Is the World in the Beginning Stages of World War 3? Are you #prepped?

[sir_danny]

Bitcoin and World War 3.

A friend's brother - who is a marine, told her to acquire property far away from city centers. When she asked why, her brother just said "just be ready" for anything.

I read a lot of news and was quite surprised when I saw that global military expenditure has reached an all-time high of $2 Trillion despite the pandemic and economic slowdown. Today, there are simultaneous military drills happening all over the world. In Asia, state-owned right wing media is calling for preparations for war. In the border between India and China - both with populations of billions and both with gigantic territory, 250,000 troops are on the ready in the event that they would be called to fight - all the signs are there. We can no longer ignore it - nations are preparing for something big.

Now I got to thinking about how I will prepare. And others should too. Then I thought of bitcoin and the global economy. It promises decentralization, censorship resistance and all those things. Foremost among my thoughts are the following:

• We should be able to find shelter or even bunkers away from city centers and not underneath your home in the middle of a major city
• If we're going to use bitcoin as a currency - or as an asset, then assuming that governments will censor the Internet, we need to be able to access it (and transfer to others who sell goods or service
• Do we need a blockstream satellite dish?
• How would having a Star Link connection work with Bitcoin

[1714714853]

1714714853

[1714714853]

1714714853

[1714714853]

1714714853

[1714714853]

1714714853

[1714714853]

1714714853

[syedakhlaque]

There are no chances of world war-3. The whole world and humanity are looking for peace and development. The countries of the world learned much with world war-1 and world war-2. No one earned anything from these wars but there was a loss of millions of lives. Many countries were destroyed by these wars and they are still establishing and paying for it. War is not the solution to any problem but it creates a lot of problems, poverty, and destruction, etc.

[Tash]

Lol, it's nearing 2 year from start of the war, people still getting shot on a daily basis. Have you been out in the bush/woods or what?

But fear not Cavalry is on the way
https://twitter.com/i/status/1451646314157051908

[teosanru]

Bitcoin and World War 3.

A friend's brother - who is a marine, told her to acquire property far away from city centers. When she asked why, her brother just said "just be ready" for anything.

I read a lot of news and was quite surprised when I saw that global military expenditure has reached an all-time high of $2 Trillion despite the pandemic and economic slowdown. Today, there are simultaneous military drills happening all over the world. In Asia, state-owned right wing media is calling for preparations for war. In the border between India and China - both with populations of billions and both with gigantic territory, 250,000 troops are on the ready in the event that they would be called to fight - all the signs are there. We can no longer ignore it - nations are preparing for something big.

Now I got to thinking about how I will prepare. And others should too. Then I thought of bitcoin and the global economy. It promises decentralization, censorship resistance and all those things. Foremost among my thoughts are the following:

• We should be able to find shelter or even bunkers away from city centers and not underneath your home in the middle of a major city
• If we're going to use bitcoin as a currency - or as an asset, then assuming that governments will censor the Internet, we need to be able to access it (and transfer to others who sell goods or service
• Do we need a blockstream satellite dish?
• How would having a Star Link connection work with Bitcoin

It's been more than 50 years people have been talking that a 3rd world war is near, earlier it was about to start between US and USSR, later people expected it to start in the middle east, later they thought it could start in North Korea and now they expect it to start in the Indian SubContinent, but the truth is that there have not been any major action or geopolitical activities which directly hint towards an all out world war, Tell me one major event and I would believe your conspiracy theory. Wars of such gigantic nature today are really difficult, not only because of the WMD the countries possess but also due to ease of information to common people. A war would never be advocated by citizens of the country which means today if a country decides to go for a war for no good reasons, the government would lose it's own country itself. Bitcoin infact would do the inverse, it would bring governments closer as they prepare to fight with it together instead of fighting among themselves.

[libertasbella]

No one earned anything from these wars but there was a loss of millions of lives. Many countries were destroyed by these wars and they are still establishing and paying for it.

Ford, General Motors, Messerschmitt, IBM, Rolls Royce, Boeing, Northrop, Grumman, Lockheed, Mitsubishi, Winchester, Krupps, Bath Iron Works, Seagram, John Pierpont Morgan and Goldman Sachs all made a killing during WWII. Plenty more companies stand to make a killing from any other war that pops up, no matter its scale.

[Gyfts]

Can anyone really prepare for a WW3 in the age of nuclear technology? Maybe you could purchase a bunker, but in combination with a nuclear winter, there's not really a point. So really what's most probable is a replication of the Cold War. China, Russia, clear allies, against the US, India, UK, and France. Wonder how the economies will operate during such a stalemate of nuclear proliferation? In the best interest of the world for no one to launch the first nuke, so just decades of tension to amount to nothing (thankfully), that is if any sort of war were to break out at all.

