EUPHORIABET.IO DONT PAY WINNINGS

[torkens]

Hellooo to all

my case is pretty simple i put 3 deposits on this bookie 140, 120 and 100, then when win 163 profite tried to withdaw 523 to check are they ok or scam,

picture what prove what i say 

https://imgur.com/a/adRBpKF

but after i asked in topic where this site present itself why my withdrawal is pending, they answer it is because of abnormal bets which could be explanation if not my biggest bet is 150usdt and its obvious i didnt deposits enough to have any abnormal bet

https://imgur.com/a/ZbyjrIY

morning after this answer i saw withdrawal rejected and back on account only 100usdt instead of 523

https://imgur.com/a/YDjKehn

So i asked here guy who present this bookie to explain everything and to allow me to withdraw my money (523 usdt) or its obvious they are SCAM bookie and everybody stay out of it

[1714969694]

1714969694

[1714969694]

1714969694

[1714969694]

1714969694

[1714969694]

1714969694

[holydarkness]

Notify them about this thread so they can come here and give their side of story.

I didn't mean to rub a himalayan salt on your wound, but I'm a bit curious on how you find this platform appealing? Looking back at their ANN, 8 of 9 pages they have basically debating their false claim of NO KYC while their ToS --which the users agreed-- specify they're allowed to ask for KYC anytime. A deliberate misleading title and dirty marketing. One red flag.

The demands by a lot of member of this forum for them to edit their thread title also came to a deaf ear where they deliberately ignore and pretend didn't read. Another red flag.

Third red flag? This,

[...]

we no have license

Anyway, as it's already happened, what you can do now is --as said above-- notify them and let them explain themselves here. The community will mark and flag them if they found to be guilty.

[torkens]

Notify them about this thread so they can come here and give their side of story.

I didn't mean to rub a himalayan salt on your wound, but I'm a bit curious on how you find this platform appealing? Looking back at their ANN, 8 of 9 pages they have basically debating their false claim of NO KYC while their ToS --which the users agreed-- specify they're allowed to ask for KYC anytime. A deliberate misleading title and dirty marketing. One red flag.

The demands by a lot of member of this forum for them to edit their thread title also came to a deaf ear where they deliberately ignore and pretend didn't read. Another red flag.

Third red flag? This,

[...]

we no have license

Anyway, as it's already happened, what you can do now is --as said above-- notify them and let them explain themselves here. The community will mark and flag them if they found to be guilty.

I do as you say and notify them in their opening thread about this accusation

[Stalker22]

If my memory serve me right, EUPHORIABET had a signature campaign here recently, no? It is weird they risk damaging their reputation here for such a trivial sum. This kind of behavior is concerning and raises questions about their integrity as a company, it will be interesting to see how this situation plays out.

Interesting fact, it seems that Google has already caught on and this topic has made its way into the top 2 search results for "EUPHORIABET.IO". This could prove to be more damaging to them than the $500 they allegedly took from the player.


https://www.google.com/search?q=EUPHORIABET.IO

[holydarkness]

If my memory serve me right, EUPHORIABET had a signature campaign here recently, no? It is weird they risk damaging their reputation here for such a trivial sum. This kind of behavior is concerning and raises questions about their integrity as a company, it will be interesting to see how this situation plays out.

[...]

Yes, but it's a very very very small campaign with as small rewards, one week only signature and reddit campaign with 600 USDT pool, 300 USDT each. If the amount OP stated is true, the amount they lost would almost equal to the amount allocated for that marketing. I looked at their spreadsheet, the highest paid for reddit was 34 USDT and signature was 28 USDT. It was distributed successfully, though.

I wouldn't be surprised if they launched that bounty for the sole purpose of giving false credibility and tricking people into thinking they're a good platform.

I would very like it if I can be proven wrong.

[euphoriabet]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

[torkens]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

You are joking? Returning me only 100 usdt despite i deposited 340 it means only winning bets were abnormal bet, with loosing bet its ofc all ok. Also you remember to call upon abnormal bets only when i try to withdraw not before.

That would sound resonable if you sanction with void after first suspicious bet not after withdrawal demand.

And ofcourse loosing bet are all clear nth abnormal or suspicious 🤣

After this explanation i can only say stay out of this bookie for sure.

[albon]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

Why his last deposit and not all of his deposits he made if the provider has canceled all his bets which you are claiming to be of abnormal activity? Where is the proof that this person's playing is unfair and matches with a predetermined result so that the members believe what you said?

Frankly, it is the first time that I got to know about this betting platform through this topic, and what I saw on review sites, most of them are shill reviews.

You can try to solve this situation and return the OP's deposits and winnings to him if you are honest and want to preserve your EUPHORIABET reputation, and you are free to close his account if you prove that he violates your platform Terms and conditions, but after he withdraws the entire funds that he deposited.

