ㅤ

[nutildah]

Here is a part of the Christian Bible, a story that most Christians all over the world know.

The chances that you would use the exact same language in the same order just randomly are very slim. Its obvious what you're doing: you're just copy/translating the works of others. These aren't your original concepts -- they belong to others. What are you actually doing here?

[1714009964]

1714009964

[1714009964]

1714009964

[1714009964]

1714009964

[1714009964]

1714009964

[Hippocampus]

He hasn't changed at all. This is definitely plagiarism.

Post title: Bitcoin is rebuilding the Tower of Babel of human collective collaboration
Article title: Bitcoin has built a tower of heaven for mankind, from Homo sapiens to gods.

After the devastating flood, the first rainbow appeared in the sky. God used the rainbow as a sign of the covenant with humans on the earth that no flood would come ever and mankind in the world spoke the same language of the same accent.

Google translated from here:

After the catastrophe of the Great Flood, the first rainbow appeared in the sky. God used the rainbow to make an agreement with the people on the earth not to use the flood to destroy the earth. Since then, people all over the world speak the same language and have the same accent.

But later, humans began to doubt God's oath and embarked on building the Tower of Babel, provoking God. So God decided to change and distinguish the language of mankind, causing them scattered everywhere and therefore the Tower of Babel was abandoned halfway.

Original (same article):

So he quietly left the kingdom of heaven and came to the world, changed and distinguished the language of human beings, so that they were scattered everywhere because of language barriers, so that they could not cooperate, and the tower was abandoned halfway.

So his "original post" is largely lifted from a translation of an older article.

Plagiarism is shameful, but it can't be done. I don't think it is strict. I feel that the author does not like this RK, which is obviously personal. If I say: Edison invented the electric light bulb, do I have to indicate where the quotation comes from? Are you solving the case? I will continue to pay attention, it is very interesting.

[RainbowKun]

Here is a part of the Christian Bible, a story that most Christians all over the world know.

The chances that you would use the exact same language in the same order just randomly are very slim. Its obvious what you're doing: you're just copy/translating the works of others. These aren't your original concepts -- they belong to others. What are you actually doing here?

Mr. Nutildah, I have always respected you, and I have also seen your contribution to the forum. But I really don’t understand your criteria for judging plagiarism. You stare at every sentence of my article, trying to find evidence of my plagiarism. What I hope more is that you can see the views in my article and exchange views on the level of views, instead of doing everything possible to accuse me of plagiarism.

Here, I quote the story of the Tower of Babel in the Christian Bible, and the story of the Rainbow Covenant, which are used to describe the three characteristics of Bitcoin: language, trust, and collaboration. Here, the core is these three keywords, which is also my core point of view.

The story of the Tower of Babel and the Rainbow Covenant is a story familiar to Christians all over the world. I believe anyone can quote this story. At the same time, I also explain here that when we named the project 3 years ago, we named it "Rainbow City". The source is the story of the Tower of Babel in the Bible, and the meaning of the rainbow originated here.

Is it true that any Christian quoting the story of the Tower of Babel is plagiarism?

[nutildah]

Mr. Nutildah, I have always respected you, and I have also seen your contribution to the forum. But I really don’t understand your criteria for judging plagiarism. You stare at every sentence of my article, trying to find evidence of my plagiarism. What I hope more is that you can see the views in my article and exchange views on the level of views, instead of doing everything possible to accuse me of plagiarism.

Here, I quote the story of the Tower of Babel in the Christian Bible, and the story of the Rainbow Covenant, which are used to describe the three characteristics of Bitcoin: language, trust, and collaboration.

It's not just that you used the same wording to tell the story, its that you're making the same point about Bitcoin that they are while using the same story as a metaphor.

A lot of ideas in your posts seem to be taken from elsewhere. As I don't know Chinese its impossible for me to know for sure, but it seems like you took the main idea behind this story and incorporated it with your own babble about Bitcoin being AI.

Just like the legend that Noah’s descendants built the Tower of Babel to avoid the occurrence of the "Great Flood", Satoshi Nakamoto designed and established Bitcoin—the original intention of the "Tower of Babel" built on the Internet was also for Resist the "flood."