[Tash]

New Nuremberg Trials – Crimes Against Humanity
https://justice4poland.com/2021/10/18/new-nuremberg-trials-crimes-against-humanity/

[Jason267]

Yes I agree with you that the world is extremely close to World War 3. Wherever you look, there are chances of fighting on each side of world. Since then, security issues between the many countries has been detected. China and the USA are in cold war. America has old enmity with Russia. Now factions have started forming, as if they were formed during Word War 2. And China has border disputes with about 24 countries. China remains in dispute for some Sea border too. A communist ideology has always been a threat to the world. It's my short opinion on world war 3 in which every economy will be destroyed.

[Similificator]

Although I cannot be sure about if whether or not a world war will happen, what I can be a BUT certain of right now is that the next world war will be very far from ghe the world wars  1 and 2. Unlike what most people imagine which is guns to guns and bombs to bombs, what I expect to haloen if such a war is to really happen, it will be a cyber war. Just think about how advanced the weaponry of every country is. If nukes get exchanged this workd will fall apart. While biological war us possible, countries would never want to be caught on the act because ot will he considered as TABOO and will only he disadvantageous in their part. Idk really, it's just my own speculation.

[cmg777]

This is more like World War 4 (World War 3 was the cold war) is the war on you the nobody that once enjoyed the fruits of the Western world. Now the psychotic elites want mass death as in WWI and WWII so they can continue to consolidate control over the world when its all just a perception game where all the sleeping giant has to do is admit that these moneyed stamp fed elites are less than nothing themselves without the giant that is the masses of the Western World (US, Canada, UK, NZ, Europe, South Korea. Japan and Australia). Meanwhile, China and Russia plot as to what happens post-western world and how they can consolidate things to their own benefit.

All I can say to you John/Jane Nobody is to get stocked up on Food and supplies (hopefully, freeze dried foods that have a long shelf life). If you are able to buy a gun or weapons. Stock up on Ammo. Stock up on Water and other essential supplies. Get prepared or the war will eat you up.

[Ebede]

Yes I agree with you that the world is extremely close to World War 3. Wherever you look, there are chances of fighting on each side of world. Since then, security issues between the many countries has been detected. China and the USA are in cold war. America has old enmity with Russia. Now factions have started forming, as if they were formed during Word War 2. And China has border disputes with about 24 countries. China remains in dispute for some Sea border too. A communist ideology has always been a threat to the world. It's my short opinion on world war 3 in which every economy will be destroyed.

I Know understand is that we are encouraging world war. War can't happen again because each country is wise enough with technology and other things. Instead war their will plan for invention of scientific technology that will good, America and Russian war was old and happen because of uncivilized ideas.

[Tash]

We all know if a major war ever again its not country against country, but neighbour against neighbour, toxic shot (toxic people) and pure bloods.

[hornetsnest]

Those nuclear weapons were NOT developed to be left unused. There WILL be a 3rd world war because some nations are ALREADY planning it including a spiritual one to attack the very notions of human ideals including religion,economic structures,genetic manipulation process and other technologies being brought to fruition. You are at war with yourself everyday everytime you are easily provoked to hate and whatever other destructive behaviour that originates within every human being. To win any war we must defeat our own weakness before looking outwards.

...could be one of those crazy conspiracy theories of course

[Slow death]

man i live in a poor third world country where leaders and politicians are corrupt and greedy so i think that a third world war will not directly affect my country in military terms it would only affect in economic terms it would bring disgrace to people who are already very poor. I hope the rich don't fight and we poor people suffer

[franky1]

No one earned anything from these wars

Ford, General Motors, Messerschmitt, IBM, Rolls Royce, Boeing, Northrop, Grumman, Lockheed, Mitsubishi, Winchester, Krupps, Bath Iron Works, Seagram, John Pierpont Morgan and Goldman Sachs all made a killing during WWII. Plenty more companies stand to make a killing from any other war that pops up, no matter its scale.

seems the only rational thought in this topic.

but to add to the list. all the 'aid' NGO's profit alot too. they just have to spend the money on management fee's before year end to declare no unspend cashflow reserves to be declared 'non-profit'.

as for other posts comments.

A war would never be advocated by citizens of the country which means today if a country decides to go for a war for no good reasons, the government would lose it's own country itself.  

thats not how it works.
citizens didnt need to advocate for/against war, for the US to invade the middle east in 2001.
citizens then did not abandon america. all that happened is the next election flipped from red to blue. and life carried on

citizens in developed democratic countries never abandon a country, they just flip to side with a different candidate.
the only time people abandon a country. is if the country they are in is getting bombed regularly to the point where bombs are hitting residential area's, not military targets. and where it is seen as not letting up or stopping any time soon where life cant just carry on as normal after the aftermath.

a future world war wont see governments declare that all citizens need to en-roll into the military(draft/conscription). instead it will be done by drones and long distance weaponry. by higher-ranked people causing damage but not having to risk their own lives.

targets wont be city centres of just residential. but instead area's near military bases.
EG if an enemy could wipe out a 50mile wide area. they'd take out the area which has a military base as that area has a high populous of military employees living within daily commute travel distance, rather than just some random residential city no where near a military base.

so if you were to 'prep' away from something. stay away from a daily commute distance of a military base.