[yahoo62278]

I feel like casinos take advantage of players confiscating the players money and using the abnormal activity excuse. Casinos need to show proof of the abnormal activity IMO. If he was betting abnormally, why wasn't his account frozen while he was losing? Why only bring it up once he won?

If he was doing illegal activity, his account should have been closed ASAP, not many bets later. It's fine when players are losing? Needs to be a different policy in place for sure. I agree that the bettor should be penalized for cheating if they cheated, but you guys need to show the proof. Just claiming it is not good enough.

[holydarkness]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

I was about to wrote this around the time OP posted his reply yesterday and something else needed my attention and it slipped from my mind.

I was curious with the same matter both OP and Albon said, if OP caught cheating and you canceled their winnings, then you should only confiscate the winnings from the --allegedly-- rigged bets ans return their deposits, not just the last one, otherwise you're stealing from them. I can't comprehend the logic behind this decision.

Second, you're accusing OP of a rigged match where they already know the outcome of the game? How?


OP, can you inform us what game or match you were betting on? As I didn't see you said anything about being locked out of your account, I assume you still have access to it and your betting history. Can you provide us the screenshot of it? Those screenshot might give us a better insight of the situation.

[khaled0111]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

Why can't he withdraw but his latest deposited amount (which, by chance, is the smallest one)?
If the provider has, indeed, found that those matches were fixed then you should void the bets and return the stakes to the customer's balance.
Sorry to say this, but letting him withdraw only the latest deposit and confiscating the remaining doesn't look good. It looks like you are trying to take advantage of this situation, as yahoo suggested above.

[CryptSafe]

I feel like casinos take advantage of players confiscating the players money and using the abnormal activity excuse. Casinos need to show proof of the abnormal activity IMO. If he was betting abnormally, why wasn't his account frozen while he was losing? Why only bring it up once he won?

If he was doing illegal activity, his account should have been closed ASAP, not many bets later. It's fine when players are losing? Needs to be a different policy in place for sure. I agree that the bettor should be penalized for cheating if they cheated, but you guys need to show the proof. Just claiming it is not good enough.

It bothers alot when players are loosing heavily and casino would not do any thing funny or ack rashly or try stopping the gambler or bettor from further play. They would remain silent while the bettor plays and loose consecutively huge amount of money but when it is the winning things for the gambler and maybe the gambler wins a big amount of money, the casino puts their eyes on the gamblers account with various investigations and security operation waiting for results for which will take upto 1 week delaying the release of the bettors win and when it is over one week plus, they start telling cock and bull tails that holds no water just to justify their  delayed pattern of scamming gamblers onboard their platform. It is very disturbing and disappointing that one would take out their time to get registered onboard a gambling platform and after doing that while scaling through their registration process following the required steps and after a win, they would start demanding for things that were not stated on their terms conditions for signing up.

[2double0]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

What is "fair play" in your dictionary?
Is it losing continuously till you wipe out your gambling account completely? Or is it that you win and then the casino decides that the amount won was due to abnormal activity?
If you have decided and as you are the casino, your decision is final, why don't you post a proof of what really was done abnormally by OP? What made you reverse the winnings of him? How can OP know the outcome of matches for which you are accusing him?
Any proof of websites where it was known? Is OP a match fixer? Would he fix games just to win $500?
Stop giving nonsense replies, be responsible and show some evidence to prove that OP is guilty.

[torkens]

All your bets were placed on matches with abnormal activity (matches with a predetermined result) and our provider canceled them so your account will be closed after you withdraw your last deposit, play fair and you will not have problems with payouts

I was about to wrote this around the time OP posted his reply yesterday and something else needed my attention and it slipped from my mind.

I was curious with the same matter both OP and Albon said, if OP caught cheating and you canceled their winnings, then you should only confiscate the winnings from the --allegedly-- rigged bets ans return their deposits, not just the last one, otherwise you're stealing from them. I can't comprehend the logic behind this decision.

Second, you're accusing OP of a rigged match where they already know the outcome of the game? How?


OP, can you inform us what game or match you were betting on? As I didn't see you said anything about being locked out of your account, I assume you still have access to it and your betting history. Can you provide us the screenshot of it? Those screenshot might give us a better insight of the situation.

Cant account is closed, but all thing is ridicilous i lost 260 then woth final deposit go up to 523  which means only 160e of profit so is there any logic for you that i know results and earn just 160$ 😁
Also none bet was void or any investigation until i decided to check are Euphoriabet is valid bookie and will they pay money so i continue bet there, good thing i checked time on time so damage is minimal but for sure DONT BET THERE.
IF THEY MAKE PROBLEM FOR 160$ EVERYTHING FURTHER IS CLEAR, JUST CLASIC SCAMMER BOOKIE