[WARNING] WitLink - Fake Team

[qwertyup23]

What happened: Fake team using stock photo

Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3241658
WitLink ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325358.0
WitLink WEBSITE: https://witlink.ai/
WitLink ARCHIVED ANN: https://archive.fo/DZZmX

READ: Some of the team members of the project contains stock photos and stolen identities copied from the internet, including one fake advisor. I highly suggest to stay away from the said project.

FLAG: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2671

Code:

https://whois.domaintools.com/witlink.ai

REAL IDENTITY: Stock Photo
PROFILE LINK/S:
https://www.goodwillde.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Staffing-Service_Job_2019.jpg
https://www.hranswers.org/coaching-employees-to-success/



REAL IDENTITY: Stock photo
PROFILE LINK/S:
https://ya-webdesign.com/image/person-arms-crossed-png/1787392.html



REAL IDENTITY: Karl Berkoben
PROFILE LINK/S:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/linkediin-expert/?trk=google
https://klaxos.com/linkedin-profile-tips/monster-resume-service-review/
https://www.activa.lv/#!vps-saskaa-ar-iso-14001%2Fcfdq

[1715672670]

1715672670

[1715672670]

1715672670

[WitlinkAI]

The site just launched with developers still working on it, as template, they carried those things. In 1-2 week, it will be updated accordingly.

Update: Thread is closed till Website is fully ready. Once ready will launch it again.

[qwertyup23]

The site just launched with developers still working on it, as template, they carried those things. In 1-2 week, it will be updated accordingly.

If the developers are still working on it, why do you need to put a fake/stock picture on the website? It is very misleading as it will cause it to appear that you have a genuine team behind the project, but in fact, some are fakes. It is better, I believe, to put no picture at all than to put a fake team profile as it says really something about the whole project being shady, in general.

[Rikafip]

The site just launched with developers still working on it, as template, they carried those things. In 1-2 week, it will be updated accordingly.

Update: Thread is closed till Website is fully ready. Once ready will launch it again.

You couldn't even bother to finish the website before you started the sale? That makes you incompetent and greedy, and that's the best case scenario here. More likely scenario is that this is scam so you decided to go with the fake team in order to exit scam more conveniently. Unlucky for you but lucky for other bitcointalk users, you got busted immediately.

By the way, no one will buy the story about "developers" still working on website as we heard that excuse so many times before from similar scams.

edit: According to the roadmap your website is live since November 2020 yet we are somehow to belive that after 4 months your "developers" didn't have time to upload real team member photos?



Whois also confirms that your website is not new at all.

Domain Name: witlink.ai
Registry Domain ID: 1073463_nic_ai
Registry WHOIS Server:: whois.nic.ai
Creation Date: 2020-10-23T16:58:38.69Z

Good job qwertyup23, as always!

[WitlinkAI]

The site just launched with developers still working on it, as template, they carried those things. In 1-2 week, it will be updated accordingly.

If the developers are still working on it, why do you need to put a fake/stock picture on the website? It is very misleading as it will cause it to appear that you have a genuine team behind the project, but in fact, some are fakes. It is better, I believe, to put no picture at all than to put a fake team profile as it says really something about the whole project being shady, in general.

The sections which were finalized were added to the ANN thread. Team section was not ready and due to that it was not added to the thread till it would be ready. ANN thread is required for marketing reasons, which is why it was created earlier so it can be put up perfectly.

The team section is already updated and would be added to ANN.

[WitlinkAI]

The site just launched with developers still working on it, as template, they carried those things. In 1-2 week, it will be updated accordingly.

Update: Thread is closed till Website is fully ready. Once ready will launch it again.

You couldn't even bother to finish the website before you started the sale? That makes you incompetent and greedy, and that's the best case scenario here. More likely scenario is that this is scam so you decided to go with the fake team in order to exit scam more conveniently. Unlucky for you but lucky for other bitcointalk users, you got busted immediately.

By the way, no one will buy the story about "developers" still working on website as we heard that excuse so many times before from similar scams.

edit: According to the roadmap your website is live since November 2020 yet we are somehow to belive that after 4 months your "developers" didn't have time to upload real team member photos?



Whois also confirms that your website is not new at all.

