NO KYC Sportbooks?

[CDC AP]

well I do betting in sportsbet.io since many years and it has never asked any kyc documents . I made many successful deposits and withdrawals on this site, both using cryptos as well as my fiat currency , no problem happened what so ever, so I would recommend you to try this site if you are looking for a no kyc sportsbook.

[Fortify]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

It seems to highly depend upon both where the sportsbook is based and where the customer is based. It's kind of a catch-22 situation, because you should have more faith that a company asking for KYC is likely trying to adhere to the financial reporting requirements of most jurisdictions (it's far too easy to launder illicit money these days if you don't) and at the same time - you will be supply them with some highly sensitive documents that could be very damaging if they were somehow leaked by the customer (either via hacking or just incompetent management). I can understand why many people do not want to hand it over but you'll see it required more and more often in future by serious businesses.

[carlfebz2]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

If you do talk about never asking out for KYC then there's none because majority of those platforms and inclusive on their terms and conditions then
they would potentially ask out for some personal verification if they do saw some violation on your part which is really indeed plausible.

If you do talk about current no KYC sportsbook for you to able to play with ease or directly as we say
then there are several sites which can really be trusted.

1. Sportsbet.ioo
2. Nitrogen
3. Stake
4. Bitdice.me
5. Playbetr

[Ryker1]

^[snip]
1. Sportsbet.ioo
2. Nitrogen
3. Stake
4. Bitdice.me
5. Playbetr

Well it is a good list but I think there are some that you did not mention, let me add some.
- ^[Betbit.com]
- ^{[Onehash.com]}
- ^[Dbet.io]
- ^{[Fairlay.com]}
- ^{[Bitcoinrush.io]}
- ^[Betcoin.ag]
Those are the gambling casino that did not require KYC but I did not know if they are already updated to KYC.

[traderethereum]

^[snip]
1. Sportsbet.ioo
2. Nitrogen
3. Stake
4. Bitdice.me
5. Playbetr

Well it is a good list but I think there are some that you did not mention, let me add some.
- ^[Betbit.com]
- ^{[Onehash.com]}
- ^[Dbet.io]
- ^{[Fairlay.com]}
- ^{[Bitcoinrush.io]}
- ^[Betcoin.ag]
Those are the gambling casino that did not require KYC but I did not know if they are already updated to KYC.

The above list is good enough to bet and plus Betcoin.ag and I think they all have their reputations among the other gambling site.
But I do not know with the other list except Betcoin.ag, one of the oldest crypto gambling sites here.
When we have a list of Sportbooks that does not require KYC, we should only select the site with reputations and not just follow other people's suggestions.
That is because we want to find which site can give us comfort, feel safe, and other things that can make us enjoy staying.
If we have one or more sites, we do not have to search for the other Sportbooks because we will need more time to find out if that site can match what we want.

[KTChampions]

I think that most of these stories about successful gamblers who beat casinos are written by the casinos themselves (by the way, as well as various winning strategies)  All this is done for the purpose of advertising and to exploit the feeling of greed in people to lure them into this area. I do not welcome this, gambling should be entertainment, not a way to make money.

Nice theory because no one would appear to the public that they are really making money in sports if they don't have another agenda or if they are not paid. They say that you cannot beat a casino, but in sports betting, you don't beat the casino as they only facilitate bets, you beat your fellow sports bettors if you are a profitable gambler.

I think this theory can be considered a proven fact - after all, no one is surprised when casinos give big bonuses to new players, and poker rooms organize poker schools and pay them for every new player who comes to poker. They all understand that such investments ultimately give a good income, so it is logical to invest in regular advertising when someone writes their "true success stories" and thus attracts new players.

[Hypnosis00]

I think that most of these stories about successful gamblers who beat casinos are written by the casinos themselves (by the way, as well as various winning strategies)  All this is done for the purpose of advertising and to exploit the feeling of greed in people to lure them into this area. I do not welcome this, gambling should be entertainment, not a way to make money.

