sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 03, 2021, 09:02:50 PM |
|
My last question is I get high mhs on first run. After a few minutes the mhs goes down and stays constant, any solution?
I see that the coreclock of your gpus are all different. It's probobly because they trottle. Not enough power or too much heat. You can increase the templimit, but not sure if this is the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 03, 2021, 09:22:00 PM |
|
My last question is I get high mhs on first run. After a few minutes the mhs goes down and stays constant, any solution?
I see that the coreclock of your gpus are all different. It's probobly because they trottle. Not enough power or too much heat. You can increase the templimit, but not sure if this is the problem. The old series 1070 can be bought this much mhs. I was able to reach 26.5 mhs (old miner 24.5). If I increase the power, maybe it will be 28 mhs, but I am in a country with high electricity prices. Thank you very much for your help. Compared to other miners, there was a total increase of about 200 mhs in my system with the same power operation.
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
November 03, 2021, 09:24:32 PM |
|
Would say keep it as is, 25mh/s average on <110 Watt is a very decent result for that old card.
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 03, 2021, 09:34:02 PM |
|
Would say keep it as is, 25mh/s average on <110 Watt is a very decent result for that old card. We were getting 32 mhs with the good old 110 W. Dag epoch increased, mhs started to drop on nvdia cards, no solution was found.
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2021, 01:16:48 AM Last edit: November 04, 2021, 04:41:56 AM by ZerodayTrader |
|
Would say keep it as is, 25mh/s average on <110 Watt is a very decent result for that old card. We were getting 32 mhs with the good old 110 W. Dag epoch increased, mhs started to drop on nvdia cards, no solution was found. Yea i know, did >34mh/s on ETC, but not worth for me to mine, as it had still less Payout over ETH. And also my suffer has a found an end. https://i.imgur.com/uMKuHf6.pngFinally showing up as it has to be with 1.22. 25mh/s with <110 Watts is perfect. Good job guys! Lets see how the 3080 will do with the switch from 1.15 to 1.22.
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 04, 2021, 10:03:29 AM Last edit: November 04, 2021, 10:29:02 AM by sp_ |
|
I try mining with unMineable and encountered this problem - If I use the Terminal to check the ping to the server ethash-eu.unminable.com avg ping 54 and in the miner the ping is very high 399 It's the same with nanopool What might be the problem? Not sure we can check it. Can you open a ticket on our github? https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/issuesMake sure that you are connecting to the eu server in the launch config. ethash.unmineable.com --port 3333 ethash-us.unmineable.com --port 3333 ethash-ca.unmineable.com --port 3333 ethash-eu.unmineable.com --port 3333 ethash-asia.unmineable.com --port 3333
|
|
|
|
symplink
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2021, 10:57:39 AM |
|
How can we find the best --xintensity and --dagintensity? I have some 6800xt, 3070, 3080. Which should be the best choices? Based on what?
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 04, 2021, 11:04:06 AM |
|
My last question is I get high mhs on first run. After a few minutes the mhs goes down and stays constant, any solution?
I see that the coreclock of your gpus are all different. It's probobly because they trottle. Not enough power or too much heat. You can increase the templimit, but not sure if this is the problem. I brought all my rigs to your miner. However, a rig gave an error. The only difference now is that it's connected to wifi.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 04, 2021, 11:23:24 AM |
|
Make sure that your wifi router doesn't have a local proxy server. You need to correct directly to the pool. Also don't use ssl connection to the pool because the miner has issues with it. Use normal the ports.
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 04, 2021, 11:30:18 AM |
|
Make sure that your wifi router doesn't have a local proxy server. You need to correct directly to the pool. Also don't use ssl connection to the pool because the miner has issues with it. Use normal the ports.
I am using Xioami Wifi repeater, I will try to reset it. I am not using ssl.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 04, 2021, 11:36:22 AM Last edit: November 04, 2021, 12:48:13 PM by sp_ |
|
How can we find the best --xintensity and --dagintensity? I have some 6800xt, 3070, 3080. Which should be the best choices? Based on what?
