Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 02:20:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Information on ATI 7xxx Series Dec. 5th!  (Read 14985 times)
amazingrando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 30, 2011, 04:59:37 PM
 #101

There are a lot of them, some in this thread.  The early reports seemed to indicate a die shrink.  The later ones now indicate only the low end OEM garbage will be a die shrink rebadge.  I agree with you (and had stated it in the past) IF the 7850 is a VLIW4 on 28nm it will be a monster card.  Sadly that doesn't seem to be the case.

If that's the case, then I'm really disappointed.  I'm quite reluctant to jump into FPGA's anytime in the near future, so I was hoping I could get some power efficient cards in the meantime.  Grrr.

I have to break it to you but those number are pure crap for a 5970.  Not just against what I have gotten but against what lots of other people have gotten.  The limit on each card varies but my slowest card is running 820Mhz/160Mhz.  3x5970 in open air rig pulls 870W at the wall (measured over 3 days using kill-a-watt).  Backing out 100W for the MB, power supply inefficiency, CPU, RAM, etc that puts each card @ roughly 250W a piece.  That is w/ cgminer 2.1.0 running on Linux w/ 11.6 drivers & 2.4 SDK.

If you aren't getting AT LEAST 700MH/s you are doing something horribly wrong.  Note: 700MH/s isn't "good" it is just barely acceptable.

My math was bad in my previous post.  340x 2 = 680, not 640.  That's what happens when you've been up all night without sleep  Grin

Most of my 5970's I have been running at 800Mhz, but stability has sucked (suckage = a stalled miner once in three days), so recently I've dropped it down to 750-ish.  I'm on pretty much the same setup as you.  Ubuntu 11.04 x64 with 11.6/2.4 drivers/SDK, though I use phoenix directly with my own scripts.  I'm sure I could get more out of the 5970s, but I simply don't have time for that.

Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
1714054850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714054850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714054850
Reply with quote  #2

1714054850
Report to moderator
1714054850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714054850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714054850
Reply with quote  #2

1714054850
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 265

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!


View Profile
December 31, 2011, 10:45:12 PM
 #102

3 coins a day @ £2 each x7 = 63x4= £252 for 28 days mining. My electric bill is 100-110 a month. THats how i do my maths. Even 2 coins a day or a drop to £1.33($2.08 ill have you know) would give me £168 still leaving a profit.

Uhh, Zed doesn't think so. Neither does Google Spreadsheets.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqP-aJPTwJFodEhkUC1ZU3JQVGp6QkpYUHZYTTNSanc

Looks like closer to £58/month (28 days) at your £2.00/coin rate.

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Just sayin'

- Zed

No mining at the moment.
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 31, 2011, 10:50:50 PM
 #103

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Now THAT'S a blast from the past....
P4man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 31, 2011, 11:08:39 PM
 #104

Uhh, Zed doesn't think so. Neither does Google Spreadsheets.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqP-aJPTwJFodEhkUC1ZU3JQVGp6QkpYUHZYTTNSanc


His bug is far worse than than the FDIV bug, that one was was pretty obscure. m3sSh3aD's brain bug produces far more and far greater errors and in each and every attempt at math.

He posted earlier his electricity costs £0.16 per KwH. to get to £110/month means £0.15/H. So he would be mining at barely over 1000W
Hes mining mostly on heavily overclocked and overvolted 69x0 cards.
To get 3 BTC per day, you need ~3.5GH. @1000W?

Show me a GPU mining rig that gets anywhere near 3.5MH/W.


DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
December 31, 2011, 11:17:46 PM
 #105

Uhh, Zed doesn't think so. Neither does Google Spreadsheets.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqP-aJPTwJFodEhkUC1ZU3JQVGp6QkpYUHZYTTNSanc


His bug is far worse than than the FDIV bug, that one was was pretty obscure. m3sSh3aD's brain bug produces far more and far greater errors and in each and every attempt at math.