Nice theory because no one would appear to the public that they are really making money in sports if they don't have another agenda or if they are not paid. They say that you cannot beat a casino, but in sports betting, you don't beat the casino as they only facilitate bets, you beat your fellow sports bettors if you are a profitable gambler.

I think this theory can be considered a proven fact - after all, no one is surprised when casinos give big bonuses to new players, and poker rooms organize poker schools and pay them for every new player who comes to poker. They all understand that such investments ultimately give a good income, so it is logical to invest in regular advertising when someone writes their "true success stories" and thus attracts new players.

But this theory is not proven and I don't know if it will be proven as no one would admit that a successful gambler based on the story receives money just to come up with a success story. Gambling operators are really clever, they'll always find a way to attract gamblers to increase their profit.

At least we should know this theory so we will not be blind when it comes to our real chance of winning.

[Peanutswar]

I guess with the word never it's too hard to tell that some of the platform today does not have a KYC before creating an account and still they have this kind of feature. KYC is an additional layer of security for their users. AFAIK stake.com does not have a mandatory KYC for now.

Select what you think to suit you and also try to check their FAQs and terms of the agreement to prevent having issues with their platform.

[Botnake]

I guess with the word never it's too hard to tell that some of the platform today does not have a KYC before creating an account and still they have this kind of feature. KYC is an additional layer of security for their users. AFAIK stake.com does not have a mandatory KYC for now.

Select what you think to suit you and also try to check their FAQs and terms of the agreement to prevent having issues with their platform.

Everyone would always choose a gambling site that does not require a KYC, it's the essence of why we are gambling in the crypto space, we want to be anonymous so we can hide our real identity, so submitting to the KYC requirements is just like playing in a fiat sportsbook.

[KTChampions]

I think this theory can be considered a proven fact - after all, no one is surprised when casinos give big bonuses to new players, and poker rooms organize poker schools and pay them for every new player who comes to poker. They all understand that such investments ultimately give a good income, so it is logical to invest in regular advertising when someone writes their "true success stories" and thus attracts new players.

But this theory is not proven and I don't know if it will be proven as no one would admit that a successful gambler based on the story receives money just to come up with a success story. Gambling operators are really clever, they'll always find a way to attract gamblers to increase their profit.

At least we should know this theory so we will not be blind when it comes to our real chance of winning.

Doesn't the presence of topics like this: Fake bets that appear from time to time indicate that casinos are engaged in marketing in all possible directions? And tell me, what's the point of the existence of poker schools that teach how to profit play while not taking payment, but on the contrary sponsoring players for their first deposit? I think the answer is obvious. Now think about why successful gamblers tell their secrets and supposedly help strangers beat the casino? I see no reason other than bragging (hard to believe in this as we talk about money). So since there are no such reasons, then most likely it is sponsored by various casinos.

[dothebeats]

Those sportsbooks that still offer no KYC on bets are already mentioned below, although there are instances wherein if you win a huge amount, or if any such discrepancies and suspicious activities were found on your account, you would need to submit KYC else your account gets locked or you cannot withdraw your profits. Sooner or later, these no KYC bookies will have to comply and re-do their ToS as government regulations will probably squeeze them tighter for them to give in.

[Woodie]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

I don't know about "never" because some of these sportsbook we have might not ask for KYC upon registration but chances are that they have these requirements hidden in their terms and conditions which becomes a humongous task when you are faced with a problem.

The only sportsbook that guaranteed this 99.99% was directbet but unfortunately they are no more!

You could try roobet sportsbook too but there was a time people were required to fill in some kyc forms into the platform before they could proceed and this was before the sportsbook was introduced.

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

If you do talk about never asking out for KYC then there's none because majority of those platforms and inclusive on their terms and conditions then
they would potentially ask out for some personal verification if they do saw some violation on your part which is really indeed plausible.

If you do talk about current no KYC sportsbook for you to able to play with ease or directly as we say
then there are several sites which can really be trusted.

1. Sportsbet.ioo

Not sure if this is a typo but isn't Sportsbet.io KYC compliant? Someone confirm this, thanks.

