There are +100500 dogs tokens already on Uniswap -))

It could be another money grabber maybe, there are a bunch of scammers who have been using this opportunity to create more and more shitscam coins, and then they will be rugpulling the investor's fund.
If we can buy real doge coin and why do we need to buy garbage coin like this one? I smell something fishy with this garbage coin.

The purpose of shit scam token to be a money grabber for the creator.

If Dogee was created to further enhance the innovation going in the Ethereum blockchain, what innovative it can give us?

Maybe, another project trying to ride the hype surrounding doge coin. I would suggest for potential buyers to think hard before buying this token. My impression is that this will be a short-lived project. Once the people behind it got their money, even if it is not that much, they will abandon this project. The proof of liquidity locked is not enough to assure potential buyers that this one will not disappear anytime they want.

Read carefully, this project is dogee, with double E, birthed just matter of days ago, not the original doge memetoken from years ago. As someone with quite a rank, you should be able to know differences between projects and at least basic knowledge about doge, it has tons of pages from years of its journey, not mere pages like this. That fact enough should be able to tell you this is a different project.

I think it's more to an attempt of exact copy rather than bearing similarities, this dev tried to mimic AKITA's tokenomy. If I'm not mistaken, akita itself was imitating shiba or inu something like that, aren't they?

One thing that brought to my attention is how their tokenomy shows how incompetent they are, or perhaps qe should better say "a scam attempt without clear planning".

Dev, explain this:

You have 100 billions total supply, and 50% of it was sent to VB and the other 50% was locked forever on uniswap LP. So where exactly do the dev got their 5% dev fund from? You have 105% total supply?

How? With your own funds? Wasn't the scenario goes like this: right after TGE, 50% of total supply was sent to VB, and the other 50% to LP, so the project themselves didn't have any fund to do a "buyback" for their 5% since there were no presale or other crowdfunding event.

Well, if that's the case, then I stand corrected and it is indeed fair and acceptable (in a sense) that dev are allowed to do whatever they pleases with the fund, since it came from their very own pocket. I saw that uniswap supply is also already bought and held by several holders. Although I can't be sure if they're early adopters or dev team themselves holding for profit with their own money, I still hope all of those holders got a nice selling price in the future.

Members will grow with time.