Domain Name: witlink.ai
Registry Domain ID: 1073463_nic_ai
Registry WHOIS Server:: whois.nic.ai
Creation Date: 2020-10-23T16:58:38.69Z

Good job qwertyup23, as always!

It was just purchased and idea were getting prepared, the design and all aspects were not. The team sheet is finally updated and will be added on the ANN thread. If people like considering everyone as scammers, then what can anyone do about it?

We added things that were ready on the website in ANN thread. If someone goes to the website and start the allegation without asking even for once, its okay maybe it makes him/her happier.

[JeromeTash]

It was just purchased and idea were getting prepared, the design and all aspects were not. The team sheet is finally updated and will be added on the ANN thread. If people like considering everyone as scammers, then what can anyone do about it?

We added things that were ready on the website in ANN thread. If someone goes to the website and start the allegation without asking even for once, its okay maybe it makes him/her happier.

The Joke is on you. If the team wasn't ready, then why even bother putting in the fake profiles on the website at all. You could have waited until it was ready and then published it. But this business of just throwing everything random on the website thinking people are blind and then when busted you got back to "update" the team won't work.

That's not how you gain investors' trust.

[sujonali1819]

I can not understand why you guys publish your project publicly without complete it. Even the issue was not a little. Details of Team members is a most important thing for a project.

Okay that it was a mistake, but why you put the photos stealing from google? Did you ask their permission? If those people come from a country which does not allow crypto? Did you think about it?

[WitlinkAI]

I can not understand why you guys publish your project publicly without complete it. Even the issue was not a little. Details of Team members is a most important thing for a project.

Okay that it was a mistake, but why you put the photos stealing from google? Did you ask their permission? If those people come from a country which does not allow crypto? Did you think about it?

It was required for marketing companies, ANN thread. That why the team sheet was missing, if the intention was to fool people, don't you think it would be part of ANN thread from start? It was not there for a reason.

Its updated and therefore now added to the ANN thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5326349.msg56644406#msg56644406

If anyone still believes there is ill-intention involved, its not possible to change the mindset. The allegation would be justified if it was in the ANN thread from start but since it was meant to be changed, the thread was created without it. It was because of marketing need of companies we are working together that ANN thread and social accounts were needed for them to begin, which is why we started it to allow us time to build it to the required level.

[qwertyup23]

It was required for marketing companies, ANN thread. That why the team sheet was missing, if the intention was to fool people, don't you think it would be part of ANN thread from start? It was not there for a reason.

Its updated and therefore now added to the ANN thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5326349.msg56644406#msg56644406

If anyone still believes there is ill-intention involved, its not possible to change the mindset. The allegation would be justified if it was in the ANN thread from start but since it was meant to be changed, the thread was created without it. It was because of marketing need of companies we are working together that ANN thread and social accounts were needed for them to begin, which is why we started it to allow us time to build it to the required level.

Sorry to burst your bubble but the team members that you uploaded to your website are all computer-generated AI pictures.



See the uneven hair on both of the sides on the first picture? See the crooked teeth with uneven proportions? In addition, the second picture contained distorted background images which are all signs of a computer-generated picture. Your project is doomed from the very beginning the moment you posted pictures of fake team members.

Now, you try to remedy this situation by posting ANOTHER set of fake pictures. Lame attempt and try harder next time. You won't fool anyone in this forum mate.

[coinmaster241]

wow at least you are thorough and can save us from fake projects, stay careful and careful for all. I hope you don't get tired of analyzing suspicious new projects. thank you

[Joel_Jantsen]

See the uneven hair on both of the sides on the first picture? See the crooked teeth with uneven proportions? In addition, the second picture contained distorted background images which are all signs of a computer-generated picture. Your project is doomed from the very beginning the moment you posted pictures of fake team members.

Don't know how could you be so sure if those pictures are AI-generated. The facial features you pointed out seem just about right like a normal human nothing uneven there, at least, according to me. They could be using a fake team but the proof you have posted about the images being computer-generated isn't solid enough. Unless you can point us to an algorithm that confirms your logic?

[stompix]

Don't know how could you be so sure if those pictures are AI-generated. The facial features you pointed out seem just about right like a normal human nothing uneven there, at least, according to me.

