1XBIT campaign could be the next longest running campaign even with scam reports

[fortunecrypto]

This is exactly my point, it is like working for a thief so the thief will be able to steal more. In this case the thief is later known and charged to court, anyone the thief implicated as co-workers will also be among that will face justice. This is what is happening to 1xbit participates for supporting a betting platform that was and still accused of wrongdoing that can continue to result to money loss for 1xbit users.

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

[Oshosondy]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

[Naficopa]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

[TwitchySeal]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit.  Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things.  The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

[Naficopa]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit.  Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things.  The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay?  I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?

[TwitchySeal]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit.  Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things.  The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay?  I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

It's none of my business what people do with their money, just like it's none of Chip Mixers business what their customers do with their money.  I think Chip Mixing is a good service to have for the community.  Yes, some people will do bad things with their money, they should be held accountable for those bad things.  Providing a mixing service is not a bad thing.  Stealing money from you customers is.  Chip Mixer isn't stealing money.  1xbit is.

[Naficopa]

Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.

I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit.  Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things.  The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay?  I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?

If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.

It's none of my business what people do with their money, just like it's none of Chip Mixers business what their customers do with their money.  I think Chip Mixing is a good service to have for the community.  Yes, some people will do bad things with their money, they should be held accountable for those bad things.  Providing a mixing service is not a bad thing.  Stealing money from you customers is.  Chip Mixer isn't stealing money.  1xbit is.

In my opinion, the word "mixing money" is just a nicer name for "laundering money". Of course, as long as no criminal charges are brought, I have nothing to fight for, because the Bitcointalk jet set is still making great money on this business. You know very well that sooner or later it will happen, because you also know that Bitcoin mixers / launderers were created mostly for that. Talks like yours are just cover, same like other bullishits that are covering at start all ponzi schemes and other scams. This is pure hypocrisy to me.

YOU ALL KNOW IT VERY WELL!

[Oshosondy]

I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?

Have you heard about Chipmixer scam anyone on this forum, I have not even heard of Chipmixer scammed anyone before, but this is what we are talking about for 1xbit, that some 1xbit users complained of their deposited and their winning not paid them by 1xbit, this is a big different cases entirely.

Chipmxier is a mixer, they can not help an address already taggged by government that has been involved in criminal activities to mix, it is not possible, they are only concerned about privacy, but some people can use it as an advatange for criminal activities just like some people use money for criminal activities, should this be the reason fiat currencies should not exist anymore?

[robelneo]

They have a new campaign right now, it's their third campaign for this month

[1xBit.com] - Christmas SPECIAL- Signature Campaign [OPEN] the rate is very attractive $100 for legendary I hope higher members with no red trust will not be tempted to participate, I still believe that their campaign here will not last as many accusations are still coming and it will have a snowball effect.