Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe?

[Xinarae*]

Although there was opposition to this vaccine at first present all vaccines have been implemented to survive covid 19. Recently there have been questions about the side effects of the astrazeneca vaccine in several european countries as a precautionary measure, several countries have suspended the astrazeneca vaccination program following allegations that the vaccine causes blood clots. However the world health organization and european medicine agencies as well as astrazeneca have insisted the vaccine is safe this vaccine has nothing to do with what is being said about blood clots.

[1714670109]

1714670109

[1714670109]

1714670109

[1714670109]

1714670109

[Sayeds56]

Although there was opposition to this vaccine at first present all vaccines have been implemented to survive covid 19. Recently there have been questions about the side effects of the astrazeneca vaccine in several european countries as a precautionary measure, several countries have suspended the astrazeneca vaccination program following allegations that the vaccine causes blood clots. However the world health organization and european medicine agencies as well as astrazeneca have insisted the vaccine is safe this vaccine has nothing to do with what is being said about blood clots.

I think it is still a better choice to have vaccine either AstraZeneca rather than having no vaccine though there have been some reports in the media about Blood clotting side effect but those case are very few and we need to remember that all Covid-19 vaccines are undergoing clinical trails and their effectiveness will be established after some time.

[Iphomme]

There is debate going on in the Media where safety of Astrazeneca vaccine developed in UK is being questioned and people are generally reluctant to get this vaccine. Some counties even banned it because some Blood clotting was reported in some people who were vaccinated in particular women and men below 50 years thought the percentage of such incidents is not very high..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhoCltkyvU

 For me I can not sure that safe for everyone cause I believe we have a different instructions of an body .some of as had an allergies maybe the vaccine Astrazeneca  will conflict and not suitable to that person who had an allergy so it's better to tell the Doctor that you have an allergy before you under go of vaccine.

[virasog]

There is debate going on in the Media where safety of Astrazeneca vaccine developed in UK is being questioned and people are generally reluctant to get this vaccine. Some counties even banned it because some Blood clotting was reported in some people who were vaccinated in particular women and men below 50 years thought the percentage of such incidents is not very high..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhoCltkyvU

Some people are of the view that AstraZeneca is the real and most effective vaccine. You may have a fever and in few cases, develop blood clots but those are temporary and soon you will be fine. All these indications means that the vaccine is making anti-bodies in your bodies. In other variants of vaccine, you have may not have these side effects meaning they are useless.

[BADecker]

What's interesting is that the Open VAERS website doesn't show any deaths for AstraZeneca. It list almost 2000 each for MODERNA and PFIZER. Yet the vaccines for AstraZeneca are supposedly almost the same as the other two. Does AstraZeneca own Open VAERS?

Also, Open VAERS lists about 400 more male deaths than female. The men are ahead. I don't see any women complaining about equal rights or something.

[tvbcof]

What's interesting is that the Open VAERS website doesn't show any deaths for AstraZeneca. It list almost 2000 each for MODERNA and PFIZER. Yet the vaccines for AstraZeneca are supposedly almost the same as the other two. Does AstraZeneca own Open VAERS?

AstraZeneca is similar to J&J and Sputnik.  These are DNA manipulating technology.  In theory the mRNA ones are not, but there are some questions about this contention popping up.

VAERS is a U.S. thing and AstraZeneca was never authorized for use in the U.S..  That's my understanding.

Also, Open VAERS lists about 400 more male deaths than female. The men are ahead. I don't see any women complaining about equal rights or something.

VAERS is notorious for it's very low capture rates.  To complicate matters, the CDC who controls the database are holding back data and allowing it to trickle in months after filing (if ever.)  Maybe men are more important than women and thus get attention when they have health issues?

[Sayeds56]

There is debate going on in the Media where safety of Astrazeneca vaccine developed in UK is being questioned and people are generally reluctant to get this vaccine. Some counties even banned it because some Blood clotting was reported in some people who were vaccinated in particular women and men below 50 years thought the percentage of such incidents is not very high..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhoCltkyvU

Some people are of the view that AstraZeneca is the real and most effective vaccine. You may have a fever and in few cases, develop blood clots but those are temporary and soon you will be fine. All these indications means that the vaccine is making anti-bodies in your bodies. In other variants of vaccine, you have may not have these side effects meaning they are useless.

All of us should get vaccinated to stop spread of corona virus, no matter if AstraZeneca is the only available vaccine in your country and you have no other choice, then go for it. In my country Sino-Vac is the only vaccine available in most of vaccination centers so i got it, although I heard a lot about its less effectiveness compared to other vaccines.

[tvbcof]

All of us should get vaccinated to stop spread of corona virus, no matter if AstraZeneca is the only available vaccine in your country and you have no other choice, then go for it. In my country Sino-Vac is the only vaccine available in most of vaccination centers so i got it, although I heard a lot about its less effectiveness compared to other vaccines.

Thank heavens since people who got the Pfizer jab have far FEWER neutralizing antibodies.  The solution?  You guessed it:  Mo boosters mo faster.

You really cannot make this shit up!

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/nwN7MxAv3kia/

I gave it the old college try to find the full context of the guy's comments, and also to see how the scientism rags and pharma shills were going to try to spin this into a good thing.  Limited success.  Maybe for comedy value franky1-n-beans can have a go at it?

[o_e_l_e_o]

Ahh yes, once again tvbcof comes out with the "Here's a scientist who (I think) says something which supports my preconceived opinions (he doesn't - more on that below), so therefore this is absolutely 100% factual. All scientists who disagree with me are still wrong, though". One day you may actually attempt to read and understand the source instead of listening to a clip deliberately snipped to make it sound like it supports the baseless nonsense of a conspiracy nut. But apparently that day is not today.

