limit 



If you see the processor specifications on https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/120489/intel-xeon-gold-6148-processor-27-5m-cache-2-40-ghz.html

It is 20 cores so it it's only 40 threads max.

I am not hardware expert so if you believe that your processor can be overclocked or something like that I think that you should search about it on a Hardware forum or something like that.

[MrlostinBTC]

Uhmm, I think that 40 is the limit 



If you see the processor specifications on https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/120489/intel-xeon-gold-6148-processor-27-5m-cache-2-40-ghz.html

It is 20 cores so it it's only 40 threads max.

I am not hardware expert so if you believe that your processor can be overclocked or something like that I think that you should search about it on a Hardware forum or something like that.

2 cpus at 40 threads, 80 total. CPU info shows 80 possible. Ubuntu shows 80 threads. But you may be correct. Strange as bios reports 40 however its not clear if its reporting for 1 cpu or 2.

Again thank you for all the hard work!

[MrlostinBTC]

I figured it out. But not sure what was going on. I reinstalled ubuntu from usb, started fresh. Bsgs is now holding 18 exa keys/s stable. All 80 cpu threads loaded around 50-60 percent. Appears my ram can now not keep up. But the speed drop out is gone.

[GR Sasa]

Bsgs is now holding 18 exa keys/s stable.

Running a program to searches 18 exa keys/s is impressive!

I have 16 GB and Core i7, and get only 70 Peta key/s 

[1qaz]

Bsgs is now holding 18 exa keys/s stable.

Running a program to searches 18 exa keys/s is impressive!

I have 16 GB and Core i7, and get only 70 Peta key/s  

18 ExKeys/s this is a drop in the ocean, the range is huge, brute force is currently not the best choice for solving the puzzle. Even if random is not a very good idea, you need to look for another approach

P.s.

[MrlostinBTC]

Bsgs is now holding 18 exa keys/s stable.

Running a program to searches 18 exa keys/s is impressive!

I have 16 GB and Core i7, and get only 70 Peta key/s  

Just uped my ram to 512 gig

51 Exa keys/s

My rig will hold up to 2 terrabtes of ram. Just $$$

Bsgs is now holding 18 exa keys/s stable.

Running a program to searches 18 exa keys/s is impressive!

I have 16 GB and Core i7, and get only 70 Peta key/s  

18 ExKeys/s this is a drop in the ocean, the range is huge, brute force is currently not the best choice for solving the puzzle. Even if random is not a very good idea, you need to look for another approach

P.s.

Still a chance, and this is what this puzzle is about.

Are you suggesting I stop searching?

Btw I will also be donating to Alberto if I find any.

[GR Sasa]

Well if your setup uses a lot of electricity or if it's overheating, then it's best to stop searching.

[ttdclient]

Hello I run the ttdsales 66 bit pool and am trying out your software for the purpose of consideration of making a 130 bit pool.

compiling was a breeze

I like the options you have built in.  I am mostly just interested in the BSGS mode and particularly interested in setups with massive amounts of ram.

My test rig is a dual cpu 2697 v2 with 512GB ram for a total of 24 cores and 48 logical processors.

keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/130.txt -b 130 -R -k 8192 -q -t 40 -s 10 -S

Code:

[+] Version 0.2.230519 Satoshi Quest, developed by AlbertoBSD
[+] Random mode
[+] K factor 8192
[+] Quiet thread output
[+] Threads : 40
[+] Stats output every 10 seconds
[+] Mode BSGS random
[+] Opening file tests/130.txt
[+] Added 1 points from file
[+] Bit Range 130
[+] -- from : 0x200000000000000000000000000000000
[+] -- to   : 0x400000000000000000000000000000000
[+] N = 0x100000000000
[+] Bloom filter for 34359738368 elements : 117781.20 MB
[+] Bloom filter for 1073741824 elements : 3680.66 MB
[+] Bloom filter for 33554432 elements : 115.02 MB
[+] Allocating 512.00 MB for 33554432 bP Points
[+] Reading bloom filter from file keyhunt_bsgs_4_34359738368.blm .... Done!
[+] Reading bloom filter from file keyhunt_bsgs_6_1073741824.blm .... Done!
[+] Reading bP Table from file keyhunt_bsgs_2_33554432.tbl .... Done!
[+] Reading bloom filter from file keyhunt_bsgs_7_33554432.blm .... Done!
[+] Total 22563756609022657036288 keys in 14460 seconds: ~1 Ekeys/s (1560425768258828287 keys/s)

I can not for the life of me get it to use more ram.  Increasing k value or n value is causing error bloom_init

keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/130.txt -b 130 -R -k 16384 -q -t 40 -s 10 -S

• Bloom filter for 68719476736 elements [E] error bloom_init _ [45]

keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/130.txt -b 130 -R -k 8192 -q -t 40 -s 10 -S -n 0x200000000000
[E] M value is not divisible by 1024

not sure why that error is happening

keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/130.txt -b 130 -R -k 8192 -q -t 40 -s 10 -S -n 0x400000000000
   

• Bloom filter for 68719476736 elements [E] error bloom_init _ [45]

same as before.

pretty sure if I can make it take advantage of 4 times the ram I can get 4 times the speed.