[Sayeds56]

There are no chances of world war-3. The whole world and humanity are looking for peace and development. The countries of the world learned much with world war-1 and world war-2. No one earned anything from these wars but there was a loss of millions of lives. Many countries were destroyed by these wars and they are still establishing and paying for it. War is not the solution to any problem but it creates a lot of problems, poverty, and destruction, etc.

I think the way enmity is growing between CHINA and USA,  major regional conflicts are likely to breakout if not world war-3, Taiwan could be the next starting point of major conflict. History is once again repeating it self  We are again again going back to Cold war era and we clearly see US backed and CHINA/RUSSIA backed Blocks. This politics will not do any service ti humanity but escalation of arms sale which benefits major world powers and pushes developing countries toward poverty and hunger.

[cabron]

There are no chances of world war-3. The whole world and humanity are looking for peace and development. The countries of the world learned much with world war-1 and world war-2. No one earned anything from these wars but there was a loss of millions of lives. Many countries were destroyed by these wars and they are still establishing and paying for it. War is not the solution to any problem but it creates a lot of problems, poverty, and destruction, etc.

I think the way enmity is growing between CHINA and USA, the major regional conflicts are likely to breakout if not world war-3, Taiwan could be the next starting point of major conflict. History is once again repeating it self  We are again again going back to Cold war era and we clearly see US backed and CHINA/RUSSIA backed Blocks. This politics will not do any service ti humanity but escalation of arms sale which benefits major world powers and pushes developing countries toward poverty and hunger.

What is to be clear here is about resources and money. It's not about Russia or China being the bogeyman of our era but every time there is a war a debasement of world currency happens soo like EURO to USD.

Do we need war?
Of course not but just compare it to the Roman empire that's collapsing. There is the need for leadership and who do we look up to today with so many resources? Its China.

New Nuremberg Trials – Crimes Against Humanity
https://justice4poland.com/2021/10/18/new-nuremberg-trials-crimes-against-humanity/

This is not accurate because the Chinese already have hypersonic missiles or we could exaggerate it like Hypersonic Nukes. It could wipe out a continent as much as possible we don't want that to happen. Even though China doesn't have the industrial-military complex that goes to countries all the time like the US, they can just shoot from thier territory without rallying on borders.

[Gyfts]

targets wont be city centres of just residential. but instead area's near military bases.
EG if an enemy could wipe out a 50mile wide area. they'd take out the area which has a military base as that area has a high populous of military employees living within daily commute travel distance, rather than just some random residential city no where near a military base.

so if you were to 'prep' away from something. stay away from a daily commute distance of a military base.

As I have mentioned above, the era of nuclear weaponry negates all of this. Forget the military bases, stay away from the major cities. Doesn't take many nukes to destroy an entire nation. Take away the electrical grid and most military bases fail. The generators can only last for so long.

So it's really a pointless discussion. There is no prepping for WW3. The nukes come out and we're all dead. If the initial blasts don't kill you, the nuclear winter will. And it's over from there.

Prepping for WW3 only prolongs the suffering.

[Tash]

...............
This is not accurate because the Chinese already have hypersonic missiles ................

Where so, did the idiot box tell so?

Tel-lie-vision full of "experts"
https://youtu.be/fAyWT3nljBI


Its happening, SECESSION HAS BEGUN - Cities Declare Themselves Republics, I go a step further and declare myself a republic just like bill gates has done. If you friendly i my do business with you.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AWoNZWQHIuzP/

[Sayeds56]

targets wont be city centres of just residential. but instead area's near military bases.
EG if an enemy could wipe out a 50mile wide area. they'd take out the area which has a military base as that area has a high populous of military employees living within daily commute travel distance, rather than just some random residential city no where near a military base.

so if you were to 'prep' away from something. stay away from a daily commute distance of a military base.

As I have mentioned above, the era of nuclear weaponry negates all of this. Forget the military bases, stay away from the major cities. Doesn't take many nukes to destroy an entire nation. Take away the electrical grid and most military bases fail. The generators can only last for so long.

So it's really a pointless discussion. There is no prepping for WW3. The nukes come out and we're all dead. If the initial blasts don't kill you, the nuclear winter will. And it's over from there.

Prepping for WW3 only prolongs the suffering.