[Poker Player]

I am going to comment on what Nutildah says in another thread, because he redirects to this one and I think this is the appropriate one:

Hey man what are you doing? You haven't changed or learned a single thing since last time. You just copied this text, translated it, changed a few words a few words and are now claiming it is your own original thought. Why do you keep doing this?

Please respond here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356476.msg57932537#msg57932537

But have you reported him?

If, as it seems, he is copying translating and pasting ideas that are not his own without citing the source, and on top of that repeatedly, not just once, he should be reported and banned. No you haven't because you wait for him to defend himself before doing so.

I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished.
...
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

And if on top of that his alts have been banned, he should be banned for ban evasion.

[nutildah]

But have you reported him?

If, as it seems, he is copying translating and pasting ideas that are not his own without citing the source, and on top of that repeatedly, not just once, he should be reported and banned. No you haven't because you wait for him to defend himself before doing so.

TBH I didn't report that particular post because it wasn't enough word-for-word copy/pasting but, its just like cmon, its obvious what he's doing, all the while saying "I'm not doing that." Was just irritated at that moment, will probably delete that post. He's not really hurting anybody, but I do wonder WTF he's doing.

[Poker Player]

But have you reported him?

If, as it seems, he is copying translating and pasting ideas that are not his own without citing the source, and on top of that repeatedly, not just once, he should be reported and banned. No you haven't because you wait for him to defend himself before doing so.

TBH I didn't report that particular post because it wasn't enough word-for-word copy/pasting but, its just like cmon, its obvious what he's doing, all the while saying "I'm not doing that." Was just irritated at that moment, will probably delete that post. He's not really hurting anybody, but I do wonder WTF he's doing.

I wanted to clarify that now when I read your comment and reread mine, I see that I've missed "is that right"? Rereading it, I find it a bit aggressive and it was not my intention. I should have written: "you haven't because you wait for him to defend himself before doing so, is that right?" or something similar.

[lovesmayfamilis]

And if on top of that his alts have been banned, he should be banned for ban evasion.

All the remaining accounts seem to have little activity, and I agree with Nutildah, they are harmless. RainbowKun himself is a rather peculiar person who, for some reason, continues to publish his ideas, realizing that after the story with the farm, many simply sent him to ignore.
The number of merits has also stopped increasing, so at the moment he is one of the most harmless participants in the forum. He does not participate in any subscription, you can just observe what he wanted to get in the end, having come with the team to this forum? Time will put everything in its place.
To ban other accounts, there is simply no evidence that the moderators rely on.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished:
<snip>
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

Nice!  I wouldn't be surprised, either.  A lot of their posts seemed like they originated from either blog posts or articles published on the web somewhere, even with the broken English.  You could tell they were probably translated using Google Translate or some other method.

I'm still hoping the rest of the members on the list get banned or caught cheating, because it was a big list and I'm certain that those accounts were linked (especially the ones with similar usernames and registration dates).  Haven't seen a lot of them posting much as of late.  Lol.

[nutildah]

I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished:
...
caryoscar -  ban evader
...
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

Well let's take care of this one as well.

The question of why Bitcoin is valuable is widely debated. Believers point out that “consensus is value” and there is no need to question its intrinsic value. They believe that from this perspective, gold, which is sought after by traditional secular society, is similar to Bitcoin and has little value in its use. Buffett has never recognized the value of gold, but some people believe that gold has the value of storing value, which represents distrust of other values. Opponents believe that Bitcoin is not currency and has a value of 0. The author does not agree that the value of Bitcoin is zero, but does not agree that this value comes only from blockchain technology, let alone that it comes from blind consensus.

This is a word-for-word copy of a Google translation of a six year old Chinese article:



Dunno how awesome a DAO filled with cheaters could have possibly been. Was kind of a harebrained scheme to begin win.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished:
...
caryoscar -  ban evader
...
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

Well let's take care of this one as well.

I join.