- High --xintensity, higher amout of stale shares, higher speed. Some pools doesn't pay for stales so the setting is pool dependent. (AMD intensity settings are 1/4 of NVIDIA) - --dagintensity , 1-8(9) is for high memclocks. When dag buffer crash. 1 is low (slow dag) 8 amd is the fastest, 9 on nvidia. or 0 (default) - --kernel , Different kernels can give a speedup on different models. Your power setting can also count. Autotune will try to find the fastest kernel for you.
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 04, 2021, 11:57:43 AM |
|
Wifi
Mining rigs will produce more if they are connected to cables. Lower ping, more accepted pool hash. Yes, you are right. One of them has to be wifi in a remote place for cable. I tried reset, unfortunately it didn't work
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 04, 2021, 12:04:29 PM |
|
Yes, you are right. One of them has to be wifi in a remote place for cable. I tried reset, unfortunately it didn't work
ssh into the rig and run: $ sudo apt install libcurl4-openssl-dev
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 04, 2021, 12:22:12 PM |
|
Yes, you are right. One of them has to be wifi in a remote place for cable. I tried reset, unfortunately it didn't work
ssh into the rig and run: $ sudo apt install libcurl4-openssl-dev I tried but unfortunately it gave the same error.
|
|
|
|
|
yuzuak
Member
Offline
Activity: 683
Merit: 16
|
|
November 04, 2021, 12:57:26 PM |
|
yes, latest version hiveos is installed.
|
|
|
|
wasarianta
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2021, 05:25:26 PM |
|
sp_, i found probs yesterday.. --lock-cclock [[1300,1300],[1390,1390],[1390,1390],[0,0]] Device Number: 0 Device name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER PCIe bus id: 5 Memory: 8GB Memory clock rate (KHz): 7751000 Memory bus width (bits): 256 Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s): 496.064000
Device Number: 1 Device name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 PCIe bus id: 2 Memory: 8GB Memory clock rate (KHz): 4001000 Memory bus width (bits): 192 Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s): 192.048000
Device Number: 2 Device name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 PCIe bus id: 6 Memory: 8GB Memory clock rate (KHz): 4001000 Memory bus width (bits): 192 Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s): 192.048000
Device Number: 3 Device name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 PCIe bus id: 4 Memory: 8GB Memory clock rate (KHz): 5005000 Memory bus width (bits): 256 Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s): 320.320000 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.673] OpenCL driver version: 30.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] Cuda driver version: 11.5 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] Cuda runtime API version: 11.5 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] Welcome to Team Black Miner 1.22 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.704] 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.814] GPU0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB added to miner as Cuda device 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:06.970] GPU1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB added to miner as Cuda device 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.064] GPU2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB added to miner as Cuda device 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.157] GPU3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB added to miner as Cuda device 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.204] Trying asia-eth.2miners.com:2020 (ethash) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.220] Extranonce is set to 6171057389404422144 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.220] Pool responded successfully to subscribe 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.251] Pool responded successfully to extranonce subscribe 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.267] Extranonce is set to 6171057389404422144 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.282] Pool responded successfully to authorize 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.298] Difficulty is set to 2.031715 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.407] GPU0 Started Cuda work thread 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.595] GPU1 Started Cuda work thread 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.720] GPU2 Started Cuda work thread 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.845] Api server started at 127.0.0.1:4068 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:07.845] GPU3 Started Cuda work thread 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.023] GPU0 Starting generating ethash dag (Epoch: 451) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.054] GPU1 Starting generating ethash dag (Epoch: 451) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.085] GPU3 Starting generating ethash dag (Epoch: 451) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.226] GPU2 Starting generating ethash dag (Epoch: 451) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.335] GPU0 DAG generated in 3.15 seconds (4743167kb) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.335] GPU0 kernel 8 selected 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.335] GPU0 XIntensity set to 2048 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.835] GPU1 DAG generated in 3.65 seconds (4743167kb) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.835] GPU1 kernel 5 selected 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.835] GPU1 XIntensity set to 1152 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU3 DAG generated in 3.65 seconds (4743167kb) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU3 kernel 0 selected 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU3 XIntensity set to 2048 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU2 DAG generated in 3.65 seconds (4743167kb) 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU2 kernel 5 selected 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:12.851] GPU2 XIntensity set to 1152 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:23.834] Job 88e3 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:28.771] GPU0 Dag buffer verified ok! 