Very well said. War is not an option now, Imagine if nuclear war breaks out then nobody will survive on this globe. WW3 can only happen  in movies, dramas and fictional novels but not in reality. it can never happen though regional conflicts will continue in many parts of the world as happened in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan  and Yemen and this kind of conflicts never produce targeted objectives but cause huge causalities.

[franky1]

As I have mentioned above, the era of nuclear weaponry negates all of this. Forget the military bases, stay away from the major cities. Doesn't take many nukes to destroy an entire nation. Take away the electrical grid and most military bases fail. The generators can only last for so long.

So it's really a pointless discussion. There is no prepping for WW3. The nukes come out and we're all dead. If the initial blasts don't kill you, the nuclear winter will. And it's over from there.

Prepping for WW3 only prolongs the suffering.

alot of people think a nuke is a continent/planet wide killing weapon.. they would be wrong.. on so many levels.
 
it all involves the yield of the radioactive substance determines how devastating it can be. in many developing countries they dont have much to produce something that can be a genocide level event. usually its only enough to affect a few city blocks or a city and so the enemy has to be choosy of their target.

much like 9-11 the plane could do alot of damage even without being nuclear. but they knew it is not city wide damage. so  they still chose specific targets. the reason they chose the world trade centre was not due to population numbers of citizens. it was about trying to take out the financial trade structure and the military HQ (pentagon)

so you can already see they dont want to target residential area's or normal people cities. they had a specific target of who the enemies enemy was.

so a city with no military or financial centre would not be a target. but a city with a military or financial centre would be a target.

but i do find it funny that you think that a nuke is 100% genocide scenario. where no where is safe and everyone will be dead, no option.

seems science, history and math has not gone too much into your thinking

yes the old advice of "if a nuke is targetting your city, hide under a table". is meaningless. but if your closest city is being targetted but you live 50miles+ away, so evacuate the city and go home. can help

when you realise in the past SEVERAL nuclear events have happened, in war, in tests, and in power plant malfunctions. and yet no continent wide "nuclear winter" caused genocide level death. in many cases it was limited to small area's. the marshal island testing site was so small they actually were able to put a 'concrete dome' over top of part of the island to contain the radiation

countries do not have enough nuclear yield to take out all cities, either as a continent wide genocide level single bomb or as multiple missile in their thousands for 1 per city. so they will choose best targets.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

"WW3 is coming!" has been proclaimed since the early 1950's...
Up to the Cuban Missile Crisis, ja, it was a valid concern but thankfully the various superpowers that own nukes have *mostly* came to their senses after that. They know that there will be no winners if they use even just a fraction of their nuclear arsenals against each other.

Unfortunately, these days a couple terrorist or otherwise loony nation states now have limited nuclear weapons capability as well and frankly do not care about 'winning' nor their survival if they actually use their weapons. If they do it will NOT be WW3 per se but I DO think that if for example, North Korea, used a nuke against ANYONE it would not be only their target country that responds in-kind. I personally feel that EVERY superpower with nuclear weapons - the US, Russia, China, France, etc - would pick a target in the offending piss-ant country and flatten it just to get the point across that actually using nukes as an offensive weapon is a very bad idea.

[Gyfts]

but i do find it funny that you think that a nuke is 100% genocide scenario. where no where is safe and everyone will be dead, no option.

seems science, history and math has not gone too much into your thinking

yes the old advice of "if a nuke is targetting your city, hide under a table". is meaningless. but if your closest city is being targetted but you live 50miles+ away, so evacuate the city and go home. can help

when you realise in the past SEVERAL nuclear events have happened, in war, in tests, and in power plant malfunctions. and yet no continent wide "nuclear winter" caused genocide level death. in many cases it was limited to small area's. the marshal island testing site was so small they actually were able to put a 'concrete dome' over top of part of the island to contain the radiation

countries do not have enough nuclear yield to take out all cities, either as a continent wide genocide level single bomb or as multiple missile in their thousands for 1 per city. so they will choose best targets.

Seems common sense has not gone too much into your thinking either.

Nuclear winters are a real concept and a real consequence to nuclear proliferation. If you'll recall to the Cold War, mutual destruction was the only thing keeping the Americans and Russians from deploying the nukes. You surely don't think either country would just stop at one, correct?

Consider that there is a difference between a nuclear test, and nuclear attack. A nuclear test stops at one deployment. Unfortunately, an attack would not, especially when there are nuclear weapons on both sides of the war.

So yes, very pointless to prep. Good luck trying to survive a nuclear attack.

[hornetsnest]

You should be more concerned about your own guberments and how they are waging war on you right now.

[cmg777]

As I have mentioned above, the era of nuclear weaponry negates all of this. Forget the military bases, stay away from the major cities. Doesn't take many nukes to destroy an entire nation. Take away the electrical grid and most military bases fail. The generators can only last for so long.

