[FREE RAFFLE] cygan's 10th forum anniversary🍻win some cool stuff😎

[cygan]

@dozerz
you can still choose a second spot

...
extra rule: if you already traded with me and gave me a positive feedback (trust), then you are allowed to pick 2 spots
...

[5tift]

5 - 5tift
Thank you!

[dozerz]

@dozerz
you can still choose a second spot

...
extra rule: if you already traded with me and gave me a positive feedback (trust), then you are allowed to pick 2 spots
...

82 thanks good sir, will be after some cs3 stamps soon

[sam00]

#87 sam00
Thank you Cygan!
Danke Cygan!

[icopress]

Number: 40

Congratulations on the anniversary 

[rdbase]

Happy 10th anniversary to you Cyan!

I pick #49.

There was a 2nd year just for Ratimov and really like that one and this one has alot more prizes available since it's for a 10th so good on you.

[sweeteye]

Happy 10th, Cygan~
Great celebratory gesture

19 & 98, plz!

[selassiesoildier]

Just realized I did a trade with you and can grab another spot. Congrats on your 10 year anniversary and the act of kindness

61

[The_Crypto_Kid]

thank you for the opportunity to participate! My grandpa speaks very highly of you all!

I will take #39

[cygan]

Number: 40

Congratulations on the anniversary 

unfortunately, since you have a negative trust, i cannot include you on the list of participants.

...
your account must not have a negative trust (unless the user has already traded with me)
...

[GazetaBitcoin]

unfortunately, since you have a negative trust, i cannot include you on the list of participants.

I am not sure I understand correctly this rule - does it mean to not have received a negative feedback or any kind of negative feedback? For example, I received a negative feedback once, from an old troll of the forum, also known for making death threats and for ban evading (obviously, a non-DT user). This feedback appears under my Untrusted feedback section of the profile. Does this make me not eligible for the raffle? I case I am eligible, I'd like to pick number 96, please.

Besides, I also want to congratulate OP for this amazing achievement!

Thank you,
Gazeta.

[cygan]

unfortunately, since you have a negative trust, i cannot include you on the list of participants.

I am not sure I understand correctly this rule - does it mean to not have received a negative feedback or any kind of negative feedback? For example, I received a negative feedback once, from an old troll of the forum, also known for making death threats and for ban evading (obviously, a non-DT user). This feedback appears under my Untrusted feedback section of the profile. Does this make me not eligible for the raffle? I case I am eligible, I'd like to pick number 96, please.

Besides, I also want to congratulate OP for this amazing achievement!

Thank you,
Gazeta.

for me someone has a negative trust, if he has at least a -1 in his trust score. so you are in the raffle and take you on the list

[xSlyy]

My first raffle I'm able to participate in!
I haven't traded with you yet Cygan but I look forward to the day we do business.
I'll take number 18
Congrats on the 10 years  BTC

(just realized I am a newbie still - oh well - Good luck to everyone)

[MoparMiningLLC]

for me someone has a negative trust, if he has at least a -1 in his trust score. so you are in the raffle and take you on the list

that is subjective though as the neg trust showing or not will depend on if the person who left it is in your trust circle or not. if they are not, you will not see it.


I have negatives too. However my negs are from game protect who left me 3 (never had any trades with him) and 1 from vod who claims I am a scammer (he changes the neg several times, first i was a child molester, second time he called me a rapist, third time he called me a scammer --- he deleted the first two)

the ones from game protect do not show to me as he is not in my trust circle but vod's does. now if someone excludes vod, they will not see my neg from him - unless I misunderstand how it works.

[cygan]

My first raffle I'm able to participate in!
I haven't traded with you yet Cygan but I look forward to the day we do business.
I'll take number 18
Congrats on the 10 years  BTC

(just realized I am a newbie still - oh well - Good luck to everyone)

exactly, but rules are rules
but you will definitely get the chance to participate in future free raffles

[Heisenberg_Hunter]

I will pick 28 - Heisenberg

Congrats on hitting 10 years on the forum cygan and glad you found the collectibles section. I am currently at 3.5 years with 10 years is still a long way to go and hopefully I guess, we will be able to migrate to newer forum software atleast before your 20th anniversary Your collection thread is always an inspiration, hope I can design you and Mopar a custom signature set when time permits. BTW looking forward for the 20 year anniversary and trading with you..  

[icopress]

unfortunately, since you have a negative trust, i cannot include you on the list of participants.

Is this some kind of joke? I am rather thick-skinned to perceive your subjective answer as a clear manifestation of illiteracy regarding the details of the work of the trust system, but I cannot tolerate unsubstantiated statements based on stupidity or ignorance. What I mean is that, theoretically, if a member of DT1/DT2 leaves you a red tag for no reason with statements that you are a pedophile or that you are a fraud, then by your own words this will become true by default.

I was confused not by the fact that you didn’t allow me to participate in your competition, but by the fact that you didn’t even figure out the details .. and if you did, you would understand that when leaving red tags, WhiteManWhite refers to absurd statements due to which he was removed from the DT1 network at week 95 and out of resentment he left the forum. Now, apparently, due to the monthly election of DT1 members, the power of this guy's word has returned to zero.

[Agrawas]

51-52..

Thanks Buddy and Congrats on completing 10yrs on the forum..

[cygan]

unfortunately, since you have a negative trust, i cannot include you on the list of participants.

Is this some kind of joke? I am rather thick-skinned to perceive your subjective answer as a clear manifestation of illiteracy regarding the details of the work of the trust system, but I cannot tolerate unsubstantiated statements based on stupidity or ignorance. What I mean is that, theoretically, if a member of DT1/DT2 leaves you a red tag for no reason with statements that you are a pedophile or that you are a fraud, then by your own words this will become true by default.

I was confused not by the fact that you didn’t allow me to participate in your competition, but by the fact that you didn’t even figure out the details .. and if you did, you would understand that when leaving red tags, WhiteManWhite refers to absurd statements due to which he was removed from the DT1 network at week 95 and out of resentment he left the forum. Now, apparently, due to the monthly election of DT1 members, the power of this guy's word has returned to zero.

...

sorry for the hasty action of me to not let you participate in my free raffle. but through your post, you have explained it to me quite well the system, which is still very unmanageable for some users (MoparMiningLLC) here...
have now of course included your desired spot and wish you good luck with it🍻✌

[MoparMiningLLC]

sorry for the hasty action of me to not let you participate in my free raffle. but through your post, you have explained it to me quite well the system, which is still very unmanageable for some users (MoparMiningLLC) here...
have now of course included your desired spot and wish you good luck with it🍻✌

lol hey now! I can manage mine just fine. but every time I add/remove someone it results in threads being made in meta on how I am abusing the trust system and then I get discord pm's, telegram dm's and forum dm's on how "unwise" it was for me to do so.

So, I instead leave my trust list blank and allow the forums to control that - I don't need the drama from all the nancy's that are so worried about everyone's trust list.