Lets take 2018 for example. Bitcoin's intrinsic value was somewhere between $6k and $8k so anything below those values was a dip
Do you consider intrinsic value to be speculative? From the definition of
intrinsic to be the underlying value which an asset has based on it's fundamentals regardless of what the market value is at should it be volatile?
For example, some people expect Bitcoin to be going to $100,000 and some $1,000,000 despite the current prices, doesn't that indicate their own intrinsic value of Bitcoin (as it's subjective).
Depending on the "asset" it may be easier or super hard to come up with a good estimation of the intrinsic value. For example a "product" intrinsic value could be measured based on its production cost but intrinsic value of a currency is not as easy. What would you say intrinsic value of USD is and why should 1 USD be 110 JPY considering US printed an outrageous amount of of dollars over the past year?
For something like bitcoin things become even more complicated because it is still very small and its adoption is increasing day by day. Also so far nobody has come up with any good method for it, they all have definitions for stocks, options, equity, real estate, ...
We can use some sort of technical analysis based on the past performance while looking at the adoption of bitcoin and how that is growing while keeping in mind that the new supply generation is half of what it was in the previous round. Then come up with a decent estimation.
P.S. Most people who expect a certain price for bitcoin aren't expecting those numbers based on any analysis but based on their emotions. For example those expecting $1 million this year are over optimistic while those expecting lower prices of $100k and below are over pessimistic. Simply because the past performance suggests a price between $400k and $500k by the end of 2021 or early 2022.