90% of bounty hunter never care about the quality of post

[LordShanken]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

When it comes to the quality of posts in the bounty campaign, it is obvious that it is lower than in the signature campaign. The main point is that signature campaigns are paid in BTC or other quickly convertible crypto, and bounty campaigns are paid in tokens that do not know what (or at all) will have value after the campaign ends.
When it comes to bounty managers, I'm sure they pay attention to the participants' posts. If they don't, it means that it is a very bad bounty manager.

[Raflesia]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts.

I think Bounty Hunters are bad posters so they only participate in Bounty. If they were quality posters, then of course they would take part in various discussions in the forum. And if everyone were quality posters, Bounty Hunters would not be found. Good and bad everyone is the part of our forum. I don't think it's right to ignore Bounty Hunters.  Because the forum has created a bounty opportunity.

The average hunter now is a newbie who just came and did a bounty promotion. I think there are many, even thousands, who come to this forum just to chase bounties to make money.
They come to this forum not to discuss, but only to be filled with many bounty reports every week. That is why now there is a lot of spam happening there because even menager can't do anything because their job is to manage with many who promote.

The point is, if the goal is only for money then in the future they will not think independently how to get insights from this forum with lots of discussion.

[Oilacris]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

This is reality but there's nothing we can do if you really mind on getting rid of those shit post and non relevant post because they would really be existing no matter what.

if you're stressed on seeing those shit post then you can always have the option to ignore or report such post if you do find it to be shit or non relevant.

Forum features are there which you can really make use of or you could also report the user who had been shitposting and make some spam post.This might not be a total solution of getting rid of spams or getting rid of low quality but at least you have done your part.

[kaseygriffin]

Ice cream quality articles are mostly hunter articles for the campaign, and almost all hunters are novices so spamming is inevitable. Cases of non-compliance will be disqualified, and if the BMs cannot do that, they should not be considered.

[stomachgrowls]

Just simply tells that if you cant reach up the qouta then you wont really get paid and in result? You would really be spamming hell of a lot and wont really like to miss out 1 week stake to be waste up.
Simply does show that people arent really caring about quality of post due of hurrying up and minding only on finishing the job in shortest time as possibe.Some do make this as a side income this is why
putting up too much effort would really be adding up on the cost.

Reasons are:
-Just lazy
-Dont have much knowledge
-Aiming for the pay and doesnt really take the task seriously

As just others say that you should get used to it.

[Rana590]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

Most of the bounty hunter are on newbie rank. They don not follow rules most of the time. Generally they do Facebook, twitter and other social media campaign. They are totally unaware of other thread on bitcointalk forum.

[shoreno]

managers are the one that usually create a rule so what we are going to do if he want to accept memebers with bad tagged in their accounts but sometimes its the owner of the company can instruct the manager and they can say that only users with clean trust can join the campaign  and for the quality , good managers can know this thing and if not the manager we still have moderators that can cleam spam post so dont worry and by the way i notice that your name is similar to darkstar (including that underscore )    are you a fan of him

[Oceat]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

Most of the bounty hunter are on newbie rank. They don not follow rules most of the time. Generally they do Facebook, twitter and other social media campaign. They are totally unaware of other thread on bitcointalk forum.

I think these people knew already the drill or maybe just following someone to do the task as fast as possible or could it be some alt accounts, who knows? Bounty managers are the one to blame for this to continue happening but it seems that they don't really care that much as long as there's a result needed in order to widen the campaign.

Yeah, probably they are totally unaware of the other thread since they were just bounty hunters participating only in social media. But the question is, who tip them to do this kind of tasks?

[Sanitough]

Most newbies or low rank maybe, they are the ones who does not fully understand what the forum is for, and they are invited here to just post and earn a stake on a  bounty that they have participated in.

We have moderators, they are looking into our post, so if 90% of the posters are spammers, then I guess this forum will not improve and might loss genuine people who are supporting it.

[Ibrahim60]

90% or more than that Bounty hunters never post in other thread. They never follow other thread of this forum. They never visit in other thread. They just know only one thread which is Bounty thread. Most of them are newbie ranked. They just want to earn money from Bounty. They don't care about the rules of this forum. If their account banned from forum then they don't care about it and create a new one. I think forum need to make this type of rules that after creating a new account everyone need to give an exam. By this i think newbies also know about forum rules and regulations.

