BITCOIN SECURITY

[Jercyhora2]

It would be nice for people like that to share potential problems with the blockchain. The case is that you can't show solid evidence for what you're saying. There are also many computer language literate people here in this forum just to listen to a post without solid evidence. What good is it for us to listen to you, if you have nothing to lay out more concrete details on that subject.

[1714735401]

1714735401

[1714735401]

1714735401

[1714735401]

1714735401

[o_e_l_e_o]

It is like the same as these sites

It's probably worth putting a scam warning if you are going to link to those sites. Anyone who types their private key in to one of those sites to "see which page it is on" or to "see if it is in their database" or to "sign up for monitoring/alerts" or whatever other nonsense they try to sell you will have all their coins stolen. Many newbies will not understand this.

I dont generate those kind of keys, I generate keys on the basis on vulnebrity i did not generate some unknown keys.

Ok, so either tell us what the vulnerability is so we can patch it, or go off and make yourself a millionaire. We know you won't do either.

[t3xoff]

Can problems in bitcoin protocol ever changed or modified. (I do not mean bitcoin core or something).
If yes where can those problems reported.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Can problems in bitcoin protocol ever changed or modified. (I do not mean bitcoin core or something).

Problems do not change. They remain... problems. Did you possibly mean if the protocol can somehow change? (And if yes, how)

Yes, it can change if we ever come into an agreement. By we, I mean the community. By the community, I mean the miners, the ones who run nodes, the ones who run SPV servers, the developers, you, me, every person in this forum. If someone proposes a change, we ought to adopt it if it makes the system more practical than before.

If some disagree with the change, they can continue supporting the version prior the change the rest of the community agrees as proper now. If this change isn't backwards compatible we say that a fork occurs where the chain is split in two separate chains. If most of the users decide that the new chain is the proper one, the miners will secure that one and essentially most of the people will abandon the old chain.

An example of a fork is Bitcoin Cash.

If yes where can those problems reported.

Problems in the source code can always be reported. The source code is in github and you can contact with the developing team.

[nc50lc]

Can problems in bitcoin protocol ever changed or modified. (I do not mean bitcoin core or something).
If yes where can those problems reported.

The thing is, Bitcoin is decentralized, meaning, there's no central authority nor client that can implement the changes solely by itself.
The closest thing there is, is Bitcoin Core (the reference client).
Since majority of the nodes use Bitcoin core, any changes to its implementation of Bitcoin will most likely be implemented to Bitcoin unless the majority refused to update or switched to a different Bitcoin client.
I believe I've already sent you a link to Bitcoin Core's repository together with my response to your PM.

Bitcoin has some flaws but not specifically what you've described in the OP.
It's like you're saying: counting from 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 to FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
is a "security flaw" because "all those private keys work", sadly it's not "infinity" like your private keys.

[pooya87]

Can problems in bitcoin protocol ever changed or modified. (I do not mean bitcoin core or something).
If yes where can those problems reported.

You should first learn how bitcoin and by extension cryptography works then try to report a "problem" with the protocol. Based on your comments so far it doesn't look like you have a firm grasp on the technology yet and things you think are "problems" and as you put it earlier "a critical security flaw" are just your lack of knowledge.

You shouldn't waste other people's time but here is all you need to do in order to report a bug to bitcoin developers: https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/contribute/issues

[LoyceV]

It's like you're saying: counting from 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 to FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
is a "security flaw" because "all those private keys work"

Wait until t3xoff discovers he can find all creditcards in existence by counting from 00000000000000001 to 9999999999999999 ! Even if your computer can only generate 1 million numbers per second, you'll find many valid cards per minute!

I'm not sure if OP is a troll, dumb, or really just clueless (or all of the above), but the size of large random numbers usually go straight against the intuition of the average person. We're all so used to create accounts online and have someone verify them for us, that it's really hard to believe Bitcoin allows you to create a private key on your own without connecting to the internet. It's really an amazing thing if you think about it

[t3xoff]

It's like you're saying: counting from 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 to FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
is a "security flaw" because "all those private keys work"

Wait until t3xoff discovers he can find all creditcards in existence by counting from 00000000000000001 to 9999999999999999 ! Even if your computer can only generate 1 million numbers per second, you'll find many valid cards per minute!

I'm not sure if OP is a troll, dumb, or really just clueless (or all of the above), but the size of large random numbers usually go straight against the intuition of the average person. We're all so used to create accounts online and have someone verify them for us, that it's really hard to believe Bitcoin allows you to create a private key on your own without connecting to the internet. It's really an amazing thing if you think about it

I think you're really dumb I've said many times that I don't generate keys random like you said, the keys I generate has more probability of getting keys with balance.

[okorieemmanuel]

I think you're really dumb I've said many times that I don't generate keys random like you said, the keys I generate has more probability of getting keys with balance.

Basically you're trying to say that you find weakness on specific RNG source which used by certain Bitcoin software?

Technically, even if find weakness, I doubt if you can exploit it because technology will always advance and the chain keeps increasing. While you try to find a weakness in point A, point B will definitely block such flaws.

[pooya87]

Technically, even if find weakness, I doubt if you can exploit it because technology will always advance and the chain keeps increasing. While you try to find a weakness in point A, point B will definitely block such flaws.

It depends on the weakness. The point @ETFbitcoin is making about weakness in RNG is about examples such as the blockchain.info wallet that used the same k for every signature and led to some funds being lost. This has nothing to do with technology, it is simply flawed implementation due to incompetency of those developers (they were stupidly using random.org website!).

[NotATether]

I'm a security researcher and for the past 45 days i've been researching on bitcoin protocol and how it is secured.
I found that each and every single bitcoin in the universe is in danger cuz i found a critical security flaw in bitcoin protocol that would give me infinity private keys and all that private keys work.

If you really are serious that you found a vulnerability then you had better follow the instructions at https://bitcoincore.org/en/contact/ to securely email the developers. Do not open a Github issue or post a proof of concept publicly so that you don't reveal it to hackers.

But the general gist of this thread seems to be that you are bluffing so you should prove otherwise if you want to be taken seriously.

[t3xoff]

I'm a security researcher and for the past 45 days i've been researching on bitcoin protocol and how it is secured.
I found that each and every single bitcoin in the universe is in danger cuz i found a critical security flaw in bitcoin protocol that would give me infinity private keys and all that private keys work.

If you really are serious that you found a vulnerability then you had better follow the instructions at https://bitcoincore.org/en/contact/ to securely email the developers. Do not open a Github issue or post a proof of concept publicly so that you don't reveal it to hackers.

But the general gist of this thread seems to be that you are bluffing so you should prove otherwise if you want to be taken seriously.

No, they never reply, I've already sent a mail coupe months ago for finding an xss ,still I did not get any reply from them and also it is not patched.

[CryptoSh1va]

xss

So this is related to the security of the site and not to bitcoin itself?
Create a new topic, with a description of the problem, but without technical details.
Most likely, this will attract the attention of developers.