One of the images seems fishy to me too
https://i.imgur.com/vEMox1a.jpg

That spiked hair on one side, the fact that one cheek is shaved with a model the other is clean, a single white hair that is at least 3-4 cm long and points directly out from his cheek, plus on his chin there is a mess of colors and lines once you zoom in, the picture has been definitely edited, at least gone through some heavy filters, why? There is only one reason I can think of.

Second, I checked their social media pages 11k followers, and not a single like or share or comment in one week, clearly bought followers.

Also, they claim they are incorporated in the UK, they offer a token sale, they must be a registered company for that but on their page:
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12969262

Nature of business (SIC)
96090 - Other service activities not elsewhere classified

And here we find something else, first, the company is registered in virtual office second the director name is Theodore Green and weirdly enough he is not on the "team".

[qwertyup23]

See the uneven hair on both of the sides on the first picture? See the crooked teeth with uneven proportions? In addition, the second picture contained distorted background images which are all signs of a computer-generated picture. Your project is doomed from the very beginning the moment you posted pictures of fake team members.

Don't know how could you be so sure if those pictures are AI-generated. The facial features you pointed out seem just about right like a normal human nothing uneven there, at least, according to me. They could be using a fake team but the proof you have posted about the images being computer-generated isn't solid enough. Unless you can point us to an algorithm that confirms your logic?

I invite your attention to check this WEBSITE so you could find out on how you could spot a computer generated AI photo. Although at the moment, there are no 100% accurate means of determining them, there are certain indicators that can help you spot the signs and some features of a computer-generated photo.

As I have been doing this for a very long time now, I would already have a hunch regarding the pictures if they are computer generated or not. The disproportions on their facial features, weird and abstract backgrounds, crooked teeths, etc. would already tell that such are fake.

In addition, you can check these websites about examples of some computer-generated photos:

Code:

https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

Code:

https://generated.photos/

[Rikafip]

It was just purchased and idea were getting prepared, the design and all aspects were not. The team sheet is finally updated and will be added on the ANN thread. If people like considering everyone as scammers, then what can anyone do about it?

Design and all others aspects were not prepared, yet you didn't waste your time and instead you decided to start the sale. That shows your true colors and I am sure that you will continue to show the same level of incompetence and negligence as up until now. Which it proved to be corrected as it see you upload AI generated team member photos instead of stock ones.

If you are indeed legit and honest project that wants to clear own reputation, you would make a video with your team members ASAP showing that they are real, but we all know that won't happen.

[JeromeTash]

Sorry to burst your bubble but the team members that you uploaded to your website are all computer-generated AI pictures.

-snip-

And here we find something else, first, the company is registered in virtual office second the director name is Theodore Green and weirdly enough he is not on the "team".

Nice job qwertyup23 and stompix upon exposing the shameless scammer. He thought fooling Bitcointalk scam detectives was a walk in the park 
I am not so good with the AI generated image thingy, but I trust you guys, ICOEthics would be proud. This should be enough for me to tag the profile and support the flag

[Lorence.xD]

Don't know how could you be so sure if those pictures are AI-generated. The facial features you pointed out seem just about right like a normal human nothing uneven there, at least, according to me. They could be using a fake team but the proof you have posted about the images being computer-generated isn't solid enough. Unless you can point us to an algorithm that confirms your logic?

There are AI generated images detecting software available on the Internet and they are really good at it. That is the aim of the AI generated images, to create an image that truly resembles a real person in the naked eye.

[FIFA worldcup]

Sorry to burst your bubble but the team members that you uploaded to your website are all computer-generated AI pictures.

That's interesting as i thought that scam projects steal people's pics from LinkedIn or social media and portrait them on their site as their team.

I never thought that these evil minded people are one step ahead in fooling people and making fake pics using AI which are difficult to identity. 

[The Cryptovator]

@WitlinkAI, your excuse isn't valid. You have done an unprofessional job from your end and it isn't acceptable by the community. It's fine you had used a template but even you don't know that you should remove the dummy picture from the site? If there is a real team then how many minutes will take to replace that all? Isn't your excuse funny? Your platform is related to money, so definitely users will take a deep look there since they would join there. I don't believe in you.

Support the flag and left negative feedback as well.