[btc78]

I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

Don't make it hard for yourself mate because This is what happening for years now but what can we do to help the community and the forum ?

-Let's Report each post we come across that without value to the thread.

- Let's Report Each account that obviously spamming just for their Paid bounty.

- Let's Be Vigilant and active , because the forum cannot win this fight without us helping them.

Little by Little Effort if go together ? for sure we can at least Help the forum lesser Spamming .

[Enzo05]

This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

Probably what you are saying are those that conduct campaign and bounty on the bounty section of altcoins. Yes majority but Im not speaking for everyone but we can really see that some are just handling campaign for the sake of payment. Regardless the post are shit or not. Its true and that can never change. I myself seen some of my Co participants on some campaign in the past. Getting paid to post shit. But for btc paid campaign its not the case majority of managers concern about tha posting habit of the participants and hence being picked for their slot.

[LordShanken]

This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.

In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.

[TopTort777]

In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.

Who is going to decide which post is quality and which one was written just to fill weekly quota? Bounty manager must be an expert in everything then. Bounty managers already introduced such rule btw - bounty hunter must get X merit during last 120 days. On one hand this helps to discard low quality poster, on the other merit is not moderated. Users can get merit just for posting a meme. To improve quality, managers must increase merit amount gained to be accepted, and make hunters write at least few posts in projects topic or forum section.

[LordShanken]

In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.

Who is going to decide which post is quality and which one was written just to fill weekly quota? Bounty manager must be an expert in everything then. Bounty managers already introduced such rule btw - bounty hunter must get X merit during last 120 days. On one hand this helps to discard low quality poster, on the other merit is not moderated. Users can get merit just for posting a meme. To improve quality, managers must increase merit amount gained to be accepted, and make hunters write at least few posts in projects topic or forum section.

I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign. Signature Campaign Manager carries out a selection and picks only the users who write the best posts as it has a limited number of places in the campaign. The Bounty Campaign Manager does not have to do this, because the participants by registering for the campaign agree to an equal distribution (according to the number of stakes) of the bounty pool.
This is a very big difference, and in the previous post I described the situation regarding a bounty campaign, not a signature campaign.

[TopTort777]

~
I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign.

But bounty campaign has signature section also. Ok, never mind.
How are you going to check if bounty hunter creates quality posts/tweets/ or simply copy/paste something from the news feed? Do you really think bounty managers are going to check social media post history before accepting? I think the only criteria they care about is the number of followers/friends/readers/subscribers. And when they check weekly tasks, they simply open all the link (for example 5 retweet and 2 tweet links), make a short look it posts have tags and words (and not just random letters) and give a stake.

[leea-1334]

I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign. Signature Campaign Manager carries out a selection and picks only the users who write the best posts as it has a limited number of places in the campaign. The Bounty Campaign Manager does not have to do this, because the participants by registering for the campaign agree to an equal distribution (according to the number of stakes) of the bounty pool.
This is a very big difference, and in the previous post I described the situation regarding a bounty campaign, not a signature campaign.

It shouldn't be a big difference, but you are right,,, bounties tend to be a lot lower in quality than in signature campaign although if we recall,,, signatures used to be part of a big bounty campaign and a lot of bounty spammers used to join them. Good thing that this forum changed to be more strict on quality.

You want to see the poorest quality versus pay? Go to check out influencer Twitter;) Some have good videos but if you dig in, no quality.

IMO the biggest problem is? 99% of people who shill never even use the product.

[carlisle1]

There are Bunch of Bounty manager that i Knew who's very particular in the quality of posts from their bounty participants and not even allot their specific payments once they are posting poor quality of posts.

and also it is indicated in OP about the rules only the implementation is important .

I can't claim about my quality but i am doing everything just to contribute in each discussion i enters.

This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.

yeah Just like what you are posting now , Some generic posts that has been mentioned already above you.

[TopTort777]

You want to see the poorest quality versus pay? Go to check out influencer Twitter;) Some have good videos but if you dig in, no quality.

Yeap, video bounty campaign is on the second place of crap promotion (first is twitter/facebook). Video has either bought views or channel has bought subscribers; they are not genuine for 99.9%. And video content - often it just scrolling through page, click and reading its content. While hunters call it review, it is more like and transcribing of page content. Terrible microphone is a total must for such videos. Like the guy is reading from under toilet seat while flashing water.