[indralit] promoting Betking

[shasan]

[indralit] promoting Betking so will s/he is not a scammer? I mean the person should be tagged negatively or not. According to me the person should be tagged negatively as the promoter of 1xbit and yobit received negative trust.
User: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=900233
Post reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5357009.msg57844650#msg57844650
Post archive: https://archive.md/56kPf#selection-2649.0-388.2
Also on the post archive showing the signature of Betking.io

[1714724837]

1714724837

[1714724837]

1714724837

[1714724837]

1714724837

[Jawhead999]

[indralit] should be tagged negatively

Done https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=900233

BetKing 100% trusted and instan payment , after failed for lauching new token and now pure 100% for gambling.

The failed launch token claim he wrote doesn't make sense, just an excuse like many scam shitcoins out there.

Anyway the account woke up from long period activity, seems like active to shills Betking only.

[Kittygalore]

They should be tagged, they're responsible for marketing and advertising the site so it can scam more people. It should be done like what was done to 1xbit signature campaign participants as they're practically the same.

[Oshosondy]

I checked about betking today and noticed it is a scam betting site, I have not being on this forum long ago until I registered last year but according to what I even saw outside this forum about betking is that the site is absolutely a scam, people should avoid such site.

Anyone that wants to promote betking on this forum should be tagged, there is no problem about that because they only want to mislead people to the wrong part that will lead to scam.

[JeromeTash]

I thought the Betking signature campaign failed miserably and was ended some weeks ago, or am I missing something?
What could be motivating indralit to wake up and start advertising scam on his signature? Hacked/bought account by betking management?

Anyway, the account cannot be trusted, and  they deserve a tag for promoting scam.

[yahoo62278]

I thought the Betking signature campaign failed miserably and was ended some weeks ago, or am I missing something?
What could be motivating indralit to wake up and start advertising scam on his signature? Hacked/bought account by betking management?

Anyway, the account cannot be trusted, and  they deserve a tag for promoting scam.

The campaign lasted 1 week is what I believe happened. Dean did not get the deposits he was hoping for so he terminated it.

[LoyceV]

They should be tagged

Then do so! The Trust system can only be decentralized if people actually use it.

[savetheFORUM]

They should be tagged

Then do so! The Trust system can only be decentralized if people actually use it.

Trust system is manipulated more than the bitcoin market was in past. At least there are guys like you LoyceV who give a glimmer of hope but it's about time bitcointalk becomes bitcoinjoke forum. You make 5 friends and manipulate the entire forum, well done.