So it's really a pointless discussion. There is no prepping for WW3. The nukes come out and we're all dead. If the initial blasts don't kill you, the nuclear winter will. And it's over from there.

Prepping for WW3 only prolongs the suffering.

alot of people think a nuke is a continent/planet wide killing weapon.. they would be wrong.. on so many levels.
 
it all involves the yield of the radioactive substance determines how devastating it can be. in many developing countries they dont have much to produce something that can be a genocide level event. usually its only enough to affect a few city blocks or a city and so the enemy has to be choosy of their target.

much like 9-11 the plane could do alot of damage even without being nuclear. but they knew it is not city wide damage. so  they still chose specific targets. the reason they chose the world trade centre was not due to population numbers of citizens. it was about trying to take out the financial trade structure and the military HQ (pentagon)

so you can already see they dont want to target residential area's or normal people cities. they had a specific target of who the enemies enemy was.

so a city with no military or financial centre would not be a target. but a city with a military or financial centre would be a target.

but i do find it funny that you think that a nuke is 100% genocide scenario. where no where is safe and everyone will be dead, no option.

seems science, history and math has not gone too much into your thinking

yes the old advice of "if a nuke is targetting your city, hide under a table". is meaningless. but if your closest city is being targetted but you live 50miles+ away, so evacuate the city and go home. can help

when you realise in the past SEVERAL nuclear events have happened, in war, in tests, and in power plant malfunctions. and yet no continent wide "nuclear winter" caused genocide level death. in many cases it was limited to small area's. the marshal island testing site was so small they actually were able to put a 'concrete dome' over top of part of the island to contain the radiation

countries do not have enough nuclear yield to take out all cities, either as a continent wide genocide level single bomb or as multiple missile in their thousands for 1 per city. so they will choose best targets.

Why nuke something so it can end up like the northern coast of Africa or some of the other deserts across the world? Wouldn't it behoove the mighty victor whoever it might be to save the environment so they can exploit and use it for themselves as always? I'd say that WW3 will involve biologics, lasers, and geoengineering to kill the masses.

[Tash]

The war is nearing it's 2nd anniversary, many have been shot and died or wounded, many more to die in years to come from the needle attack.

Every war has traitors and sell outs. It is claimed Daniel Andrews is one such creature.
The claim is that Daniel Andrews acted against official Australian govenment foreign policy and for personal gain signed Victoira up to China's Belt and Road initiative. His corrupt secretive China deals will see the light of day. It also becomes clear from where his "virus" policies, orders come from.
So his unpaid leave has become a tax payer funded "tested positive and needs to isolate"

~Two weeks delay before the inevitable

Follow the money...

Another one of the many covid weapon attack implements.
https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/masks-kn95-masks-biomass-graphene-2021-04-08



If anyone dares to look, plenty to be found
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/reminder-ilhan-omars-father-top-propaganda-official-genocidal-barre-regime-changed-name-entered-us-illegally/

[hornetsnest]

The EU will be the first casualty of WW3 if they keep provoking Russia and China. That's a guarantee like money in a swiss bank. WW3 would last 3 weeks at most and would be the most brutal firestorm unleashed on the earth since the big bang that will take out not only Europe and outlying island nations but the mega tsunami from what will be generated by targeting specific geo points in the atlantic will engulf the whole of the US east coast with waves over a kilometre high due to the gradual water shelf along these regions not to mention the targets already fixed in other countries that are not in europe.There will be a good chance of war in Europe but it hopefully will remain contained if it breaks out.


Besides war which may be inevitable you are going to see a major disruption to electricity,water,communications and the food chain first along with part deux of the "virus".

Bets anyone?

[suchmoon]

Bets anyone?

Sure. When is that war happening? I wouldn't want to wait 500 years for you to pay up.

[shogun47]

Bets anyone?

Sure. When is that war happening? I wouldn't want to wait 500 years for you to pay up.

"Are you prepped"? Yes, I have my own laboratories in the garden working on nuclear weapons just for defense reasons. A company is also building bunkers in my backyard right now, will be ready very soon.

Jokes aside, there is indeed some action going on in Europe between Russia and the Ukraine, which is quite intense. More intense than what most people in continental Europe are used to. I guess it is unlikely to escalate, but who knows...

[franky1]

but i do find it funny that you think that a nuke is 100% genocide scenario. where no where is safe and everyone will be dead, no option.

seems science, history and math has not gone too much into your thinking

yes the old advice of "if a nuke is targetting your city, hide under a table". is meaningless. but if your closest city is being targetted but you live 50miles+ away, so evacuate the city and go home. can help

when you realise in the past SEVERAL nuclear events have happened, in war, in tests, and in power plant malfunctions. and yet no continent wide "nuclear winter" caused genocide level death. in many cases it was limited to small area's. the marshal island testing site was so small they actually were able to put a 'concrete dome' over top of part of the island to contain the radiation

countries do not have enough nuclear yield to take out all cities, either as a continent wide genocide level single bomb or as multiple missile in their thousands for 1 per city. so they will choose best targets.

