Money is just a paper or number on the screen, and this can all be gone in second in some financial collapse, like in Lebanon now for example.
Money is not really control because money is controlled by only few individuals and corporations.
That's somewhat true. It can definitely be made pointless in an event of a economical collapse, but I also think its completely relevant, and contributes to the amount of control a person or corporation has up until that point.
You don't have to agree with me, but read and investigate how many countries Soros destroyed, and he is just using money as one of his tools for destruction and control of the people.
I'm not trying to disagree with you. You've brought up some valid points. I just think that the point stands that at the moment whilst money is relevant, it does directly correlate with control. Although, I don't know the intentions of Soros'anymore than the next guy, and I might be underestimating the significance of this. Plus, I don't doubt that someone has powerful as Soros' wants to benefit directly from his investments, and is looking for both control, and money.