The first president after Putin will be the president of Muscovy

[Alik Bahshi]

Alik Bakhshi

The first president after Putin will be the president of Muscovy


   
     Russian President Vladimir Putin, during his speech at the 25th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, said "The USSR is historical Russia, but it so happened that it ceased to exist." It's a pity Putin did not name the reason for this. Today Russia is on the verge of final disintegration and the reason is known.
     
     In the article “When the donkey dies” (2005, https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/3702.html) I wrote that Putin’s policy is dangerous not only for neighboring, former fraternal peoples, with most of which Putin managed to ruin relations, but also for countries with well-established democracies, which could turn into disastrous self-isolation for Russia. The war launched by Russia in Ukraine as the first step towards the restoration of the empire within the borders of the USSR will be its last step. The Russian Empire will return to its historical borders and acquire its former name Muscovy. The vast territory beyond the Volga River will be divided between the indigenous peoples of Siberia and the Urals. By the way, historically Siberia was not Russia, they were exiled to Siberia from Russia.

    21.06. 2022

[Moneyprism]

i doubt that Putin will step down from his government... i think that he will try to revise the amendments and will continue as president forever .. but if he does step down as president, i hope that his successor is not as "crazy" as he is

[af_newbie]

Russia needs a color revolution.

But most Russians have a serf mentality, so I am not sure this society is ready for a progressive democracy.

They have been far too long under autocratic governments. People cannot think independently, and if they can, they are scared
to question the actions of their government.

Another problem is that there are two Russias, one is St. Petersburg+Moscow and the other: the regions.
They are two completely different countries.

And on top of all of this, the country is currently run by a criminal mafia.
The revenues from the sales of fossil fuels are stolen by a small group of criminals.
Russians in the regions never see a cent from those sales.

But when the ethnic majorities in the resource-rich regions wake up, Russian Federation will fall apart like a house of cards.

[TheNineClub]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

[Alik Bahshi]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

The fact is that the actual original territory of Russia is up to Tatarstan, the former Kazan Khanate. The Urals and Siberia in tsarist times were not considered Russia, prisoners were exiled there from Russia.

[BADecker]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

The fact is that the actual original territory of Russia is up to Tatarstan, the former Kazan Khanate. The Urals and Siberia in tsarist times were not considered Russia, prisoners were exiled there from Russia.

First, you need to understand what a state is. All the countries are states. They are states of mind. Your state of mind regarding borders might be different from that of the next person.

Whose state of mind is right regarding Siberia? Isn't it the one who maintains the power over it? Written words regarding borders are only there to keep the memory of who claims ownership of what alive.

If you or China or Mongolia or anybody else doesn't like the FACT that Siberia is part of Russia, go take it from them if you can. Your borders might be right. You might have the strength to do this. If you do, you can make Siberia belong to anyone you want.

[Alik Bahshi]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

The fact is that the actual original territory of Russia is up to Tatarstan, the former Kazan Khanate. The Urals and Siberia in tsarist times were not considered Russia, prisoners were exiled there from Russia.

First, you need to understand what a state is. All the countries are states. They are states of mind. Your state of mind regarding borders might be different from that of the next person.

Whose state of mind is right regarding Siberia? Isn't it the one who maintains the power over it? Written words regarding borders are only there to keep the memory of who claims ownership of what alive.

If you or China or Mongolia or anybody else doesn't like the FACT that Siberia is part of Russia, go take it from them if you can. Your borders might be right. You might have the strength to do this. If you do, you can make Siberia belong to anyone you want.



   Firstly, Siberia belongs to those peoples who existed there before the conquest of Siberia by the Russians, and not to the Chinese or anyone else who, according to your concept, should conquer it. Secondly, the indigenous peoples of Siberia have every right to independence, like all peoples on planet Earth.

[BADecker]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

The fact is that the actual original territory of Russia is up to Tatarstan, the former Kazan Khanate. The Urals and Siberia in tsarist times were not considered Russia, prisoners were exiled there from Russia.