Seems common sense has not gone too much into your thinking either.

Nuclear winters are a real concept and a real consequence to nuclear proliferation. If you'll recall to the Cold War, mutual destruction was the only thing keeping the Americans and Russians from deploying the nukes. You surely don't think either country would just stop at one, correct?

Consider that there is a difference between a nuclear test, and nuclear attack. A nuclear test stops at one deployment. Unfortunately, an attack would not, especially when there are nuclear weapons on both sides of the war.

So yes, very pointless to prep. Good luck trying to survive a nuclear attack.

seems you dont understand things..
you say the "concept".

and then you imagine it being full US territory destruction and entire 320million US population death... as your 'concept'
you first flaw is using the cold war example to explain nuclear winter. it was funny because there was no actual nuclear winter. well more precicely no actual atomic war.. no actual cuban "boom, they all dead", so no nuclear winder fallout after..
so no proof of actual damage caused. to prove YOUR "concept"

the concept of the cold war was project fear. fear of the unknown. not knowing how many nukes or where the nukes would land. it was never about full america genocide. it was about the unknown damage. to unknown targets within US territory

secondly it seems you did not look into my hints about the marshal islands or fukushima or chernobyl

if them multiple nuclear incidents were as you propose guaranteed to be country wide genocide nuclear winters.. then how come the world is not extinct already..
heck the marshal islands(bikini) done 26 nuclear tests.. that compounding amount of radiation would have turned the moon to ice if your theory was true

common sense reveals that the amount of destruction is not continent wide nor genocide level event. and instead more confined to smaller area's
fukushima
hiroshima
marshal islands(bikini)
chernobyl

look them up.
oh spoiler..
japan, china, russia and the pacific/oceania still exist, no genocide nation wide population deaths occured

but hey, if you want to ignore actual evidence of actual atomic damage and instead spend more time making posts of your "fears" of destruction based on historic "fears" of destruction..well. you continue to not understand what the real possibilities are, and thus not be able to 'prep' effectively. so yea just sit where you are and expect to die, not due to any nuclear winter. but just you lack of wanting to live and prepare for eating and drinking daily because you want to remain sat there afraid, waiting for winter

[OgNasty]

Be ready for anything is just good advice. In finance you call it diversification of assets.

I don’t see the beginning of world war 3 at all though. If anything governments have shown that they’re trying to work together on this pandemic situation. Maybe if a couple countries banned together refusing vaccines for their citizens then you’d have some tension…

[franky1]

and on the subject of pandemic.
the lockdowns have proved that imports/exports have caused supply problems, access to goods and services at local retail problems. so instead of living a empty fridge, but daily snack/fast food life style.. atleast try to keep atleast a weeks worth, preferably a months worth of tinned food and groceries in your kitchen cupboards and freezers.

atleast if anything happened, you have supplies to live in your own home if there was any reason why you couldnt get out for a few days

oh and have a full tank of fuel. there are many people that prefer to wait for the E (empty) light to flash and then only put in a couple litres to get them through the day.. try keeping a full tank where you then only need to top up by a few litres a day.. it ends up costing the same daily cost to add the same few litres, but then you have excess for the 'just in case' situations you cant predict.

its just common sense stuff

[hornetsnest]

Bets anyone?

Sure. When is that war happening? I wouldn't want to wait 500 years for you to pay up.

Yeah no prob. My guess if it were to go outside of being regional would be it begins after the Catholic pope meets his Russian counterpart and the last ditch at diplomacy fails but before the end of 2022 if not sooner but only after Putin moves the "peace keepers" into the Donbass region to test the response. Then there may be a half assed incursion into Ukraine with only light infantry but no top cover to clear the path ahead to see if it can be done "peacefully". The reason for my guess is purely tactical due to the divisions among general populations in the EU and the confusion due to the pandemic and societal infighting unless restrictions are lifted to unite the dumb low IQ plebs behind a new cause/crisis. My guess would be during any of the coldest months because then you can leverage the threat of fuel starvation into the equation. The choice for europe would then to be use its reserves to supply citizens or its military unless they keep paying Russia for the gas and oil so that would help Russia counter sanctions and keep the cash coming in. An alliance with China and other key nations would allow quick disruption to the raw materials and other supply chains coming from outside the EU and a complete outflank of its territories once the west fights back with sanctions and attacks the logistics and financial flows of russian commodities etc. Allies outside the bloc would be faced with the decision to engage and be assured of mutual destruction or attempt conventional tactics which would be useless and only escalate it into global thermo nuclear warfare. Ukraine would not be the launch pad for this though and would be only a decoy to get resources away from where the real action would start. Then with mobile and barrage tactics cloaking warheads no defence would be useful so all sides would fight to exhaustion for about 1 day maximum before depletion by which time over 300 million people will be dead and hundreds of millions slowly dying waiting for nuclear winter where natural photosynthesis will stop and only stockpiles of food will be available to the remnant. Some satellite and radio communication will be useful but in a limited capacity. WW3 would mainly affect europe,Canada,US and a few middle eastern states but no nation would escape if it goes nuclear however once it remains regional it can be averted. It will look like it was badly planned in order to look weak and disorganised to give a sense of false confidence to enemy forces but this will all be a trick like a predator pretending to be wounded to draw the prey in while distracting them from the main event .