Plagiarism
User: Tim-BTC
Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279
(archive)

After the craziest half a year, China's crypto mining entered a period of sharp turbulence from May to June. Under the attack of local governments, most of the mines were shut down. The miners who just entered the high point this year suffered huge losses. The sell-off of some miners under economic pressure also led to a sharp correction in the crypto market.
At the moment, how to dispose of this batch of down-time mining machines and minimize losses is the most urgent problem for miners of all sizes.
Going overseas is the way that miners have placed the greatest hope before, but after a period of exploration, the road to overseas is not as smooth as expected, and some small miners are still trying to stay

https://inf.news/en/economy/92ee32304bd76dbb698a4a79450bb071.html

If all these accounts, as RainbowKun said, belong to his students, then they are very lazy and stupid.
If it is RainbowKun who creates this, then you can understand where he has time to post for all accounts, when he himself writes walls of texts, paraphrasing other people's thoughts.

EDIT:

If Tim-BTC copied the text from an English resource.
Then Kimberl2020 stole the post from the Chinese. @Ratimov, you were right.
Two more accounts should be banned.

=================================================================================================
Plagiarism
User: Kimberl2020
Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350533.msg57517578#msg57517578
(archive)

The main reasons for Bitcoin's current transaction speed limitations are:
1. The processing power of the entire blockchain = the average processing power of all nodes-the product of consensus

2. Block size is limited

3. The time required for consensus is too long.

4. The average information propagation speed between nodes is limited.

Although the consensus provides sufficient security for transactions, it also imposes huge restrictions on the transaction processing capabilities of the blockchain.

 There is no scale increase effect, but limited by the processing capacity of the node itself, which is essentially a great waste of resources.

The solutions to this are: the node itself can form a chain; joint mining; sharding.
 Increasing the block size can certainly increase the TPS, but this will lead to an increase in the requirements for hardware processing capabilities, which will cause users to switch to mining machines.
The recentralization of mining pools has already occurred on PoW platforms such as BTC and BCH. 10 minutes of consensus has severely affected transaction demand, and reducing the consensus time will increase the probability of being attacked successfully. Therefore, an overpass can be built-both side chains and lightning transactions.

Post original, Released August 3, 2018
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word.



https://www.zhihu.com/question/41004649


https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/ofc9s31hp98wxvtz/preview?key=7or83l41aquc0jj7&suspectId=b8ec04e9be&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1

[Poker Player]

...after the story with the farm, many simply sent him to ignore.

Incidentally, I have also sent him to ignore. He floods the Bitcoin Discussion with his mega texts, the last one I commented on even talked about aliens and I prefer not to waste any more time with him.

[lovesmayfamilis]

defi-Dany - banned
caryoscar -  ban evader
Mituletr -    banned
dota2bestplayer - banned
clippers - banned
John Jefferson - bounty cheater
Mikayla Buckley - bounty cheater
Harper32 - banned
kxwhalexk - banned
Scarlett7777 - banned
Poker A-k - banned

I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

XUNing - banned
Connor Britton - banned
Tina H - banned
Irenerty - banned
sisikin - banned
Mcphail - banned
Kimberl2020 - banned
Tim-BTC - banned

Add these banned accounts, which committed plagiarism by copying texts from Chinese sites and translating them with a Google translator.
This time, all the evidence is in the LoyceV topic on plagiarism, so I think they will not create appeals to unblock accounts and the usefulness of their presence on the forum.

[nutildah]

Here's another that slipped by:

1.The steam engine triggered the industrial revolution, and the Internet has completely changed our way of life.

2.Under the traditional Internet model, the information shared by people through the network will be stored in the server.

3.Information is encrypted and stored through blockchain technology, thereby achieving more secure information protection.
....

Google translated from this article:



He didn't get any merits because his post his just a mishmash of jibberish.

Well let's take care of this one as well.

Not banned yet... Please report the plagiarized post quoted in the post above if you have a moment.

[lovesmayfamilis]

defi-Dany - banned
caryoscar -  ban evader
Mituletr -    banned
dota2bestplayer - banned
clippers - banned
John Jefferson - bounty cheater
Mikayla Buckley - bounty cheater
Harper32 - banned
kxwhalexk - banned
Scarlett7777 - banned
Poker A-k - banned

I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.

