What do you think does this Cities have that we dont?

[dothebeats]

If anything, these countries are more open to change, and them failing on accepting said changes won't really put them in too much trouble since they can easily bounce back as if nothing happened. Also, culture probably plays an important role, too. Other countries that haven't posted any significant contributions or innovations in the past tend to have leaders and people that are extremely conservative, and won't change their ways just because something is more efficient by just a small percent.

[Renampun]

...

QUESTIONs
1) When it comes to cryptocurrencies from your point of view. what do the think about why this counries top best in innovation and in the hotspot in bitcoin?

I compared these two for when you are a hotspot in bitcoin and innovation it shows from my point of view that your country is rich and a part of the innovated country this 2021.

2) Do you think of the people of the Government? on why this country is listed in the top 10 best?


I am just curious what others think

If your country is listed quote it and answer what you think

my country is not included in the list because it is still a developing country...

The government of my country still strongly considers bitcoin to be something that should not be allowed to be freely allowed so that our government only allows bitcoin as an investment asset, not a means of payment, whereas in developed countries such as Singapore, they have begun to want to take advantage of the advantages that can be obtained from bitcoin as well as possible.

[fara_buduk]

Cities with high natural resources will of course be faster in responding to the times, so that cities are very open to responding to the development of cryptocurrencies. On the other hand, an environment that is very influential on the rapid spread of news, among business people and their community, it will be easier for them to exchange ideas for mutual progress.

Mostly those 3rd world country cant adapt crypto currency fast since they dont have enough resources like internet and other devices since it is really a poor country. On the first world country that is we called a lot of resources that can catch to the latest tech and able to adopt easily in crypto. Also having communication with other countries to exchange ideas , i think that was for business purposes only but in terms of crypto most of the countries right now are just thinking of it

In general, developing countries - 3rd world countries - are actually slower to catch up because of technological infrastructure that still does not reach all regions, especially remote areas so they cannot know a system and innovation that is developing in this world is not like developed countries too poverty and the culture of the people in the country also make it difficult to accept it

[dezoel]

Having less problems. That is right, having less problems in a nation and for a city means that they could focus on getting more innovative and progressive. If everything goes well in your nation then you could focus on crypto or any other thing as well.

Look at all those marvelous places you can visit in London to have fun, the museums, the operas, the plays (specially royal shakespearen group), and many other things that looks like normal life in UK, but a very elite sense of fun for many nations. Tell the same thing to the south Africans, Indians, Chinese, West Africans and even some Pakistanis. You will not see that much elite fun in regular life of regular citizens there, why? Because UK managed to steal all the resources from those nations and grew superbly economically and gave their citizens a prosper life that can focus on beauty in the world.

[Fortify]

Here is the top countries that adapted innovation much faster

1. Switzerland
2. UK
3. Sweden
4. Finland
5. Netherlands
6. US
7. Singapore
8. Denmark
9. Luxembourg
10. Hong Kong (China)
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is the
1. San Francisco
2. Vancouver
3. Amsterdam
4. Ljubljana, Slovenia
5. Tel Aviv
6. Portsmouth, New Hampshire
7. Miami, Florida
8. El Zonte, El Salvador
9. New York
10. London

There is quite a bit distinction between the two, because while the first set talks about innovation in all different sectors (of which Bitcoin is a insignificant fraction of the economy) we see at least half the second batch being in North America. While El Salvador were certainly groundbreaking in their adoption of Bitcoin as an official currency, besides that their tech sector and Bitcoin functionality would be dwarfed by many other places - I'm not even sure how they made the list, somewhere like Tallinn in Estonia should really sit in that slot. Anyway, the fact is these countries have solid legal and financial structures that are enforced, while the workforce is willing to adapt to new technologies - I'd say those would be the most useful drivers.

[BuNga_cute]

Cities with high natural resources will of course be faster in responding to the times, so that cities are very open to responding to the development of cryptocurrencies. On the other hand, an environment that is very influential on the rapid spread of news, among business people and their community, it will be easier for them to exchange ideas for mutual progress.