[andrei8787]

Reported to Cryptoscamalert
https://cryptoscamalert.com/crypto_scam_report/1224

[Stalker22]

Yes, I agree. All these images from their team are fake AI-generated images that can easily be detected by artefacts and distorted backgrounds.
I noticed Jaian Cuttari as their advisor who was involved in many scam and defunct projects. His photo, though extensively altered and mutilated for reasons unknown, is probably the only true one on the website.




source: https://www.bdam.co/

[TimeTeller]

At least, one less project here that may screw some users.
I don't think this project will move forward. The "dev" may abandon this project and just create a new one.
They are still selling their tokens at a rate of $0.15 and currently there are 3 holders.
One is their address but seems that there are 2 buyers, or so it seems.
I hope users from the forum will not take their chance on this one.

[jcut]

Yes, I agree. All these images from their team are fake AI-generated images that can easily be detected by artefacts and distorted backgrounds.
I noticed Jaian Cuttari as their advisor who was involved in many scam and defunct projects. His photo, though extensively altered and mutilated for reasons unknown, is probably the only true one on the website.

https://i.imgur.com/oez2KdO.png

https://i.imgur.com/j0EYxhZ.png
source: https://www.bdam.co/

This is 100% incorrect and defamation. I am not involved or affiliated in any way to this project. So stop spreading BS. There are people using my picture without my consent. and BDAM is in no way a scam moron https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D27zhl7nEvk&ab_channel=bdamcoin

[stompix]

This is 100% incorrect and defamation. I am not involved or affiliated in any way to this project. So stop spreading BS. There are people using my picture without my consent. and BDAM is in no way a scam moron https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D27zhl7nEvk&ab_channel=bdamcoin

You have been involved as an advisor for 5 projects, there of them died without issuing any coins and two of them died in the ICO phase.
As for BDAM, anyone would call a scam a coin that doesn't exist and a team that alters its so-called roadmap every month:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200602214126/https://www.bdamcoin.com/

[jcut]

This is 100% incorrect and defamation. I am not involved or affiliated in any way to this project. So stop spreading BS. There are people using my picture without my consent. and BDAM is in no way a scam moron https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D27zhl7nEvk&ab_channel=bdamcoin

You have been involved as an advisor for 5 projects, there of them died without issuing any coins and two of them died in the ICO phase.
As for BDAM, anyone would call a scam a coin that doesn't exist and a team that alters its so-called roadmap every month:

First of all if you know anything about the start up world, start ups can fail.... second of all you think one advisor determines the success of a project? and not the team? or the market conditions? Advisory does not equate to success. Third of all the start ups I advised were largely in 2017-2018 when the market was down and a lot of start ups in the space failed because of the market dip and quite frankly teams which weren't willing to take advice and burnt through their private seed investments on development alone, to a point where they didn't have enough to even do a ICO or some cases enter the market. Lastly the idea that you think that during one of the most historic economically devastating events (pandemic) would not force a company to pivot to survive is hilarious and show cases you're lacking knowledge in entrepreneurship and business in general. When literally every business, big or small has pivoted why can't a company which is self funded mind it's own business and do what it needs to do to be competitive? Also BDAM is not a coin company, its a financial ecosystem. The coin was a small part but we decided to focus on building infrastructure and decentralization.  BDAM is completely self funded we didn't ask a dime from anyone. check yourself and come correct.

Don't throw your opinions around as facts and try to defame people without having any clue or context on the facts. I said it once and I will say it again I have nothing to do with this witlink garbage. I have never endorsed or posted anything about such a project. So stop the bullshit.



Just to be clear I appreciate you performing your civic duty to protect the community, I support that 100%. But I am not going to promote defamation of myself or my company on baseless claims If I didn't care I wouldn't comment but I do care and I am happy to have a conversation. So again if you don't know ASK, don't make up opinionated statements and push them as facts..

[Rikafip]

You have been involved as an advisor for 5 projects, there of them died without issuing any coins and two of them died in the ICO phase.
As for BDAM, anyone would call a scam a coin that doesn't exist and a team that alters its so-called roadmap every month:

BDAM is full of shit. They lied about partnerships, hired people via Cameo platform for a few hundreds of bucks to pretend giving them support, and then after few of us started asking them tough questions to which they didn't have an answer to, they deleted the ANN content, locked it and ran away.