XUNing - banned
Connor Britton - banned
Tina H - banned
Irenerty - banned
sisikin - banned
Mcphail - banned
Kimberl2020 - banned
Tim-BTC - banned

 

Kiley33 - banned
Liamttw - banned
Aliceooo78 - banned
KevinRosa - banned
caryoscar - banned

new arrival

[lovesmayfamilis]

Even banned accounts go online? It looks a little strange. Authorization takes place in a few seconds.
Either these are virtual machines on one computer or a multi-browser. By clicking on the tabs, you log into accounts, thereby recording the login time.
I assume that the cheater does not clear cookies after his session. Since I very much doubt that banned accounts will regularly log into their profile.
It turns out that these are three people who, on average, have the same number of accounts?

[lovesmayfamilis]

James Watson -- in the piggy bank

Another account, most likely belonging to the RainbowKun farm, but was accidentally left out of the lists of The Pharmacist and Ratimov. But, like all previously banned accounts, he was caught for plagiarism.
Another cheater is minus one.

---------------------
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5048984.180
You can see that there were many more accounts, but fortunately, most were also banned, but apparently, the plans were very ambitious. A theme in which you can see those who did not live to see today 

[Trojane]

Hi @ratimov
 I really mean no disrespect.
 We'll, I wanna start by saying that 60 percent of your assumptions are wrong seriously,you mentioned my name as a suspect in coordination to rainbow's account farm,do I even know who these guy is in the first place ?
What do you think that we share in common that makes me his alt? Are we sharing the same address?
I'm not a Chinese for crying out loud and I don't even know how to speak Chinese, talkless of posting with it.
 Oh please,You don't just jump into conclusions like that; I got registered in these forum with the help of my friend and he taught me how to operate in here when I was a newbie, then gradually I began to grow with the few merits I had. Initially,it was hard but I made it through then at a point,you even merited most of post, these was because they were constructive.
Why are you now promptly against me?
You have mentioned so many reputable members that I also have  a broad idea 'bout their status, they don't even have any business with these guy.
  I started these forum and my prior intention wasn't to join these campaign but I had to do so. Promoting 1xbit doesn't make me a scammer neither an account farmer.
  All the boards you have listed out claiming that we all post there simultaneously, have you ever seen me post anything in most of those boards?? Check my post histories ..
 Seriously I wasn't happy at all when I saw these post this morning and I was just 'bout to sleep just in preparation for tomorrow's parade.
 I believe this is a misunderstanding and I wouldn't wanna fall a victim of your unrighteous judgements...oh please, erase my name off that list, I have nothing to do with that guy or girl from where ever......
What are your proves that I'm his alt?? Is these how you make judgments? Have you began to go extra miles in reporting innocent peeps all in a bid to gain accolades??
Ratimov, you are totally wrong about the second list.
I don't even know him for Christ sake.!!! We could make a video call to confirm these, I'm not happy 'bout this mess!!
 It took me a long time, dedication, strength,money and focuse to be able to go out there, read thoroughly just to be able to post constructively....... I learnt it the hard way and I wouldn't wanna damage everything I achieved in one day just because of another man's misconception....
  RETHINK ABOUT THESE POST, I DONT REALLY KNOW ABOUT THOSE ONES YOU'VE PROVEN OUT ALREADY BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT THESE ONES THAT YOU LISTED ME AMONG, PLEASE RECONSIDER THESE CUS IT'S NOT TRUE!!!
you're just trying to figure some fishy activities around, I understand but these second list is totally innocent...
ERASE MY NAME, I DON'T HAVE ANY BUSINESS WITH THAT GUY!!!

[Poker Player]

-snip

If what you say is true, you are within your rights to ask Ratimov to rectify, and I see that you have done so reasonably.

Now, this issue, which is one of reputation, I don't know why you are so concerned about it and don't care about selling yourself cheap to give publicity to a known scam site.

If I had seen you on the forum, I wouldn't even remember that according to Ratimov you are one of RainbowKun's alleged alts. What I do see right away is the shitty house you advertise in your signature, well known for being a scam site. Just as I see your negative trust for it.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Seeing this topic brought up, I thought the company was back. But no, it turns out that another eccentric decided to speak here about his rights and reputation.
The fact that he is clearly not Chinese has long been known. But the fact that he is proud of his successes after being caught plagiarizing, and now with three negative tags, becomes ridiculous.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121680.msg58042068#msg58042068

What can I say here? The stripling grows up impudent, but unfortunately stupid!