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:28.833] GPU0 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1300, gpuClkMax 1300)" for GPU 00000000:02:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:28.927] GPU1 Setting locked GPU clocks is not supported for GPU 00000000:04:00.0. 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:28.989] GPU2 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1390, gpuClkMax 1390)" for GPU 00000000:05:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:28.989] Job 88e4 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:30.460] GPU3 Dag buffer verified ok! 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:30.522] GPU0 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1300, gpuClkMax 1300)" for GPU 00000000:02:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:30.585] GPU1 Setting locked GPU clocks is not supported for GPU 00000000:04:00.0. 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:30.647] GPU2 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1390, gpuClkMax 1390)" for GPU 00000000:05:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:31.397] Job 88e5 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.521] GPU1 Dag buffer verified ok! 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.584] GPU0 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1300, gpuClkMax 1300)" for GPU 00000000:02:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.646] GPU1 Setting locked GPU clocks is not supported for GPU 00000000:04:00.0. 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.709] GPU2 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1390, gpuClkMax 1390)" for GPU 00000000:05:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.787] GPU2 Dag buffer verified ok! 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.849] GPU0 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1300, gpuClkMax 1300)" for GPU 00000000:02:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:35.943] GPU1 Setting locked GPU clocks is not supported for GPU 00000000:04:00.0. 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:36.005] GPU2 GPU clocks set to "(gpuClkMin 1390, gpuClkMax 1390)" for GPU 00000000:05:00.0 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:36.131] Job 88e6 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:38.489] Job 88ea 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:45.589] Job 88eb 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:50.323] Job 88ed 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:52.681] Job 88f1 0m [2021-11-02 01:16:59.789] Job 88f3 0m [2021-11-02 01:17:06.881] Job 88f4 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] asia-eth.2miners.com (ethash) PING: 0ms DIFFICULTY: 2.03 EPOCH: 451 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] ID BOARD TYPE KERN XINT TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU0 2080S Cuda 8 2048 44/0 72 1394 8692 91 <== lockclock at 1390 (this clock for 1660) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU1 1660 Cuda 5 1152 47/0 75 1315 4891 51 <== lockclock but miner say not supported at 1300 (for 2080S) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU2 1660 Cuda 5 1152 54/0 75 1884 4891 88 <== miner say lock clock at 1390 but using stock clock [0,0] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU3 1080 Cuda 0 2048 50/0 75 2119 4911 140 <== runing fine 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 370 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU0 2080S 623.35 kH/W 56.72 MH/s 45.83 MH/s 0/0/0 (100.00) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU1 1660 574.11 kH/W 29.28 MH/s 25.79 MH/s 0/0/0 (100.00) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU2 1660 332.56 kH/W 29.27 MH/s 25.76 MH/s 0/0/0 (100.00) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] GPU3 1080 220.76 kH/W 30.91 MH/s 26.16 MH/s 0/0/0 (100.00) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 437.69 kH/W 146.18 MH/s 123.54 MH/s 0/0/0 (100.00) 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] 1m [2021-11-02 01:17:07.303] COST: 0.37 KWH (555.00IDR) POOL HASHRATE: 0.00 H/s have change bat.. nvidia-smi -i 0 -lgc 1490 nvidia-smi -i 2 -lgc 1490 nvidia-smi -i 3 -lgc 1390
START "TBMiner.exe" "C:\Users\len4_\Downloads\MINING\MINE\TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_5\TBMiner.exe" --algo ethash --dagintensity [0,0,0,0] --kernel [8,5,5,7] --cuda-devices [0,1,2,3] --xintensity [768,768,768,768] --hostname asia-eth.2miners.com --port 2020 https://ibb.co/gMKKLvB
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 04, 2021, 08:27:38 PM |
|
sp_, i found probs yesterday.. --lock-cclock [[1300,1300],[1390,1390],[1390,1390],[0,0]]
Fixed in v1.23
|
|
|
|
Shlimann
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
|
|
November 05, 2021, 08:13:15 AM |
|
Dear dev, I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!
|
|
|
|
|