One post from their ANN was a spot on and explains perfectly the way BDAM operates

Probablay they are using Microsoft windows,a SAMSUNG phone ,Searched for a laptop on GOOGLE and bought a IBM laptop with INTEL processor, on Amazon .They also subscribe Forbes and also have a bank account with Goldman Sacchs

so technically they are associated with these brands and so partners !!!

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

BDAM with Binance US and Akoin (by akon the singer)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3MXhSW8UmE&ab_channel=bdamcoin

BDAM on NASDAQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D27zhl7nEvk&ab_channel=bdamcoin

Neither of this proves legitimacy of BDAM.

[stompix]

First of all if you know anything about the start up world, start ups can fail.... second of all you think one advisor determines the success of a project? and not the team? or the market conditions? Advisory does not equate to success.

This is exactly my point, every single one of the strat-ups you were assigned as an advisor has failed, but you have failed to advise investors about that. Since nobody is forcibly appointing you to them it simply means you've bet on the loser team five times in a row, so why would that change now?

Just to be clear I appreciate you performing your civic duty to protect the community, I support that 100%.

You're free to open a reputation topic on your exchange coin project whatever that is and defend it there and tell us how facts are opinion, not facts.
If indeed you are the man you claim to be and if indeed this project is using your name without your consent you can divert your energy on making that known in public and prevent others from falling into another scam.

As for the rest of your mumbo jumbo, I couldn't care less.
And an INNER city business with a revenue of 1 million a year is not going to impress anyone on this forum.

@Rikafip
Just lol...

[jcut]

First of all if you know anything about the start up world, start ups can fail.... second of all you think one advisor determines the success of a project? and not the team? or the market conditions? Advisory does not equate to success.

This is exactly my point, every single one of the strat-ups you were assigned as an advisor has failed, but you have failed to advise investors about that. Since nobody is forcibly appointing you to them it simply means you've bet on the loser team five times in a row, so why would that change now?

Just to be clear I appreciate you performing your civic duty to protect the community, I support that 100%.

You're free to open a reputation topic on your exchange coin project whatever that is and defend it there and tell us how facts are opinion, not facts.
If indeed you are the man you claim to be and if indeed this project is using your name without your consent you can divert your energy on making that known in public and prevent others from falling into another scam.

As for the rest of your mumbo jumbo, I couldn't care less.
And an INNER city business with a revenue of 1 million a year is not going to impress anyone on this forum.

@Rikafip
Just lol...

Aquaintel had Hilton Chairman Rick Hilton, ex Apple Executive Chuck goldman on advisory board with me and it failed? so Rick Hilton of Hilton Hotels and Chuck Goldman are scammers too? idiots..

I never endorsed or even knew of any project such as witlink also the rest of what I said is no mumbo jumbo its facts.. and yeah im not impressing anyone especially a person trying to push opinons as facts from their basement. Don't flatter your self. I'm done here I said what I said.  0 Association with witlink. Never even knew it existed.

[Rikafip]

Aquaintel had Hilton Chairman Rick Hilton, ex Apple Executive Chuck goldman on advisory board with me and it failed? so Rick Hilton of Hilton Hotels and Chuck Goldman are scammers too? idiots..

Care to explain in which capacity BDAM partnered with Amazon, IBM, Google Microsoft, Samsung and other top tier companies that you mentioned as your "strategic partners"? About all those people sending their support videos that you shared on your website, all of them are selling those on platform made exactly for that, Cameo. Coincidence? I think not!

It's interesting to notice that neither of those two things are available on your website anymore  

[jcut]

Aquaintel had Hilton Chairman Rick Hilton, ex Apple Executive Chuck goldman on advisory board with me and it failed? so Rick Hilton of Hilton Hotels and Chuck Goldman are scammers too? idiots..

Care to explain in which capacity BDAM partnered with Amazon, IBM, Google Microsoft, Samsung and other top tier companies that you mentioned as your "strategic partners"?

About all those people sending their support videos that you shared on your website, is it just a coincidence that absolutely all of them are selling them on Cameo?

[Rikafip]

We had a marketing service who took 8k from us per " famous endorsement" they lied and scammed us once we found out it was from cameo we were all pissed. Oh we didn't control what anyone said we were lied to and ripped off. But I disagree many companies crypto/non crypto related have had endorsements like that.  Also in regards to the partners the web design team was out of asia and they put rubbish like that on there and I told them to take that down and they left it there as "place holders" we are NOT Affiliated in any partnership with those companies. The updated site however does have the real partners.

