1xbit.com signature campaign (over)

[Tumanggor]

received this week payment smoothly, thank you 1xBIT

[1714590264]

1714590264

[1714590264]

1714590264

[Alisha-k]

Hi manager, my post was miscalculated I completed my post for last week  I made a total of 15 posts but was calculated as 13 please review it thank you.

[Manager1xBit]

payment again send in your wallet you can check! campaign going strong but not new position open for now.

[JollyGood]

Very hard to add anything more than what I posted earlier about the 1xbit scammers. I hope people take notice of the real situation and stop participating in any form of activity with them.

Just going through some of the feedback and posting history of some members that were (and still are) begging to join the 1xbit scam outfit signature campaign shows exactly how low in the gutter some would go. Furthermore it shows the 1xbit campaign manager dealing with like-minded highly dubious individuals that probably would not hesitate to sell their granny to the devil given half a chance as long as they pocketed a bit of crypto.

[sam00]

Please change the title of this post if you are not accepting any new members. This is misleading.

[1xbit_official]

Very hard to add anything more than what I posted earlier about the 1xbit scammers. I hope people take notice of the real situation and stop participating in any form of activity with them.

The opposite side of the coin is placed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

Regarding title of the topic - we are planning to accept a few more people.

[JollyGood]

How much income have 1xbit made from selective scamming? Is an honest answer possible?

Very hard to add anything more than what I posted earlier about the 1xbit scammers. I hope people take notice of the real situation and stop participating in any form of activity with them.

The opposite side of the coin is placed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

Regarding title of the topic - we are planning to accept a few more people.

[bitcoinst]

Btctalk username: bitcoinst
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=555953
Rank: Hero
Current post count: 4592
BTC Address: bc1qs3mcfmyak58df3stt4ldf58qta7u8pyakvx5rq

[Alisha-k]

payment again send in your wallet you can check! campaign going strong but not new position open for now.

I haven't received mine and reasons been that my activities for last week was miscalculated. Please review my posts for last week I made a total of 16-1 posts meaning I made 15 eligible posts (126activities - 110 activities) = (16) I will be glad if last week spreadsheet is reviewed urs @Alisha-k

[FatFork]

Very hard to add anything more than what I posted earlier about the 1xbit scammers. I hope people take notice of the real situation and stop participating in any form of activity with them.

The opposite side of the coin is placed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0
<cut>

Yes. There are two sides to every coin, even a fake one (such as your 'honest' review campaign). You hired every last one Adkinsbet scam sockpuppet and the worst garbage of this forum for your promotion.
So, let's review some of your honest reviewers:

• BitcoinAccepted - Adkinsbet shill account, troll [Trust summary]
• BlackFor3st - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• Cacingkemi - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• coin.princess - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• cutesgirl - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• gadado - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• imutlinda - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• kkaroul4 - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]
• MI6 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• nasipadang - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• ongkok87 - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]
• perla - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• pungopete468 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• qory - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• sempak - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• toast - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• VanityWallets2015 - Adkinsbet shill, account has changed hands [Trust summary]
• wildan88 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• yayayo - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• zidanw - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]

As if that weren't enough, many accounts appear to be controlled by a single person or small group of people. And you still deny having anything to do with the Adkinsbet scam? What a funny coincidence.  

Accounts Connected:

1. yayayo
2. BlackFor3st
3. gadado
4. wildan88
5. sempak

Accounts Connected:

1. toast
2. pungopete468
3. qory
4. perla
5. MI6
6. Cacingkemi

3 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.Caross
2.Tessnik
3.BIN-BIN

[Cryptock]

Regarding title of the topic - we are planning to accept a few more people.

Btctalk name: Cryptock
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251145
Rank: Hero
Current post count: 854
BTC Address: bc1q7sqr4g7zl3kmlylpdmgxr4xxawe3tm7nsxwj3j

[Enemona]

We are all aware Of how the trust system of this forum have been abused by the so-called reputable members and DTS giving negative trust to innocent and vulnerable members all in the name of trying to keep the forum clean from impostor and scammers but you guys are the real bad eggs in the forum I hope theymos will do something about this abuse of the trust system in the nearest future.

Very hard to add anything more than what I posted earlier about the 1xbit scammers. I hope people take notice of the real situation and stop participating in any form of activity with them.

The opposite side of the coin is placed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0
<cut>

Yes. There are two sides to every coin, even a fake one (such as your 'honest' review campaign). You hired every last one Adkinsbet scam sockpuppet and the worst garbage of this forum for your promotion.
So, let's review some of your honest reviewers:

• BitcoinAccepted - Adkinsbet shill account, troll [Trust summary]
• BlackFor3st - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• Cacingkemi - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• coi[Suspicious link removed]incess - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• cutesgirl - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• gadado - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• imutlinda - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• kkaroul4 - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]
• MI6 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• nasipadang - Adkinsbet shill account [Trust summary]
• ongkok87 - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]
• perla - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• pungopete468 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• qory - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• sempak - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• toast - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• VanityWallets2015 - Adkinsbet shill, account has changed hands [Trust summary]
• wildan88 - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• yayayo - Alt account, Adkinsbet sockpuppet [Trust summary]
• zidanw - Adkinsbet shill, Part of the Spammer Blacklist [Trust summary]

As if that weren't enough, many accounts appear to be controlled by a single person or small group of people. And you still deny having anything to do with the Adkinsbet scam? What a funny coincidence. 

