Little Mouse, RapTarX and apology from me

[Little Mouse]

One more Little Mouse and RapTarX thread. It's the PM for which some of you are waiting (no, actually it's the one which I should share long ago, right after the shit happened).

Since there are 3 threads on this issue which really looks weird, everything can be discussed one single thread, I would like to post in this thread everything because otherwise I have to post in 3 different threads.
I really had no idea how can I start this because this is something which is really stupid move from me. But later after watching this to be live after time to time, it seems a pain and I was looking for get rid of this pain. And I decided to post the truth finally because-

My advice: always speak the truth. Nothing wrong with being humiliated when deserved, it makes you grow as a person.

I will quote the message I sent to LoyceV here.

Hi LoyceV,
Thanks for your post. I wish I could post it publicly but I can't.
 I wanted to post it many times before but I couldn’t. It turned into a stupid move but I really didn’t want to do so.

It may sound stupid, it is actually- it was an experiment to check how community (the participants) reacts on such issue. I was expecting some random reaction and it will end in that campaign thread but it turned into something very big. It's RapTarX whom I quoted, he was an easy pick because I saw his ranked had changed and I wanted to add something that would feel real but it could be someone else too. I wanted to say this many times, right at that moment too but sadly I couldn’t. I was afraid of being humiliated. The case was presented in such a way that I did a big crime. I didn’t have anything of such happening in mind when I did the stupid quote.

Reason for such experiment- I had a bounty group earlier (I still have one) to discuss about finding the good bounties and someone in that group complained he was tagged just because of a wrong quote. He quoted someone to copy the format, replaced with his data and applied with their information. But sadly he forgot to remove telegram id and replace with him. I can't find the link now. The purpose of the experiment was to check how in this case community reacts. He was just a simple bounty hunter, no one hear what did he say.

My bad or good luck that everything turned into so real that I myself have been the victim of my own mistake.

I'm not sure if you are buying this, in fact it's such that anyone would barely trust. But what else can I say as the truth is it.

Best regards
LM

Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.


RapTarX had sent few PM to me but due to this reason said above, I couldn’t tell him anything. Recently, I sent him a PM and asked offered an apology.

My apology to everyone of the forum. I made a stupid move and so far, the cost I paid for this stupid move is really huge.

LM


I will possibly lock this thread within next 1 or 2 days.

[1715197986]

1715197986

[1715197986]

1715197986

[1715197986]

1715197986

[Maidak]

Lol . Thank you for your explanation.

Even though it doesn't seem credible, if I believe it was an experiment, you shouldn't have done it at all.

And speaking of the community, this community doesn't know how to forgive, Competition is high in this competitive community. Even if you have alt accounts I can't find the cause of the headache of the curious community, I don't see any tendency to do anything criminal in either account, it's clear that both are unique accounts.

However, it is unethical that you have ruined the reputation of another person in such an act.
Before experimenting you should have informed RapTarX about the matter and sought his permission. Or someone reputed to the forum should have been informed in advance.

[LoyceV]

Nothing wrong with being humiliated when deserved

a stupid move

Allow me to be the first: that was stupid! But what's more stupid, is waiting 2 years before explaining it.

I sent him a PM and asked an apology.

I hope this is because of your English: asked > offered!

Or someone reputed to the forum should have been informed in advance.

Nothing is more reputed than a signed message: if you're going to do stupid things, you can sign a message upfront to prove later on that it was intentional.

So, post this somewhere in Archival:

Code:

G71zpw0D/eXrJ51hsQ9gvLutTAKZOiWHNlMMgXwnRKvYQPAhmR1T8hki30yQcwqmn6vOG08i5Rt607TN3apLHWo=

Don't edit this post anymore.

Then, later, you can prove your intentions by posting this:

Code:

Today is October 8, 2021. I'm going to do stupid things: tomorrow I'm say I am theymos, just to mess with all of you.

Signed by 1LoyceVGjMmUj6Na79M9Ju8N52KXkbKMQE (staked here).
I forgot the words "I'm going to say", but don't want to sign again.
Disclaimer: I'm not theymos!

Of course, if you start posting signatures without ever posting what they're for, you could be building up a pile of shady shit and selectively deciding what to use. Don't go down that road.

[Selingkuhan]

Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.

Hello Little Mouse, I waiting for you.
I hope you are doing well there, I like your current profession, there are many changes about you, it is good to hear your achievements so far.
Can you provide a screenshot of your transaction with Dr.Lender3

[The Cryptovator]

As a human, I will say we might do mistake consciously or unconsciously. For example, your mistakes were conscious mistakes. You had tried to experiment but it turn into a big problem, but you did the second mistake of not sharing the truth with the community. Was it necessary to share it after 2 years? I don't think so. I always like to hear the truth about an incident that happened on the forum. If you hide the truth then it is quite complicated to decide and make a decision about an allegation. The negative feedback exists on your profile left by Lauda since she left the forum,  so there is no way to remove the feedback except for her. And I have seen you have a couple of green trusts which is really good. So, I don't think you will face any problem with the left feedback by Lauda.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

However, it is unethical that you have ruined the reputation of another person in such an act.