Fair enough, I guess that could have happened.

Problem is, exactly the same excuse has been used so many times before by a bunch of scam projects each and every time they got caught for something; whether it was incompetent team member who forgot to include reference links in the whitepaper, or simply lazy developer who used placeholder images for team members. Point is, it was always someone else's fault so even if on some odd ocassion that's really the case and project didn't intend to scam anyone but were victims themselves, no one on this forum will believe it (including me).

[jcut]

We had a marketing service who took 8k from us per " famous endorsement" they lied and scammed us once we found out it was from cameo we were all pissed. Oh we didn't control what anyone said we were lied to and ripped off. But I disagree many companies crypto/non crypto related have had endorsements like that.  Also in regards to the partners the web design team was out of asia and they put rubbish like that on there and I told them to take that down and they left it there as "place holders" we are NOT Affiliated in any partnership with those companies. The updated site however does have the real partners.

Fair enough, I guess that could have happened.

Problem is, exactly the same excuse has been used so many times before by a bunch of scam projects each and every time they got caught for something; whether it was incompetent team member who forgot to include reference links in the whitepaper, or simply lazy developer who used placeholder images for team members. Point is, it was always someone else's fault so even if sometimes that's really the (very rare) case and project didn't intend to scam anyone but were victims themselves, no one on this forum will belive it.

I agree with you on that, and I 100% respect you guys trying to clean up the market and set standards. The market has been tough but we have persisted and there have been bumps on the road,  we have gotten burnt many times, but we have kept it moving forward and also are looking into how to dive into the NFT space, and just to be clear, we haven't taken a dime from outside investment and we have been self funded.

[Rikafip]

This is exactly my point, every single one of the strat-ups you were assigned as an advisor has failed, but you have failed to advise investors about that. Since nobody is forcibly appointing you to them it simply means you've bet on the loser team five times in a row, so why would that change now?

Crypto rent-a-advisors is another tragicomic story..I planned for a long time to make topic about those leeches that are ready to "advise" and sell their name for a couple of bucks but somehow never wrote it.  And worst of all, they usually don't have any repercussions, they just go from one project to another, selling their name so scammy projects looks more legit. Some of those specimens are also on BDAM advisory board.



I saw those two weasels ( Martin Ploom and Frederik Lund) on bunch of scammy projects and honestly when I see them, in my mind there is immediately something wrong with the project. BDAM is no exception, if they ever vetted those two and projects they "advised" they wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole.

[Stalker22]

/cut/

This is 100% incorrect and defamation. I am not involved or affiliated in any way to this project. So stop spreading BS. There are people using my picture without my consent. and BDAM is in no way a scam moron

I just noticed that you addressed me personally here.

I'm sorry, but where did I say BDAM was a scam, you moron? True, as other members have pointed out, it's full of shit, just like you, but I never said it's a scam.

As I previously said, your name and photo are being used to advertise this dubious WitLink project, as in a number of other failed projects. If this is defamation, feel free to sue me.

[yawars20]

Omg Why i didn't check this thread before 
They ( Witlink ) did another big scam using an nft base project ( witland ) and yesterday they scape with a large sum of 600+ Ethereum of liquidity pool 

[abel1337]

Omg Why i didn't check this thread before   
They ( Witlink ) did another big scam using an nft base project ( witland ) and yesterday they scape with a large sum of 600+ Ethereum of liquidity pool 

I haven't hear anything about witland or I don't know if that really exist. I can't found any information of them in the internet, 600+ Ethereum pool is pretty large enough for people to make them trust so We should expect that they should have atleast a website or whitepaper over the internet. Could you provide us a necessary information about it?

[JeromeTash]

Omg Why i didn't check this thread before 
They ( Witlink ) did another big scam using an nft base project ( witland ) and yesterday they scape with a large sum of 600+ Ethereum of liquidity pool 

You only have yourself to blame. The information containing all the red flags about the now turned scam project was here for over a year. All you had to do was just hit the search button

I do hope you didn't lose a fortune to the scammers in the name of NFTs.