Ledger omitting one character from a Doge address

[dkbit98]

Reading some of the comments on Reddit it sounded like people were complaining about not being able to send coins, and not so much about the address showing up incorrectly on the device.

But who knows, what with Ledger trying so hard to avoid explaining what the issue is and what to do (or not to do) to prevent it.

This is what their co-founder and ledger reddit moderator btchip has to say about this issue:

AFAIK there are no issues with Doge for the time being

https://www.reddit.com/user/btchip/

He is obviously not informed what is written on ledger website, he is ignoring many complains on their reddit page, and last step is probably banning and muting people.

[1715244250]

1715244250

[1715244250]

1715244250

[1715244250]

1715244250

[1715244250]

1715244250

[1715244250]

1715244250

[suchmoon]

This is what their co-founder and ledger reddit moderator btchip has to say about this issue:

Yeah sending a shill labelled "co-founder" to spread false information on social media is not the smartest thing to do when you have a problem but Ledger isn't really known for doing smart things lately.

[RickDeckard]

@LoyceV have you had an opportunity to send Doge from your Ledger using Ledger Live? I've noticed that the warning that appeared on the official support page[1] is no longer there, so I'm assuming that it has been solved? I haven't been able to confirm this, but since the posts complaining about Doge have disappeared from their official sub - r/ledgerwallet - (regarding this problem) I'm guessing that maybe it has been solved?

[1] https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005174025-Dogecoin-DOGE-

[LoyceV]

@LoyceV have you had an opportunity to send Doge from your Ledger using Ledger Live?

I haven't tested the same address yet, but I doubt it can be solved without a firmware update.

[HCP]

I haven't tested the same address yet, but I doubt it can be solved without a firmware update.

I didn't see any real mention of bug fixes in the release notes but it would be interesting to see if it was solved in the new 2.0.0 firmware update...

[Lucius]

I haven't tested the same address yet, but I doubt it can be solved without a firmware update.

I managed to upgrade Nano S firmware version to 2.0.0, and then I did a test again with your address. I can confirm that the missing character is now showing correctly. The whole firmware update process is very fast and without any problems (W10), it took a little over 5 minutes in my case.