I'm still not sure if I believe this story, as it doesn't seem like something a rational, thinking person would do.  But assuming what Little Mouse said is true, you're absolutely right.  Involving another member in a silly "experiment" like this is inconsiderate at best, and then keeping silent after the other member got tagged by multiple people is reprehensible.

Before experimenting you should have informed RapTarX about the matter and sought his permission. Or someone reputed to the forum should have been informed in advance.

It would have been infinitely better had Little Mouse just not carried out that experiment, because there was nothing to gain or to really learn from it.  If that's what he did, at the very least he should have consulted RapTarX first.  LoyceV's suggestion of signing a message in advance is an even better one, because then there's undeniable proof of what the intentions were.

On a related note, I don't think RapTarX's reputation is destroyed exactly.  True, he got negged because of this, but I've never considered him a shady character.  I'm not even sure I've even looked at his feedback until now.  I've got a custom trust list, so his feedback score doesn't show up red, nor does Little Mouse's. 

What a fuck up this was.

[JollyGood]

Reason for such experiment- I had a bounty group earlier (I still have one) to discuss about finding the good bounties and someone in that group complained he was tagged just because of a wrong quote. He quoted someone to copy the format, replaced with his data and applied with their information. But sadly he forgot to remove telegram id and replace with him. I can't find the link now. The purpose of the experiment was to check how in this case community reacts. He was just a simple bounty hunter, no one hear what did he say.

I wonder how many people actually believe what Little Mouse has written.

He claims to have randomly plucked out a member enrolled (or asking to be enrolled) on to a campaign to have an experiment to see how the community reacts to such thing and as soon as he started the experiment by making that post, he ended up deleting the message which would have been counterproductive to the whole premise that he claims he took that action (by quoting another forum member) on.

What was the point of deleting the post in under 5 minutes after you actually posted it?

It was written in the OP that it was part of the experiment to gauge how forum members react to this sort of thing but then to delete the post within 5 minutes of posting it therefore trying to stop people posting about the very thing wanted them to post about - it makes zero sense.

I certainly do not accept that version of events to be the whole truth. I do not accept that this was some sort of experiment which he for reasons unknown abandoned within 5 minutes of unilaterally starting it.

I would be more inclined to believe there is something more to the story.

--------------------------------------




--------------------------------------





--------------------------------------





--------------------------------------

[Rotten Egg]

What was the point of deleting the post in under 5 minutes after you actually posted it?

Check mate @ Little Mouse aka RapTarX. He had two years to make a story and he came up with such a pathetic one!

Post archived, because it can be locked/edited/removed: https://archive.is/s3h43

I think, it is high time to investigate this connection as well...

S_Therapist also woke up from a year long hiatus a few days ago.

mdayonliner = S_Therapist = Little Mouse = DTalk = bitcoinbangladesh.org = RapTarX

[_BlackStar]

You all probably don't have to go against yourself and your own beliefs to not think rationally in making judgments. Some of the available evidence has shown you that both accounts are owned by one person and that is enough authentic evidence to say they are fraudulent. Little Mouse, you should not be an important actor in this drama.

[yahoo62278]

  Involving another member in a silly "experiment" like this is inconsiderate at best, and then keeping silent after the other member got tagged by multiple people is reprehensible.

This is the part I don't get. Why not step up once he seen someones reputation getting ruined? Why take 2 years to come clean? Why do the dumb shit in the 1st place?

Little Mouse, your actions have landed you on my distrust list. If I  didn't feel a negative would be an abuse of DT i'd do that as well. At the very least, your actions make you very untrustworthy. Hope your story was worth it.

[suchmoon]

First time I read the OP I  thought "there is no fucking way, this is the stupidest excuse for sockpuppeting I've ever heard" but instead of posting a profane response right away I left the tab open for a couple of hours. Now I'm thinking that the story is bizarre enough to actually be true.

At any rate, I'm with yahoo on this one. Even if true, this shows very poor judgement.

[JeromeTash]

Why did you have to wait for this long for the apology?

Are you trying to say that you just realized your mistake after hundreds of days being active in the forum after the incident?
This is reputation we are talking about here, and not just anything that doesn't matter.

Come on man, this even makes it harder to believe since you have been quiet about the apology all along.

[Little Mouse]

It was written in the OP that it was part of the experiment to gauge how forum members react to this sort of thing but then to delete the post within 5 minutes of posting it therefore trying to stop people posting about the very thing wanted them to post about - it makes zero sense.

I was well aware that loyce.club archives the post and all of this things were part of my experiment. Believing or not believing is your choice. Some forum member said you are overzealous and that seems true.

Why not step up once he seen someones reputation getting ruined? Why take 2 years to come clean? Why do the dumb shit in the 1st place?

Thanks to JG for bringing this issue. Actually credit goes to me as after removing JG from my trust list, he did the same and neg tagged me with a reference  to this issue after 15 months. Otherwise, I would never confess this at all and will have a pain all the time. And some credit to LoyceV of course. If we didn’t exchange few PM, I wouldn’t get few inspiring words from him and possibly I would never be able to confess this publicly.