First, you need to understand what a state is. All the countries are states. They are states of mind. Your state of mind regarding borders might be different from that of the next person.

Whose state of mind is right regarding Siberia? Isn't it the one who maintains the power over it? Written words regarding borders are only there to keep the memory of who claims ownership of what alive.

If you or China or Mongolia or anybody else doesn't like the FACT that Siberia is part of Russia, go take it from them if you can. Your borders might be right. You might have the strength to do this. If you do, you can make Siberia belong to anyone you want.

   Firstly, Siberia belongs to those peoples who existed there before the conquest of Siberia by the Russians, and not to the Chinese or anyone else who, according to your concept, should conquer it. Secondly, the indigenous peoples of Siberia have every right to independence, like all peoples on planet Earth.

The current maps say otherwise about who owns Siberia. Take a look at popular Wikipedia maps. They show Siberia as part of Russia. Who would benefit from Siberia being part of Russia? Russia of course.

This seems to suggest that Russia is taking over the world through some unknown means and methods. They certainly didn't conquer the map-makers to make the maps change. Maybe they rule the world and we don't know it, right?

If Siberia belongs to the indigenous peoples of Siberia, let them prove it by showing it on the maps... if they are strong enough. Or is it that indigenous peoples of Siberia rule the world, and are simply letting the maps exist as they are as a cover for their covert operations?

I agree with you that what is right isn't always the thing that exists. The indigenous peoples of Siberia might be the rightful heirs to Siberia, and they might think that they own Siberia. But what do they have for strength if any other country decides to push them off their land right into the ocean?

[Alik Bahshi]

It's hard to predict for sure, but it's definatelly good to know all the options. I recently watched a video that expressed an Idea that a lot of non Russian people east of the Urals could separate from Russia and for their own small enclaves. Can't say if there's enough of willpower for that or if this will even make a dent in the current borders. But something will have to roll out in the next 5 years.

The fact is that the actual original territory of Russia is up to Tatarstan, the former Kazan Khanate. The Urals and Siberia in tsarist times were not considered Russia, prisoners were exiled there from Russia.

First, you need to understand what a state is. All the countries are states. They are states of mind. Your state of mind regarding borders might be different from that of the next person.

Whose state of mind is right regarding Siberia? Isn't it the one who maintains the power over it? Written words regarding borders are only there to keep the memory of who claims ownership of what alive.

If you or China or Mongolia or anybody else doesn't like the FACT that Siberia is part of Russia, go take it from them if you can. Your borders might be right. You might have the strength to do this. If you do, you can make Siberia belong to anyone you want.

   Firstly, Siberia belongs to those peoples who existed there before the conquest of Siberia by the Russians, and not to the Chinese or anyone else who, according to your concept, should conquer it. Secondly, the indigenous peoples of Siberia have every right to independence, like all peoples on planet Earth.

The current maps say otherwise about who owns Siberia. Take a look at popular Wikipedia maps. They show Siberia as part of Russia. Who would benefit from Siberia being part of Russia? Russia of course.

This seems to suggest that Russia is taking over the world through some unknown means and methods. They certainly didn't conquer the map-makers to make the maps change. Maybe they rule the world and we don't know it, right?

If Siberia belongs to the indigenous peoples of Siberia, let them prove it by showing it on the maps... if they are strong enough. Or is it that indigenous peoples of Siberia rule the world, and are simply letting the maps exist as they are as a cover for their covert operations?

I agree with you that what is right isn't always the thing that exists. The indigenous peoples of Siberia might be the rightful heirs to Siberia, and they might think that they own Siberia. But what do they have for strength if any other country decides to push them off their land right into the ocean?

  Once upon a time, many colonial peoples of the British Empire, and recently the Soviet Empire, did not have their state on the map. The time will come and the states of the Ural and Siberian peoples will appear on the map: Tatars, Yakuts, Buryats and many others.