[johhnyUA]

From my base knowledge, most sportsbook will ask for KYC verification depending on player's activity and balance.

From my experience the interconnection between your activity and KYC is very simple: If you're winning, they ask you to prove yourself. If you're losing, you can play without KYC for a very long time (maybe even endlessly).

So yeah, for succesfull players there no such thing as "Sportbook without KYC"

[7788bitcoin]

~
From my experience the interconnection between your activity and KYC is very simple: If you're winning, they ask you to prove yourself. If you're losing, you can play without KYC for a very long time (maybe even endlessly).

So yeah, for succesfull players there no such thing as "Sportbook without KYC"

You got a point, either the sportsbook will give you incentive to verify your KYC and that is what some of the smart ones are doing  , when you are winning a lot then you will be asked to verify your identity and i have seen some cases where some of the players were forced to verify before withdrawing. Yet i can wage in stake without verifying if i am not looking for any freebies from them.

[timerland]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Can't guarantee that.

But based on historical track record alone I'd probably go with Stake.

Stake/PD has been around for almost a decade and I have never heard anyone complain about needing to do KYC on their platform. Definitely a safe bet.

[alegotardo]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

first we need to know what you want when betting on sports games.

If your intention, like mine, is just to have fun while following championships that you would watch one way or another, then that's ok... there are several sites that allow you to play without the need for KYC.

But, if your intention is to withdraw some eventual profit and this amount is significant, then you will find little or no option if you are considering only the most recognized and safe sites.

[mv1986]

I think most of the sportsbookies have had some bad publicity or unsatisfied customers, that is why it is really a bit difficult to share one's own experiences while others might have had problems at some point. However, my personal experience with Cloudbet was very smooth so far for years now, but I just saw that there are also rumors about some shady actions. The problem is it is hard to outsiders to distinguish between real information a player claims to provide and real information the bookie claims to provide.So still for me it was like five or six years now without any trouble. I think I had one minor problem, but that got resolved eventually. Was during their early days. No KYC thus far.

[Desmong]

From my base knowledge, most sportsbook will ask for KYC verification depending on player's activity and balance.

From my experience the interconnection between your activity and KYC is very simple: If you're winning, they ask you to prove yourself. If you're losing, you can play without KYC for a very long time (maybe even endlessly).

So yeah, for succesfull players there no such thing as "Sportbook without KYC"

Kyc should not be forced on gamblers to do. Kyc can be stressful at times making you to do what you don't want to do with stress. Although the government might require kyc to update tax duties to be paid by gamblers. There are various forms of kyc that which should not be forced on gamblers. When you are winning the system would want to ensure that the player is a human not robot that is why kyc might be required during winnings.

[DoublerHunter]

From my base knowledge, most sportsbook will ask for KYC verification depending on player's activity and balance.

From my experience the interconnection between your activity and KYC is very simple: If you're winning, they ask you to prove yourself. If you're losing, you can play without KYC for a very long time (maybe even endlessly).

So yeah, for succesfull players there no such thing as "Sportbook without KYC"

^ Definitely right and especially when you are in winning of big amount, either the reason is you will be suspected for the illegal activity and your identity must be at stake because of another suspecting having illegal activities. Because of money laundering, I understand that gamblers need to proceed with KYC verification if this is a basic one and I don't think you must be afraid. What if you will win a big amount and after you will know that they will ask KYC if you will win a huge amount, take it or leave it just because you did not want to expose your identity.

[fullhdpixel]

well I do betting in sportsbet.io since many years and it has never asked any kyc documents . I made many successful deposits and withdrawals on this site, both using cryptos as well as my fiat currency , no problem happened what so ever, so I would recommend you to try this site if you are looking for a no kyc sportsbook.

Glad to see even though you are promoting a scam via your signature, at least you are recommending the trusted ones . And yeah I agree that I have never been asked for documents from any sportsbook either apart from the documents some ask as a mandatory rule, but that has nothing to do with sports betting specifically.

You may try bitsler, stake, sportsbet and even wolf bet nowadays as they have added sportsbook and none of them ask for KYC from what I know.