Accounts Connected:

1. yayayo
2. BlackFor3st
3. gadado
4. wildan88
5. sempak

Accounts Connected:

1. toast
2. pungopete468
3. qory
4. perla
5. MI6
6. Cacingkemi

3 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.Caross
2.Tessnik
3.BIN-BIN

I challenge you and others calling 1xbit and all the other so-called scam platforms to put off your signature then I will take you guys seriously not until then I will always see you guys as trolls trying to talk down competitors of your pay Masters.
You all have signatures of other gambling sites and yet want us to believe you for calling and tagging 1xbits and they promoters unjustly.
I know I will receive 100x red tags for this but I don't give a shit about that cause am only here to learn and not to earn like you, am tired of all this dramas 🎭 

[Cryptock]

You all have signatures of other gambling sites and yet want us to believe you for calling and tagging 1xbits and they promoters unjustly.

Doesn't matter how people understand your post, but this fragment ^ is very real.
It's quite obvious that noone speaks positively about competition.
It is not strange that those who wear advertising of competitive websites have extremely negative opinions.
Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

[Frengki_cisco]

It's not a drama-but it's a true story-which is played by the 1xbit site, not a few people are victimized by the greed of the 1xbit team.

I think the member who hides behind their main account can be called that person is a loser.

I see-not a broken DT system, the actions of the 1xbit team that broke this forum, if I become an admin-I guarantee 1xbit site, I will drown in the eyes of this community forever.

[FatFork]

I challenge you and others calling 1xbit and all the other so-called scam platforms to put off your signature then I will take you guys seriously not until then I will always see you guys as trolls trying to talk down competitors of your pay Masters.
You all have signatures of other gambling sites and yet want us to believe you for calling and tagging 1xbits and they promoters unjustly.

Although I've never studied debate, I recognize this as a classic logical fallacy. Instead of responding with a well-reasoned, to-the-point counterargument (such as concrete examples or genuine evidence against my claims), you try to undermine my argument by saying "See, he wears the signature of another gambling site, so he must be trying to talk down the competition!" As a matter of fact, I made a much more nuanced argument, but you chose to ignore it completely and constructed a vague straw man fallacy instead.

Furthermore, you challenge me for something I've never said. In your statement, you said, "I challenge you and others calling 1xbit and all the other so-called scam platforms ..." , which is totally untrue. Throughout all of my posts, you won't find a single post in which I explicitly stated that 1xBIT casino is a scam, as opposed to some of the members I quoted here, who were later paid by 1xBIT as their promoters.

Now, for your second claim, can you show me at least one member from the list I posted who was unjustly tagged?
Considering the evidence I presented (consolidation of received payments to a single address), I believe it to be quite evident that these accounts belong to one person or a small group of people. As you may know, multiple accounts are not against the rules of this forum, but cheating in contests and signature campaigns by using alt accounts is fraudulent and deceptive practice, and deserves to be tagged as such, don't you think?

Given the above, would you accept the reviews and opinions of such members as honest?
However, 1xBIT decided to hire them and paid them to promote their business. Go figure.

[Marvelman]

It's quite obvious that noone speaks positively about competition.
It is not strange that those who wear advertising of competitive websites have extremely negative opinions.
Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

Not true. People don’t speak negatively about other competing casinos. Why do only scammers have this problem?
Healthy competition is good for business. Fraudulent behavior and bad publicity is bad for the entire industry.

Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition 1xbit should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

[Cryptock]

It's quite obvious that noone speaks positively about competition.
It is not strange that those who wear advertising of competitive websites have extremely negative opinions.
Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

Not true. People don’t speak negatively about other competing casinos. Why do only scammers have this problem?
Healthy competition is good for business. Fraudulent behavior and bad publicity is bad for the entire industry.

Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition 1xbit should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

Did I write anything about 1xbit? I have to stand on the side of what? Side of my opinion about the fact that if competition speaks negatively, this is a kind of conflict?
Honest competition, of course, that is very much needed for the entire market (every market). However, the competition speaking negatively, in my opinion, is not fair and for sure can not be objective.

[Erdogan]

payment again send in your wallet you can check! campaign going strong but not new position open for now.

I haven't received mine and reasons been that my activities for last week was miscalculated. Please review my posts for last week I made a total of 16-1 posts meaning I made 15 eligible posts (126activities - 110 activities) = (16) I will be glad if last week spreadsheet is reviewed urs @Alisha-k

I have similar situation in week 3.
It's clear from the statistics and my posts history that I wrote 16 posts in week 3 (07.06 - 13.06), but only 14 were counted in the spreadsheet. Also check again please or at least tell the reason for these difference. Maybe there are some threads or sections where posts don't count?

[Manager1xBit]

if not met required post you post wrong part or post was bad so not count it. can send to me pm for review!

yes we have open position but looking too people with good and neutral trust not negative!

[rat03gopoh]

yes we have open position but looking too people with good and neutral trust not negative!

Who would make them have a neg trust/s?
Your campaign.