Royse777, Bitlucy and long story in brief

Quote from: JollyGood on July 02, 2022, 08:49:05 AM

I am one to extensively analyse various bits of information

Until now JollyGood made 17 (+/-2) posts only on this thread. Most of them are by asking questions. He then elaborates his thoughts of why he was asking the questions and what he thinks all about. All these posts are long repetitive posts, unnecessarily longer then it was supposed to take (Are you working on applying the next chipmixer open spot) . Poker Player was correct in his comparison.

In his long line of texts he asked many questions that clearly means he did NOT bother to do proper case study.
How can someone spend hours of time for days without doing their homework correctly? Or a) this is intentional attack because he felt unnoticed of not adding him in the PM circle / b) he felt insulted because I was not responding his nonsense / c) I was criticizing the way he justifies a case / d) to achieve some name from the bad situation I am in / e) anything else?

Quote from: JollyGood on June 22, 2022, 11:15:25 PM

Was he also a part-owner or investor in the Bitlucy website too? I know stated here he was working full-time for Bitlucy (whatever that may entail) but was there more to his involvement?

Quote from: JollyGood on July 16, 2022, 12:29:09 AM

Was this ever actually addressed by Royse777? Was a straight answer ever posted addressing this issue about the dinner? If so, can anybody provide a link before Royse777 locks this thread.

One will need to read the post (^^^)to understand the context.

Quote from: JollyGood on July 17, 2022, 12:35:15 PM

- Does anybody know what the percentage of the Bitlucy company given to Royse777 was?

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2022, 01:34:22 PM

I believe I read another member quoted 10% but did Royse777 ever state the percentage voluntarily? I tried searching but that part remains elusive.

The answer of all above including many questions were already made in the first post. For example share of GGR.

To conclude,
In many cases but safe to say in my case, JollyGood did not do proper case study. Which makes me believe that he does not do proper case study of the allegations he makes against anyone or any project.
If a long lasting member like me is having very difficult time to handle his nonsense clueless allegations, unnecessary demands which I am not comfortable to share with him furthermore he personally has no business with it then imagine how difficult it is for new users and lower rank users who has not established them before going face to face against Jolly.
JollyGood takes the opportunity of him being forum police/lawyer and leave red tag to the users.
I do not trust his judgement. His motives are questionable.

Quote from: JollyGood on July 02, 2022, 08:49:05 AM

As for the trade-risk comment you made, I broadly agree with it but with my own perspective added for consideration that is why I left the negative tag. In my opinion the flag should have stayed, I supported it along with others yet on the other hand others opposed it. The one who created the flag decided to withdraw it (as he was well within his rights to do so) but each member has their opinion how to conduct themselves in this highly unusual set of circumstances: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632;page=iflags

To make it worst, this is his reason for him to leave the negative tag. Because the flag is inactive which was a combined effort from many users. Since the flag is not active he decided to use his sole power of using the red feedback.