Mostly those 3rd world country cant adapt crypto currency fast since they dont have enough resources like internet and other devices since it is really a poor country. On the first world country that is we called a lot of resources that can catch to the latest tech and able to adopt easily in crypto. Also having communication with other countries to exchange ideas , i think that was for business purposes only but in terms of crypto most of the countries right now are just thinking of it

In general, developing countries - 3rd world countries - are actually slower to catch up because of technological infrastructure that still does not reach all regions, especially remote areas so they cannot know a system and innovation that is developing in this world is not like developed countries too poverty and the culture of the people in the country also make it difficult to accept it

I agree that the most important thing for a country to be able to catch up with technological developments, the country's technological
infrastructure must have reached all regions. Meanwhile, third world countries whose population is still high in poverty, usually there are
still many areas that do not have internet access. So not all residents in third world countries can enter the crypto world, whereas crypto is
one solution to improve the economy. It is the duty of the government to immediately make all regions achieve technological infrastructure
evenly, so at least all areas have internet  access. Because I believe that the more people in third world countries can access the internet,
then the country's economy will change for the better. Because there are many opportunities to be able to make money on the internet compared
to having to look for work in the real world, it can indirectly reduce the poverty rate in the country.

[Vaskiy]

The government need to take initiative to develop the financial technology. Right now very few countries have got the perfect fintech infrastructure whereas majority are in the developing stage. My country hasn't come to a conclusion about the development of fintech infrastructure for a long. Today on an article read about the State policy for the development of fintech infrastructure. Maybe within few years time we'll get higher level of adoption and acceptance of bitcoin.

[justdimin]

When it comes to cryptocurrencies from your point of view. what do the think about why this counries top best in innovation and in the hotspot in bitcoin?

I compared these two for when you are a hotspot in bitcoin and innovation it shows from my point of view that your country is rich and a part of the innovated country this 2021.

They are mainly rich places? I mean if you look at the cost of living in those cities, and compare it to the mean average of the rest of the world you will realize that these places are one of the richest ever. If you look at the nations they are in, they are from the richest nations as well, hell California (San Francisco) is 5th biggest economy in the whole world if it was a nation.

So, to think that they have a bigger crypto presence is basically all due to them being rich. This is why I believe that we are talking about something very valuable here, it is definitely something about the wealth that they have which caused them to be at the top of the list.

[uneng]

I believe just because a country is innovative it doesn't mean they are going to stand out in crypto currency sphere. Their focus in search and development for innovations might be addressed to another matters such as energy production, health sector, tourism, accessibility and so on... What means crypto currency or digital finances stay in second plan.

In the case of top 10 leading bitcoin cities I see what they have in common are the crypto businesses (especially popular exchanges) operating in their territories, added to the fact those are traditional cities known for the development of new startups, entrepreneurship activities and financial opportunities in general, what makes them fertile spots for investors and innovations related to the financial world, naturally including bitcoin and its altcoins pairs at some point, as we are already seeing right now.

[milewilda]

The government need to take initiative to develop the financial technology. Right now very few countries have got the perfect fintech infrastructure whereas majority are in the developing stage. My country hasn't come to a conclusion about the development of fintech infrastructure for a long. Today on an article read about the State policy for the development of fintech infrastructure. Maybe within few years time we'll get higher level of adoption and acceptance of bitcoin.

There would be some progress and that would vary on the govenrment you do have whether they are really serious in regards on development on the country or places that they've been holding up and as a citizen then we wont really be having a choice but to wait up on what would be their
future steps to make in regarding with the development and acquiring or adopting the current trends that we do have now.

[doomloop]

When it comes to cryptocurrencies from your point of view. what do the think about why this counries top best in innovation and in the hotspot in bitcoin?

I compared these two for when you are a hotspot in bitcoin and innovation it shows from my point of view that your country is rich and a part of the innovated country this 2021.

They are mainly rich places? I mean if you look at the cost of living in those cities, and compare it to the mean average of the rest of the world you will realize that these places are one of the richest ever. If you look at the nations they are in, they are from the richest nations as well, hell California (San Francisco) is 5th biggest economy in the whole world if it was a nation.

So, to think that they have a bigger crypto presence is basically all due to them being rich. This is why I believe that we are talking about something very valuable here, it is definitely something about the wealth that they have which caused them to be at the top of the list.

Well, most of most these countries and states that are listed here didn’t just come out and became rich just like that. It’s all about the citizens or people that are living in that location being hardworking and able to raise themselves to the standard that they are right now. It’s just like when they said that Rome isn’t built in a day, it took years for it to be to that level that it is.  Big places like this are where you would see big investors and institutions, and these are the people who are more likely to invest in cryptocurrencies.

These locations would have higher adoption of cryptocurrency, because they have more understanding of what this is all about, and they have enough money to invest in it. Investment requires money, a state that is poor wouldn’t be talking about investment. There would only be a higher adoption of cryptocurrency in places where people are rich. All these big institutions that we are seeing today that are buying Bitcoin, most of them are from these locations.