He posted earlier his electricity costs £0.16 per KwH. to get to £110/month means £0.15/H. So he would be mining at barely over 1000W
Hes mining mostly on heavily overclocked and overvolted 69x0 cards.
To get 3 BTC per day, you need ~3.5GH. @1000W?

Show me a GPU mining rig that gets anywhere near 3.5MH/W.



I think you could do it with some serious underclocking and undervolting on the right hardware.   Maybe....

If I ever get bored I may try to see what is the highest MH/W possible using one of my 3x5970 rigs.  I think I could make 3.5MH/W.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
January 01, 2012, 12:16:28 AM
 #106

If I ever get bored I may try to see what is the highest MH/W possible using one of my 3x5970 rigs.  I think I could make 3.5MH/W.
Sounds like a fun challenge.

Buy & Hold
plastic.elastic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 01, 2012, 01:41:15 AM
 #107

Quote
I didn't think 6970s could hit 395 MH/s out of the box, unless they (Tomshardware) did some tweaking to theirs just to make it benchmark slightly above a 5870.

Total BS in that article. Most of my 5870s can EASILY get a maximum of 440 Mhash/s when slightly overclocked to 960 MHz.

6XXX sucks compared to 5XXX. Even a 6990 sucks compared to the 5970 king ATM. A 6970 can almost never beat a 5870. 

Nobody really knows how the 7XXX will perform or behave until some months after release to allow for optimizations and OCing.



What BS is the crap coming from your mouth.

Run your card at stock then come here and eat your own BS.

Tips gladly accepted: 1LPaxHPvpzN3FbaGBaZShov3EFafxJDG42
TurboK
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 01, 2012, 04:21:36 PM
 #108

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Is that the one where if you input "@[=g3,8d]\&fbb=-q]/hk%fg" (quote included) and press Delete, you get sucked into the internet?

12zJNWtM2HknS2EPLkT9QPSuSq1576aKx7

Tradehill viral bullshit code: TH-R114411
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 01, 2012, 04:27:50 PM
 #109

Uhh, Zed doesn't think so. Neither does Google Spreadsheets.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqP-aJPTwJFodEhkUC1ZU3JQVGp6QkpYUHZYTTNSanc


His bug is far worse than than the FDIV bug, that one was was pretty obscure. m3sSh3aD's brain bug produces far more and far greater errors and in each and every attempt at math.

He posted earlier his electricity costs £0.16 per KwH. to get to £110/month means £0.15/H. So he would be mining at barely over 1000W
Hes mining mostly on heavily overclocked and overvolted 69x0 cards.
To get 3 BTC per day, you need ~3.5GH. @1000W?

Show me a GPU mining rig that gets anywhere near 3.5MH/W.


I think you could do it with some serious underclocking and undervolting on the right hardware.   Maybe....

If I ever get bored I may try to see what is the highest MH/W possible using one of my 3x5970 rigs.  I think I could make 3.5MH/W.

Nice challenge. Hope you can find the time one day and show us if it is possible !
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 265

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!


View Profile
January 01, 2012, 06:14:40 PM
 #110

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Is that the one where if you input "@[=g3,8d]\&fbb=-q]/hk%fg" (quote included) and press Delete, you get sucked into the internet?

No, I think that is is the one where you get a visit from the Men In Black, or maybe the Man With One Red Shoe? I can never remember.

The FDIV bug is the one that allowed banks to honestly claim there was error in their spreadsheets. I know, "honest bank" sounds odd.  Smiley

- Zed

No mining at the moment.
Mousepotato
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


Seal Cub Clubbing Club


View Profile
January 03, 2012, 09:03:53 PM
 #111

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Is that where this saying came from?:

"I am Pentium of the Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated"

Mousepotato
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 03, 2012, 09:14:09 PM
 #112

Are you using a Pentium with the FDIV bug for doing your math?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Is that where this saying came from?:

"I am Pentium of the Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated"

It is amusing how threads can deteriorate. But this is +1 for sure!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!