This is only a guess of course but I will honour that bet if it happens and am still alive for a can of beans and a cripsy 100 trillion dollar zimbabwae note because money will be worthless. I am good for the can of beans though and will send you the 100T zim dollars if I am wrong

[Ebede]

The world needs peace, we shouldn't anticipate for such a war.
This isn't what the world wants at the moment.
Too bad human beings, interprete things wrongly.

[suchmoon]

This is only a guess from a random internet troll of course but I will honour that bet if it happens and am still alive for a can of beans and a cripsy 100 trillion dollar zimbabwae note because money will be worthless. I am good for the can of beans though and will send you the 100T zim dollars if I am wrong

Sad backpedaling.

If you change your mind and want to do an actual bet, 1 BTC says that you're wrong about WW3 breaking out before the end of 2022. Should be easy money for you, and unlike dollars it will likely be worth many cans of beans.

[hornetsnest]

Sad backpedaling.

If you change your mind and want to do an actual bet, 1 BTC says that you're wrong about WW3 breaking out before the end of 2022. Should be easy money for you, and unlike dollars it will likely be worth many cans of beans.

ROFL youre a real baller eh? Your 1 BTC would be no good to me when it comes time for you to pay out and even if you were able to so it would be a ridiculous bet to take because if I win you can't pay but if I lose you have no reason to not get paid. 1 BTC wouldn't even get the bombardier ( I don't own one) far enough south if it all kicks off so do yourself a favour, head to vegas and spend it on the slots now before its too late or even better give it to charity. Appreciate the offer though. At least I know people read my posts now

[suchmoon]

ROFL youre a real baller eh? Your 1 BTC would be no good to me when it comes time for you to pay out and even if you were able to so it would be a ridiculous bet to take because if I win you can't pay but if I lose you have no reason to not get paid. 1 BTC wouldn't even get the bombardier ( I don't own one) far enough south if it all kicks off so do yourself a favour, head to vegas and spend it on the slots now before its too late or even better give it to charity. Appreciate the offer though. At least I know people read my posts now

You're the one who asked about bets and this is Bitcoin forum and I'm offering you a solid Bitcoin bet.

Not that ever doubted that you're completely full of shit just like all these WW3 nutcases, but now there's proof.

[cabron]

The US provoking Russia and China all the time, they'd really find a way to make this WW3 strike. And then Russia and China also see the US as weak due to them leaving Afghanistan and Biden not being a very sharp president, they are going to challenge. Challenging the sanctions imposed by the US on Russia. 

China is also about to make deals in the Middle East countries thru their belt and road initiative. There was a rumor that the deal they have with Iran includes a Chinese military base.

[yhiaali3]

At the outset, I would like to say: How sad are the figures you mentioned for military spending on weapons in the world, if these huge sums were spent on the poor in the world, we would be able to feed millions of hungry people around the world!!!
In any case, if the Third World War occurs, which is unlikely to happen in the coming years, but if it occurs, massive destruction will occur on the planet and it is possible that the Internet will be disrupted in most countries of the world, so the best solution will probably be to use the satellite Internet, but it will not be This is available to everyone around the world because many countries do not have the necessary technologies and the situation of the Bitcoin network will become very difficult due to the loss of many network nodes that were maintaining the strength of the network and decentralization, and the completion of transactions will become very slow and very difficult and fees are very high.

[Sayeds56]

ROFL youre a real baller eh? Your 1 BTC would be no good to me when it comes time for you to pay out and even if you were able to so it would be a ridiculous bet to take because if I win you can't pay but if I lose you have no reason to not get paid. 1 BTC wouldn't even get the bombardier ( I don't own one) far enough south if it all kicks off so do yourself a favour, head to vegas and spend it on the slots now before its too late or even better give it to charity. Appreciate the offer though. At least I know people read my posts now

You're the one who asked about bets and this is Bitcoin forum and I'm offering you a solid Bitcoin bet.

Not that ever doubted that you're completely full of shit just like all these WW3 nutcases, but now there's proof.

