DIY Bitcoin Blockclock

[ABCbits]

Coinkite issued a cease and desist (and GitHub complied):

- https://x.com/BitsagaRob/status/1857353170768253170
- https://x.com/btcqna/status/1857142583065264385

Considering this action along with making ColdCard source code no longer open source, it's clear Coinkite no longer care about open source community. What a shame.

On a side note, it doesn't seem GitHub publicize cease and desist they received, when they do that with DMCA request on https://github.com/github/dmca.

[dkbit98]

Project killed by Coinkite. GitHub removed.

So cypherpunk.  Lol.

I always said that nvk is an biggest asshole ever and I was right!
It is confirmed now that he is egoistic mental patient and a nutcase.
This Djuri guy didn't reverse enginer or clone anything, he made everything himself and post it as open source, but nvk obvisouly hates open source!
Time to start campaign against c0dlcard and all other nvk crapware!

EDIT:
Limited number of stock available at bitsaga, and all orders will be forwarded to Djuri:
https://bitsaga.be/product/btclock/

[dkbit98]

New update to situation, and big support to developer Djuri!
Appeal has been submitted to Github, and watch out guys if you use word CLOCK in your open source project nvk could also try to report you for ''stealing'' his tRadeEmArk'' because he doesn't have anything better to do in his poor life  

Thanks to
@satslwyr
 we just submitted an appeal to GitHub 🙏 the gist (no pun intended 😄) is that generic words like clock can't be trademarked and that there is no likelyhood of confusion.

https://x.com/dsbaars/status/1858939382272585895

Longer explanation from Djuri in his blog post written in El Salvador (Adopting Bitcoin conference):
https://njump.me/nevent1qqst22qclvkw7p8fqhcukrcc6m8unjh0ppp72t9heq8gf89eeu82qagpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qk5f85zx0xdskyayqpfpc0zq6n7vwqjuuxugkayk72fgynp34cs3qfdqzjh

[SFR10]

I haven't been that active in the past few months so I'm not updated on all fronts ^{[e.g. NVK's issues with Foundation, Seedsigner, etc...]}, but it appears that nvk wasn't expecting BTClock to have a chance in the beginning and as soon as Djuri started adding more features to BTClock, he chose to take out the competition to salvage their overpriced products ^[SMH]!
^{- Based on one of the X posts shared by Mitchell, I think Djuri only needs to change the name and the appearance of BTClock to get back to normal operations and I actually think this would be a blessing in disguise.}

[dkbit98]

^{- Based on one of the X posts shared by Mitchell, I think Djuri only needs to change the name and the appearance of BTClock to get back to normal operations and I actually think this would be a blessing in disguise.}

I don't want to waste time talking about nvk and his pathetic behavior, but I am glad to see that everything is back to normal.
Website is up again, and source code has been moved from to GIT, that is much better alternative for github.
I really like this new BTClock Rev. B with white front light and bamboo material.


https://btclock.store/
https://git.btclock.dev/explore/repos

[SFR10]

I really like this new BTClock Rev. B with white front light and bamboo material.

Same here... It adds a cozier vibe to any setup, but apart from the bamboo plate, the one with the front light is already out of stock in the official store while Bitsaga is selling it for €70 more and that one doesn't come with the bamboo plate.
^{- BTW, it appears that there'll be a cool-looking alternative soon, but it'll probably have fewer features: BitKlock™ (there's still no official name, so its name is only meant to be a joke and it might cost around $200) - Mechanical displays were designed by @Engineezy and here's the "link to buy the STL files".}

[bias]

First of all, congrats on your work, I really like it and I have always been interested in/ wanted a BTC clock.
I don't have the knowledge though to assemble it myself, so in any case I will have to get the complete version of the clock. Unfortunately, in the country I am in, it will cost a lot to ship it and I imagine that the taxes will be equally expensive. So, I don't know if it's even worth asking about it. Plus as I see on your site, it's out of stock.
Anyways, once again congrats on your project, and keep up!

[Mitchell]

A good device. You did well!

First of all, congrats on your work, I really like it and I have always been interested in/ wanted a BTC clock.
I don't have the knowledge though to assemble it myself, so in any case I will have to get the complete version of the clock. Unfortunately, in the country I am in, it will cost a lot to ship it and I imagine that the taxes will be equally expensive. So, I don't know if it's even worth asking about it. Plus as I see on your site, it's out of stock.
Anyways, once again congrats on your project, and keep up!

bias and Jont_Silver, is it really that hard to actually read a post?

[bias]

bias and Jont_Silver, is it really that hard to actually read a post?

No, what did we (I) miss? Are you referring to a specific one?

[ABCbits]

Website is up again, and source code has been moved from to GIT, that is much better alternative for github.
--snip--
https://git.btclock.dev/explore/repos

It's good to see they host the code elsewhere, although it'll impact it's popularity on long term. Anyway, i wanted to check whether BTCClock's code pose similarity with CoinKite Blockclock, but i unable to find code for it. Does anyone where or how Coinkate host or share it's blockclock source code?

bias and Jont_Silver, is it really that hard to actually read a post?

No, what did we (I) miss? Are you referring to a specific one?

I think you missed the fact OP doesn't create, build or design either CoinKite Blockclock or someone else DIY BTCClock.

[bias]

I think you missed the fact OP doesn't create, build or design either CoinKite Blockclock or someone else DIY BTCClock.

But he promotes, supports, shares its news, and advertises it. That means that he is involved in this project. Is it so bad/ wrong to congratulate him (and of course the creator as well) for their effort or does that make me blind?

[ABCbits]

I think you missed the fact OP doesn't create, build or design either CoinKite Blockclock or someone else DIY BTCClock.

But he promotes, supports, shares its news, and advertises it. That means that he is involved in this project. Is it so bad/ wrong to congratulate him (and of course the creator as well) for their effort or does that make me blind?

I'll let OP says whether he's actually involved on either project. But IMO word "enthusiast" is better term to describe someone who support and sharing words about certain project.