he says right before doing the exact thing he said he never done
Read what you're writing:
even now he tries convincing people to prune even when they found no issue with being a full node but issues pruning.
And now read what I said:
You're just making things up for the thousandth time. Whoever has the required storage is recommended for them, and for the rest of the users, to run a full non-pruned node. If they don't, they can still enjoy the benefits of self-validation by pruning.
What I said is that
IF they can't afford running a full non-pruned node, they can still enjoy the benefits of a full node, but with less contribution to the network.
IF they afford it, they're advised to run a non-pruned one.
also the over embellishing what pruned nodes can do, by ignoring what they cant do, is advertising pruned as something people should try.
Hah, it reminds me of you with the Lightning Network, only that you're constantly talking about it.