Here is the paper that guy wrote and he is referring to in that clip: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext

It says absolutely nothing about people having fewer antibodies as you claim. What it actually says is that the antibodies they have are less effective against some of the new variants, which is not in the least bit surprising and not at all the "GOTCHA PHARMA SHILLS!!1!11" you think it is.

[BADecker]

Ahh yes, once again tvbcof comes out with the "Here's a scientist who (I think) says something which supports my preconceived opinions (he doesn't - more on that below), so therefore this is absolutely 100% factual. All scientists who disagree with me are still wrong, though". One day you may actually attempt to read and understand the source instead of listening to a clip deliberately snipped to make it sound like it supports the baseless nonsense of a conspiracy nut. But apparently that day is not today.

Here is the paper that guy wrote and he is referring to in that clip: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext

It says absolutely nothing about people having fewer antibodies as you claim. What it actually says is that the antibodies they have are less effective against some of the new variants, which is not in the least bit surprising and not at all the "GOTCHA PHARMA SHILLS!!1!11" you think it is.

... after the jab.     

[Sayeds56]

All of us should get vaccinated to stop spread of corona virus, no matter if AstraZeneca is the only available vaccine in your country and you have no other choice, then go for it. In my country Sino-Vac is the only vaccine available in most of vaccination centers so i got it, although I heard a lot about its less effectiveness compared to other vaccines.

Thank heavens since people who got the Pfizer jab have far FEWER neutralizing antibodies.  The solution?  You guessed it:  Mo boosters mo faster.

You really cannot make this shit up!

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/nwN7MxAv3kia/

I gave it the old college try to find the full context of the guy's comments, and also to see how the scientism rags and pharma shills were going to try to spin this into a good thing.  Limited success.  Maybe for comedy value franky1-n-beans can have a go at it?

It is never ending debate that which vaccine is less effective and which one is more and which has less side effects and it will take quite long time before the results of clinical trails will be published  so  as a responsible citizen we should respect health care system of our country  &  get vaccinated at the earliest to make this globe Corona free.

[mu_enrico]

All of us should get vaccinated to stop spread of corona virus

People should have the freedom to choose. You get it if you want it; you ditch it if you don't trust it.

it will take quite long time before the results of clinical trails will be published  so  as a responsible citizen we should respect health care system of our country  &  get vaccinated at the earliest to make this globe Corona free.

That's a conclusion from a confused man. It means you should wait for more research before deciding to take it.

Sorry, I only trust empirical studies, not hypothetical or historical one. If it takes five years to get studies for long-term side effects, I'll decide it by then. Not now. FYI, so many adverse side effects from AZ in my country.

[Slow death]

If it takes five years to get studies for long-term side effects, I'll decide it by then. Not now.

would you wait for 5 years or 100,000 years until all side effects came to get the vaccine? imagine if all people had this thought? would have many deaths, we would have many lockdowns to contain the virus, we would have many people crying for losing relatives, the vaccines were made in a time of emergency and in my opinion they are fulfilling their role very well, I know and understand that there are risks such as any medicine or vaccine has side effects, but they are protecting us.

in my country we are using astrazeneca vaccine, my uncles have already taken the vaccine, all health people and people from the state security service have also taken the vaccine, we all have to take the vaccine and it should be mandatory

so many adverse side effects from AZ in my country.

in my country i didn't see any serious cases

[Mauser]

There is debate going on in the Media where safety of Astrazeneca vaccine developed in UK is being questioned and people are generally reluctant to get this vaccine. Some counties even banned it because some Blood clotting was reported in some people who were vaccinated in particular women and men below 50 years thought the percentage of such incidents is not very high..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhoCltkyvU

From my personal experience I can say that the vaccine is alright. Around half of my family all got the AstraZeneca vaccine, and most of them already have the second dose. My dad had probably the strongest side effects with lying in bed for one day with fever. Everybody else including myself just had some light headaches, nothing severe.

[mu_enrico]

would you wait for 5 years or 100,000 years

5-10 years is enough.

imagine if all people had this thought? would have many deaths, we would have many lockdowns to contain the virus, we would have many people crying for losing relatives, the vaccines were made in a time of emergency and in my opinion they are fulfilling their role very well, I know and understand that there are risks such as any medicine or vaccine has side effects, but they are protecting us.

And, after the vaccine? No lockdown or threats to lockdown from the government?
Since my childhood, I've been taught that once you get the vaccine, you are immune for life. But this vaccine just sounds like an alternative medicine where its efficacy is questionable. Without skeptics, you wouldn't know if they injected a mere vitamin-C into your body and pretended to be a legit vaccine.

we all have to take the vaccine and it should be mandatory

Holyshit, injecting something into your body should only be done with your 100% consent.

Bonus: To save the world from overpopulation, the government requires you to only have 1 kid. Without everyone comply, there will be famine, destruction, etc. so don't reproduce! It's for the sake of the earth and others.

[evilgreed]

               This astrazenica vaccine is really a hot topic here in our place. A lot of people are very reluctant in taking the shots ever since several videos talking about how bad astrazenica is for everyone and that a lot have died because of astrazenica emerged. This has even reach the primetime news here in my country. And so, even the ones who have already taken the first dose like me before hearing the news about it, are also very reluctant since the videos circulating around along with the one on the news said that it is not suitable for ages 59 and below. This means that some complications may occur after the second dose.