Anyway I appreciate the help and understanding you can provide.

Chris

[cryptocool]

P.s.
https://i.ibb.co/8rdKv3V/2023-11-08-00-14-18.png

Hi 1qaz,
It seems the memory is 1 TB. Can I please know what CPUs are being used in the screen shot ?

Thanks!

[ljf2238]

hi albert0bsd,

I found keyhunt wont stop even out of range ,  I test
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:FFFF

it seems the hunter wont stop and keep running ....

Hit! Private Key: 1ba534
pubkey: 031a746c78f72754e0be046186df8a20cdce5c79b2eda76013c647af08d306e49e
Address 14oFNXucftsHiUMY8uctg6N487riuyXs4h
rmd160 29a78213caa9eea824acf08022ab9dfc83414f56

Hit! Private Key: 2de40f
pubkey: 023ed96b524db5ff4fe007ce730366052b7c511dc566227d929070b9ce917abb43
Address 1CfZWK1QTQE3eS9qn61dQjV89KDjZzfNcv
rmd160 7ff45303774ef7a52fffd8011981034b258cb86b

Hit! Private Key: 556e52
pubkey: 03f82710361b8b81bdedb16994f30c80db522450a93e8e87eeb07f7903cf28d04b
Address 1L2GM8eE7mJWLdo3HZS6su1832NX2txaac
rmd160 d0a79df189fe1ad5c306cc70497b358415da579e
^C

if its possible split puzzle job in many pieces just like miner workers in mining pool?

[albert0bsd]

hi albert0bsd,

I found keyhunt wont stop even out of range ,  I test
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:FFFF

it seems the hunter wont stop and keep running ....

Default subrange per thread is 0x100000000 if you want it to to stop in the given range reduce the subrange N value per thread.

Add -n 0x400

1024 is the minimum value so please increment your range -n to a minimum of 24 bits this is 0x1000000 or

-r 1:1000000 -n 0x400

[GTX1060x2]

Hello Alberto!
Do you have plans to add a BrainWallet search mode by dictionary or mask?

[albert0bsd]

Do you have plans to add a BrainWallet search mode by dictionary or mask?

No, sorry that is outside of the scope of this tool, the only thing that is near of that is the minikey option.

But I have no plans to add any of that, it include no dictionary search, no hexadecimal key check, no brain wallet.

If you want to do brain wallet search use brainflayer that tools is good and its already developed.

[Banyduge]

The whole thing is confusing and I think I need a simple language to understand this. I think this development gonna be interesting if well explain, am new here thanks

[citb0in]

The whole thing is confusing and I think I need a simple language to understand this. I think this development gonna be interesting if well explain, am new here thanks

Your contribution makes no sense, there is neither any information or added value nor any question. Are you a person who mainly posts anything (for whatever reason) or one of the countless bots that are up to mischief? You registered today and spreading around, a rogue who thinks evil.

Summarize your questions or statements so that they make sense or save yourself the post. Thank you

[coinchaser1]

Do you have plans to add a BrainWallet search mode by dictionary or mask?

No, sorry that is outside of the scope of this tool, the only thing that is near of that is the minikey option.

But I have no plans to add any of that, it include no dictionary search, no hexadecimal key check, no brain wallet.

If you want to do brain wallet search use brainflayer that tools is good and its already developed.

Hi Alberto,

I'd like to be able to specify a range for the ripemd160 scan, with the ability to scan either forwards or backwards in that range. Is this possible at the moment?

thanks
cc

[GR Sasa]

The whole thing is confusing and I think I need a simple language to understand this. I think this development gonna be interesting if well explain, am new here thanks

Your contribution makes no sense, there is neither any information or added value nor any question. Are you a person who mainly posts anything (for whatever reason) or one of the countless bots that are up to mischief? You registered today and spreading around, a rogue who thinks evil.

Summarize your questions or statements so that they make sense or save yourself the post. Thank you

That's probably Digaran, lmao