Overall, bitcoin is probably a hobby and people wouldn't use such a subjective factor to sum up for an election.
I think there are still people who have different conclusions from what you said but maybe very few and the impact will not affect the whole. sometimes we are unable to digest there is still something that connects something with bitcoin because sometimes it is difficult to conclude, but indeed we are in a democracy / free to express opinions.
A US presidential candidate supports Bitcoin in terms of thinking, in my opinion it is quite a strange thing because constitutionally, the leader of the country will be more pro with the economic system that has been passed down or centralized. How can he support even if only in a mindset, maybe if you understand bitcoin then it's normal but it's a different story if you support it. Fundamentally, Bitcoin is difficult for regulators to accept.
maybe he might personally not institutionally say things about bitcoin but as head of state it is arranged in such a way to be able to voice his opinion with the provisions that have been made. like you said that the economic system that has been in use for a long time cannot be changed immediately because it will have an impact on the country's economic system and globally, of course as the head of government this has been thought about and it is impossible for the expert staff to recommend things that will put the country in a state of crisis later because of the impact.
after becoming head of government then he will change for wider interests not just for self-interest and a preference for certain things such as bitcoin. when he was an individual he could have done that. he is now thinking about whether the impact will be beneficial for the country.