Certainly even thinking of WW3 when many counties own piles of Nukes is a madness. There will be no winners and no survivors if such kind of war breaks out. The huge sums of money countries spend to buy and develop weaponry if half of that is spent to fight poverty and save  environment  in the world this world will be more peaceful and a better place to live.

[cabron]

At the outset, I would like to say: How sad are the figures you mentioned for military spending on weapons in the world, if these huge sums were spent on the poor in the world, we would be able to feed millions of hungry people around the world!!!
In any case, if the Third World War occurs, which is unlikely to happen in the coming years, but if it occurs, massive destruction will occur on the planet and it is possible that the Internet will be disrupted in most countries of the world, so the best solution will probably be to use the satellite Internet, but it will not be This is available to everyone around the world because many countries do not have the necessary technologies and the situation of the Bitcoin network will become very difficult due to the loss of many network nodes that were maintaining the strength of the network and decentralization, and the completion of transactions will become very slow and very difficult and fees are very high.

Strange as it may seem, hunger and lack of resources are actually one of the reasons for war as well. Pretty Ironic because countries band together for climate change, other countries see it like they were stopped from realizing thier dreams of industrialization all because these climate change groups don't have the energy sources like petro and coal. All things can become political in the end regardless of how hungry the people are.

Bitcoin mining energy can even be politicized here. China wouldn't care about Bitcoin actually so why stop and ban everything and what will stop them from unbanning again? Once countries are just negotiating deals and ransoms like Meng Wenzhou or sending home NATO diplomats, the signs are real and you can already hear the war drums!

[hornetsnest]

ROFL youre a real baller eh? Your 1 BTC would be no good to me when it comes time for you to pay out and even if you were able to so it would be a ridiculous bet to take because if I win you can't pay but if I lose you have no reason to not get paid. 1 BTC wouldn't even get the bombardier ( I don't own one) far enough south if it all kicks off so do yourself a favour, head to vegas and spend it on the slots now before its too late or even better give it to charity. Appreciate the offer though. At least I know people read my posts now

You're the one who asked about bets and this is Bitcoin forum and I'm offering you a solid Bitcoin bet.

Not that ever doubted that you're completely full of shit just like all these WW3 nutcases, but now there's proof.

Hahaha suchmoon is butthurt because I won't take his lunch money for a wager. Stop being an idiot and go buy your mom a nice Christmas gift before Russia rolls into Luhansk. I engage with who I please at whatever time and terms I decide and not at the behest of some nobody pleb. Stop trolling random internet people

[syedakhlaque]

ROFL youre a real baller eh? Your 1 BTC would be no good to me when it comes time for you to pay out and even if you were able to so it would be a ridiculous bet to take because if I win you can't pay but if I lose you have no reason to not get paid. 1 BTC wouldn't even get the bombardier ( I don't own one) far enough south if it all kicks off so do yourself a favour, head to vegas and spend it on the slots now before its too late or even better give it to charity. Appreciate the offer though. At least I know people read my posts now

You're the one who asked about bets and this is Bitcoin forum and I'm offering you a solid Bitcoin bet.

Not that ever doubted that you're completely full of shit just like all these WW3 nutcases, but now there's proof.

Certainly even thinking of WW3 when many counties own piles of Nukes is a madness. There will be no winners and no survivors if such kind of war breaks out. The huge sums of money countries spend to buy and develop weaponry if half of that is spent to fight poverty and save  environment  in the world this world will be more peaceful and a better place to live.

We are not prepared for world war -3 because we are supporters of peace in the world. We believe that "The service of suffering humanity is the ascension of humanity".This is the object of the creation of humans & the universe. But the war is only the destruction of humans and sources. World war-1 and world war-2 brought a lot of worries and havoc in the world.So there is need to avoid world war-3.

[franky1]

the main reason for war has been territory.

different clans trespassing on other clans area and declaring it theirs. its been the age old story since the caveman.
its either triggered by an invasion of territory. or the build up of tensions of certain sides they no longer want on existing territory.

even hitler wanted to invade and take over other countries. the russia/ukraine battles at the borders is over territory. the middle east/gulf wars were about land grabbing of oil territory. the african wars were about western 'big agri' taking over land and evicting the natives.

do you really think african nomads want to live 20 miles away from a water source in crappy built shanty towns and have to walk the trip each day, rather than just settle near a river. no. the reason they do it is because they have been evicted off the land that has a river.

wars are not caused by starvation/poverty. territory overtaking/invasions came first, which causes starvation/poverty.

..
although there are 'aid' agencies that give food donations. dont think of them as aid. think of them as the invader funded compensation scheme. invaders take over land for cheap/free cost. not buying out the land owner. and think they dont have to pay the land owner to leave because they can instead just donate to an aid agency to feed them and shelter them to settle the evictee's woes.